Abstract
Gibberellic acid (GA3) is a biocide with insecticidal properties. Selenium (Se) has an enzymatic structure that mediates its antioxidant activities. This study aimed to assess the GA3 toxicity on pre and postnatal ovarian development and to investigate the protective effect of Se against GA3 toxicity in albino rats. Two experiments were conducted in this study (n=24 rats for each): the first was performed on pregnant female rats and the second on prepubertal females (4 weeks old). Rats were divided into Group I (controls: Ia, negative and Ib, positive rats received sodium selenite 0.3 mg/kg/body weight); Group II (GA3-treated, the rats received 55 mg/kg, 1/100 of lethal dose 50); and Group III (the rats were cotreated with GA3 plus Se). Treatments in the first experiment began at gestational day 7 until postnatal day 4, while in the second experiment, treatments lasted two weeks. All hormonal levels were decreased in pre and postnatal GA3 rats’ exposure. Histological examination of GA3-treated prenatal rats showed disturbance in ovarian development as shown by ovigerous cords with germ cell breakdown. Meanwhile, multiple histopathological and developmental changes occur in all stages of the ovarian follicles in postnatal rats. In both developmental ages, there was collagen deposition with decreased proliferative marker and androgen receptor expressions, which was confirmed by a decrease in the morphometric measures of the ovarian follicles. All biochemical, immunostaining, and histological results were improved after Se co-administration due to its antioxidant activity against GA3 toxicity.
Gibberellins (GAs) are plant growth hormones that regulate various processes, including stem elongation, seed germination, dormancy, flowering, sex expression, enzyme induction, and fruit senescence [1]. Gibberellic acid (GA3) is a subtype of GAs that, when accumulated in the soil for months and consumed by various exposed vegetables and fruits, can cause toxicity and have hazardous effects on the health of humans and animals [2]. GA3 has been shown to modify antioxidative systems induced by free radical production in various organs [3], tissue carcinogenic, persuade tumor formation [4], affect sexual differentiation and mammal fertility [5].
The development of the ovary depends on the development and maturation of ovarian follicles; a process of folliculogenesis [6]. The development of ovaries in rats starts before birth, with the primary change being the formation of follicles [7]. During the initial stages of ovarian development, the ovalocytes are arrested in the meiosis-I phase while awaiting two essential developmental processes: (1) formation of the primordial follicle, and (2) transition from primordial to the primary follicle. This process takes in (a) embryonic days from 18 to 21 (E18–21) as the majority of the oocytes in the rats were in their places and the apoptosis was observed, (b) the peak days from postnatal day (PND) 0 to 3 in which the apoptosis and primordial follicle formation is present, and (c) the final stage from PND 4 to 7; where all oocyte cavities have been demolished, resulting in no observed oocytes in the ovaries, and a transition from primordial to primary follicles is present in the most of the ovarian cortex [8]. In the neonatal period (PND 0–7); the ovarian follicle development is independent of the pituitary gonadotropins luteinizing hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and the follicles remain in the preantral stage [9]. The peripubertal period in rats lasts from (PND 33–37), and pubertal periods from (PND 38–46) which depends mainly on pituitary gonadotropins (LH and FSH) [10]. Postnatal ovarian development, or folliculogenesis, occurs when the primordial follicle pool matures into primary, then secondary follicles independently of gonadotropins. However, this process is closely regulated by both activating and inhibitory factors making it more suspectable to internal or external environmental toxicity. The development of a secondary follicle into a Graafian follicle is completely dependent on gonadotropins, with ovulation relying on this process [11].
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient required for the function of various Se-dependent enzymes, known as selenoprotiens, which are crucial for every animal cell [12]. Se has been shown to have antioxidant properties that help protect cells from oxidative damage [13]. To our knowledge, this is the first study assigned to assess the effect of GA3 toxicity on pre and postnatal ovarian development and to investigate the expected protective effect of Se against GA3-induced embryotoxicity during pre and postnatal stages of ovarian development in albino rats.
GA3: Berelex tablets (10 g) contain GA3 10% tablet manufactured (Valent BioSciences).
The stock solution for GA3: was prepared in saline and refreshed as needed during the experiment.
Sodium selenite powder (Na2SeO3; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in distilled water.
This study was conducted at the animal house of the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University. According to a statistical sample size equation [14]; forty-eight females with an equal number of male rats obtained from the animal house of Suez Canal University were used in this study. Animals were adapted to laboratory conditions with normal light and temperature, having free access to water and food. The current experiment was conducted after obtaining the approval permission of the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University (5132#). All experiments in this study occurred according to the laboratory animal care guidelines, guaranteeing the study followed Good Laboratory Practice procedures. After one week of acclimatization, two experimental procedures were done on two different age groups in this study. The first experiment: was done on adult mature female rats weighting (200–250 g) that were prepared for mating (each exposed female was mated with one mature male 1:1). After making sure of pregnancy by finding sperms in their vagina was considered the first day of pregnancy (GD1), then the pregnant rats were divided into 3 groups. The second experiment: was done on prepubertal female albino rats (4 weeks old) with an average body weight of 50–60 g. The rats in the two experiments (n=24 for each) were divided into 3 groups for each group.
Group I: served as control (n=12) and was divided into 2 subgroups as follows:
Group Ia; (negative control): the rats received distilled water (0.01 ml/g body weight) without any treatments.
Group Ib; (positive control): the rats received sodium selenite in a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/body weight [15].
Group II (GA3 treated, n=6): rats received GA3 (55 mg/kg equivalent to 1/100 of lethal dose 50) via gastric gavage [16].
Group III (Se-protected, n=6): rats received GA3 by the previous dose plus sodium selenite in a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/body weight via gastric gavage.
The treatments in the first experiment began at the gestational day 7 [6] until day four postnatal (PND 4) and 2 weeks in the pubertal rats in the second experiment. The ovaries of the rat’s offspring in the 1st experiment and from the pubertal rats in the 2nd experiment were taken for different histological and immunohistochemical analyses.
For assessing oxidative stress marker levels; samples of the ovarian tissues from all groups were frozen in liquid nitrogen, then homogenized in potassium phosphate buffer solution (50 mM, pH 7.5) using a Potter-Elvehiem homogenizer to give a 10% homogenate. Homogenates were centrifuged at 1,500 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected, placed on ice, and immediately used to determine malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). MDA, a marker for lipid peroxidation, was measured calorimetrically in ovarian homogenate according to the specified method by Ohkawa et al. [19]. SOD is a group of antioxidant enzymes that regulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by catalyzing the conversion of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. The activity of SOD was determined in ovarian tissues according to the method of Nishikimi et al. [20]. The principle of this method is based on the ability of SOD to inhibit the reduction power of phenazine methosulphate, which mediates the reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium. CAT is an antioxidant enzyme that degrades hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. The CAT activity was assayed using a spectrophotometric assay developed by Góth [21], which measures the stable complex formation of hydrogen peroxide with ammonium molybdate at an absorbance of 405 nm.
Samples of ovarian tissues from the first experiment (neonatal rats; PND 4) and the second experiment (pubertal rats) from all studied groups were fixed in Carnoy’s fixative. The fixed ovarian tissues were dried using ultimate ethanol, cleaned with methyl benzoate, and later infiltrated with paraffin wax. The studied paraffin blocks of the ovarian tissues were cut into 5 μm thick sections using a microtome. The ovarian sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for general histopathological findings and with a Masson Trichrome stain to detect collagen deposition and fibrosis.
