Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is defined as bleeding from the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, whereas lower gastrointestinal bleeding originates from below the ligament of Treitz, including the small bowel and colon. The incidence of UGIB has decreased globally over the past 20 years, reaching approximately 50–150 and 47 cases per 100,000 of the global population per year for variceal and non-variceal bleeding, respectively. The eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the widespread introduction of proton pump inhibitors have contributed to the current improvement in epidemiological outcomes. Regarding the etiology of UGIB, peptic ulcer disease is the most common cause, accounting for 43.6% of cases, followed by gastritis and duodenitis (27.6%), esophageal variceal bleeding (8.0%), and esophagitis (5.6%). Other causes, including malignancy, Dieulafoy’s lesions, and Mallory Weiss tears, collectively account for 10–12% of UGIB. In conclusion, the outcomes of H. pylori eradication and the widespread introduction of proton pump inhibitors have offset the effects of an aging population. In addition, the increasing indications for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet agents have resulted in a decrease in the incidence of UGIB.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a commonly encountered clinical manifestation that has a mortality rate ranging from 7% to 11%.1,2 The incidence of variceal and non-variceal bleeding has reached approximately 50–150 and 47 cases per 100,000 of the global population per year. Defined as a loss of blood from the gastrointestinal tract, including the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, UGIB is categorized and distinguished from lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) by the ligament of Treitz, which confines it to the proximal region. In contrast, LGIB covers the distal portion from the ligament of Treitz, including the jejunum, ileum, and colon. It has risk factors of age, male, smoking, alcohol consumption, and medication that interferes with the stability of the intestinal epithelium.3-8 The clinical manifestation varies depending on the disease severity. It is typically manifested by fresh red hematemesis or coffee-ground vomiting, hematochezia, or melena. In addition, the gastrointestinal symptoms mentioned above and systemic signs associated with hypovolemia occur, including syncope, sweating, and orthostasis. Peptic ulcer disease is the most common cause, accounting for 43.6% of UGIB, followed by gastritis and duodenitis (27.6%), esophageal variceal bleeding (8.0%), and esophagitis (5.6%). Other causes, including malignancy, Dieulafoy’s lesions, and Mallory Weiss tears, collectively account for 10– 12% of UGIB cases.9,10 This study investigated the changing global incidence and the etiology of UGIB from Western countries to the Asian region.
UGIB is more common in males than females, and the incidence increases with age (Fig. 1).11-15 The consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antiplatelet agents, and anti-coagulants is more frequently indicated in old age. Hence, the incidence of age-dependent bleeding has increased regardless of the total global UGIB tendency.14,16
Several population-based studies have presented declining global epidemiologic outcomes of UGIB in the recent twenty years. Most epidemiologic studies have covered Western countries, including Europe and the United States (US), to the Asian region (Table 1 and Fig. 2).13,14,16-21 A prospective observational study conducted in Italy comparing the time trends of UGIB from 1983 to 1985 and from 2002 to 2004 reported an overall 35% decrease in incidence.17 The overall incidence has decreased from 112.5 to 89.8 per 100,000 persons. In addition, the annual mortality has decreased from 17.1 to 8.2 per 100,000 persons in 1983-to-1985 and 2002-to-2004 periods, respectively.17
Abougergi et al. retrospectively evaluated the incidences and mortality rates of UGIB in the US population from 1989 to 2009.18 The incidence and mortality rates have shown a declining trend, with a decrease in incidence from 108 to 78 cases per 100,000 persons in 1994 and 2009, respectively, as well as a reduction in mortality rate from 4.5% in 1989 to 2.1% in 2009.18
Theocharis et al. evaluated the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of UGIB in Greece by comparing the prospective study results from 2005 with retrospective data from the same population 10 years earlier.16 The incidence decreased from 162.9 per 100,000 population in 1995 to 108.3 per 100,000 population in 2005.16 A prospective study in the Netherlands examined the recent trends in the incidence and outcome of UGIB in 1993/1994 and 2000.19 They reported a decrease in incidence from 61.7 cases per 100,000 persons in the 1993/1994 period to 47.7 cases per 100,000 persons in 2000.19
Kim et al. evaluated the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database records of Korean patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) from 2006 to 2015.14 The average annual incidence of hospitalization was 34.98 per 100,000 person-year. A 2.7% decrease in total hospitalizations was observed between 2008 and 2015. In addition, the incidence of hospitalization with PUB significantly decreased, especially in men between 2008 and 2015, with an annual change of –3.4%.14
