Journal List > Anat Cell Biol > v.58(3) > 1516092892

Azimi, Keshtparvar, Sadeghi, and Bahramian: Aberrant rib cage anatomy with false ribs attachment to the sternum: review of the literature focused on slipping ribs syndrome case reports

Abstract

The thoracic cage, formed by ribs and sternum, protects vital organs while enabling respiration. This review examines anatomical variations in rib-sternum attachments and their clinical significance through analysis of literature from 1993–2023. Variations, including bifid ribs (0.15%–3.4% prevalence) and cervical ribs (0.05%–3.0%), can lead to conditions like slipping rib syndrome (SRS). An extensive search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and specialized collections identified 17 comprehensive SRS case reports. Two independent reviewers evaluated these cases, revealing that rib-sternum morphological variations significantly impact respiratory biomechanics, with unstable costal cartilage identified as a primary cause of pain syndromes. These findings highlight the critical importance of recognizing aberrant rib-sternum anatomy for patient safety, particularly in thoracic procedures. Advanced imaging technologies have enhanced detection capabilities, allowing for improved surgical planning and patient management. This review underscores the value of both cadaveric and radiological examination in identifying these variations, and recommends further research to clarify their prevalence, functional implications, and clinical correlations to optimize treatment approaches and outcomes.

Introduction

The thoracic cage, consisting of the ribs and sternum, is crucial in protecting vital organs such as the heart and lungs and providing structural support to them [1]. The thoracic cage stabilizes the thoracic spine, leading to higher stiffness [2]. The anatomy of the thoracic cage (ribs and sternum) including the size and attachment of the ribs, provides structural support to the thoracic spine, contributing to its rigidity and stability [3]. During respiration, the muscle groups of the rib cage, such as the intercostal muscles and the diaphragm, work together to facilitate breathing by expanding the thorax and elevating the ribs [4]. The rib cage also acts as a protective framework for the insertion of respiratory muscles and contributes to the biomechanical integrity of the thoracic spine [5]. Furthermore, the rib cage is essential for maintaining chest wall dynamics and allowing normal respiration [6]. Additionally, surgical procedures such as endoscopic robotic surgery in children are essential.
The ribs are categorized into true, false, and floating ribs based on their attachment to the sternum. The first seven pairs of ribs, known as true ribs, have direct cartilaginous attachments to the sternum [7-9]. In contrast, the false ribs (8th to 10th pairs) are indirectly attached to the sternum via the costal cartilage (Fig. 1). The costal margin, formed by the fusion of the false ribs, is an important anatomical landmark [10-12]. The floating ribs (11th and 12th pairs) do not articulate with any skeletal structures and are not directly attached to the sternum [11].

Review

Importance of ribs attachment to the sternum for anatomical function and surgical procedure

The attachment of the ribs to the sternum is essential for maintaining the structural integrity of the thoracic cavity and facilitating respiratory movements. From a functional perspective, the central lower thorax (ribs 7–12) is where the diaphragm, a key respiratory muscle, is attached [13]. Furthermore, the anatomical concept of the retroperitoneal and retro-pleural spaces being continuous compartments, separated by the lateral attachments of the diaphragm to the 11th and 12th ribs and the L1 transverse process, highlights the importance of rib attachment to the sternum in surgical anatomy [14].
The thoracic cage and its components are also relevant in pain management and surgical procedures. The anterior abdominal wall is bounded superiorly by the costal margin, which is important for abdominal wall blocks for intra-abdominal surgery [15]. The lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) approach performed at the midaxillary line between the costal margin and iliac crest can consistently provide anterior abdomen analgesia [16]. Furthermore, the thoracic inter-fascial plane block involves identifying the pectoralis muscles, external intercostal muscle, and second rib which is crucial for multimodal analgesia after breast lumpectomy [17].
Surgical stabilization of rib fractures, particularly for the first seven ribs, is increasingly utilized in managing moderate to severely displaced rib fractures [18]. This procedure aims to restore pulmonary function and treat underlying thoracic injuries to avoid respiratory complications [19]. Additionally, the effectiveness of surgical fixation for flail chest and unifocal non-flail rib fractures has been a research subject, with some studies indicating positive outcomes regarding lung function and reduced hospital length of stay [20, 21]. The clinical relevance of rib attachment to the sternum is further underscored by the surgical management of conditions such as chest wall reconstruction, where custom-made, anatomically designed titanium ribs and sternum implants have been utilized to address skeletal defects [22].
The anatomical relationship between ribs and sternum, particularly false ribs, is crucial for surgical outcomes and post-operative recovery. Our narrative review analyzes published case reports on rib-sternum attachment variations, focusing on clinical presentations and diagnostic approaches. This synthesis provides enhanced surgical decision-making guidelines, especially for procedures [23].

