Abstract
Several molecules in human body exhibit light-dependent diurnal expression rhythms, and their disruption impairs physiological functions and health. Normal aging alters these rhythms, contributing to aging processes and age-related brain disorders. Chronic low-grade inflammation is a hallmark of aging (inflammaging), and age-related changes in the diurnal expression of proinflammatory cytokines have been reported in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and peripheral blood. However, it remains unclear which genes show diurnal expression changes in brain with the SCN regions removed (extra-SCN) and whether these changes are reflected in peripheral blood. To address this, we analyzed the diurnal expression of genes in extra-SCN brain regions and cytokines in the peripheral blood of young and aged male and female mice. Samples were collected during the light (10 AM) and the dark (10 PM) phases and analyzed using RNA sequencing and cytokine array analysis. In the aged brain, the number of genes displaying diurnal variation in expression was reduced, whereas genes related to inflammation and immune responses, especially Ccl21, were upregulated regardless of phase, suggesting age-associated immune dysregulation. However, peripheral blood levels of CCL21 protein did not differ between age groups. Instead, CXCL13 and IGFBP1 showed age-related diurnal alterations in the blood, but their expression patterns in the aged brain differed from those in the blood. These findings indicate that diurnal expression of inflammation-related molecules is altered with aging in both the brain and blood, with differences observed. These diurnal changes may contribute to the underlying mechanism of inflammaging and age-related diseases.
In mammals, various physiological functions, including the sleep/wake cycle and the release of hormones, exhibit diurnal rhythms according to the light and dark phases. These rhythms are regulated by the central clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the brain, which synchronizes the rhythms of the brain and peripheral organs in response to light [1]. The importance of diurnal rhythms in human health has been well demonstrated in metabolic diseases and cancers in individuals with frequent shift work and jet lag [2]. In addition, disruption of the diurnal rhythm has been found to impair cognitive function and increase the risk of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [3-5].
During normal aging, diurnal rhythms of waking activity, energy metabolism, and hormone release decrease in amplitudes and undergo phase shifts [6]. At the molecular level, the expression levels of core clock genes, brain and muscle ARNT-Like 1 (Bmal1), Clock, Period 1 (Per1), and/or Per2, are reduced or altered with aging in both the SCN and extra-SCN sites, such as the hippocampus and cortex [7-15]. These molecular changes have been implicated in aging-related alterations in diurnal rhythms.
Core clock proteins, known transcription factors, regulate the expression of numerous genes (clock-controlled genes) in both a diurnal and tissue-specific manner [16,17]. In the cerebral cortex of mammals, 5%‒15% of genes exhibit diurnal variations in expression [18]. For example, elevated gene expression of proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor α in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, and cortex of male rats was detected during sleep periods [19,20]. When compared with young male mice, older mice exhibited altered diurnal patterns of IL-1β and IL-1 receptor type I expression in the SCN, suggesting a role of the IL-1 system in declining clock function with age [21]. Considering that a chronic low-grade inflammatory state is one of the hallmarks of brain aging (inflammaging) [22], genes related to inflammation and immune responses may exhibit age-related altered diurnal expression in extra-SCN regions. However, genes undergoing altered diurnal expression in the brain other than those in the SCN with aging are yet to be clarified. To address this, we analyzed gene expression in the brain of young and aged male and female mice during the light and dark phases, and then performed cytokine array analysis of peripheral blood to determine whether age-related altered diurnal expression of molecules in the brain is similar to that in the periphery.
Male and female C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from Orient Bio Inc. and maintained in a specific pathogen-free animal facility at Ewha Womans University Medical College under a 12-h light/dark cycle (8:00 AM, lights on; 8:00 PM, lights off) at 22°C ± 2°C. Experiments were performed using young adult mice (2.5 months old), and aged mice (20 months old). The blood and brains of the mice were collected under terminal sodium pentobarbital anesthesia (120 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) at 10:00 and 22:00 h for the light and dark phases, respectively. For sampling in the dark phase, the mice were anesthetized in the dark, and the blood and brain were obtained under light. Following cardiac puncture, the blood was collected in heparin-coated tubes and centrifuged for 15 min at 4,000 rpm; the separated plasma layer was transferred into a new tube and stored at −80°C. Each hemispheric brain was obtained after removal of bilateral SCN regions, which were located just above the optic chiasm [23], in order to examine diurnal gene and protein expressions in extra-SCN sites, and then stored at −80°C until analyses.
