Journal List > Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg > v.29(4) > 1516093402

Mullen, O’Connell, Walsh, Fullard, Hardy, O’Sullivan, Ó Súilleabháín, Conneely, McEntee, Maguire, Stafford, Hand, Gallagher, and Hoti: Patient outcomes and healthcare costs following iatrogenic bile duct injuries: A national multicentre retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDIs) are an uncommon but potentially severe complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to assess both peri-operative and long-term outcomes of the current surgical management of IBDIs in Ireland and to estimate the associated costs.

Methods

Patients who underwent management for IBDIs following laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively identified from the three hepatobiliary (HPB) centres in Ireland. Data collected included demographics, surgical details, and perioperative as well as long-term outcomes. Cost analysis was conducted using the activity-based funding in-patient price list from the healthcare pricing office.

Results

A total of 34 patients underwent surgical intervention for IBDIs. Of these, 26 patients (76.4%) underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, while primary bile duct repair was performed in five patients (14.7%). Three patients (8.8%) required right hepatectomy in conjunction with hepaticojejunostomy. Ten (29.4%) patients required re-operation, including four of the five who initially underwent primary repair. One patient ultimately required orthotopic liver transplant, and there were three (12.5%) peri-operative deaths. No statistically significant differences in peri-operative outcomes were observed between intra-operative and post-operative diagnosis of BDI. The median direct in-patient treatment cost was estimated at €85,961.

Conclusions

IBDIs pose a considerable risk of long term complications and mortality with substantial costs to the health service. Subspecialist HPB referral is key to successful management, which typically involves bilio-enteric anastomosis and occasional liver resection if associated with major vascular injury.

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is among the most frequently performed procedures in general surgery, both electively and in emergencies. In Ireland, approximately 6000 cholecystectomies performed annually, with this figure continuing to rise over recent years [1]. Bile duct injury during LC remains a potentially devastating complication, associated with considerable morbidity and mortality [2].
An initial increase in the incidence of bile duct injuries (BDIs) was documented during the early introduction of LC in the 1990s, with reported rates ranging from 0.4% to 0.6% [3]. Subsequent studies have demonstrated a marked reduction in BDI incidence, now estimated at around 0.2%–0.4%, which is comparable to the rate observed with open cholecystectomy [4,5]. Anatomic misidentification is recognised as the primary risk factor for bile duct injury, with evidence from the Japanese national clinical database showing that approximately 60% of such injuries are due to this cause [5]. Additional risk factors include anatomic variations and the presence of acute inflammation [6]. Minor BDIs are typically treated with endoscopic stenting. In contrast, major bile duct injuries (MBDIs) usually necessitate complex major bilio-enteric reconstruction. The World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines from 2020 recommend Roux-en-Y hepatico-jejunostomy for all MBDI post LC [7]. The timing of BDI detection is a critical prognostic indicator and influences management strategies [8]. Optimal timing of BDI repair is currently debated. Early repair may reduce length of stay (LOS) and costs, while certain centres recommend initial drainage followed by delayed repair to allow resolution of inflammation [9,10].
Long-term morbidity following BDIs is frequently attributed to the development of biliary strictures. These strictures often require additional interventions, including endoscopic procedures or revision of the bilioenteric anastomosis, and in some cases may necessitate liver transplantation. As a result, such injuries pose a significant economic burden on the healthcare system [11].
The aim of this study was to evaluate peri-operative and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgical management of BDI across the three hepatobiliary (HPB) centres in Ireland and to estimate the associated inpatient healthcare costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