Anatomical variation of the thoracic cage and ribs attachment

The thoracic cage represents a complex anatomical structure essential for protecting vital organs and facilitating respiratory mechanics. Understanding its anatomical variations is crucial for clinical practice, as these variations significantly impact patient care across medical specialties [24]. These variations encompass several key structural elements, including lateral costal vessels, rib attachments, and costal margins, which influence various medical procedures and conditions. Furthermore, these variations can lead to specific clinical conditions, such as slipping rib syndrome (SRS) [25] and thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), necessitating careful consideration in diagnostic approaches and treatment planning (Fig. 2). Recent advances in imaging technologies and surgical techniques have emphasized recognizing these anatomical differences, particularly in diagnostic procedures and surgical planning [22, 26]. Healthcare providers must maintain comprehensive knowledge of these variations for optimal outcomes, from routine procedures like thoracentesis to complex endoscopic robotic surgery, especially in pediatric patients. This growing understanding of thoracic variations continues to enhance patient care and treatment outcomes across medical disciplines [27].
As a glimpse to review other important anatomical variations, should be noted to bifid ribs and extra intercostal spaces. Anatomical variations of the thoracic cage present significant clinical considerations, particularly concerning bifid ribs and extra intercostal spaces. Bifid ribs, occurring in 0.15% to 3.4% of the population and accounting for up to 20% of congenital rib anomalies, develop during embryological growth when costal processes split abnormally [28, 29]. This condition manifests as a Y-shaped bifurcation, typically affecting the 3rd and 4th ribs, with separate costal cartilage attachments to the sternum. Clinical implications include altered respiratory mechanics, chronic discomfort, and increased fracture risk. Additionally, bifid ribs are associated with genetic conditions like Gorlin-Goltz syndrome, present in 26% of affected individuals [30]. Accurate diagnosis through computed tomography (CT) scanning is crucial, as these variations can be misinterpreted as fractures on standard radiographs [31]. Healthcare providers must maintain precise documentation for proper medical management and future interventions [32], particularly given that these variations often remain asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally during routine imaging.
Extra intercostal spaces and cervical ribs represent significant anatomical variations warranting clinical attention. Extra intercostal spaces develop through supernumerary ribs or abnormal rib segmentation during embryological development, influenced by genetic factors including HOX gene mutations [33]. The prevalence of cervical ribs ranges from 0.05% to 3.0% in the general population, with significant implications for TOS development [34]. These variations present crucial clinical considerations, particularly regarding variant neurovascular patterns necessitate modified surgical approaches [35]. Cervical ribs, developing from the 7th cervical vertebra’s costal elements, can compress the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels, leading to TOS [36]. Diagnosis requires comprehensive imaging, including CT scans with three-dimensional reconstruction and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT angiography [37]. Healthcare providers must maintain meticulous documentation and vigilance for neurological and vascular complications, ensuring appropriate management strategies for affected patients [38].
The variation in rib attachment to the sternum has implications for medical procedures and conditions. For instance, in chest wall reconstruction, the sternum, ribs, and chest wall can be reconstructed using specific materials and techniques [26]. Moreover, chondrosarcoma, the most common primary bone tumor involving the ribs and sternum, is thought to affect the ribs more frequently than the sternum [39, 40]. The clinical problem of false ribs attaching directly to the sternum is a significant anatomical concern. The false and floating ribs (8–12) do not attach directly to the sternum but are connected to the thoracic vertebrae. This anatomical variation can lead to complications such as SRS, which can cause severe abdominal pain due to the overriding of the 9th and 10th ribs [25], hypermobility, and injuries during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [25, 41, 42]. In contrast, the true ribs (1–7) attach directly to the sternum via the costal cartilage, providing stability and protection to the thoracic cavity [7, 8, 43, 44].

Slipping rib syndrome and correlation with rib attachment

SRS, also known as Cyriax syndrome, is a mechanical condition characterized by the hypermobility of the costal cartilages attached to the floating ribs, leading to lower chest or upper abdominal pain [10, 45]. This syndrome was first described by Cyriax in 1919 and is often overlooked, underdiagnosed, or misdiagnosed, making it a challenging condition to recognize [46]. The primary cause of SRS is the entrapment of the intercostal nerve due to the hypermobility of the costal cartilage, resulting in symptomatic impingement and subsequent pain in the lower thorax and upper abdomen (Table 1) [43, 45, 47-61].
The diagnosis of SRS can be made through a hooking maneuver, and when pain medication is not sufficient, resection of the rib can be performed [25]. The syndrome can be identified by performing a physical examination, which may reveal the characteristic clicking rib and rib-tip syndrome, leading to severe abdominal pain due to the overriding of the 9th and 10th rib [62]. Surgical interventions such as costal cartilage resection and rib plating have been explored as treatment options for SRS in adult patients [63]. Moreover, the correlation between SRS and rib attachment is evident in the anatomical description of the syndrome. The lower costal cartilages (ribs 8–10) are not directly connected to the sternum but attach to adjacent cartilages with a cartilaginous cap or fibrous band [63]. Additionally, the disruption of the inter-chondral fibrous attachments and the hypermobility of the anterior false ribs are key factors in the pathophysiology of SRS [10]. According to all the contents mentioned above, the way the ribs are connected to the sternum can affect respiratory functions, the anatomy of the human body, and the surgical process. Due to this issue, examining the structure of the chest and how to connect the false and even floating ribs has become one of the important variations studied (Fig. 3).

