DISCUSSION
In sub-study 1, the ISP increased progressively across all compartments after laminectomy and TSCI. No significant difference was observed between subdural and spinal cord ISP. However, epidural ISP remained significantly lower throughout the observation period, with a nearly constant margin. These findings clearly argue against the first hypothesis that ISP increases more within the spinal cord than in the subdural compartment. As such, the results of sub-study 1 support the use of subdural ISP as a reliable proxy for spinal cord pressure in experimental and clinical contexts.
In sub-study 2, MRI analysis showed that the CSF was displaced around the injury site, most probably explaining why drainage attempts were unsuccessful and did not affect the subdural ISP. These findings strongly indicate that CSF restoration does not account for elevated ISP levels, which is the second hypothesis.
MRI analysis also showed that laminectomy combined with TSCI resulted mostly in spinal cord compression from epidural soft tissue swelling and minor hematoma, rather than expansive spinal cord swelling. This suggests that the epidural ISP is larger than the subdural ISP. Correspondingly, sub-study 3 showed that the subdural ISP increased comparably over time in both sham-operated and TSCI animals. The ISP was significantly higher in TSCI animals than in sham-operated animals only during the final 3 hours. However, by leaving the wound open, the subdural ISP was reduced by 2.5-fold magnitude over time. Therefore, the progressive elevation of subdural ISP observed in closed-wound animals most likely reflects the rising epidural pressure.
In summary, converging evidence from sub-studies 2 and 3 strongly suggests that ISP elevation is driven by epidural pressure resulting from post-laminectomy soft tissue edema and/or the accumulation of blood components, supporting the third hypothesis. In partial contradiction, sub-study 1, which provided a direct measure of epidural pressure, was found to be significantly lower than subdural and spinal cord compartment pressures. However, the parallel trajectories of pressure in the spinal cord and the subdural and epidural compartments suggest biomechanical interdependence. Additionally, there was a steep drop in all compartment pressures when Animal 2 in sub-study 1 was re-opened for probe replacement. As expected, the pressure originating below the dura precludes these observations.
These observations suggest that although the epidural pressure measurements in sub-study 1 appeared technically stable, they may have been systematically inaccurate, i.e., precise but not physiologically representative of the epidural pressure above the injury site. One plausible explanation is that following wound closure, the large and heterogeneous epidural space may have allowed the probe to migrate into localized regions of lower pressure. This is supported by the MRI findings from sub-study 2, which demonstrated air pockets, fluid accumulation, and minor hemorrhage within the epidural compartment. A key limitation of sub-study 1 was that the epidural probe was not securely affixed to the dura, which may have contributed to probe migration and/or inconsistent positioning. Furthermore, sub-study 3 did not include concurrent epidural pressure measurements, limiting our ability to determine the effect of the open wound directly on epidural pressure. In general, it should be noted that the sample size of each sub-study (n=3–6) was small, and the statistical power was limited.
One clinical study involving both TSCI patients and controls reported a mean subdural ISP of 22.5 mm Hg (standard deviation [SD], 5.1 mm Hg; n=10), significantly higher than the mean CSF pressure of 7.8 mm Hg (SD, 3.3 mm Hg; n=12) in healthy individuals evaluated for normal pressure hydrocephalus (the control group) [
23]. Interestingly, epidural ISP was measured in two TSCI patients and found to be significantly lower than the subdural ISP, consistent with our findings. However, although we observed a progressive increase in epidural ISP over time, the measurements remained constant [
10]. They also reported that the supine position led to increased ISP [
24], supporting epidural pressure transmission to the subdural compartment following laminectomy. The ISP spikes observed in conjunction with the lung recruitment maneuvers in the present study could thus be explained by thoracic expansion, which increased the epidural pressure on the cord.
In our previous sham-controlled animal trial, directly comparing sham-operated controls to TSCI, we did not observe values as elevated as those in human TSCI patients [
19]. Similarly, the ISP values measured in the present study measured ISP values considerably lower than those reported in clinical studies. However, it should be noted that not all patients seem to develop elevated ISP [
10,
18,
23].
Our previous studies have demonstrated visible injury and glial activation [
19,
20], indicating an inflammatory response. We assumed that the identical experimental conditions in the present study elicited a similar response. However, the lack of histological verification of TSCI is a limitation. Additionally, visual inspection confirmed a comparable and significant spinal cord contusion.