Immunohistochemical staining was done using Ki-67 antibodies to assess the proliferative activity marker of the developing follicles and androgen receptors (ARs) antibodies expression to evaluate the degree of maturation of hormonal receptors and their responses to androgens of the ovarian follicles. The slides were dried after being mounted to eliminate any water trapped underneath them. The slides were washed with tris-buffered saline buffer after being immersed in distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase was inhibited with hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes, rinsed with buffer for 1 minute, and then digested with proteinase K, followed by a 2-minute rinse. The protein block was added for 10 minutes before being shaken off. Anti-Ki-67 [22], and primary ARs antibodies [23] were applied to each tissue and cleaned with buffer for 2 minutes, followed by an antibody enhancer for 10 minutes and a one-minute rinse with buffer. The polymer was added and allowed to sit for 15 minutes, followed by a two-minute rinse with buffer solution. DAB was added to the solution for 10 minutes, with a subsequent 2-minute wash using a buffer. Hematoxylin was utilized as a counterstain. The tissue was washed with buffer for two minutes, followed by a wash in water. It was then dehydrated, cleared, and mounted.
The immunostained sections were examined using a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence), then photographed by an Axio CCamMR camera (Zeiss) [24].
H&E-stained and immune-stained slides from each group were used for measuring the following:
(1) The percentage % number of ovarian follicles in neonatal rats of 1st experiment (PND 4); by using H&E-stained sections, the ovarian follicles were classified, based on their stages, as the primordial (the oocyte is closely surrounded by a single layer of squamous granulosa cells) and early primary follicles (the growing oocyte is surrounded by a single layer of cuboidal cells or a multilayered mass of granulosa cells together with theca cells). The average number of primordial and primary follicles was assessed using the Olympus microscope CAST 2 stereological software v2.1.4. The stained slide glasses were scanned by the Nano Zoomer 2.0 RS virtual slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics). The follicles were counted at 7-section intervals (whole ovaries were sectioned, resulting in at least 50 sections per ovary). The number of numerous developmental follicles was multiplied by 7 to assess the total number of follicles per ovary [25]. Only follicles with visible oocytes were counted to prevent double counting.
(2) The average number of healthy ovarian follicles, atretic follicles, and corpus luteum in the pubertal rats in the 2nd experiment: the number of various developing follicles and atretic follicles was counted every five sections in high power fields (×100) multiplied by five to determine the total number of follicles per ovary. The follicles observed were classified into four groups: (a) primary follicles (as previously described in experiment-1), (b) secondary follicles (the oocyte is surrounded by several layers of granulosa cells together with theca cells, (c) growing follicles (pre-antral) as secondary plus a single large antrum, and (d) Graafian (antral) follicles (the oocyte is surrounded by cumulus oophorus cells, and is adjacent to a single large antrum. A follicle that either contains a fragmenting oocyte, surrounded by five or more layers of granulosa cells, or has a well-defined single follicular cavity containing cell debris was scored as nongrowing or atretic [26, 27].
(3) The average diameter of the counted ovarian follicles in both experiments and corpus luteum: five microscopic fields at a magnification of 10× were randomly chosen from each rat group. The ocular micrometer of a light microscope (Olympus EH; America Inc.) was used for measuring the diameter of each ovarian follicle, atretic follicles, and corpus luteum [28]. To avoid recounting the same follicle, only individual follicles, containing an oocyte with a nucleus, were evaluated [29]. The results are presented as the mean and standard deviation.
(4) The average area % of immune expression for Ki-67 positive and ARs in granulosa cells in both experiments. The immune-stained slides were photographed using an Olympus digital camera (E24-10 M pixel; Olympus) attached to an Olympus microscope with a ×0.5 photo adaptor. The obtained images were analyzed using Video Test Morphology computer software (VideoTesT) with a specific routine built-in for calculating an expression’s calibrated distance and area percentage. The results were shown as the ratio between the immunostaining positive area and the total area of the image [30].
Data from all groups were expressed as mean±SD. The initial tests were conducted on the normal data of control groups. The differences in the values between the study groups were measured using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Results were deemed statistically significant when the P-value was less than 0.05. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 19 (IBM Co.).
Serum levels of the neonatal rats (PND 4) revealed a highly statistically significant reduction in the levels of the LH, FSH, estrogen, and progesterone (P<0.001) in the GA3-treated group in comparison with the control and Se-treated groups. There was a significant improvement in these hormonal levels when rats received Se alongside GA3 (P<0.05) compared to the control group (Fig. 1A). The same results were reported in the 2nd experiment of the pubertal rats regarding FSH and progesterone levels, meanwhile, the levels of LH and estrogen were significantly increased to mimic the control group in the Se-protected group (Fig. 1B). The data from both experiments of neonatal and pubertal rats are presented in Table 1.
The ovarian level of the MDA (the marker of lipid peroxidation) of the GA3-treated group of both neonatal and pubertal rats showed a high statistically significant increase compared with control and Se-protected groups (P<0.001). But significant decrease in the activities of the antioxidant enzymes, SOD, and CAT was recorded in the same group compared to other study groups (P<0.001). On the other hand, the neonatal and pubertal rats that were co-treated with Se showed a significant decrease in MDA and an increase in antioxidant markers (SOD, CAT) (P<0.05) when compared to control groups. The data from both experiments of neonatal and pubertal rats are presented in Table 2.
Ovarian sections of the control groups of the neonatal rats (PND 4) showed normal structural development. The ovary is covered externally by a layer of coelomic epithelium. Many primordial follicles were noticed in the ovarian cortex, each consisting of an oocyte surrounded by a single layer of squamous follicular cells. Early-developed primary follicles were observed in the cortex, where each oocyte was surrounded by a single layer of cuboidal cells (Fig. 2A). The GA3-treated rats showed disturbance and delayed developed ovaries. The ovary was covered by a thin and sometimes damaged coelomic epithelial layer. The ovarian cortices showed a small number of primordial follicles. A different shape of ovigerous cords with germ cell nest breakdown or collapsed germ cells was still present at this stage of development. Multiple spaces encircle the ovigerous cords (Fig. 2B, C). The H&E examination of the ovarian sections in the Se-protected group showed significant improvement in developmental events, with the ovaries covered by an intact coelomic epithelial layer. The cortex showed greater primordial follicles than the treated group. Early primary follicles with a small number of ovigerous cords with germ cell nest breakdown were observed in this group (Fig. 2D).
Ovarian sections of the control groups of the pubertal rats showed normal ovarian structures with normal stages of follicular development in the cortex and with normal medulla. The follicles are; primary follicles, secondary follicles, growing follicles, and a well-developed Graafian follicle that showed a rounded oocyte surrounded by zona pellucida, zona granulosa cells, theca externa cell layer, and had follicular antrum. The Corpus luteum contained normal luteal cells (Fig. 3). The ovaries of the GA3-treated group showed a reduction in ovarian follicle numbers, abnormally shrinkage primary follicles, abnormally small secondary follicles with a greater number of degenerated (non-growing); atretic follicles having multiple layers of granulosa cells with degenerated or shrinkage oocytes with perifollicular cellular degeneration which were marked as spaces. Severe medullary congestion, hemorrhage, vacuolations, and congested blood vessels were observed. Other sections showed completely degenerated cortical follicles, necrosis with interstitial hemorrhage, edema, and excessive vacuolations. Abnormally elongated growing follicles with lens-like oocytes and a small antrum were observed (Fig. 4).