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Medical College of Ewha Womans University (approval number: EUM18-0419) and conformed to the international guidelines for the ethical use of experimental animals.
RNA isolation: Total RNA was purified using TRIzol reagent (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA quality (greater than 8 by an RNA integrity value) was assessed using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Nano Chip (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), and RNA quantification (> 20 μg of total RNA and > 2 of 260/280) was achieved using ND-2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
Library preparation and sequencing: For the control and test RNAs, the construction of library was performed using QuantSeq 3′ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ebiogen Inc.). In brief, each 500 ng total RNA were prepared and an oligo-dT primer containing an Illumina-compatible sequence at its 5′ end was hybridized to the RNA and reverse transcription was then performed. After degradation of the RNA template, second strand synthesis was initiated by a random primer containing an Illumina-compatible linker sequence at its 5′ end. The double-stranded library was purified by using magnetic beads in order to remove all of the reaction components. The library was amplified to add the complete adapter sequences required for cluster generation. The finished library is purified from polymerase chain reaction components. High-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina, Inc.).
Data analysis: QuantSeq 3′ mRNA Seq reads were aligned using Bowtie2 [24]. Bowtie2 indices were either generated from genome assembly sequence or the representative transcript sequences for aligning to the genome and transcriptome (mm10 mouse reference genome from University of California Santa Cruz). The alignment file was used for assembling transcripts, estimating their abundances and detecting differential expression of genes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined based on counts from unique alignments using coverage in Bedtools [25]. The read count data were processed based on the trimmed mean of M values normalization in the calcNormFactors method using EdgeR within R (R development Core Team, 2016) using Bioconductor [26]. Gene classification was based on searches performed using by DAVID (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) and Medline databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Fold changes were analyzed as the ratio of normalized protein-coding gene expression values (log2) between brains in the light and dark phases or between young and aged brains in the corresponding phase (log2 > 4). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 using the t-test functions in R. Data mining and graphic visualization were performed using an Excel-based Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis (ExDEGA) tool (Ebiogen Inc.).
Changes in the levels of cytokines and chemokines in the peripheral blood during the light and dark phases were examined using a Proteome Profiler Mouse XL Cytokine Array Kit (R&D Systems), including 111 proteins, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins in the membranes were visualized using Western Blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and ImageJ (version 1.37, National Institutes of Health) was used to measure the pixel intensity of each captured antibody spot. Density was corrected for background intensity and normalized to the positive control on the membrane. Proteins with < 10-pixel density int both light and dark phases were excluded, given that the weak densities made it difficult to determine altered expression.
Proteins from the hemispheres excluding SCN regions were isolated, and 50 μg of protein was loaded, electrophoresed, and transferred to trans-Blot TurboTM Transfer membranes (Bio-Rad) as described previously [27]. Membranes were blocked for 1 h in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 10% dry milk, followed by overnight incubation with primary antibodies against flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO) 2 (1:1,000; Proteintech), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) 3α (1:1,000; Proteintech), indolamine N methyltransferase (INMT, 1:1,000; Proteintech), insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP) 1 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 13 (1:500; LS Bio). After washing, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using Western Blotting Luminol Reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For quantification, the density of each band was normalized to that of actin using ImageJ (version 1.378, National Institutes of Health).
Sections of brain tissues were obtained and prepared as previously described [28]. Sections were incubated in TBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 5% normal serum, and 1% bovine serum albumin for 1 h and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies against FMO2 (1:200) or IGFBP1 (1:500). The next day, sections were incubated in secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (1:1,000; Vector Laboratories, Inc.) for 1 h. Sections were washed with TBS for all steps. Sections were then mounted with the Vectashield mounting medium containing the nuclear stain 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories, Inc.), and fluorescence images were obtained using a confocal microscope (LSM5 PASCAL; Carl Zeiss).