In Japan, Miyamoto et al. retrospectively evaluated the correlation between the incidence of UGIB from 1997 to 2008 and the frequency of usage of medicine, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine 2 receptor antagonists, and aspirin.13 The annual incidence of UGIB with the widespread use of PPI decreased significantly from 160.8 to 23.6 per 100,000 population.13 Oakland et al. conducted a global review of UGIB from 1980 to 2012 and reported a decline in the incidence of UGIB in Western population-based studies.20 Their study results included a reduction of upper gastrointestinal complication incidence from 87 to 47 per 100,000 persons between 1996 and 2005 in Spain.20,21
The global trend has become evident for populations with appropriate access to endoscopic facilities and hospitalization because of the advances in the gastrointestinal field, the introduction of endoscopic devices, and the application of effective endoscopic and medical therapeutic management, including injection therapy, thermal coagulation, hemoclips, hemospray, Doppler endoscopic probe, and endoscopic suturing.22-25 The eradication of H. pylori and the widespread introduction and use of PPIs have led to superior treatment outcomes for peptic ulcer diseases, resulting in a reduction of upper gastrointestinal complications.26-32 The population is aging, and they are consuming increasing amounts of NSAIDs and anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Nevertheless, H. pylori eradication, the use of PPIs, and the increased use of safer COX-2 selective inhibitors may have contributed to the current changing epidemiologic outcomes.28-34 In addition, advances in therapeutic endoscopy, including novel effective endoscopic devices and efficient approaches to endoscopic units, have contributed to the current changing epidemiologic outcomes of UGIB.22-25 In the aspect of variceal bleeding, the incidence of variceal UGIB in the US showed a declining outcome, demonstrating a consistent worldwide trend of gastrointestinal bleeding.35,36 In addition, despite the expanded hospitalization caused by cirrhotic underlying comorbidities, studies performed in the US evaluation on esophageal variceal bleeding based on a national inpatient sample from 2002 to 2012 showed a decreasing incidence.37 The prophylactic management of varices with endoscopic ligation and the application of beta blockers and vasoactive agents would have resulted in the current epidemiologic outcome of variceal bleeding.
Previous studies based on national observational and databases in the US and Europe as well as the Asian region have shown the global etiology of UGIB (Fig. 3).12-15,17,38 Peptic ulcer disease is the most common cause reaching 43.6% of UGIB cases followed by gastritis and duodenitis (27.6%), esophageal variceal bleeding (8.0%), and esophagitis (5.6%). Other causes, including malignancy, Dieulafoy’s lesions, and Mallory –Weiss tears, collectively account for 10–12% of UGIB.9,10
A prospective observational study conducted in Italy to analyze the time trends of UGIB with its etiology in 1983–1985 and 2002–2004 reported an overall decrease in the incidence of peptic ulcer disease from 32.7% to 19.5% (p<0.001). In addition, a decrease in the proportion of patients bleeding from peptic ulcers (347/587, 59.1% vs. 286/539, 53.1%, p=0.12) and gastroesophageal varices (73/587, 12.4% vs. 44/539, 8.2%, p=0.05) was reported.17 On the other hand, the proportion of patients bleeding from other lesions, including esophagitis (11/587, 1.9% vs. 23/539, 4.3%, p=0.01), angiodysplasia, and Dieulafoy’s lesion, increased in 2002–2004.17
According to the recent retrospective, an observational cohort study to investigate the trends in the etiology and outcome of UGIB in hospitalized patients from 2002 to 2012 in the US, the hospitalization rate of peptic ulcer disease decreased 30% from 41 to 30 cases per 100,000 population, in addition to an overall reduction of the hospitalization rate from 81 to 67 cases per 100,000 population.12 Regarding trends in other etiologies, the hospitalization rate of Dieulafoy’s lesions, angiodysplasia, and neoplasm increased 33%, 32%, and 50%, respectively.12 Hearnshaw et al. performed a multi-center, cross-sectional clinical audit of the UK to assess the organization of endoscopy services for acute UGIB in 2007.15 Six thousand and fifty patients from 208 hospitals were analyzed. The study group showed 36% with PUB as the most common cause, followed by 11% of variceal bleeding.15
An analysis of PUB in Korea was performed from an extensive prospectively collected database of patients with PUB who were hospitalized between 2014 and 2015 at 28 medical centers.14 The study had 904 registered PUB patients, of which 897 patients were analyzed, with 60.9% having gastric ulcers and 29.9% having duodenal ulcers.14 Approximately 7.1% of the patients had rebleeding with a 1.0% 30-day mortality.14 In addition, a prospective observational cohort study reviewed prospectively collected data from 1984 patients who underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy due to UGIB to assess the predictability of scoring systems for non-ulcer bleeding (NUB) and compare the outcomes of NUB and ulcer bleeding.38 The most common cause of bleeding in Group NUB was Mallory–Weiss tears (51.1%), followed by Dieulafoy’s lesions (18.9%), AGML and erosions (9%), and esophagitis (8%).38