This study was conducted as a retrospective multi-centre analysis involving patients who underwent surgical management of iatrogenic BDI following LC at the three HPB centres in Ireland between 2014 and 2024. Patients who underwent primary repair, hepatico-jejunostomy, and/or right hepatectomies for BDI were identified through theatre records, and corresponding patient charts were retrieved for review. Demographic characteristics, time to surgical management, peri-operative data, and follow-up information, including data on re-operations, were collected and analysed. Classification of BDIs was performed according to the Strasberg system using imaging and operative note records. While Strasberg classification is widely used for BDIs, it does not account for related vascular injuries, injury mechanisms, or timing of diagnosis. Therefore, all BDIs were also retrospectively classified using the more recent ATOM (Anatomic, Time Of detection, Mechanism) classification in addition to the Strasberg system. Post-operative complication severity was graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Peri-operative outcomes were compared across groups based on timing of BDI detection. Ethical approval was obtained from St. Vincent’s University Hospital research and ethics committee on the 10.12.2024 (reference number = RCR24-025).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi (Version 2.62; The Jamovi Project [2024], https://www.jamovi.org). Continuous variables were compared between groups using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test where appropriate. Frequencies of categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as indicated. p-value of < 0.050 was considered statistically significant.

Cost analysis

Costs were estimated using the Healthcare Pricing Office published admitted patient price list. This document provides estimated costs per admission for procedures categorised according to the diagnosis-related group (DRG) using Australian-Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups (AR-DRG) version 8.0. Surgically managed BDIs were classified under the major biliary tract procedures (H02A) AR-DRG. The direct cost estimate was based on the assigned DRG and LOS. Costs from subsequent admissions due to re-operations were incorporated using the relevant subsequent procedure DRG.

RESULTS

Demographics and pre-operative data

A total of 34 patients who underwent surgical management for iatrogenic BDI following LC were identified (Table 1). During the study period, 26 (76.4%) patients had bilio-enteric anastomosis using hepatico-jejunostomy. Five patients (14.7%) underwent a primary repair. In addition, three patients (8.8%) required a right hepatectomy in conjunction with hepatico-jejunostomy. Of these patients, 32 (94%) were referred from a non-HPB centre with suspected or confirmed BDI. The median age was 58 years (range = 24–79). The female to male ratio was 2.09. The median BMI was 29 (range = 19–44.8). The most common indication for LC was cholecystitis, representing 58.8% of cases (n = 20). Six patients (17.6%) underwent LC due to biliary colic, and five (14.7%) for either choledocholithiasis or gallstone-induced pancreatitis. In 30 (88.2%) cases, LC was performed electively, whereas four patients (11.7%) had emergency LC for cholecystitis. Conversion to open surgery occurred in six (17.6%) cases. The overall median time to surgical management was 6.5 days (range 0–685). There were 4 revision hepatico-jejunostomies performed for biliary strictures following initial primary repairs. For these patients, time to surgery was calculated from the date of revision hepatico-jejunostomy, which was considered the definitive surgical intervention.

Classification of the BDIs including vascular injuries

Tables 2 and 3 provide a summary of the results. More than 90% (n = 31) of BDIs were classified as MBDIs, namely Strasberg E, and the majority were located within 2 cm of the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts. Vascular injuries were identified in 13 patients (38.2%), predominantly involving the right hepatic artery (n = 12). Intra-operative diagnosis of BDI occurred in 15 patients (44.1%). Early postoperative diagnosis was made in 14 patients (41.1%), while in five cases, the diagnosis was delayed beyond 21 days.

Management of intra-operatively diagnosed BDIs

Fourteen of the 15 intra-operatively diagnosed BDIs were MBDI that occurred at non-HPB centres. In ten cases, initial management involved placement of an external drain followed by transfer to an HPB centre for definitive care. Median time to surgical intervention was 2 days (range 0–685). Eight patients ultimately underwent hepatico-jejunostomy, while two required both right hepatectomy and hepatico-jejunostomy. One patient needed abdominal washout for biliary peritonitis prior to hepatico-jejunostomy. In another case, a patient with confluence disruption and concurrent right hepatic artery injury received hepatico-jejunostomy to the left main duct with ligation of the right duct.
Five patients underwent primary repair intra-operatively. Four of these cases involved MBDIs, which were initially repaired at non-HPB centres before being referred. All four of these primary repairs ultimately required revision to hepatico-jejunostomy. The single non-MBDI addressed with primary repair was a cystic duct stump leak. Peri-operative outcomes are detailed in Table 4. The mean LOS was 27.4 days (range 5–90). Nine patients (60%) experienced post-operative complications, including four cases of surgical site infection and three bile leaks. Three patients had Clavien-Dindo grade I-IIb complications, while four had grade IIIa to IV events. There were two peri-operative deaths (Clavien-Dindo grade V): one patient developed respiratory failure secondary to lower respiratory tract infection and significant intra-abdominal collections, and another developed uncontrolled sepsis following re-laparotomy for biliary peritonitis washout.