The ovarian sections of the Se-protected group showed nearly normal stages of follicular development beginning from the primary, secondary, growing follicle, Graffian follicle, some atretic follicles, and slightly degenerated secondary follicles. A small amount of medullary congestion, hemorrhages, and small areas of parenchymal tissue damage are still present. The corpus luteum showed normal and vacuolated luteal cells (Fig. 5).
Examination of Masson’s trichrome stain of the ovarian sections of the control groups of the neonatal rats (PND 4) showed normal ovarian cellular stroma with scattered small thin collagen fibers only around blood vessels (Fig. 6A), but of the neonatal GA3-treated rats showed moderate fibrosis with deposition of thin collagen fibers that were more evident around ovigerous cords and in the coelomic epithelial layer (Fig. 6B). Meanwhile, the Se-protected group showed mild fibrosis with deposition of thin collagen fibers around primary follicles and within interstitial tissues (Fig. 6C).
Masson’s trichrome stain of the ovarian sections of the control groups of pubertal rats showed normal ovarian cellular stroma with scattered deposition of thin collagen fibers-stained green color around blood vessels with no fibrosis (Fig. 7A). Sections of the GA3-treated pubertal rats showed excessive fibrosis and deposition of thick collagen fibers that are more evident around blood vessels in interstitial tissues and the degenerated follicle (Fig. 7B). After Se coadministration, the ovarian sections of the pubertal rats showed mild fibrosis with deposition of thin collagen fibers around blood vessels and in interstitial tissues (Fig. 7C).
Ovarian sections of the studied groups stained with immuno-histochemical staining for Ki-67 showed strong and discrete staining of the cell nuclei of the granulosa cell of the primordial follicle and early primary follicles of control groups of the neonatal rats (PND 4) (Fig. 8A) but showed faint staining for Ki-67 in the germ cells in the ovigerous cords and mild stain in the follicular cells of the primordial follicle in GA3-treated rats of the same age group (Fig. 8B). However, after Se- co-administration, the ovarian sections showed moderate Ki-67 stain in the primordial follicle and strong stain in granulosa cells of early primary follicles which indicates the proliferative effect of the Se (Fig. 8C).
Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 of the ovarian sections of the pubertal control rats showed discrete positive brown staining of the cell nuclei of the follicular cells of the primary follicle and strong brown staining of the granulosa cell growing follicle (Fig. 9A), meanwhile, it showed faint brown staining of the follicular cells of the primary follicle and mild staining the granulosa cells of the atretic follicle in GA3-treated group (Fig. 9B). Sections of the Se-protected rats of the same age group showed mild staining in the follicular cells of the primary follicle but strong brown staining in the granulosa cells of the growing and Graafian follicles (Fig. 9C).
The ovarian sections of the control groups of the neonatal rats (PND 4) stained with AR antibodies showed high expression in the granulosa cells of both primordial and early primary follicles (Fig. 10A). The GA3-treated group showed mild expression in the primordial follicles but a faint expression in the broken germ cell nests (Fig. 10B). Meanwhile, the Se-protected group showed moderate expression in granulosa cells of the primordial follicle but showed high expression in the early primary follicle (Fig. 10C).
Results of immunohistochemical staining of the AR of the control group of the pubertal rats showed high expression in the granulosa cells of primary follicles and slightly and sporadic expression of the theca cells of the growing follicles (Fig. 11A, B). Sections of the GA3-treated rats of the same age showed mild expression of AR in the follicular cells of the primary follicles and very faint expression of granulosa cells of the atretic follicles (Fig. 11C), After Se co-administration, the ovarian sections from the same age group showed high expression of ARs in the granulosa cells of the primary follicle and the theca cells of the growing follicle. (Fig. 11D).
The measuring of the percentage % number of ovarian follicles of the neonatal rats (PND 4); showed a highly significant decrease in the average percentage of the primordial and early primary in the GA3-treated group in comparison with other study groups (P<0.001), then showed a significant increase again (P<0.05) after Se combined treatment in comparison with control group (Fig. 2E). The average diameter of primordial and early primary in the ovarian sections of the neonatal rats showed a highly significant decrease in the GA3-treated group in comparison with other groups (P<0.001) while showing a statistically significant increase in Se-protected rats of the same age (P<0.05) in comparison with the control group (Fig. 2F).
When counting the average number of ovarian follicles (primary, secondary, growing, Graafian, atretic, and corpus luteum in ovarian sections of the pubertal rats; a highly statistically significant low number of all follicles except for atretic follicles which showed a significantly higher number were found in the GA3 treated group (P<0.001) in comparison with other groups. The diameters of the ovarian follicles also were significantly decreased in this group (P<0.001) compared to different groups. The Se-protected group showed a statistically significant increase in ovarian follicles number except for the atretic follicles which showed a significant decrease compared to the control group (P<0.01). The diameters of the primary and the growing follicles were increased in the Se-protected group with insignificant differences with control. The secondary, the Graffian follicles and Corpus luteum diameters in Se-protected increased than GA3-treated but showed significant differences from the control group (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the diameters of the atretic follicles in this group showed a high statistical difference compared to the control (P<0.01). The values of the number and diameters of the ovarian follicles of the pubertal rats are presented in Tables 3 and 4 respectively.
Quantification of the average area % for counting the positive Ki-67 of granulosa cells in the ovarian sections of both age groups’ experiments (neonatal and pubertal rats); showed a statistically significant decrease in the GA3-treated group compared with the other study groups (P<0.001). Meanwhile, the Se-treated group showed a high significance increase compared with GA3 and control groups (P<0.001, P<0.05) respectively (Fig. 8D for neonatal and Fig. 9D for pubertal rats). The same results were reported regarding the average area % of immune expression for AR of the granulosa cells in both neonatal and pubertal rat groups (Fig. 10D for neonatal and Fig. 11E for pubertal rats).
Ovary development begins early during fetal life in mammals and proceeds for a long time. Normal ovarian development involves a balance between the proliferation and apoptosis of germinative cells, which is the major phenomenon in establishing the maximal reproductive potential of adult females. Exposure to any toxicity during intrauterine life or folliculogenesis may influence the normal progression of development of the fetal ovary and the future of adult fertility [31]. GA3 is a substance whose molecular structure is similar to that of steroid hormones and may be an environmental endocrine disruptor [32]. Se supplementation has been proven to be protective against an extensive range of harmful factors, both chemical, such as drugs exerting severe side effects, heavy metals, carcinogens, mycotoxins, or pesticides, and physical, such as heat stress or magnetic fields [33]. This work represents an experimental demonstration of the potentially harmful effect of GA3 exposure on the pre and postnatal development of the rat ovary and to investigate the protective effect of Se.