Data of protein expression are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The distribution of data was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. Comparisons between the two groups were performed using the unpaired Student’s t-test (cytokine array). Comparisons between more than two groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (Western blot analysis). Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism9.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
To identify genes exhibiting altered diurnal expression with aging, the brains excluding SCN regions of young and aged mice of both sexes were subjected to RNA sequencing analyses. DEGs were identified by a ≥ 2-fold change in gene expression values between the dark and light phases. In male mice, we identified 27 DEGs (20 upregulated and 7 downregulated) in young and 18 DEGs (9 upregulated and 9 downregulated) in aged brains (Fig. 1A). In female mice, we identified 56 DEGs (36 upregulated and 20 downregulated) in young brains and 11 DEGs (5 upregulated and 6 downregulated) in aged brains (Fig. 1B). Diurnal expression patterns of genes related to molecular clock, including per1, dbp and ciart, detected in young brains of both sexes, disappeared in aged brains. However, the diurnal expression patterns of fmo2 (in both sexes), hif3a (in males), and inmt (in females), which increased during the dark phase, were maintained in aged brains, although these expression levels were higher in the aged brain than in the young brain (Fig. 1A, B). In addition, eight genes (acer2, arc, ciart, dbp, fmo2, hif3a, inmt, and per1) were common diurnal DEGs in the young brains of both sexes, but only fmo2 was conserved in the diurnal pattern in the aged brains of both sexes (Fig. 1C). To determine whether diurnal expression patterns in fmo2, hif3a, and inmt observed at the transcript level were reflected at the protein levels, we examined FMO2, HIF1α and INMT protein expression. In young male and female mice, FMO2 protein levels increased during the dark phase (1.40-fold in males and 1.56-fold in females; both p = 0.01 vs. light phase; Fig. 2A, B). Immunofluorescence staining revealed elevated FMO2 expression in the cortex (Fig. 2C), hippocampus (Fig. 2D), and striatum (Supplementary Fig. 1) of young female brains during the dark phase, implying that these areas contribute to its diurnal regulation. Similarly, HIF3α in young males (1.45-fold, p = 0.035) and INMT in young females (1.35-fold, p = 0.02) also showed diurnal variations consistent with their gene expression patterns (Fig. 2A, B). However, these diurnal patterns were absent in aged brains (Fig. 2A, B), suggest that the number of molecules exhibiting shared diurnal regulation across age and sex may be even more limited at the protein level. The discrepancy between mRNA and protein levels in the aged mice may resulted from altered translational efficiency or post-translational regulation [29]. Together, these findings suggest a disruption in the diurnal regulation of gene and protein expression in the aged brain.
Several DEGs have been identified in the brains of aged rodents when compared with those expressed in the brains of young rodents [30,31]. However, whether their expression levels vary during the day and night. Therefore, we analyzed gene expression levels in the brains of young and aged mice during the light or dark phase, respectively. In the aged male brain, we identified 40 DEGs (26 upregulated and 14 downregulated) in the light phase, 32 DEGs (21 upregulated and 11 downregulated) in the dark phase, and 21 DEGs (16 upregulated and 5 downregulated) in both phases (total: 93 DEGs; Fig. 3A). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that the identified DEGs were mostly associated with inflammation and immune responses (Fig. 3A). Our findings are consistent with the previous study showing that upregulated DEG pathways at all time domains of day are the immune and inflammatory responses in the hypothalamus of aged male mice [32]. In the aged female brain, we identified 35 DEGs (23 upregulated and 12 downregulated) in the light phase, 33 DEGs (21 upregulated and 12 downregulated) in the dark phase, and 25 DEGs (22 upregulated and 3 downregulated) in both phases (total: 93 DEGs; Fig. 3B). Similar to the results observed in male mice, the GO enrichment analysis revealed that identified DEGs were mainly related to inflammation and immune responses (Fig. 3B).
Next, we further analyzed the diurnal patterns of genes involved in inflammation and immune responses (28 genes in both sexes) among the 93 DEGs. In the aged male brain, expression levels of 20 genes were phase-specifically upregulated (13 genes in the light phase and 7 genes in the dark phase), and the expression levels of eight genes (aim2, c4a, c4b, ccl21b, ccl21c, defb1, H2-Ab1, and slc7a5) were increased in both phases (Fig. 4A, B). In the aged female brain, expression levels of 18 genes were phase-specifically increased (8 genes in the light phase and 10 genes in the dark phase), and the expression levels of 10 genes (agpat2, c4a, c4b, ccl21b, ccl21c, clec7a, defb1, lyz2, slc11a1, and slc7a5) were increased in both phases (Fig. 4C, D). Six genes (c4a, c4b, ccl21b, ccl21c, defb, and slc7a5) were commonly increased in the aged brains of both sexes during the light and dark phases (indicated by upright grey triangles in Fig. 4), with the ccl21 gene (ccl21b and ccl21c) exhibiting the highest increase in fold changes in the aged brain.