Management of post-operatively diagnosed BDIs

Among the post-operatively diagnosed BDIs, 17 out of 19 were classified as major injuries. The two non-MBDI were lateral injuries to the common bile duct (Strasberg D). Of the 19 patients, 18 underwent hepatico-jejunostomy, while one required both right hepatectomy and hepatico-jejunostomy. Median time to surgical intervention was 6.5 days in early post-operative BDIs (<2 weeks) compared to 81 days for late-diagnosed cases.
The mean LOS was 17.2 days in the early post-operative diagnosis group and 14 days in the late diagnosis group. Nine patients (50%) experienced post-operative complications, including five bile leaks and one portal vein thrombosis. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was required for three patients. One peri-operative mortality resulted from a combination of respiratory sepsis, liver failure, and cardiac tamponade.

Overall outcomes and statistical analysis

Peri-operative morbidity for the entire cohort was 52.9%, with a median LOS of 21.5 days (range 5–90). No statistically significant differences were observed for LOS (p = 0.278), post-operative complication rate (p = 0.73), or ICU admission (p = 0.169) across intra-operative diagnosis, post-operative diagnosis, and late diagnosis groups in this study. There was no significant association between vasculobiliary injury and the development of biliary strictures (p = 0.955).

Long term outcomes

The follow-up period was ten months (range 0–109). Ten patients required re-operation, including four who underwent hepatico-jejunostomy revision due to biliary strictures following failed primary repairs. Four patients underwent incisional hernia repairs. One patient ultimately required orthotopic liver transplantation for recurrent cholangitis due to a biliary stricture. Additional interventions included re-laparotomy and washout for bile leak in one patient, and adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction in another. Four patients developed biliary strictures after hepatico-jejunostomy, which were managed with endoscopic stenting, while one patient is awaiting revision re-hepatico-jejunostomy for recurrent cholangitis.

Cost analysis

The direct cost of a BDI was calculated using formulae adopted from the Admitted Patient Price List for 2019 [12]. The base price corresponds to the monetary value reflecting the average resource use for the DRG procedure. The relative value (RV) is established from the projected LOS for each DRG [12]. For complex biliary interventions, the base price is €21,735 with an inlier RV of 3.955 and an anticipated LOS between 9 and 43 days. Accordingly, the mean expected cost for a BDI repair falling within the expected LOS was €85,961. When applying our LOS findings to this calculation, we observed a median cost of €85,961 for the initial repairs, ranging from €52,663 to €278,012. Table 5 provides a summary of these results. We then incorporated costs for admissions related to re-operations by using the corresponding DRG and calculating the RV based on the actual LOS. The overall expenditure for the 34 BDIs, inclusive of subsequent procedures, was €7,686,245, with individual BDI costs ranging from €52,663 to €4,656,064. The most significant outlier was a patient who underwent an orthotopic liver transplant and had a 177 day hospitalisation following the procedure.