Our biochemical findings of this study revealed a significant reduction in the serum levels of LH, FSH, estrogen, and progesterone in GA3-treated groups in both experimental ages which improved after Se administration, especially in the pubertal rats. Kamel et al. [34], reported in their studies that GA3 has a molecular structure similar to that of steroid hormones and possesses androgenic properties that make it one of the environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals that can affect reproductive development by exerting estrogenic/anti-androgenic and androgenic/anti-estrogenic effects or by directly acting on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis producing negative feedback mechanism on endogenous production of LH, FSH, estrogen, and progesterone levels. On the other hand, previous studies have also reported that GA3 exerts several estrogenic hormone-like effects accelerating the growth of animals and causing weight increases in the thyroid, ovaries, and adrenal glands suppressing them to produce androgens [35]. An explanation reported by Guo et al. [32], that GA3 exposure increased granulosa cell apoptosis, thus affecting follicle development and decreasing their hormonal production. The serum hormonal levels improved by Se administration due to its antioxidant and protective role against drug toxicity, decreasing the apoptotic process in the developing ovary [33]. Akintola et al. [36], demonstrate in their research that the synthesized Se nanoparticles restored estrogen and progesterone levels, as well as LH, FSH, testosterone, aromatase, and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase levels which were altered in the hypertensive polycystic ovary syndrome rats.
In the current study, GA3 toxicity increased lipid peroxidation (MDA) in ovarian tissues and decreased the activities of the antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT). This may indicate that GA3-induced ovarian toxicity involves an oxidative effect and disturbs the balance between the antioxidant capability and harmful products in the ovarian tissues. This finding is consistent with the results of previous research [37, 38]. However, after Se co-treating, a significant decrease in MDA and an increase in antioxidant markers (SOD, CAT) were observed as Se increased the tissue antioxidants and decreased lipid peroxidation. These results align with Nady Ouais and Hassan [39] who assessed the Se antioxidant activities against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage.
Light microscopy results of GA3-treated neonatal rats revealed disruption of ovarian development, with fewer primordial follicles and ovigerous cords containing germ cell breakdown. These findings led to a significant decrease in the average percentage number of primordial and nearly absent early primary and their diameters as recorded in our morphometric measures of this study. Also, there were multiple histopathological changes in the same group of pubertal rats with abnormal development of the different stages of folliculogenesis, especially the growing follicles that led to a significant decrease in the average number and diameters of developing ovarian follicles except for atretic follicles which showed significant increase. These histological changes were attributed to the harmful effects of GA3 linked to oxidative stress, with ROS oxidizing and attacking vital cellular components, which can initiate or worsen cellular damage as reported in previous research [40]. This is in agreement with Bushra and Shenouda who documented the lung damage caused by other factors such as impairment of the antioxidant enzyme system due to lipid peroxidation caused by GA3 free radicals, which reduce the cellular defense system, and produce free radicals that account for the histo-pathological alteration of the different tissues [41] as occurs in the ovarian tissue of pubertal rats. Exposure to GA3 induces damage to the cellular DNA due to oxidative stress suppressing the intracellular growth factors responsible for follicular development [42]. GA3 toxicity interrupts the gonadal hormonal production considered an important factor in the development of the ovarian follicles; it also, increases the occurrence of apoptosis of granulosa cells, thus affecting the folliculogenesis. The same changes were noticed in rat testes of previous histological studies that showed loss of germ cells, derangement of the germinal cells, reduction in the size of the seminiferous tubules, and dystrophy of Leydig cells in rats treated orally and intradermally for 45 days with GA3 [43].
In this experiment, co-treatment with Se in both developmental stages reduced or eliminated the histopathological changes caused by GA3 toxicity as confirmed by the morphometric measures. In concurrence with these findings, Shen et al. [44] reported that Se administration positively modulates the growth and reproductive system development of the offspring in rats exposed to lead toxicity. Se is essential for female reproductive function, influencing follicle growth, maturation, and dominance in both cows and human [45, 46]. Grazul-Bilska and colleagues [47] have reported that low Se levels in a maternal diet suppress the growth of primordial, secondary, and antral follicles, stroma, and blood vasculature in the ovaries of the sheep fetus. Wang et al. [48] found that Se and vitamin E stimulate granulosa cell proliferation by reducing ROS levels, enhancing estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) secretion, regulating folliculogenesis-related genes, suppressing apoptosis, and increasing tissue antioxidant capacity, thereby improving redox balance in bovine granulosa cells.
In this experiment, ovarian Masson’s trichrome stain revealed deposition of thin collagen fibers around ovigerous cords and in the coelomic epithelial layer of neonatal rats treated by GA3 and excessive deposition of thick collagen fibers (a sign of fibrosis) around blood vessels in interstitial tissues. Collagen fiber deposition can be induced by ROS, which trigger the pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor-β, leading to increased fibroblast proliferation and ovarian fibrosis. Alsemeh et al. [4] explained the occurrence of fibrosis after sub-chronic GA3 treatment resulting from lipid peroxidation that led to protein and nucleic acid damage that eventually enhanced collagen formation in the livers of pregnant albino rats and their offspring.
The amount of collagen fiber deposition showed a significant decrease in this work after Se co-administration. Varlamova et al. [49] explained in their research that Se exhibits an anti-fibrotic effect by reducing nearly all pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory genes. Kreindl et al. [50] showed that Se compounds reduced fibrosis-related gene expression, including α-smooth muscle actin, collagen, TGF-β1, and TIMP-1, by inducing apoptosis in activated hepatic stellate cells. Se can lower the number of collagen-producing stellate cells and increase collagen degradation to inhibit fibrosis in fatty liver-associated disorder [51].
Anti Ki-67 antibody is a mouse monoclonal antibody that detects the Ki-67 protein considered a marker of cell proliferation. Ki-67 is positive during normal stages of folliculogenesis. It is observed in germ cells within nests and follicles, as well as in granulosa cells of developing follicles and stromal cells [52]. Our results of Ki-67 immunohistochemical examination of the GA3-treated rats showed faint staining for Ki-67 in the germ cells in the ovigerous cords and mild stain in the follicular cells of the primordial follicle. The same results were noticed in the pubertal rats which showed faint staining of the follicular cells of the primary follicle and mild staining of the granulosa cells of the atretic follicle. In agreement with our findings, Khadrawy et al. [38] found that GA3 exposure impairs ROS scavenging, causing damage to DNA leading to enzyme inactivation, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and membrane integrity loss that explain the toxic effects of GA3 on the proliferating capacity of ovarian follicles. The same explanation reported by Ebrahim et al. [53] in their study that oxidative stress can cause inhibition of cellular proteins responsible for cellular proliferation as Ki-67 which supports the hypothesis that oxidative stress is linked to the attenuation of cellular proliferation and the morphological dysfunction observed in the ovarian tissue that is induced by the SOF treatment. The results of the Ki-67 expression study improved after the coadministration of Se in both experimental ages, indicating Se’s effect on cell survival. Our results were consistent with previous studies that reported the potential antioxidant role of seleno-proteins on follicle dominance protecting the dominant follicle from increasing levels of ROS suggesting promotion of follicular cell proliferation [54]. Our results of Ki-67 immune expression were confirmed by morphometric measures of quantification of the average area % for counting of positive Ki-67 of granulosa cells in both experimental ages; that showed a statistically significant decrease in GA3 treated groups but showed a high significant increase in the groups that were co-administrated with Se.