Incidence and prevalence rates from current literatures

SRS is a little-known and often misdiagnosed condition characterized by the hypermobility or instability of the 8th, 9th, and/or 10th ribs [64]. First described by the British orthopedist Henry Gauvain Stedman in 1918 and further characterized by James Cyriax in 1919, SRS occurs when the costal cartilage attachments between the ribs and sternum become stretched or torn, allowing the rib margins to slip and cause irritation and trauma to surrounding intercostal nerves [10, 45]. This leads to considerable chronic pain in the lower chest or upper abdomen that can be debilitating and severely impact quality of life [46, 63]. Despite being recognized in the medical literature for over a century, SRS continues to be an underdiagnosed condition, particularly among pediatric and adolescent populations where musculoskeletal complaints may be dismissed [12]. Contributing factors include poor awareness among clinicians and difficulty establishing the diagnosis, often requiring specialist imaging techniques like hooking maneuver radiographs or MRI [43]. As a result, patients with SRS frequently endure a lengthy diagnostic odyssey spanning multiple years and various misdiagnoses before receiving appropriate treatment [62].
Once diagnosed, the primary treatment goal is mechanical stabilization of the hypermobile rib segments to relieve nerve irritation. Both minimally invasive and open surgical techniques have been employed, including laparoscopic resection/realignment, vertical rib plating using bioabsorbable mesh, and complete surgical excision of ribs [61, 65]. While these interventions can successfully provide long-term pain relief, with an average duration of 2.2 years reported, the lack of procedure standardization and recurrence risk highlights the need for continued research and protocol development [43]. No collation or critical appraisal of the collective case report literature on SRS has been undertaken. Through a comprehensive review of published SRS case reports, this article aims to delineate the clinical spectrum of this little-known syndrome, explore diagnostic and treatment challenges, synthesize management outcomes, and extract learning points that can optimize future patient care. It represents the first review article focused specifically on SRS case reports with clinical manifestations.

Multimodal diagnostic paradigms in slipping rib syndrome

The costal and intercostal pathologies diagnosis necessitates a multifaceted approach, incorporating advanced imaging modalities and meticulous physical examinations. Dynamic ultrasonography has proven invaluable in visualizing costal subluxation and intercostal dynamics, offering a real-time assessment of rib mobility and potential impingement [44, 59, 60]. Multimodal imaging protocols, including plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT, are frequently employed to elucidate osseous abnormalities, cartilaginous defects, and soft tissue anomalies [43, 56, 58]. More advanced techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging and esophagogastroduodenoscopy may exclude alternative etiologies and assess for concomitant pathologies [25]. These modalities offer high-resolution visualization of the costal architecture and surrounding structures, enabling precise localization of anatomical aberrations.
The “hooking maneuver” test, a provocative physical examination technique, involves anterior traction on the costal margin to elicit characteristic symptomatology [50, 56, 57]. This maneuver is particularly efficacious in diagnosing SRS, as it reproduces the mechanical stress on the costal joints. Localized tenderness at specific anatomical landmarks, such as intercostal drain sites, can provide valuable diagnostic insights and guide further investigation [49].
The diagnostic algorithm typically initiates with clinical suspicion, progresses through a comprehensive physical examination, and culminates in dynamic imaging studies [61]. Functional assessments, such as the Valsalva maneuver and positional testing, may be incorporated to evaluate the impact of intrathoracic pressure changes and postural variations on symptom manifestation. This comprehensive, multimodal approach enables clinicians to differentiate between various costal and intercostal pathologies accurately (Fig. 4).

Search strategy and study selection

A comprehensive review of SRS case reports published between 1993 and 2023 was conducted in this retrospective study. The search encompassed multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and nine prominent case report repositories (detailed in Table 2). The investigation employed sophisticated search algorithms, combining key terms related to rib cage anatomical variations, false rib attachments to the sternum, and documented SRS incidents. Two independent reviewers scrutinized the findings, ultimately selecting 17 case reports. Any discrepancies in selection were resolved through collaborative discussion. The study focused exclusively on human subject case reports published in English, utilizing databases known for their extensive coverage of peer-reviewed medical literature across various specialties.