DISCUSSION

This study presents a comprehensive overview of the surgical management and outcomes of BDIs occurring after LC in Ireland. Hepaticojejunostomy was the predominant intervention (76.4%), consistent with recommendations for MBDI treatment [7], while a proportion of patients underwent right hepatectomy, mainly due to extensive confluence disruption or significant vascular injury. Notably, severe vasculobiliary injuries were identified in 13 patients (38.2%), highlighting the need for precise classification and documentation of BDIs referred to HPB centres. Although the Strasberg classification is widely used, it omits important information. The new ATOM classification published by the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery should be utilised for its increased granularity on important prognostic factors including associated vascular injury, timing and mechanism of injury [13,14]. Within this study population, at the time of diagnosis BDI categorisation was reported either using the Strasberg system or was not formally classified; none of the cases were assessed with the new ATOM classification.
Our median time to definitive surgical management was 6.5 days, closely aligning with a recent 2024 national cohort multi-centre Danish study by Stilling et al. [15], which evaluated surgical management of BDIs and reported a median time to surgery of 5 days. In contrast, these intervals differ from an older large study on surgically managed BDIs by Lillemoe et al. [16], where the median time to surgery was 3 months, highlighting a significant shift towards aggressive early repair in contemporary practice. Several factors likely explain these temporal differences. Over the past decade there has been a trend towards prompt imaging and expedited referral to specialist HPB services, driven by improved access to cross-sectional imaging (including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [MRCP]), more rapid inter-hospital transfer pathways, and a contemporary preference in many centres for early definitive repair in appropriately selected patients. In contrast, older series frequently included patients managed with delayed elective reconstruction and often combined minor and MBDIs, resulting in longer median times to repair.
The predominance of referrals from non-HPB centres (94%) emphasises the need for early recognition and prompt referral of such injuries. In Ireland, most LCs are performed outside HPB centres, as the HPB centres alone lack the capacity to perfrom a high volume of LCs. Our data strongly supports the management of MBDI repairs in HPB centres. Every primary repair of MBDIs performed outside an HPB setting subsequently required revision with hepatico-jejunostomy, indicating that definitive management of complex BDIs is best undertaken in specialised units. This is supported by a single-centre review of 200 patients, which demonstrated that early repair by non-specialist HPB surgeons is an independent risk factor for recurrent cholangitis and repeat reconstructions [17]. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis comparing early and delayed surgical repair reported that non-specialist early repair may compromise future revisions by subspecialist HPB surgeons [18].
The overall peri-operative morbidity in our cohort was 52.9%. This rate is somewhat higher than figures reported in several large series of surgically managed BDIs, where complication rates generally range from 37% to 50%. Sicklick et al. [19] reported a morbidity rate of approximately 42% in a cohort of 200 patients, while Martin et al. [20] observed complication rates nearing 45% in an 11-year single-centre study; Zidan et al. [21] documented 40% morbidity in a recent cohort [19], and Reinsoo et al. [22] described rates from 37%–43% in a population-based study. The slightly elevated morbidity rate in our series is likely due to the case-mix, which included a high proportion of major injuries (over 90% Strasberg E), a substantial rate of associated vascular injuries (38%), and a referral pattern favouring complex cases, including four with failed primary repair prior to transfer from non-HPB centres. These are recognised factors that contribute to increased peri-operative complication risk and may account for the higher morbidity observed in our national cohort.
Interestingly, there was no significant difference in post-operative complication rate, LOS, or ICU admissions between intra-operative and post-operative diagnosis groups. These results align with those reported by Stilling et al. [15]. In their population-based study of 139 BDIs, peri-operative outcomes did not differ between intra-operative and post-operative diagnosis of BDI or between early and late repair with hepatico-jejunostomy. This is in contrast to an increasing number of studies suggesting early BDI diagnosis improves peri-operative outcomes [14,23]. Törnqvist et al. [24] examined the impact of early BDI detection on survival in 747 BDIs using data from the GallRik’s national Swedish registry for gallbladder surgery. They found intra-operative diagnosis of BDIs resulted in 1 year survival rates comparable to patients post-LC with no BDI. Conversely, patients with post-operatively diagnosed BDIs had a twofold increase in mortality risk compared to those undergoing LC without BDI, according to Cox regression analysis. However, it is important to recognise that the GallRik’s database includes all minor BDIs, while both our study and that by Stilling et al. [15] focused exclusively on MBDIs.