The overall changing etiology of UGIB from 2006 to 2015 has shown a gradual decline of PUB, reflecting the prevalence of H. pylori and the widespread use of PPIs. On the other hand, the incidence of non-ulcer, non- variceal bleeding has increased slightly owing to advanced diagnostics capturing rare or atypical lesions as well as variceal bleeding, reflecting the trends of chronic liver disease (Fig. 4).14,38 The study results from Japan, retrospectively evaluating the correlation between the use of medicine and incidence of UGIB over 12 years from 1997 to 2008, revealed a bleeding etiology, with 144 peptic ulcer patients (56.7%), including 108 gastric and 36 duodenal ulcer patients, out of 253 patients with UGIB.13
The global epidemiologic approach and evaluation revealed a declining trend due to the influential outcome of H. pylori eradication and the widespread introduction of PPIs, over the effect of an aging population with increasing indication for NSAIDs, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet agent consumption. In the aspect of variceal bleeding, a prophylactic therapeutic approach combining endoscopic ligation and medical management with beta blockers and vasoactive agents would have resulted in the current reduction trends in the epidemiological outcomes of variceal bleeding. Future follow-up studies tracing the consistency of current changes would be required to understand and assess UGIB.
REFERENCES
1. Stanley AJ, Laine L. 2019; Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMJ. 364:l536. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l536. PMID: 30910853.
2. Rockall TA, Logan RFA, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. 1995; Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 311:222–226. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.222. PMID: 7627034. PMCID: PMC2550278.
3. Christensen S, Riis A, Nørgaard M, Sørensen HT, Thomsen RW. 2007; Short-term mortality after perforated or bleeding peptic ulcer among elderly patients: a population-based cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 7:8. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-7-8. PMID: 17439661. PMCID: PMC3225863.
4. Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, Travis SP, Murphy MF, Palmer KR. 2011; Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 60:1327–1335. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.228437. PMID: 21490373.
5. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. 1996; Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 38:316–321. DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.3.316. PMID: 8675081. PMCID: PMC1383057.
6. Tai FWD, McAlindon ME. 2021; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Med (Lond). 21:131–134. DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0039. PMID: 33762373. PMCID: PMC8002800.
7. Kärkkäinen JM, Miilunpohja S, Rantanen T, et al. 2015; Alcohol abuse increases rebleeding risk and mortality in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 60:3707–3715. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3806-6. PMID: 26177705.
8. Andersen IB, Jørgensen T, Bonnevie O, Grønbaek M, Sørensen TI. 2000; Smoking and alcohol intake as risk factors for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers: a population-based cohort study. Epidemiology. 11:434–439. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200007000-00012. PMID: 10874551.
9. Sung JJ, Chiu PW, Chan FKL, et al. 2018; Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018. Gut. 67:1757–1768. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316276. PMID: 29691276. PMCID: PMC6145289.
10. Saydam ŞS, Molnar M, Vora P. 2023; The global epidemiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in general population: a systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg. 15:723–739. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.723. PMID: 37206079. PMCID: PMC10190726.
11. Kamboj AK, Hoversten P, Leggett CL. 2019; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: etiologies and management. Mayo Clin Proc. 94:697–703. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.022. PMID: 30947833.
12. Wuerth BA, Rockey DC. 2018; Changing epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the last decade: a nationwide analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 63:1286–1293. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4882-6. PMID: 29282637.
13. Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Okamoto T, Higashi Y, Hidaka T, Manabe N. 2012; Continuous proton pump inhibitor treatment decreases upper gastrointestinal bleeding and related death in a rural area in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 27:372–377. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06878.x. PMID: 21793917.
14. Kim YS, Lee J, Shin A, Lee JM, Park JH, Jung HY. 2021; A nationwide cohort study shows a sex-dependent change in the trend of peptic ulcer bleeding incidence in Korea between 2006 and 2015. Gut Liver. 15:537–545. DOI: 10.5009/gnl20079. PMID: 33071238. PMCID: PMC8283284.
15. Hearnshaw SA, Logan RFA, Lowe D, Travis SPL, Murphy MF, Palmer KR. 2010; Use of endoscopy for management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: results of a nationwide audit. Gut. 59:1022–1029. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.174599. PMID: 20357318.
16. Theocharis GJ, Thomopoulos KC, Sakellaropoulos G, Katsakoulis E, Nikolopoulou V. 2008; Changing trends in the epidemiology and clinical outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a defined geographical area in Greece. J Clin Gastroenterol. 42:128–133. DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000248004.73075.ad. PMID: 18209579.