ARs are found in all three components of the ovarian follicle; oocytes, theca cells, and their protein are most in granulosa cells which contain abundant amounts of AR RNA and its protein [55]. Laird et al. [56] showed that the androgens stimulate the growth of both preantral and antral follicles in various species. In this study, GA3 toxicity affects ARs expression in both developmental ages. According to previous studies; ROS of GA3 attack biomolecules such as DNA, lipids, proteins, and protein transcriptional factors causing enzyme inactivation, and RNA protein suppression, thus affecting protein stability and gene expression [57].
The results of ARs expression were increased after Se co-administration as confirmed by measuring the average area % of immune expression for ARs. Basini and Tamanini [58] demonstrated that Se might regulate the growth of the granulosa cells and 17β-estradiol bio-synthesis in adult ovaries in vitro, promoting AR expression. Previous studies have also elucidated that Se and selenoprotein levels are important for healthy follicles and perform a vital antioxidant function during early and later growth and the proliferation of the follicles [54].
In conclusion, the results of the current study showed that prenatal (maternal) exposure of female rats to GA3 or postnatal (pre-pubertal exposure) exhibited delayed & breakdown of the developmental process of folliculogenesis in the rat’s ovaries, as evidenced by multiple histological alterations, immunohistochemical levels, and morphometric measures of the developing ovarian follicles. Co-administration of Se minimized the developmental alternation, as confirmed by histological, immunohistochemical, and morphometric measures. The study recommended considering Se as a protective agent against the hazardous effects of plant regulators that are widely used and reach the developing organs.
Notes
References
1. Bhattacharya A. Effect of high-temperature stress on the metabolism of plant growth regulators. In: Bhattacharya A, editor. Effect of High Temperature on Crop Productivity and Metabolism of Macro Molecules. Elsevier; 2019. p.485-591.
10.1016/B978-0-12-817562-0.00006-9
2. Abu Amra ES, Lashein FEDM, Seleem AA, Saleh MM. 2020; The protective role of olive oil against gibberellic acid-induced embryotoxicity at prenatal stages of mice. J Basic Appl Zool. 81:44. DOI: 10.1186/s41936-020-00182-y.
3. Soliman MM, Gaber A, Alsanie WF, Mohamed WA, Metwally MMM, Abdelhadi AA, Elbadawy M, Shukry M. 2022; Gibberellic acid-induced hepatorenal dysfunction and oxidative stress: mitigation by quercetin through modulation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic activities. J Food Biochem. 46:e14069. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.14069.
4. Alsemeh AE, Moawad RS, Abdelfattah ER. 2019; Histological and biochemical changes induced by gibberellic acid in the livers of pregnant albino rats and their offspring: ameliorative effect of Nigella sativa. Anat Sci Int. 94:307–23. DOI: 10.1007/s12565-019-00488-0. PMID: 31054114.
5. Schwechheimer C, Willige BC. 2009; Shedding light on gibberellic acid signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 12:57–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.09.004. PMID: 18930434.
6. Cox E, Takov V. Embryology, ovarian follicle development. In: Ackley WB, Adolphe TS, Aeby TC, Aeddula NR, Agadi S, Agasthi P, et al., editors. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
7. Cruz G, Fernandois D, Paredes AH. 2017; Ovarian function and reproductive senescence in the rat: role of ovarian sympathetic innervation. Reproduction. 153:R59–68. DOI: 10.1530/REP-16-0117. PMID: 27799628.
8. Sarraj MA, Drummond AE. 2012; Mammalian foetal ovarian development: consequences for health and disease. Reproduction. 143:151–63. DOI: 10.1530/REP-11-0247. PMID: 22106406.
9. Picut CA, Dixon D, Simons ML, Stump DG, Parker GA, Remick AK. 2015; Postnatal ovary development in the rat: morphologic study and correlation of morphology to neuroendocrine parameters. Toxicol Pathol. 43:343–53. DOI: 10.1177/0192623314544380. PMID: 25107574. PMCID: PMC4320985.
10. Picut CA, Remick AK, Asakawa MG, Simons ML, Parker GA. 2014; Histologic features of prepubertal and pubertal reproductive development in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol Pathol. 42:403–13. DOI: 10.1177/0192623313484832. PMID: 23599412.
11. Dunlop CE, Anderson RA. 2014; The regulation and assessment of follicular growth. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 244:13–7. discussion 17DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2014.936674. PMID: 25083887.
12. Sakr SA, Ibrahim SA. 2014; Effect of selenium on carbendazim - induced ovarian toxicity in albino rats: histomorphometric and histochemical study. Br Biomed Bull. 2:728–41.
13. Kushki D, Azarnia M, Gholami M. 2015; Antioxidant effects of selenium on seminiferous tubules of immature mice testis. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 17:e5188. DOI: 10.17795/zjrms-5188.
14. Charan J, Biswas T. 2013; How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 35:121–6. DOI: 10.4103/0253-7176.116232. PMID: 24049221. PMCID: PMC3775042.
15. Desouky M, Salah M, Abo Bakr AH, Tony H. 2019; Histological study of the protective effect of Selenium against Nephrotoxicity induced by Aspartame in adult male albino rats. Minia J Med Res. 30:1–12. DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.222761.
16. Sun W, Liu C, Luo J, Niu C, Wang J, Zheng F, Li Q. 2020; Residue analysis of gibberellic acid isomer (iso-GA3) in brewing process and its toxicity evaluation in mice. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 110:104514. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104514. PMID: 31705942.
17. Mohammad P, Zienab B, Hossein KJ. 2014; The effect of cinnamon extract on gonadotrop in changes (FSH & LH) in rats treated with gelophen. Biomed Pharmacol J. 7:363–7. DOI: 10.13005/bpj/499.
18. Bell MR. 2018; Comparing postnatal development of gonadal hormones and associated social behaviors in rats, mice, and humans. Endocrinology. 159:2596–613. DOI: 10.1210/en.2018-00220. PMID: 29767714. PMCID: PMC6692888.
19. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. 1979; Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 95:351–8. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90738-3. PMID: 36810.
20. Nishikimi M, Appaji N, Yagi K. 1972; The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 46:849–54. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-291X(72)80218-3. PMID: 4400444.
21. Góth L. 1991; A simple method for determination of serum catalase activity and revision of reference range. Clin Chim Acta. 196:143–51. DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(91)90067-M. PMID: 2029780.
22. Adeleke OS, Oyewopo AO, Falana BA, Akinyemi BR, Dare BJ, Adegoke AA, Ibiam V, Adeyemi BS, Ilesanmi DO. 2022; Immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, cytokeratin-18 and BCL-2 in Wistar rats testes treated with Rauwolfia vomitoria, Chlorpromazine and co-administration of reserpine, ascorbate and zinc. Res J Health Sci. 10:177–89. DOI: 10.4314/rejhs.v10i3.2.
23. Sen A, Prizant H, Light A, Biswas A, Hayes E, Lee HJ, Barad D, Gleicher N, Hammes SR. 2014; Androgens regulate ovarian follicular development by increasing follicle stimulating hormone receptor and microRNA-125b expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111:3008–13. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318978111. PMID: 24516121. PMCID: PMC3939860.
24. Khalaf HA, Elmorsy E, Mahmoud EM, Aggour AM, Amer SA. 2019; The role of oxidative stress in ovarian toxicity induced by haloperidol and clozapine-a histological and biochemical study in albino rats. Cell Tissue Res. 378:371–83. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-019-03067-x. PMID: 31342169.