These results show that genes involved in the inflammatory process are increased in the aged brain compared with those in the young brain, in both the light and dark phases, indicating a heightened inflammatory state in the aged brain with different molecules between phases and sexes.
Age-associated inflammation can be determined by detecting levels of inflammatory mediators in the peripheral blood, and these levels are known to exhibit diurnal variations [33,34]. To determine whether the expression changes of inflammatory molecules in the aged brain were systemic and general responses with aging, we analyzed plasma levels of cytokines in young and aged mice during the light and dark phases using a cytokine array. Differentially expressed proteins were identified by a ≥ 2-fold change in pixel density values between the dark and light phases of young or aged mice, respectively.
In young mice of both sexes, there were no diurnal changes in cytokine expression. In aged mice of both sexes, the expression of IGFBP1 was reduced in the dark phase (0.39-fold for males and 0.31-fold for females, p = 0.06 and p < 0.01 vs. light phase, respectively; Fig. 5A, B), and other cytokines did not exhibit more than a two-fold change in expression levels in aged male mice. In aged female mice, expression levels of CXCL13 (0.32-fold reduction, p < 0.01), IL-7 (2.11-fold increase, p = 0.15), and receptor for advanced glycation end products (2.03-fold increase, p = 0.08) were altered in the dark phase when compared to those detected in the light phase (Fig. 5B).
Next, cytokine levels were compared between young and aged mice in the light and dark phases, respectively. Compared with young male mice, aged male mice exhibited altered expression levels of CD105 (0.48-fold decrease, p = 0.01), CXCL5 (0.29-fold decrease, p < 0.05), CXCL13 (7.42-fold increase, p = 0.06), IL-28 (0.42-fold decrease, p = 0.13) in the light phase, while IGFBP1 (0.27-fold decrease, p < 0.05) and IGFBP3 (0.50-fold decrease, p = 0.03) levels were altered in the dark phase (Fig. 5A, C). During both the light and dark phases, aged male mice displayed a decrease of CD93 levels (0.34-fold in the light phase and 0.40-fold in the dark phase, both p < 0.05) and a marked increase in CXCL13 levels (7.42-fold with p = 0.06 in the light phase and 7.19-fold with p = 0.03 in the dark phase) compared with young male mice (Fig. 5A, D). Compared with young female mice, aged female mice displayed no change in cytokine levels during the light phase, while complement component C5/C5a (2.01-fold increase, p = 0.10), IGFBP1 (0.25-fold decrease, p = 0.01), and lipocalin 2 (2.05-fold increase, p < 0.01) levels were altered in the dark phase (Fig. 5B, C). Increased levels of CXCL13 in aged female mice in both phases (6.66-fold in the light phase and 1.97-fold in the dark phase, both p < 0.01 vs. the respective phase of young female mice; Fig. 5B, D), similar to those detected in aged male mice. Unlike the increased CCL21 gene expression in the aged brain, blood levels of CCL21 did not differ between young and aged mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). These findings indicate that the brain and peripheral blood exhibit distinct age-related alterations in cytokine expression during the light and dark phases.
Common findings in the peripheral blood of aged mice of both sexes include a decrease in IGFBP1 expression in the dark phase and an increase in CXCL13 expression in both phases. Finally, to determine whether these changes also occurred in the brain as general aging responses, we examined IGFBP1 and CXCL13 protein levels. Unlike the blood, IGFBP1 levels were increased in the aged brains of both sexes, independent of phase (more than 1.86-fold for both male and female, p < 0.05 vs. corresponding phases of young mice). CXCL13 levels also differed between the blood and brain. CXCL13 did not increase in the aged brain of either sex. Especially, its levels decreased in the aged male brain during the dark phase (0.47-fold, p < 0.01 vs. that of young male brains; Fig. 5E, F).