17. Loperfido S, Baldo V, Piovesana E, et al. 2009; Changing trends in acute upper-GI bleeding: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 70:212–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.051. PMID: 19409558.
18. Abougergi MS, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. 2015; The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 81:882–888.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.027. PMID: 25484324.
19. van Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EAJ, et al. 2003; Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenterol. 98:1494–1499. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07517.x. PMID: 12873568.
20. Oakland K. Changing epidemiology and etiology of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2019;42-43:101610.
10.1016/j.bpg.2019.04.003
31785737
21. Lanas A, García-Rodríguez LA, Polo-Tomás M, et al. 2009; Time trends and impact of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 104:1633–1641. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.164. PMID: 19574968.
22. Laine L, Jensen DM. 2012; Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 107:345–360. quiz 361DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.480. PMID: 22310222.
23. Han YJ, Cha JM, Park JH, et al. 2016; Successful endoscopic hemostasis is a protective factor for rebleeding and mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 61:2011–2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4082-9. PMID: 26923946.
24. Barkun AN, Martel M, Toubouti Y, Rahme E, Bardou M. 2009; Endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcer bleeding for patients with high-risk lesions: a series of meta-analyses. Gastrointest Endosc. 69:786–799. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.031. PMID: 19152905.
25. Mullady DK, Wang AY, Waschke KA. 2020; AGA clinical practice update on endoscopic therapies for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: expert review. Gastroenterology. 159:1120–1128. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.095. PMID: 32574620.
26. Bardou M, Toubouti Y, Benhaberou-Brun D, Rahme E, Barkun AN. 2005; Meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 21:677–686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02391.x. PMID: 15771753.
27. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD002094.
10.1002/14651858.CD002094.pub3
28. Rokkas T, Karameris A, Mavrogeorgis A, Rallis E, Giannikos N. 1995; Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the possibility of rebleeding in peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 41:1–4. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70266-0. PMID: 7698617.
29. Labenz J, Börsch G. 1994; Role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding relapse. Digestion. 55:19–23. DOI: 10.1159/000201117. PMID: 8112492.
30. Gisbert JP, Calvet X, Feu F, et al. 2007; Eradication of Helicobacter pylori for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding. Helicobacter. 12:279–286. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00490.x. PMID: 17669099.
31. Macri G, Milani S, Surrenti E, Passaleva MT, Salvadori G, Surrenti C. 1998; Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the rate of duodenal ulcer rebleeding: a long-term follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 93:925–927. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.00278.x. PMID: 9647020.
32. Gisbert JP, Calvet X, Cosme A, et al. 2012; Long-term follow-up of 1,000 patients cured of Helicobacter pylori infection following an episode of peptic ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 107:1197–1204. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.132. PMID: 22613904.
33. Watson DJ, Yu Q, Bolognese JA, Reicin AS, Simon TJ. 2004; The upper gastrointestinal safety of rofecoxib vs NSAIDs: an updated combined analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 20:1539–1548. DOI: 10.1185/030079904X3078. PMID: 15462687.
34. Hunt RH, Harper S, Watson DJ, et al. 2003; The gastrointestinal safety of the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib assessed by both endoscopy and analysis of upper gastrointestinal events. Am J Gastroenterol. 98:1725–1733. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07598.x. PMID: 12907325.
35. Lim N, Desarno MJ, Lidofsky SD, Ganguly E. 2014; Hospitalization for variceal hemorrhage in an era with more prevalent cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 20:11326–11332. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11326. PMID: 25170218. PMCID: PMC4145772.
36. Jamal MM, Samarasena JB, Hashemzadeh M, Vega KJ. 2008; Declining hospitalization rate of esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6:689–695. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.049. PMID: 18456566.
37. Pant C, Desai M, Deshpande A, Taylor R, Olyaee M, Gilroy R. 2015; Esophageal variceal bleeding in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. J Hosp Med. 10:453–456. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2360. PMID: 25976490.
38. Park HW, Jeon SW. 2018; Clinical outcomes of patients with non-ulcer and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective multicenter study of risk prediction using a scoring system. Dig Dis Sci. 63:3253–3261. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5255-5. PMID: 30132232.
Fig. 1
UGIB incidence by age and sex group. UGIB incidence increases significantly with age, especially in individuals aged 65 and older. Males generally have higher incidence rates than females across all age groups. Western countries (USA and UK) show higher overall UGIB incidence compared to East Asian countries (Korea and Japan), particularly in elderly males. UGIB, upper gastrointestinal bleeding.



PDF
Citation
Print



XML Download