25. Islam MR, Ichii O, Nakamura T, Irie T, Masum MA, Hosotani M, Otani Y, Elewa YHA, Kon Y. 2020; Unique morphological characteristics in the ovary of cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). J Reprod Dev. 66:529–38. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2020-061. PMID: 32879182. PMCID: PMC7768171.
26. Hua L, Zhao L, Mao Z, Li W, Li J, Jiang X, Che L, Xu S, Lin Y, Fang Z, Feng B, Wu D, Zhuo Y. 2021; Beneficial effects of a decreased meal frequency on nutrient utilization, secretion of luteinizing hormones and ovarian follicular development in gilts. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 12:41. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00564-4. PMID: 33820556. PMCID: PMC8022406.
27. Uslu B, Dioguardi CC, Haynes M, Miao DQ, Kurus M, Hoffman G, Johnson J. 2017; Quantifying growing versus non-growing ovarian follicles in the mouse. J Ovarian Res. 10:3. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0296-x. PMID: 28086947. PMCID: PMC5237173.
28. Sato J, Hashimoto S, Doi T, Yamada N, Tsuchitani M. 2014; Histological characteristics of the regression of corpora lutea in wistar hannover rats: the comparisons with sprague-dawley rats. J Toxicol Pathol. 27:107–13. DOI: 10.1293/tox.2013-0054. PMID: 25352711. PMCID: PMC4110934.
29. Dorostghoal M, Mahabadi MK, Adham S. 2011; Effects of maternal caffeine consumption on ovarian follicle development in wistar rats offspring. J Reprod Infertil. 12:15–22.
30. Ha B, Greenbaum JA, Shmiedel BJ, Singh D, Madrigal A, Valdovino-Gonzalez AG, White BM, Zapardiel-Gonzalo J, Altay G, McVicker G, Seumois G, Rao A, Kronenberg M, Vijayanand P, Peters B. 2019; Database of immune cell EQTLs, expression, epigenomics. J Immunol. 202(1 Suppl):131.18. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.202.Supp.131.18.
31. Guigon CJ, Magre S. 2006; Contribution of germ cells to the differentiation and maturation of the ovary: insights from models of germ cell depletion. Biol Reprod. 74:450–8. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.047134. PMID: 16339043.
32. Guo Y, Wang W, Chen Y, Sun Y, Li Y, Guan F, Shen Q, Guo Y, Zhang W. 2020; Continuous gibberellin A3 exposure from weaning to sexual maturity induces ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis by activating Fas-mediated death receptor signaling pathways and changing methylation patterns on caspase-3 gene promoters. Toxicol Lett. 319:175–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.11.012. PMID: 31733319.
33. Kiełczykowska M, Kocot J, Paździor M, Musik I. 2018; Selenium - a fascinating antioxidant of protective properties. Adv Clin Exp Med. 27:245–55. DOI: 10.17219/acem/67222. PMID: 29521069.
34. Kamel KI, Elkomy AE, El-Sbeiy ME. 2009; The androgenic action of gibberellic acid (GA) 3 on reproductive performance of New Zealand white rabbit bucks. World J Agric Sci. 5:40–8.
35. Elkomy AE, Elghalid OA, Elnagar SA. 2012; Evaluation of estroidogenic effect of gibberrellic acid in aging hens. Egypt J Anim Prod. 49:303–8.
36. Akintola TE, Akintunde JK, Eteng OE, Thomas FC, Adeleke JT. 2024; Selenium nanoparticles from Corchorus olitorius corrects polycystic ovarian syndrome by inhibition of hormonal imbalance, aromatase and cellular inflammation via hypothalamic-ovarian axis in female rat. Endocr Metab Sci. 16:100202. DOI: 10.1016/j.endmts.2024.100202.
37. Troudi A, Ben Amara I, Soudani N, Bouaziz H, Boudawara T, Zeghal N. 2011; Oxidative stress induced by gibberellic acid in bone of suckling rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 74:643–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.10.010. PMID: 21074855.
38. Khadrawy SM, Mohamed DS, Hassan RM, Abdelgawad MA, Ghoneim MM, Alshehri S, Shaban NS. 2023; Royal jelly and Chlorella vulgaris mitigate gibberellic acid-induced cytogenotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in rats via modulation of the PPARα/AP-1 signaling pathway and suppression of oxidative stress and inflammation. Foods. 12:1223. DOI: 10.3390/foods12061223. PMID: 36981150. PMCID: PMC10048508.
39. Nady Ouais G, Hassan DM. 2023; A comparative study on the hepatoprotective effect of selenium-nanoparticles and dates flesh extract on carbon tetrachloride induced liver damage in albino rats. Anat Cell Biol. 56:538–51. DOI: 10.5115/acb.23.101. PMID: 37696756. PMCID: PMC10714081.
40. Bayoumy AA, Abd El Salam MH, Ali AAER, El Shenawy RMED, Radwan OAELS, Magdi MM. 2023; Toxic effects of chronic use of gibberellic acid on liver and kidney and hematological study in male albino rats. Zagazig J Forensic Med Toxicol. 21:208–22. DOI: 10.21608/zjfm.2023.183873.1137.
41. Bushra RR, Shenouda MB. 2023; The possible protective role of N-acetylcysteine against gibberellic acid-induced lung structural changes of the adult albino rat. Egypt J Histol. 46:603–18.
42. Yan F, Zhao Q, Li Y, Zheng Z, Kong X, Shu C, Liu Y, Shi Y. 2022; The role of oxidative stress in ovarian aging: a review. J Ovarian Res. 15:100. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01032-x. PMID: 36050696. PMCID: PMC9434839.
43. Ravikumar S, Srikumar K. 2005; Metabolic dysregulation and inhibition of spermatogenesis by gibberellic acid in rat testicular cells. J Environ Biol. 26:567–9.
44. Shen W, Chen J, Yin J, Wang SL. 2016; Selenium protects reproductive system and foetus development in a rat model of gestational lead exposure. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 20:773–80.
45. Ceko MJ, Hummitzsch K, Hatzirodos N, Bonner WM, Aitken JB, Russell DL, Lane M, Rodgers RJ, Harris HH. 2015; X-ray fluorescence imaging and other analyses identify selenium and GPX1 as important in female reproductive function. Metallomics. 7:71–82. DOI: 10.1039/C4MT00228H. PMID: 25362850.
46. Ceko MJ, Hummitzsch K, Bonner WM, Aitken JB, Spiers KM, Rodgers RJ, Harris HH. 2015; Localization of the trace elements iron, zinc and selenium in relation to anatomical structures in bovine ovaries by X-ray fluorescence imaging. Microsc Microanal. 21:695–705. DOI: 10.1017/S1431927615000380. PMID: 25850937.
47. Grazul-Bilska AT, Caton JS, Arndt W, Burchill K, Thorson C, Borowczyk E, Bilski JJ, Redmer DA, Reynolds LP, Vonnahme KA. 2009; Cellular proliferation and vascularization in ovine fetal ovaries: effects of undernutrition and selenium in maternal diet. Reproduction. 137:699–707. DOI: 10.1530/REP-08-0375. PMID: 19129369.