In our study, one (2.9%) patient with end stage liver disease following a revision hepatico-jejunostomy for failed primary repair required an orthotopic liver transplant, and three additional patients underwent a right hepatectomy. Nordin et al. [25] observed a 22% liver transplantation rate in a small BDI case series from a tertiary referral centre. In that investigation, most patients had received prior primary repair before referral. de Santibañes et al. [26] reported a 7.3% incidence of liver transplantation after BDI with a median follow-up of 62 months, while Schmidt et al. [27] identified an overall liver transplantation rate of 4.3% along with an additional 4.3% of patients requiring liver resection.
With a median follow-up of 12 months, the overall stricture rate in our cohort was 23.5%, and four patients subsequently required a revision hepatico-jejunostomy. These results are consistent with previously published findings. Stilling et al. [15] documented a 30% stricture rate, and Schmidt et al. [27] found a 19.6% stricture rate in their cohort. Interestingly, we found no significant correlation between vasculobiliary injuries and later strictures (p = 0.95). This was comparable to findings from the Danish cohort study [15]. Previous studies demonstrated higher rates of strictures in associated vascular injuries and have theorised that stricture formation post BDI is due to ischaemic consequences of arterial disruption [28,29]. The retrospective design of our study means vascular injuries may have gone unrecorded if not documented by the operating surgeon or on pre-operative imaging. This limitation may have led to underreporting of vascular injuries in patients who later developed strictures.
Several recent studies in Ireland have employed the Activity Based Funding framework [12] to estimate healthcare costs, including a recent report on testicular torsion [30] and previously on the costs associated with hip fracture [31]. Our study found a median cost of €85,961, which is substantially higher than the €26,569 per MBDI estimated in a recent study by Rystedt et al. [32]. In that study, direct costs were derived from a regional debit price list, and repeat hospital admissions for re-operations were excluded. Elser et al. [33]’s comprehensive US review using private healthcare claims data recorded estimated costs of $63,524 for same day repairs and $122,055 for early repairs, with significant cost increases observed with longer delays to definitive surgical intervention.
Preventive strategies remain central in reducing the occurrence of IBDIs. The “critical view of safety” technique is widely advocated, and the 2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines advocate its routine use, particularly with selective intraoperative cholangiography when the anatomy may be unclear [7]. In the Irish setting, intraoperative cholangiography is not routinely implemented but may be used on a case-by-case basis. MRCP is commonly adopted in the early postoperative period when IBDI is suspected, offering high diagnostic precision before patients are referred to a HPB centre. The integration of these preventive measures, together with new approaches such as artificial intelligence–assisted anatomical recognition, reflects the evolving international focus on prevention and early detection [5].
This study’s strengths include the collection of data from all three HPB referral centres in Ireland, supporting its validity as a comprehensive representation of the Irish experience with BDI. Compared to a recent national registry study that identified only 4 MBDI among 3,500 emergency cholecystectomies, our study found approximately the expected number of BDIs [6]. However, it is important to consider that some BDIs may have been overlooked if repaired outside of HPB centres or in private hospitals. There are also several limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small (n = 34). This limits statistical power and subgroup analysis. Second, the retrospective design and referral bias (the majority of cases were referred from non-HPB centres) may overrepresent more complex injuries, including those managed endoscopically or treated definitively in non-HPB settings. In addition, our cost analysis is necessarily specific to the Irish publicly funded healthcare system, and we acknowledge that direct extrapolation to other international contexts is limited.
In conclusion, in this study of BDIs in Ireland we found a significant rate of morbidity (52.9%) and mortality (8.8%) post-surgical management with significant cost associated to the healthcare system. Subspecialist HPB referral is key to successful management, which typically involves bilio-enteric anastomosis with occasional hepatic resection reserved for selected cases of concomitant vascular injury. These findings complement international, prevention-oriented research by providing national outcome and cost data, reinforcing the global consensus that early recognition, timely referral, and prevention strategies are central to care.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: CM, RMOC, EH. Data curation: CM, JW, AF. Methodology: RMOC, JW, AF. Visualization: NH, AOS, COS, JC, GM, DM, AS, FH, TG, EH. Writing - original draft: CM, RMOC. Writing - review & editing: JW, AF, NH, AOS, COS, JC, GM, DM, AS, FH, TG, EH.