Direct false rib attachment to sternum - clinical and surgical implications

Direct attachment of false ribs to the sternum is an uncommon anatomical variant with clinical implications. The literature contains reports of similar anomalies, but available data is limited. For example, recently an investigation assessed the anatomy of the anterior ribs and the composition of the costal margin rib-sternum integrity through a standardized dissection on 30 cadavers (15 male, 15 female). This investigation revealed substantial variability in bilateral chest wall anatomy compared to normal presentation. Lower ribs (8–10) frequently showed atypical features like inter-chondral joints, cartilaginous unions, and morphological variation resulting in altered mechanics. Up to 83% featured anomalous connections between ribs 6 and 7 while 10% displayed direct sternum attachment of the 8th rib sans the 7th. Increased mobility of up to 90% was evident in the lowermost rib tips, correlating with a greater incidence of anatomical anomalies like hooked and floating ribs in these segments [66]. This anatomical variation on rib attachment can disturb kinematics, while fusion variants may alter physiology through effects on rib angulation and chest expansion. On the other hand, a pilot study by Laswi et al. [7] in 2022, revealed that the costal margins of 40 cadavers with roughly equal numbers of males and females had anatomical variation, especially for the 10th rib. The 9th rib is attached to the 8th rib via an inter-chondral cartilage in all specimens. Mobility and subluxation of the lower rib tips were observed frequently, especially for the 10th rib, which often presented as a free-floating rib not attached to the 9th rib 59% (47 of 80). Variations like hooking and medial/lateral subluxation patterns were also noted for the 10th rib, correlating with a lack of rib attachment [7]. Our find lacks functional correlation but asks whether fused false ribs impair ventilation or increase infection risk.
For chest wall surgeons treating diseases of the costal margin, appreciating anatomical variability is crucial. Internal subluxation and hooked tips of the 10th rib may predispose patients to slipped rib syndrome, which is influenced by hormones that increase joint laxity. This condition is further affected by the combination of joint laxity and increased range of motion [67-69]. Deviations from the classically depicted rib cage are frequent, particularly in the lower costal margins. Surgeons operating in this region should account for inter-chondral joints, cartilaginous unions between ribs, floating ribs, and atypical subluxation or hooking patterns that differ substantially from typical presentations. Further biomechanical and epidemiological research could prove insightful. Accurate anatomical knowledge is key for safe surgical access. Unanticipated rib fusions can surprise surgeons and endanger mediastinal structures. Preoperative CT assessment helps detect variants, enabling modifications to avoid complications. However, most procedures rely on classic anatomy. Rib-sternum anomalies may necessitate extra precautions, such as specialized instrumentation or limited resection. Our findings reinforce the value of careful dissection and adaptability when operating on the thorax. Pathologic conditions like slipped rib syndrome demonstrate clinical links between unstable cartilage and pain.
Though our variant likely does not cause similar symptoms due to direct fusion, the association warrants mention. Overall, appreciating normal and aberrant rib cage anatomy is valuable for surgeons and clinicians. With anomalies potentially existing in up to 30% of people, anatomical variations are clinically relevant.

Conclusion

Our literature review examined reported cases of unusual rib attachments to the sternum, specifically focusing on variations involving the 8th and 9th ribs. The medical literature provides limited documentation of these anatomical variations, which differ from typical human chest structures. Available research indicates these variations can impact breathing mechanics and create surgical challenges. Medical imaging and anatomical studies have proven essential in identifying these differences, though comprehensive data on their prevalence remains limited. Understanding these anatomical variations holds particular importance for medical professionals, especially those performing chest surgeries. While current literature provides valuable insights, more research is needed to understand these variations and potential health implications. This knowledge gap suggests an opportunity for further investigation to improve surgical planning and patient care in cases involving unusual rib-sternum connections.

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: HB. Illustrated the figures: SMA, FK. Designed the tables: ZS. Drafting of the manuscript: HB, SMA. Critical revision of the manuscript: SMA, FK, HB. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