48. Wang M, Li Y, Molenaar A, Li Q, Cao Y, Shen Y, Chen P, Yan J, Gao Y, Li J. 2021; Vitamin E and selenium supplementation synergistically alleviate the injury induced by hydrogen peroxide in bovine granulosa cells. Theriogenology. 170:91–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.04.015. PMID: 34000522.
49. Varlamova EG, Goltyaev MV, Rogachev VV, Gudkov SV, Karaduleva EV, Turovsky EA. 2023; Antifibrotic effect of selenium-containing nanoparticles on a model of TAA-induced liver fibrosis. Cells. 12:2723. DOI: 10.3390/cells12232723. PMID: 38067151. PMCID: PMC10706216.
50. Kreindl C, Soto-Alarcón SA, Hidalgo M, Riveros AL, Añazco C, Pulgar R, Porras O. 2024; Selenium compounds affect differently the cytoplasmic thiol/disulfide state in dermic fibroblasts and improve cell migration by interacting with the extracellular matrix. Antioxidants (Basel). 13:159. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13020159. PMID: 38397757. PMCID: PMC10886037.
51. Xu L, Lu Y, Wang N, Feng Y. 2022; The role and mechanisms of selenium supplementation on fatty liver-associated disorder. Antioxidants (Basel). 11:922. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050922. PMID: 35624786. PMCID: PMC9137657.
52. Islam MR, Ichii O, Nakamura T, Irie T, Shinohara A, Masum MA, Otani Y, Namba T, Chuluunbaatar T, Elewa YHA, Kon Y. 2021; Comparison of ovarian morphology and follicular disturbances between two inbred strains of cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). Animals (Basel). 11:1768. DOI: 10.3390/ani11061768. PMID: 34204816. PMCID: PMC8231567.
53. Ebrahim NA, Abdalla HA, Yassin NAE, Maghrabia AE, Morsy AI. 2023; Effect of Sofosbuvir on rats' ovaries and the possible protective role of vitamin E: biochemical and immunohistochemical study. Anat Cell Biol. 56:526–37. DOI: 10.5115/acb.23.079. PMID: 37654017. PMCID: PMC10714087.
54. Qazi IH, Angel C, Yang H, Pan B, Zoidis E, Zeng CJ, Han H, Zhou GB. 2018; Selenium, selenoproteins, and female reproduction: a review. Molecules. 23:3053. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123053. PMID: 30469536. PMCID: PMC6321086.
55. Franks S, Hardy K. 2018; Androgen action in the ovary. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 9:452. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00452. PMID: 30147675. PMCID: PMC6097027.
56. Laird M, Thomson K, Fenwick M, Mora J, Franks S, Hardy K. 2017; Androgen stimulates growth of mouse preantral follicles in vitro: interaction with follicle-stimulating hormone and with growth factors of the TGFβ superfamily. Endocrinology. 158:920–35. DOI: 10.1210/en.2016-1538. PMID: 28324051. PMCID: PMC5460807.
57. Juan CA, Pérez de la Lastra JM, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. 2021; The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and proteins) and induced pathologies. Int J Mol Sci. 22:4642. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094642. PMID: 33924958. PMCID: PMC8125527.
58. Basini G, Tamanini C. 2000; Selenium stimulates estradiol production in bovine granulosa cells: possible involvement of nitric oxide. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 18:1–17. DOI: 10.1016/S0739-7240(99)00059-4. PMID: 10701760.
Fig. 1
Bar charts show the serum LH, FSH, estrogen, and progesterone levels. (A) Values of the neonatal rats and (B) values of the pubertal rats in different study groups. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. LH, luteinizing hormone; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Fig. 2
Photomicrographs of H&E stain of the ovarian sections ×40 of the neonatal rats. Scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section of the control group shows a normal structure with coelomic epithelial layer (arrowhead), primordial follicles (arrow) consisting of oocytes surrounded by a single layer of squamous follicular cells and early primary follicle (elbow arrow). (B, C) Sections of GA3 treated group. (B) Shows dark stained and small coelomic epithelial layer (arrowhead), little number of primordial follicles (arrows) with irregular ovigerous cords with germ cell nests breakdown (*). (C) Damaged coelomic epithelial layer (arrowhead), multiple shapes ovigerous cords with collapsed germ cells (*) with pericellular spaces (arrow). (D) Section of the Se-protected group shows intact coelomic epithelial layer (arrowhead), a great number of primordial follicles (arrows), and the early primary follicle (elbow arrow) with little ovigerous cords with germ cell nests breakdown (*). (E, F) Bar charts show; (E) the average % number of the primordial and early primary ovarian follicles. (F) The average diameter of the primordial and early primary follicles. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Fig. 3
Photomicrographs of H&E stain of the ovarian sections of the control groups of the pubertal rats. (A) Scale bar=100 μm, (B–D) scale bar=25 μm. (A) Normal ovary shows normal follicular development ×10 with normal medulla (*). (B) Normal ovary ×40 showed normal primary follicles (PF) and secondary follicles (SF). (C) Well-developed Graafian follicle (GrF) ×40, with rounded oocyte (O), surrounded by zona pellucida (blue arrow), zona granulosa cells (ZG), theca externa cell layer (elbow arrow) and follicular antrum (FA). (D) Corpus luteum ×40, shows normal luteal cells (arrow). GF, growing follicle.
Fig. 4
Photomicrographs of H&E stain of the ovary of GA3-treated group of the pubertal rats. (A) Scale bar=100 μm, (B, C) scale bar=50 μm, (D) scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section ×10 shows little ovarian follicles. Darkly stained and shrinkage primary follicles (PF). Small secondary follicle (SF) and degenerated or atretic follicle (AF) with perifollicular cellular spaces (arrow) with severe medullary congestion and hemorrhage (star), vacuolations (arrowheads), and congested blood vessels (BV). (B) Section ×20; shows abnormal growing follicle (GF) with multiple layers of granulosa cells in zona granulosa (ZG) and shrinkage oocyte (O), completely degenerated cortical follicles (blue asterisk), necrosis (short arrows), and interstitial hemorrhage (*). (C) Section ×20; shows an abnormally elongated GF with lense-like oocyte (LO), small antrum (blue arrow), edematous cortical tissues (star), and excessive vacuolations (arrowheads). (D) Ovarian cortex ×40; shows an area of completely degenerated cortical follicles (blue asterisk), interstitial hemorrhage (*), with large necrotic area (long arrow).
Fig. 5
Photomicrographs of H&E stain of the ovary of the Se-protected group of the pubertal rats. (A) Scale bar=100 μm, (B–D) scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section ×10; shows nearly normal follicular development of growing follicle (GF), Graffian follicle (GrF), atretic follicle (AF), and corpus luteum (CL) with moderate medullary congestion (*). (B) Section ×40; shows a small primary follicle (PF), completely developed secondary follicle (SF), and GF with parenchymal tissue damage (blue asterisk). (C) Section ×40; shows GrF, the normal SF, and the AF with medullary congestion and hemorrhages (*). (D) Section ×40; CL showed normal luteal cells (arrow), vacuolated luteal cells (arrowhead), and slightly degenerated SF.