References

1. https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-health/collections/national-healthcare-statistics-2025/#hospital-and-surgical-activitie.
2. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2003;290:2168-2173. 10.1001/jama.290.16.2168 14570952
3. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 1996;83:1356-1360. 10.1002/bjs.1800831009 8944450
4. Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J, Meng Z, Altieri MS, Parikh P, et al. Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2239-2243. 10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2 26335071
5. Endo Y, Tokuyasu T, Mori Y, Asai K, Umezawa A, Kawamura M, et al. Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2023;37:5752-5759. 10.1007/s00464-023-10224-5 37365396 PMC10322759
6. O'Connell RM, Hardy N, Ward L, Hand F, Maguire D, Stafford A, et al. Management and patient outcomes following admission with acute cholecystitis in Ireland: a national registry-based study. Surgeon 2024;22:364-368. 10.1016/j.surge.2024.08.004 39142970
7. de'Angelis N, Catena F, Memeo R, Coccolini F, Martínez-Pérez A, Romeo OM, et al. 2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. World J Emerg Surg 2021;16:30. 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w 34112197 PMC8190978
8. Popa C, Schlanger D, Zaharie F, Graur F, Moiș E, Ciocan A, et al. A retrospective analysis of bile duct injuries treated in a tertiary center: the utility of a universal classification-the ATOM classification. Surg Endosc 2023;37:347-357. 10.1007/s00464-022-09497-z 35948807
9. Dageforde LA, Landman MP, Feurer ID, Poulose B, Pinson CW, Moore DE. A cost-effectiveness analysis of early vs late reconstruction of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2012;214:919-927. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.01.054 22495064
10. Kapoor VK. Bile duct injury repair: when? what? who? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007;14:476-479. 10.1007/s00534-007-1220-y 17909716
11. Andersson R, Eriksson K, Blind PJ, Tingstedt B. Iatrogenic bile duct injury - a cost analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2008;10:416-419. 10.1080/13651820802140745 19088927 PMC2597315
12. https://assets.hse.ie/media/documents/ABF_2022_Admitted_Patient_Price_List.pdf.
13. Fingerhut A, Dziri C, Garden OJ, Gouma D, Millat B, Neugebauer E, et al. ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2013;27:4608-4619. 10.1007/s00464-013-3081-6 23892759
14. Strasberg SM, Helton WS. An analytical review of vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2011;13:1-14. 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00225.x 21159098 PMC3019536
15. Stilling NM, Fristrup C, Wettergren A, Ugianskis A, Nygaard J, Holte K, et al. Long-term outcome after early repair of iatrogenic bile duct injury. A national Danish multicentre study. HPB (Oxford) 2015;17:394-400. 10.1111/hpb.12374 25582034 PMC4402049
16. Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, et al. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg 2000;232:430-441. 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00015 10973393 PMC1421156
17. Perera MT, Silva MA, Hegab B, Muralidharan V, Bramhall SR, Mayer AD, et al. Specialist early and immediate repair of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injuries is associated with an improved long-term outcome. Ann Surg 2011;253:553-560. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fad3 21217507
18. Wang X, Yu WL, Fu XH, Zhu B, Zhao T, Zhang YJ. Early versus delayed surgical repair and referral for patients with bile duct injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2020;271:449-459. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003448 32106173
19. Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Yeo CJ, Campbell KA, et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg 2005;241:786-795. 10.1097/01.sla.0000161029.27410.71 15849514 PMC1357133
20. Martin D, Uldry E, Demartines N, Halkic N. Bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 11-year experience in a tertiary center. Biosci Trends 2016;10:197-201. 10.5582/bst.2016.01065 27319974
21. Zidan MHE, Seif-Eldeen M, Ghazal AA, Refaie M. Post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2024;24:8. 10.1186/s12893-023-02301-2 38172774 PMC10765830
22. Reinsoo A, Kirsimägi Ü, Kibuspuu L, Košeleva K, Lepner U, Talving P. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomies: an 11-year population-based study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023;49:2269-2276. 10.1007/s00068-022-02190-9 36462050
23. Rystedt J, Lindell G, Montgomery A. Bile duct injuries associated with 55,134 cholecystectomies: treatment and outcome from a national perspective. World J Surg 2016;40:73-80. 10.1007/s00268-015-3281-4 26530691
24. Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M. Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 2012;345:e6457. 10.1136/bmj.e6457 23060654 PMC3469410
25. Nordin A, Halme L, Mäkisalo H, Isoniemi H, Höckerstedt K. Management and outcome of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from therapeutic endoscopy to liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2002;8:1036-1043. 10.1053/jlts.2002.35557 12424717
26. de Santibañes E, Ardiles V, Gadano A, Palavecino M, Pekolj J, Ciardullo M. Liver transplantation: the last measure in the treatment of bile duct injuries. World J Surg 2008;32:1714-1721. 10.1007/s00268-008-9650-5 18553191
27. Schmidt SC, Settmacher U, Langrehr JM, Neuhaus P. Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic arterial injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 2004;135:613-618. 10.1016/j.surg.2003.11.018 15179367
28. Koffron A, Ferrario M, Parsons W, Nemcek A, Saker M, Abecassis M. Failed primary management of iatrogenic biliary injury: incidence and significance of concomitant hepatic arterial disruption. Surgery 2001;130:722-731. 10.1067/msy.2001.116682 11602904
29. Gupta N, Solomon H, Fairchild R, Kaminski DL. Management and outcome of patients with combined bile duct and hepatic artery injuries. Arch Surg 1998;133:176-181. 10.1001/archsurg.133.2.176 9484731
30. Sugrue DD, O'Connor E, Davis NF. The cost of testicular torsion care in Ireland 2009-2018: a novel cost estimation model using a national database. Ir J Med Sci 2022;191:2689-2695. 10.1007/s11845-021-02887-7 35028896
31. Ferris H, Brent L, Sorensen J. Cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture-findings from the Irish hip fracture database. Osteoporos Int 2022;33:1057-1065. 10.1007/s00198-021-06294-7 35015086 PMC8749353
32. Rystedt JML, Tingstedt B, Montgomery F, Montgomery AK. Routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy is a cost-effective approach when analysing the cost of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. HPB (Oxford) 2017;19:881-888. 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.004 28716508
33. Elser H, Bergquist JR, Li AY, Visser BC. Determinants, costs, and consequences of common bile duct injury requiring operative repair among privately insured individuals in the United States, 2003-2020. Ann Surg Open 2023;4:e238. 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000238 37600869 PMC10431520