References

1. Selvendran S, Cheluvappa R. 2023; Management pathways for traumatic Rib fractures-importance of surgical stabilisation. Healthcare (Basel). 11:1064. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081064. PMID: 37107898. PMCID: PMC10138113.
2. Spiegl UJ, Hölbing PL, Jarvers JS, Höh NVD, Pieroh P, Osterhoff G, Heyde CE. 2021; Midterm outcome after posterior stabilization of unstable Midthoracic spine fractures in the elderly. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 22:188. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04049-3. PMID: 33588814. PMCID: PMC7885444.
3. Liebsch C, Graf N, Appelt K, Wilke HJ. 2017; The rib cage stabilizes the human thoracic spine: an in vitro study using stepwise reduction of rib cage structures. PLoS One. 12:e0178733. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178733. PMID: 28570671. PMCID: PMC5453693.
4. Aktas G, Kollmeier JM, Joseph AA, Merboldt KD, Ludwig HC, Gärtner J, Frahm J, Dreha-Kulaczewski S. 2019; Spinal CSF flow in response to forced thoracic and abdominal respiration. Fluids Barriers CNS. 16:10. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-019-0130-0. PMID: 30947716. PMCID: PMC6449937.
5. Alvarez AG, Evans PL, Dovgalski L, Goldsmith I. 2021; Design, additive manufacture and clinical application of a patient-specific titanium implant to anatomically reconstruct a large chest wall defect. Rapid Prototyp J. 27:304–10. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-08-2019-0208.
6. Gravina PR, Chang DK, Mentz JA, Dibbs RP, Maricevich M. 2021; Sternal defect reconstruction using a double-barrel vascularized free fibula flap: a case report. Arch Plast Surg. 48:498–502. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2021.00682. PMID: 34583434. PMCID: PMC8490120.
7. Laswi M, Lesperance R, Kaye A, Bauman Z, Hansen A, Achay J, Kubalak S, Eriksson E. 2022; Redefining the costal margin: a pilot study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 93:762–6. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003792. PMID: 36121266.
8. Okuno K, Ishizu K, Matsubayashi J, Fujii S, Sakamoto R, Ishikawa A, Yamada S, Yoneyama A, Takakuwa T. 2019; Rib cage morphogenesis in the human embryo: a detailed three-dimensional analysis. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 302:2211–23. DOI: 10.1002/ar.24226. PMID: 31344324.
9. Foulad A, Wong B. Costal cartilage harvest and preparation for rhinoplasty. Papel ID, Frodel JL, Holt GR, Larrabee WF, Nachlas NE, Park SS, Sykes JM, Toriumi DM. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4th ed. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2016.
10. Chhipa I, Cheesman Q. 2020; Slipping rib syndrome in an adolescent wrestler. BMJ Case Rep. 13:e232514. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232514. PMID: 31932462. PMCID: PMC7021148.
11. Kim WS, Kim KH. 2021; Percutaneous osteoplasty for painful bony lesions: a technical survey. Korean J Pain. 34:375–93. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.375. PMID: 34593656. PMCID: PMC8494954.
12. Squillaro AI, Sanders K, Onwubiko C, Chang CJ, Kim S. 2020; Laparoscopic treatment of slipping rib syndrome in pediatric patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 30:1253–6. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0314. PMID: 32955995.
13. García-Martínez D, Torres-Tamayo N, Torres-Sánchez I, García-Río F, Rosas A, Bastir M. 2018; Ribcage measurements indicate greater lung capacity in Neanderthals and Lower Pleistocene hominins compared to modern humans. Commun Biol. 1:117. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-018-0125-4. PMID: 30271997. PMCID: PMC6123625.
14. Xu DS, Walker CT, Farber SH, Godzik J, Gandhi SV, Koffie RM, Turner JD, Uribe JS. 2022; Surgical anatomy of minimally invasive lateral approaches to the thoracolumbar junction. J Neurosurg Spine. 36:937–44. DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21793. PMID: 34972082.
15. Onwochei DN, Børglum J, Pawa A. 2018; Abdominal wall blocks for intra-abdominal surgery. BJA Educ. 18:317–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.07.002. PMID: 33456796. PMCID: PMC7808037.
16. Li X, Xu ZZ, Li XY, Jiang TT, Lin ZM, Wang DX. 2019; The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 19:186. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0850-3. PMID: 31627728. PMCID: PMC6800496.
17. Kim Y, Oh C, Youn S, Yun S, Park H, Lee W, Kim YH, Ko Y, Hong B. 2019; Thoracic interfascial plane block for multimodal analgesia after breast lumpectomy. Anesth Pain Med. 14:222–9. DOI: 10.17085/apm.2019.14.2.222.
18. Hung GSL, Gardiner B, Patel BM. 2021; Evaluation of patient information material in the consent process for surgical stabilization of rib fractures. J Trauma Nurs. 28:310–5. DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000601. PMID: 34491948.
19. Sawyer E, Wullschleger M, Muller N, Muller M. 2022; Surgical rib fixation of multiple rib fractures and flail chest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 276:221–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.055. PMID: 35390577.
20. Fokin AA, Wycech J, Weisz R, Puente I. 2019; Outcome analysis of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 33:3–8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001330. PMID: 30277986. PMCID: PMC7002076.
21. Jiang Y, Wang X, Teng L, Liu Y, Wang J, Zheng Z. 2019; Comparison of the effectiveness of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for multiple rib fractures accompanied with pulmonary contusion. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 25:185–91. DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00295. PMID: 31068507. PMCID: PMC6698715.
22. Goldsmith I, Evans PL, Goodrum H, Warbrick-Smith J, Bragg T. 2020; Chest wall reconstruction with an anatomically designed 3-D printed titanium ribs and hemi-sternum implant. 3D Print Med. 6:26. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-020-00079-0. PMID: 32975713. PMCID: PMC7519505.