Fig. 6
Photomicrographs of Masson’s trichrome stain of the ovarian sections of neonatal rats. (A) Section of the control group shows normal ovarian cellular stroma with scattered small thin collagen fibers (stained green) only around blood vessels (arrows). (B) Section of the gibberellic acid-treated group shows moderate fibrosis and deposition of thin collagen fibers stained green (*) more evident around ovigerous cords and in the coelomic epithelial layer (arrows). (C) Section of the selenium-protected group shows mild fibrosis with deposition of thin collagen fibers stained green around primary follicles (arrow) and in interstitial tissues (*). Masson’s trichrome stain ×40; scale bar=25 μm.
Fig. 7
Photomicrographs of Masson’s trichrome stain of the ovarian sections of the pubertal rats. (A) Section of the control group shows normal ovarian cellular stroma with scattered deposition of thin collagen fibers-stained green color around blood vessels (BV) with no fibrosis. (B) Section of the gibberellic acid-treated group shows excessive fibrosis and deposition of thick collagen fibers more evident around BV, in interstitial tissues (*), and around the degenerated follicle (arrowheads). (C) Section of the selenium-protected group shows mild fibrosis with deposition of thin collagen fibers stained green around BV and in interstitial tissues (*). Masson’s trichrome stain ×40; scale bar=25 μm. F, mature follicle.
Fig. 8
Photomicrographs of the ovarian sections of neonatal rats stained with immuno-histochemical staining for Ki-67 ×40; scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section of the control group shows strong and discrete staining of the cell nuclei of the granulosa cell of the primordial follicles (short arrows) and early primary follicles (long arrow). (B) Section of the GA3-treated group shows faint staining Ki-67 in the germ cells in the ovigerous cords (long arrow) and mild stain in the follicular cells of the primordial follicle (short arrow). (C) Section of the Se-protected group shows moderate stain in the primordial follicles (short arrows) and strong stain in granulosa cells of early primary follicles (long arrow). (D) The bar chart shows the average % of granulosa Ki-67 positively stained cells of the different study groups. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Fig. 9
Photomicrographs of the ovarian sections of the pubertal rats stained with immuno-histochemical staining for Ki-67 ×40; scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section of the control group shows discrete positive brown staining of the cell nuclei of the follicular cells of the primary follicle (arrowhead) and strong brown staining of the granulosa cell Graafian follicle (GrF). (B) Section of the GA3-treated group shows faint brown staining of the follicular cells of the primary follicle (arrowhead) and mild staining of the granulosa cells of the atretic follicle (AF). (C) Section of the Se-protected group shows mild staining in the follicular cells of the primary follicle (arrowhead) but strong brown staining in the granulosa cells of the growing follicle (GF) and GrF. (D) The bar chart shows the average % of granulosa Ki-67 positively stained cells of the different study groups. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Fig. 10
Photomicrographs of immunohistochemical expression of androgen receptor (AR) in the ovarian sections of the neonatal rats of the studied groups, immunostaining ×40; scale bar=25 μm. (A) Section of the control group shows high expression of ARs in the granulosa cells of both primordial (short arrow) and early primary follicles (long arrow). (B) Section of the GA3-treated group shows mild expression in the granulosa cells of the primordial follicle (short arrow) and faint expression of broken germ cell nests (long arrow). (C) Section of the Se-protected group shows moderate expression in granulosa cells of the primordial follicle (short arrow), but high expression in early primary follicle (long arrow). (D) The bar chart shows the average area % of immune expression for ARs. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Fig. 11
Photomicrographs of immunohistochemical expression of androgen receptor (AR) in the ovarian sections of the pubertal rats, immunostaining ×40; scale bar=25 μm. (A, B) The control group shows high expression of ARs in the granulosa cells of primary follicles (arrowheads) and slightly and sporadic expression of the theca cells of the growing follicles (GF). (C) GA3-treated group shows mild AR expression in the primary follicles follicular cells (arrowheads) and very faint expression of granulosa cells of the atretic follicles (AF). (D) The Se-protected group shows high expression in granulosa cells of the primary follicle (arrowheads) and theca cells of the GF. (E) The bar chart shows the average area % of immune expression for AR. Values are presented as mean±SD. ANOVA followed Tukey’s multiple comparisons-test. GA3, gibberellic acid; Se, selenium. *P<0.05 vs. control group, ***P<0.001 vs. other groups.
Table 1
Hormonal concentrations in neonatal and pubertal rats across study groups
| LH (pg/ml) | FSH (pg/ml) | Estrogen (pg/ml) | Progesterone (pg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neonatal rats | ||||
| Control | 6.4±2.8 | 4.2±1.1 | 5.3±3.2 | 12.6±2.2 |
| GA3-treated | 1.1±0.0*** | 0.4±2.4*** | 0.8±1.4*** | 2.6±0.1*** |
| Se-protective | 5.0±1.0* | 3.4±0.1* | 4.8±2.6* | 10.0±2.1* |
| Pubertal rats | ||||
| Control | 124.8±32.7 | 31.2±7.2 | 44.3±2.9 | 91.6±8.3 |
| GA3-treated | 61.1±0.1*** | 14.6±3.3*** | 18.8±1.1*** | 35.0±2.1*** |
| Se-protective | 118.1±35.9 | 28.4±6.6* | 41.3±5.6 | 78.7±11.2* |
Table 2
Ovarian oxidative stress markers in neonatal and pubertal rats
| MDA (nmol/mg protein) | SOD (U/mg protein) | CAT (U/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neonatal rats | |||
| Control | 1.0±0.2 | 56.7±12.4 | 106.7±25.2 |
| GA3-treated | 6.3±1.4*** | 27.2±8.2*** | 76.6±12.7*** |
| Se-protective | 2.1±0.8* | 50.4±11.3*** | 97.3±15.6*** |
| Pubertal rats | |||
| Control | 16.3±1.7 | 226.0±17.4 | 547.0±22.6 |
| GA3-treated | 39.4±2.6*** | 119.0±9.7*** | 325.0±31.4*** |
| Se-protective | 21.4±2.4* | 197.0±11.5* | 487.0±18.2* |
Table 3
Ovarian follicle counts in pubertal rat study groups
| Groups | Ovarian follicles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Secondary | Growing | Graafian | Atretic | Corpus luteum | |
| Control | 1,645.0±164.0 | 568.0±66.0 | 155.0±35.0 | 131.0±42.0 | 12.0±3.0 | 1,147.0±51.0 |
| GA3-treated | 657.0±87.0*** | 197.0±22.0*** | 57.0±11.0*** | 38.0±8.0*** | 86.0±17.0*** | 435.0±66.0*** |
| Se-protected | 1,387.0±113.0* | 493.0±32.0* | 131.0±15.0* | 122.0±31.0* | 28.0±9.0** | 1,077.0±62.0* |
Table 4
Average ovarian follicle diameters in the pubertal rat study groups
| Groups | Follicular diameter (μm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Secondary | Growing | Graafian | Atretic | Corpus luteum | |
| Control | 19.2±2.1 | 57.34±1.2 | 137.6±43.2 | 460.3±89.3 | 355.2±92.4 | 2,654.5±643.0 |
| GA3-treated | 8.43±1.3*** | 28.46±7.2*** | 87.59±22.8*** | 178.4±45.7*** | 214.7±43.2*** | 937.7±246.0*** |
| Se-protected | 17.4±1.8 | 42.6±8.21* | 133.51±35.7 | 397.3±76.3* | 291.8±34.7** | 2,246.3±702.0* |



PDF
Citation
Print



XML Download