Table 1
Demographics
Clinical characteristics Value
Age (yr) 58 (24–79)
Sex
Male 11 (32.3)
Female 23 (67.6)
ASA grade
1 10 (29.4)
2 19 (55.8)
3 4 (8.8)
4 1 (2.9)
Body mass index (kg/m2) 29.8 (19–44.8)
Emergency 4 (11.7)
Elective 30 (88.2)
Cholecystectomy indication
Biliary colic 6 (17.6)
Cholecystitis 20 (58.8)
Choledocholithiasis/gallstone pancreatitis 5 (14.7)
Other (gallbladder polyp) 1 (2.9)
Unknown 2 (5.9)
Surgical approach for cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic 28 (82.3)
Laparoscopic converted to open 6 (17.6)
Surgical management
Hepatico-jejunostomy 26 (76.4)
Primary repair 5 (14.7)
Right hepatectomy + hepatico-jejunostomy 3 (8.8)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean (range).

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Table 2
Strasberg classification of BDIs
Type of injury n (%)
A Bile leak from cystic duct stump or small biliary ducts in gallbladder fossa 1 (2.9)
B Occlusion of part of the biliary tree, commonly aberrant right hepatic duct(s) -
C Transection without ligation of the aberrant right hepatic duct -
D Lateral injuries to major bile duct 2 (5.8)
E Injury to the main hepatic duct; classified according to the level of injury 31 (91.2)
E1 Low CHD stricture, with the length of the CHD stump of >2 cm 6 (17.6)
E2 Proximal CHD stricture - hepatic duct stump <2 cm 11 (32.3)
E3 Hilar stricture, no residual CHD, but the hepatic ductal confluence is preserved 8 (23.5)
E4 Hilar stricture, with involvement of confluence and loss of communication between right and left hepatic duct 5 (14.7)
E5 Injury to the aberrant right hepatic duct as well as the main duct 1 (2.9)

BDIs, bile duct injuries; CHD, common hepatic duct; -, not available.