23. Illig KA, Donahue D, Duncan A, Freischlag J, Gelabert H, Johansen K, Jordan S, Sanders R, Thompson R. 2016; Reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 64:e23–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.039. PMID: 27565607.
24. Nakazawa S, Kawatani N, Obayashi K, Ohtaki Y, Ito T, Yajima T, Shirabe K. 2022; Clinical and anatomical features of the lateral costal artery and vein. Sci Rep. 12:10589. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14318-3. PMID: 35732684. PMCID: PMC9217911.
25. Khan NAJ, Waseem S, Ullah S, Mehmood H. 2018; Slipping rib syndrome in a female adult with longstanding intractable upper abdominal pain. Case Rep Med. 2018:7484560. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7484560. PMID: 30057619. PMCID: PMC6051074.
26. Sanna S, Brandolini J, Pardolesi A, Argnani D, Mengozzi M, Dell'Amore A, Solli P. 2017; Materials and techniques in chest wall reconstruction: a review. J Vis Surg. 3:95. DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.06.10. PMID: 29078657. PMCID: PMC5638032.
27. Onan B, Aydin U, Kadirogullari E, Onan IS, Sen O. 2019; Totally endoscopic robotic-assisted cardiac surgery in children. Artif Organs. 43:342–9. DOI: 10.1111/aor.13357. PMID: 30207600.
28. Dhana LV, Arun KKR, Satish KS, Suresh KT, Suba AK. 2014; Multiple bifid ribs: a case report. J Evolut Med Dent Sci. 3:3883.
29. Andrea A, Tardieu G, Fisahn C, Iwanaga J, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. 2016; Bifid ribs: a comprehensive review. Anatomy. 10:221–7. DOI: 10.2399/ana.16.034.
30. Ponti G, Ruini C, Pastorino L, Loschi P, Pecchi A, Malagoli M, Mandel VD, Boano R, Conti A, Pellacani G, Tomasi A. 2014; Skeletal and cranio-facial signs in Gorlin syndrome from ancient Egypt to the modern age: sphenoid asymmetry in a patient with a novel PTCH1 mutation. Future Oncol. 10:917–25. DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.2. PMID: 24941978.
31. Kumar N, Guru A, Patil J, Ravindra S, Badagabettu SN. 2013; Additional circular intercostal space created by bifurcation of the left 3rd rib and its costal cartilage: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 7:6. DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-6. PMID: 23298541. PMCID: PMC3560263.
32. Tsoucalas G, Razos K, Panagouli E, Krioni E, Thomaidis V, Fiska A. 2019; The rare skeletal variation of the congenital bifid rib. Arch Balk Med Union. 54:372–4. DOI: 10.31688/ABMU.2019.54.2.25.
33. Roy S, Jain N, Narang E, Singh J. 2022; Cervical rib: a rare differential of a supraclavicular mass. Ear Nose Throat J. 101:192–3. DOI: 10.1177/0145561320950495. PMID: 32791903.
34. Sokhal BS, Mohammadi L, Weerathunga J, Rajagopalan S. 2022; Acute cerebellar ischaemic stroke secondary to arterial thoracic outlet syndrome. J Surg Case Rep. 2022:rjac296. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjac296. PMID: 35769312. PMCID: PMC9230701.
35. Umar F, Khan BH, Naseer MZ, Hussain H. 2022; Transaxillary approach for thoracic outlet syndrome case report. Pak J Med Health Sci. 16:437. DOI: 10.53350/pjmhs22168437.
36. Chandak S, Kumar A. 2014; Usefulness of 3D CT in diagnosis of cervical rib presenting as supraclavicular swelling of short duration. J Clin Diagn Res. 8:RD01–2. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7977.4374. PMID: 24995230. PMCID: PMC4080051.
37. Viertel VG, Intrapiromkul J, Maluf F, Patel NV, Zheng W, Alluwaimi F, Walden MJ, Belzberg A, Yousem DM. 2012; Cervical ribs: a common variant overlooked in CT imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 33:2191–4. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3143. PMID: 22790240. PMCID: PMC7965591.
38. Jones MR, Prabhakar A, Viswanath O, Urits I, Green JB, Kendrick JB, Brunk AJ, Eng MR, Orhurhu V, Cornett EM, Kaye AD. 2019; Thoracic outlet syndrome: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pain Ther. 8:5–18. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-019-0124-2. PMID: 31037504. PMCID: PMC6514035.
39. Lenze U, Angelini A, Pohlig F, Knebel C, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Mavrogenis AF, Theisen J, R VONE-R, Ruggieri P. 2020; Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: a review of 53 cases from two institutions. Anticancer Res. 40:1519–26. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14097. PMID: 32132052.
40. Laitinen MK, Kask G, Laurila K, Tukiainen EJ, Rönty M, Haapamäki V, Salo JTK. 2023; Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: a single institution review of 50 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 90:151–5. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003334. PMID: 36688858.
41. Beydilli H, Balci Y, Erbas M, Acar E, Isik S, Savran B. 2016; Liver laceration related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Turk J Emerg Med. 16:77–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2015.01.002. PMID: 27896328. PMCID: PMC5121265.
42. Prins JTH, Wijffels MME. 2021; Operative treatment of multiple costochondral dislocations in a patient with severe rib fractures and a flail chest following trauma. BMJ Case Rep. 14:e239511. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239511. PMID: 33653849. PMCID: PMC7929885.
43. Jung J, Lee M, Choi D. 2020; Twelfth rib syndrome: a case report. J Int Med Res. 48:300060520952651. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520952651. PMID: 32883133. PMCID: PMC7479855.
44. Schowalter S, Le B, Creps J, McInnis KC. 2022; Rib fractures in professional baseball pitchers: mechanics, epidemiology, and management. Open Access J Sports Med. 13:89–105. DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S288882. PMID: 36248020. PMCID: PMC9563740.