Given the marked increase of IGFBP1 levels in aged female mice during the dark phase, immunofluorescence staining was performed to identify brain regions showing elevated expression in aged female mice at this time point. IGFBP1 expression was increased in multiple regions, including the cortex, striatum and corpus callosum in the aged female mice, compared with young female mice (Fig. 6), indicating that these brain regions are, at least in part, responsible for the age-related increase in IGFBP1 expression throughout the day. Taken together, these results suggest that distinct inflammatory molecules exhibit different diurnal expression patterns in the brain and peripheral blood with aging.
Herein, we demonstrated that the diurnal expression of certain genes was altered in the aged brains of male and female mice. The majority of DEGs between young and aged mice in the light or dark phases were related to inflammation and immune responses, such as chemokines and complements, and differed according to phase and sex. However, cytokine arrays of the blood of aged mice did not detect molecules identified in the aged brain. Additionally, IGFBP1 and CXCL13, which commonly exhibited changes in diurnal expression in the blood of aged mice of both sexes, showed distinct expression patterns in the brain. These findings indicate that the diurnal expression of inflammatory molecules changes with aging and that these molecules differ in the periphery and brain. Moreover, age-associated inflammatory molecules and their expression vary according to sex.
A recent study demonstrated that aging is associated with a reduced number of rhythmically expressed genes (REGs) in the hypothalamus, where the SCN resides [32], consistent with our findings. That study, conducted exclusively in male mice, identified eight REGs shared across all examined age groups of male mice (young, aged, and old), including Hif3a, which we also observed in male mice. In our analysis of the extra-SCN brain regions included both male and female mice, we found that Fmo2 was the only gene that maintained its diurnal expression pattern across age groups in both sexes. Additionally, Inmt preserved its diurnal pattern specifically in female mice. To our knowledge, diurnally expressed genes that are sex-specific or shared between sexes have not been reported previously. The differences in the diurnal genes identified in our study compared to the previous one likely might be explained by discrepancies in the methodology, including the brain regions examined, time points, animal sex and age groups. Notably, despite diurnal gene expression, the protein levels of FMO2, HIF3α and INMT did not exhibit diurnal variation in aged brain. Given the prior report of enhanced protein stability in the aged brain [29], the mismatch between transcript and protein levels may reflect age-related changes in translational efficiency or post-translational regulation. Such changes may further contribute to the disruption of the diurnal expression in molecules with aging.
When comparing gene expression in the brains of young and aged mice during each phase, we found that genes associated with inflammation and immune processes exhibited significant age-related alterations in both sexes. These results are also consistent with the previous study reporting that age-related upregulated DEGs are enriched in immune- and inflammation-related pathways across all time domains of the day [32]. Of particular note, six upregulated genes–ccl21b, ccl21c, C4a, C4b, defb1 and slc7a5–were commonly altered in aged mice of both sexes. These genes have been implicated in various brain disorders, including brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease [35-38]. Thus, dysregulated expression of these genes in the aged brain may play a role in the development of age-related neurodegenerative diseases.
In the peripheral blood, expression profiles of inflammatory molecules revealed distinct patterns compared to the brain. For example, despite a marked increase in CCL21 gene expression in the aged brain, its blood levels did not differ between young and aged mice. In contrast, aged mice exhibited significantly altered blood levels of CXCL13 and IGFBP1 comparing to young mice. CXCL13, a B-lymphocyte chemoattractant, was substantially elevated in aged mice, especially during the light phase. However, no corresponding increase or diurnal variation was observed in the aged brain. Elevated serum CXCL13 levels have been reported in patients with various immune and inflammatory diseases, including rheumatic arthritis and multiple sclerosis, suggesting its potential utility as a biomarker for disease severity and prognosis [39]. Additionally, a previous study reported that increased plasma CXCL13 levels were associated with frailty status in individuals over 65 years of age [40], similar to our findings. In the brain, only one study has reported increased CXCL13 gene expression in the whole brain of 24-month-old mice, without reporting protein levels [41]. In our study, neither gene nor protein levels of CXCL13 were elevated in the aged brain. Given that CXCL13 does not cross from the blood into the cerebrospinal fluid [42], our findings suggest that aging does not significantly influence brain CXCL13 expression, even in the presence of elevated blood levels. Therefore, CXCL13 may serve as a peripheral biomarker for inflammaging, rather than for age-associated neuroinflammation, regardless of sampling time.