Table 3
ATOM classification of BDIs
ATOM classification n (%)
Anatomical level
MBD (major) 31 (97.4)
MBD 1 6 (17.6)
MBD 2 11 (32.3)
MBD 3 8 (23.5)
MBD 4 5 (14.7)
MBD 5 1 (2.9)
MBD 6 -
NMBD (minor) 3 (8.8)
Type and extent of injury
Partial division 2 (5.8)
Complete division 29 (85.2)
Partial occlusion 3 (8.8)
Complete occlusion -
Vasculobiliary injury
No 18 (52.9)
Right hepatic artery 11 (32.3)
Right hepatic artery and portal vein 1 (2.9)
Accessory vessel 1 (2.9)
Unknown 3 (8.8)
Time of detection
Intra-operative 15 (41.1)
Early post-operative (<2 weeks) 14 (44.1)
Late 5 (14.7)
Mechanism of damage
Mechanical 19 (55.9)
Energy driven 4 (11.76)
Unknown 11 (32.3)

Anatomic level: level 1, more than 2 cm from lower border of superior biliary confluent; level 2, less than 2 cm from lower border of superior biliary confluent; level 3, injury involves the superior biliary confluent, but communication right left is preserved; level 4, the injury involves superior biliary confluent, but communication right left is interrupted; level 5, right or left hepatic duct.

ATOM, Anatomic, Time Of detection, Mechanism; BDIs, bile duct injuries; MBD, main bile duct; NMBD, nonmain bile duct; -, not available.

Table 4
Peri-operative outcomes
Overall Intra-operative Post-operative p-value
Mortality
Yes 3 (8.82) 2 (13.3) 1 (7.14)
No 31 (91.2) 13 (86.7) 13 (92.9)
Reoperation
Yes 10 (29.4) 8 (53.3) 1 (7.14)
No 24 (70.6) 7 (46.7) 13 (92.9)
Post-operative complication
Yes 18 (52.9) 9 (60.0) 6 (42.9) 0.73
No 16 (47.1) 6 (40.0) 8 (57.1)
Bile leak 7 (20.5) 3 (20.0) 3 (21.4)
Surgical site infection 3 (8.82) 3 (20.0) -
Cholangitis 2 (5.88) 1 (6.67) -
Abscess/collection requiring drainage 3 (8.82) - 2 (14.3)
Wound infection 1 (2.94) 1 (6.67) -
Other - 2 (13.3) 2 (14.3)
Clavien-Dindo classification
0 16 (47.1) 6 (40.0) 8 (57.1)
I–II 7 (20.5) 3 (20.0) 3 (21.4)
IIIa–IVb 8 (23.5) 4 (26.7) 2 (14.3)
V 3 (8.82) 2 (13.3) 1 (7.14)
ICU admission
Yes 8 (23.5) 5 (33.3) 3 (21.4) 0.17
No 26 (76.4) 10 (66.7) 11 (78.6)
Time from operation (day)
Mean 56.4 66 11.9
Median 6.5 2 6.5
Range 0–685 0–685 1–72
Length of post-operative stay (day)
Mean 21.4 27.4 17.2 0.28
Median 14 15 13
Range 5–90 5–90 7–39

Values are presented as number (%).

ICU, intensive care unit; -, not available.

Table 5
In-patient cost of BDI repairs and subsequent procedures
DRG DRG description Total cases One day Low outlier Inlier High outlier Cost per case (€) Total cost (€)
H02A Major biliary tract procedure 34 0 8 23 3 85,961 (52,663–278,012) 3,222,496
A01Za) Liver transplantation 1 0 0 0 1 - 4,390,310
G10Aa) Incisional hernia repair 4 3 0 1 0 17,962 71,848
G65Ba) Adhesiolysis 1 0 0 1 0 - 1,584
Total 40 3 8 25 4 85,961 (52,663–4,656,064) 7,686,245

Values are presented as number only or median (range).

Derived from the HSE Admitted Patient Price List 2022 [12].

DRG, diagnosis-related group; BDI, bile duct injury; -, not available; HSE, Health Services Executives.

a)Subsequent procedures.

TOOLS
Similar articles