Animals were sedated throughout the study period. Anesthesia is used therapeutically in traumatic brain injury to reduce metabolism and intracranial pressure [
7]. A previous human study found no correlation between anesthesia and ISP levels [
18], and our earlier work also reported no association between infusion levels and ISP [
19] in porcines. Given that ISP is measured directly at the injury site where the damaged tissue swells against the dura, it has been suggested that ISP is largely unresponsive to such interventions [
10].
In human trials, all TSCI cases involved cervical injuries [
10], whereas the present porcine model involved thoracic injuries. The cervical spine has a larger cross-sectional area, potentially allowing swelling to fill the subdural compartment more readily, thereby elevating the ISP to higher levels. Although the possibility of a different ratio between subdural pressure and external forces highlighted in our study cannot be excluded, the MRI from sub-study 2 demonstrated the absence of CSF around the injured cord, suggesting near-complete obliteration of the subdural space. This implies that swelling was sufficient to eliminate the CSF buffer, even in cases of thoracic injury.
Anatomical differences alone may not fully explain ISP discrepancy. Human studies have predominantly involved complete injuries [
10], which are expected to provoke more severe inflammation and edema within the injured segment than incomplete or sham conditions. Injury completeness may correlate with the expansive force of subdural swelling and, consequently, with the ISP magnitude. In our previous porcine study, the ISP did not differ significantly between near-complete injuries (average injured-to-normal spinal cord ratio of 93%) and mild or sham controls [
19]. Although injury completeness and spinal level may influence the ISP, further comparative studies are required to disentangle their respective contributions.
The temporal profile in our study differed markedly from that of clinical TSCI. In our design, ISP monitoring commenced immediately after injury, whereas in human trauma studies, delays occur owing to transport, admission, diagnostics, and hospital logistics. Consequently, ISP monitoring in patients often begins multiple hours after injury, allowing secondary injuries to develop over time. For example, one clinical study initiated ISP monitoring within 72 hours and continued for up to 7 days [
10]. This suggests that patients exhibiting an initially or sustainably high ISP may have reached such levels after 15 hours, which was the maximum follow-up duration in the present study. Even in our previous 72-hour study, ISP values remained lower than those typically reported in human cohorts. These observations reinforce the importance of long-term follow-up when modeling ISP dynamics and evaluating therapeutic interventions in animal models. However, compared with other porcine TSCI trials, the ISP measured up to 120 hours post-injury was similar to or lower than that in our studies [
25-
28].
These arguments bridge the gap in the applicability of real-life human TSCI. However, the inherent artificial aspects of the model impose general limitations on its applicability. In addition to the above-discussed aspects of anesthesia, injury location, injury completeness, and temporal aspects, the model is limited by the animal model and artificial injury. Injury differs from real-life human TSCI in several ways. First, the injury was induced to an exposed cord following laminectomy. Second, the injury was blunt and there were no sharp bone fragments to compress the cord. Third, although the blunt device was left behind after the impact to mimic compression from the bone, the 5-minute period was very short. Fourth, the injury was uni-local, which, in comparison with multi-local injuries in real life, may elicit a smaller immune response, with implications for ISP dynamics.
The development of elevated ISP following TSCI is likely to be a multifactorial process influenced by intrinsic factors, such as trauma type and energy, spine and spinal cord anatomy, immune profile, and inflammatory response, as well as extrinsic factors, including patient positioning and external pressure, after laminectomy. Accurate ISP measurements also critically depend on correct probe placement [
29]. This complexity may partly explain the variability in ISP levels observed within and between clinical and porcine studies. Our findings suggest that epidural pressure was a major contributor to the observed increase in the incidence of ISP.
Our findings demonstrate that subdural ISP closely approximates the spinal cord compartment pressure, validating its use as a surrogate in both experimental and clinical settings. The hypothesis that ISP increases more within the spinal cord compartment than in the subdural compartment was not supported. CSF restoration does not appear to contribute to ISP elevation. Instead, epidural pressure following laminectomy emerged as a driver of elevated ISP in both TSCI and sham groups. In the present study, the effect was 2.5-fold greater than that of TSCI alone. Although direct clinical translation is broadly constrained by model limitations, our findings underscore the importance of further investigations of post-laminectomy epidural tissue and pressure dynamics in the pathophysiology of elevated ISP. Caution should be exercised against direct pressure on the area of laminectomy in patients with postoperative TSCI.