IGFBP1, a binding protein of IGFs, also demonstrated distinct age-related expression patterns between the blood and brain. In healthy individuals, blood IGFBP1 levels fluctuate diurnally in response to fasting and food intake [43]. A previous study have shown that fasting serum IGFBP1 levels increase with age and are associated with reduced growth hormone secretion and increased adiposity in human male subjects [44]. In our study, mice had ad libitum access to food, which may explain the lack of diurnal changes in IGFBP1 levels in young mice. Unexpectedly, blood IGFBP1 levels were reduced in aged mice, especially during the dark phase, despite evidence that its expression is upregulated by systemic administration of inflammatory stimuli [45,46]. Our findings suggest that complex interactions among dietary intake, hormone regulation, adiposity, inflammation, and aging influence the diurnal pattern of IGFBP1 in the blood. In contrast, IGFBP1 protein levels were significantly increased in multiple brain regions of aged mice, irrespective of the phase–an observation not previously reported previously. As activated microglia are known to upregulate IGFBP1 expression in the presence of cytokines [47], its increase may reflect age-associated neuroinflammation, although the precise role of IGFBP1 in the aged brain remains to be elucidated. Taken together, our findings may enhance the understanding of aging process and provide molecular information for assessing interventions restoring diurnal rhythms in both the brain and periphery in the elderly, such as time-restricted eating, exercise, and pharmacological treatments [48,49].
This study has several limitations. The sample size was relatively small, sampling was limited to 12-h intervals, and genes and proteins with low expression levels were excluded from the analysis. As a result, the number of molecules showing diurnal and age-related variation was lower than in previous studies. Nevertheless, our data revealed previously unreported genes and protein expression changes in both the brain and peripheral blood with aging, either in a diurnal manner or independent of the light/dark phase.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that aging reduces the number of genes exhibiting diurnal expression patterns in the brain. Many upregulated genes were related to immune and inflammatory pathways in aged mice compared to young mice during the light/dark phases. Blood cytokine levels were also diurnally altered in aged mice, although some changes differed from those observed in the brain. Our findings highlight age-associated diurnal changes in expression of inflammatory mediators in both the brain and peripheral blood, and underscore the importance of considering sampling time to assess inflammaging-associated molecules.
Supplementary data including two figures can be found with this article online at https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.24.372
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Ebiogen Inc. for providing technical advice on analyzing the quantitative RNA sequencing data.
Notes
REFERENCES
1. Golombek DA, Rosenstein RE. 2010; Physiology of circadian entrainment. Physiol Rev. 90:1063–1102. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00009.2009. PMID: 20664079.
2. Masri S, Sassone-Corsi P. 2018; The emerging link between cancer, metabolism, and circadian rhythms. Nat Med. 24:1795–1803. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0271-8. PMID: 30523327. PMCID: PMC6535395.
3. Craig LA, McDonald RJ. 2008; Chronic disruption of circadian rhythms impairs hippocampal memory in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 76:141–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.013. PMID: 18395623.
4. Oosterman JM, van Someren EJ, Vogels RL, Van Harten B, Scherder EJ. 2009; Fragmentation of the rest-activity rhythm correlates with age-related cognitive deficits. J Sleep Res. 18:129–135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00704.x. PMID: 19250179.
5. Leng Y, Musiek ES, Hu K, Cappuccio FP, Yaffe K. 2019; Association between circadian rhythms and neurodegenerative diseases. Lancet Neurol. 18:307–318. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30461-7. PMID: 30784558.
6. Hood S, Amir S. 2017; The aging clock: circadian rhythms and later life. J Clin Invest. 127:437–446. DOI: 10.1172/JCI90328. PMID: 28145903. PMCID: PMC5272178.
7. Weinert H, Weinert D, Schurov I, Maywood ES, Hastings MH. 2001; Impaired expression of the mPer2 circadian clock gene in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of aging mice. Chronobiol Int. 18:559–565. DOI: 10.1081/CBI-100103976. PMID: 11475423.