45. Mekhail FG, Montgomery JR, Spicer PJ. 2022; Slipping rib syndrome presentation in a young woman. Radiol Case Rep. 17:4376–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.08.076. PMID: 36188090. PMCID: PMC9520504.
46. Bong J, Healey D. 2022; Slipping rib syndrome. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 66:409–10. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13247. PMID: 34053201.
47. Park J, Kim SJ, Kim H, Jung H, Shin HY. 2023; Ultrasound diagnosis and treatment of intractable anterior chest pain from golf - a case report. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 18:65–9. DOI: 10.17085/apm.22182. PMID: 36746904. PMCID: PMC9902635.
48. Spence EK, Rosato EF. 1983; The slipping rib syndrome. Arch Surg. 118:1330–2. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390110076016. PMID: 6639342.
49. Conacher ID, Doig JC, Rivas L, Pridie AK. 1993; Intercostal neuralgia associated with internal mammary artery grafting. Anaesthesia. 48:1070–1. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07530.x. PMID: 8285328.
50. Mooney DP, Shorter NA. 1997; Slipping rib syndrome in childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 32:1081–2. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90403-6. PMID: 9247238.
51. Boyle JJ. 1999; Is the pain and dysfunction of shoulder impingement lesion really second rib syndrome in disguise? Two case reports. Man Ther. 4:44–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1356-689X(99)80009-5. PMID: 10463021.
52. Meuwly JY, Wicky S, Schnyder P, Lepori D. 2002; Slipping rib syndrome: a place for sonography in the diagnosis of a frequently overlooked cause of abdominal or low thoracic pain. J Ultrasound Med. 21:339–43. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.3.339. PMID: 11883545.
53. Peterson LL, Cavanaugh DG. 2003; Two years of debilitating pain in a football spearing victim: slipping rib syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 35:1634–7. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000089249.00206.04. PMID: 14523297.
54. Udermann BE, Cavanaugh DG, Gibson MH, Doberstein ST, Mayer JM, Murray SR. 2005; Slipping rib syndrome in a collegiate swimmer: a case report. J Athl Train. 40:120–2.
55. Fu R, Iqbal CW, Jaroszewski DE, St Peter SD. 2012; Costal cartilage excision for the treatment of pediatric slipping rib syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 47:1825–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.06.003. PMID: 23084191.
56. Pirali C, Santus G, Faletti S, De Grandis D. 2013; Botulinum toxin treatment for slipping rib syndrome: a case report. Clin J Pain. 29:e1–3. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318278d497. PMID: 23328342.
57. Migliore M, Signorelli M, Caltabiano R, Aguglia E. 2014; Flank pain caused by slipping rib syndrome. Lancet. 383:844. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60156-2. PMID: 24581669.
58. van Delft EA, van Pul KM, Bloemers FW. 2016; The slipping rib syndrome: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 23:23–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.04.009. PMID: 27082995. PMCID: PMC4855817.
59. Hussain Z, Khan JA, Murtaza S. 2018; Nanotechnology: an emerging therapeutic option for breast cancer. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 28:163–75. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2018022771. PMID: 30055543.
60. Fares MY, Dimassi Z, Baydoun H, Musharrafieh U. 2019; Slipping rib syndrome: solving the mystery of the shooting pain. Am J Med Sci. 357:168–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.10.007. PMID: 30509726.
61. McMahon LE. 2020; Recurrent slipping rib syndrome: initial experience with vertical rib stabilization using bioabsorbable plating. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 30:334–7. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0519. PMID: 31895629.
62. Mazzella A, Fournel L, Bobbio A, Janet-Vendroux A, Lococo F, Hamelin EC, Icard P, Alifano M. 2020; Costal cartilage resection for the treatment of slipping rib syndrome (Cyriax syndrome) in adults. J Thorac Dis. 12:10–6. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.83. PMID: 32055418. PMCID: PMC6995823.
63. Ninad N, Christie DB. 2023; Minimally invasive realignment for slipping rib syndrome. Am Surg. 89:3246–7. DOI: 10.1177/00031348231157893. PMID: 36797834.
64. Romano R, Gavezzoli D, Gallazzi MS, Benvenuti MR. 2022; A new sign of the slipping rib syndrome? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 34:331–2. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab252. PMID: 34557920. PMCID: PMC8766200.
65. Hansen AJ, Toker A, Hayanga J, Buenaventura P, Spear C, Abbas G. 2020; Minimally invasive repair of adult slipped rib syndrome without costal cartilage excision. Ann Thorac Surg. 110:1030–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.081. PMID: 32330472. PMCID: PMC7953350.
66. Patel A, Privette A, Bauman Z, Hansen A, Kubalak S, Eriksson E. 2023; Anatomy of the anterior ribs and the composition of the costal margin: a cadaver study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 95:875–9. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004115. PMID: 37982795.
67. Foley CM, Sugimoto D, Mooney DP, Meehan WP 3rd, Stracciolini A. 2019; Diagnosis and treatment of slipping rib syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 29:18–23. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000506. PMID: 29023277.
68. Van Tassel D, McMahon LE, Riemann M, Wong K, Barnes CE. 2019; Dynamic ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected slipping rib syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 48:741–51. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-018-3133-z. PMID: 30612161.
69. McMahon LE. 2018; Slipping rib syndrome: a review of evaluation, diagnosis and treatment. Semin Pediatr Surg. 27:183–8. DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.05.009. PMID: 30078490.

Fig. 1
Slipping rib syndrome occurs when intercostal cartilage between the ribs weakens and allows movement.
acb-58-3-334-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Three categories of the most important anatomical variations related to the ribs with crucial clinical considerations.
acb-58-3-334-f2.tif
Fig. 3
The clinical signs and manifestations of the disease, as identified through the reviewed literature, include the five most common symptoms in patients: (1) pain during movement/activity (10 studies); (2) right/left-sided chronic chest pain (8 studies); (3) intermittent symptom patterns (7 studies); (4) popping/clicking sensations (4 studies); and (5) breathing affected symptoms (3 studies).
acb-58-3-334-f3.tif
Fig. 4
Based on a review of 17 case report articles, five commonly used diagnostic methods for identifying the disease as shown in the chart. These methods are as follows: hooking maneuver test (4 studies), ultrasound examination (5 studies), computed tomography (CT) scan imaging (5 studies), physical assessment methods (8 studies), and Chest X-ray imaging (9 studies).
acb-58-3-334-f4.tif
Table 1
Slipping rib syndrome and correlation with rib attachment focused on clinical manifestations and diagnostic tests
Author Year of publication Clinical manifestations (signs and symptoms) Diagnosis tests
Spence and Rosato [48] 1983 Rib movement triggered symptoms
Right quadrant pain persisted
Torso movements increased discomfort
Pain lasted twenty-three years
Position changes aggravated condition
Subcostal pain occurred intermittently
Activity worsened the patient’s symptoms
Pain affecting the right side
Movement exacerbated the condition
Physical assessment
Conacher et al. [49] 1993 Direct trauma causes damage
Diathermy interrupts nerve function
Stretching produces neurologic symptoms
Pain demonstrates neurogenic pattern
Physical assessment
Mooney and Shorter [50] 1997 Pain mimics digestive issues
Movement worsens costal symptoms
Cartilage contacts iliac crest
Physical tenderness locally present
Hooking maneuver
Boyle [51] 1999 Thoracic outlet causes heaviness
Grip weakness becomes apparent
Clicking sensation in ribs
Shoulder pain prominently
Arm positioning worsens symptoms
Second rib affects spine
Neurovascular compression occurs frequently
Shoulder discomfort persists noticeably
Physical assessment
Meuwly et al. [52] 2002 8th rib slips repeatedly
Valsalva triggers rib movement
Pain occurs during slippage
Abdominal contractions cause displacement
Real-time ultrasound
Abdominal ultrasound
Abdominal high-frequency transducer
Valsalva maneuver
Peterson and Cavanaugh [53] 2003 Patient experienced thoracic trauma
Vital signs showed hypotension
Left thoracic wall painful
Lateral tenderness was present
Consciousness remained stable unchanged
Lower extremities functioned normally
Breathing showed no distress
Reddened area appeared posteriorly
Chest X-ray imaging
Udermann et al. [54] 2005 The patient experienced sleep disturbances
Left rib pain present
Back discomfort was noted similarly
Slouching provided comfort and relief
Compression testing
Valsalva maneuver
Multiple imaging
Bone scan analysis
Fu et al. [55] 2012 Unilateral chest pain
Resection radiating to the left arm
Chest X-ray imaging
Pirali et al. [56] 2013 Pain occurred intermittently yearly
Episodes showed distinct patterns
Sharp pain preceded aching
Left-side symptoms predominated
Hooking maneuver
Patient assumes lateral position
Fingers hook costal margin
Anterior pulling tests ribs
Migliore et al. [57] 2014 Chronic pain under the lower ribs Hooking maneuver
van Delft et al. [58] 2016 Pain reproduced during examination
Right lower ribs persistent “popping” sensations
Chest X-ray imaging
Bone scan test
Hussain et al. [59] 2018 The lower chest pain
Left side predominantly involved
Symptoms waxed and waned
Movement aggravated patient discomfort
Chest X-ray imaging
Chest ultrasound diagnostic
Fares et al. [60] 2019 Breathing triggered intense pain
Discomfort resolved without treatment
Sliding sensation accompanied by pain
Thoracic popping feelings observed
Chest X-ray imaging
CT Scan imaging
Physical assessment
Jung et al. [43] 2020 Right side chronic pain
Symptoms occurred intermittently
Multiple locations of chronic pain
Both rib cages involved
Right side chronic pain
Symptoms occurred intermittently
Walking worsened pain condition
CT scan imaging
Physical assessment
Chest X-ray imaging
Abdominal CT scan imaging
Bone scan test
Chhipa and Cheesman [10] 2020 Chest pain Hooking maneuver
Physical assessment
McMahon [61] 2020 Flexible 8th-9th ribs present
8th-9th cartilages show movement
Rib cartilages enable mobility
Chest ultrasound
Physical assessment
Mekhail et al. [45] 2022 Right upper quadrant chronic pain (duration: 3 years)
Pain exacerbation with heavy lifting
Right lower ribs persistent “popping” sensations
Grinding sensation in ribs
Clicking sensation in ribs
CT scan
HIDA scan
Ultrasound
Laparoscopy
Chest ultrasound diagnostic with a dynamic maneuver

CT, computed tomography; HIDA, hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid.

Table 2
Database name
1 PubMed Central
2 BioMed Central Case Reports
3 BMJ Case Reports
4 Journal of Medical Case Reports
5 The New England Journal of Medicine
6 Database of Open Access Clinical Cases
7 ScienceDirect
8 Oxford Medical Case Reports
9 JAMA Network Open databases
TOOLS
Similar articles