8. Kolker DE, Fukuyama H, Huang DS, Takahashi JS, Horton TH, Turek FW. 2003; Aging alters circadian and light-induced expression of clock genes in golden hamsters. J Biol Rhythms. 18:159–169. DOI: 10.1177/0748730403251802. PMID: 12693870.
9. Bonaconsa M, Malpeli G, Montaruli A, Carandente F, Grassi-Zucconi G, Bentivoglio M. 2014; Differential modulation of clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, liver and heart of aged mice. Exp Gerontol. 55:70–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.011. PMID: 24674978.
10. Nicola AC, Ferreira LB, Mata MM, Vilhena-Franco T, Leite CM, Martins AB, Antunes-Rodrigues J, Poletini MO, Dornelles RCM. 2021; Vasopressinergic activity of the suprachiasmatic nucleus and mRNA expression of clock genes in the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis in female aging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 12:652733. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.652733. PMID: 34504470. PMCID: PMC8421860.
11. Wyse CA, Coogan AN. 2010; Impact of aging on diurnal expression patterns of CLOCK and BMAL1 in the mouse brain. Brain Res. 1337:21–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.113. PMID: 20382135.
12. Duncan MJ, Prochot JR, Cook DH, Tyler Smith J, Franklin KM. 2013; Influence of aging on Bmal1 and Per2 expression in extra-SCN oscillators in hamster brain. Brain Res. 1491:44–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.11.008. PMID: 23159832. PMCID: PMC3530017.
13. Chen CY, Logan RW, Ma T, Lewis DA, Tseng GC, Sibille E, McClung CA. 2016; Effects of aging on circadian patterns of gene expression in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113:206–211. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508249112. PMID: 26699485. PMCID: PMC4711850.
14. Brunswick CA, Baldwin DJ, Bodinayake KK, McKenna AR, Lo CY, Bellfy L, Urban MW, Stuart EM, Murakami S, Smies CW, Kwapis JL. 2023; The clock gene Per1 is necessary in the retrosplenial cortex-but not in the suprachiasmatic nucleus-for incidental learning in young and aging male mice. Neurobiol Aging. 126:77–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2023.02.009. PMID: 36958103. PMCID: PMC10106450.
15. Davis JA, Paul JR, Mokashi MV, Yates SA, Mount DJ, Munir HA, Goode LK, Young ME, Allison DB, Gamble KL. 2022; Circadian disruption of hippocampus in an early senescence male mouse model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 217:173388. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173388. PMID: 35447158. PMCID: PMC9422145.
16. Reppert SM, Weaver DR. 2001; Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Physiol. 63:647–676. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.647. PMID: 11181971.
17. Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. 2014; A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111:16219–16224. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1408886111. PMID: 25349387. PMCID: PMC4234565.
18. Lim ASP. 2021; Diurnal and seasonal molecular rhythms in the human brain and their relation to Alzheimer disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 179:271–284. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819975-6.00017-0. PMID: 34225968.
19. Taishi P, Bredow S, Guha-Thakurta N, Obál F Jr, Krueger JM. 1997; Diurnal variations of interleukin-1 beta mRNA and beta-actin mRNA in rat brain. J Neuroimmunol. 75:69–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00002-7. PMID: 9143239.
20. Bredow S, Guha-Thakurta N, Taishi P, Obál F Jr, Krueger JM. 1997; Diurnal variations of tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA and alpha-tubulin mRNA in rat brain. Neuroimmunomodulation. 4:84–90. DOI: 10.1159/000097325. PMID: 9483199.
21. Beynon AL, Coogan AN. 2010; Diurnal, age, and immune regulation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-1 type 1 receptor in the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus. Chronobiol Int. 27:1546–1563. DOI: 10.3109/07420528.2010.501927. PMID: 20854134.
22. Bodles AM, Barger SW. 2004; Cytokines and the aging brain - what we don't know might help us. Trends Neurosci. 27:621–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.07.011. PMID: 15374674.
23. Savelyev SA, Larsson KC, Johansson AS, Lundkvist GB. 2011; Slice preparation, organotypic tissue culturing and luciferase recording of clock gene activity in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Vis Exp. 48:2439. DOI: 10.3791/2439-v. PMID: 21372784. PMCID: PMC3197397.
24. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012; Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9:357–359. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. PMID: 22388286. PMCID: PMC3322381.
25. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010; BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 26:841–842. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. PMID: 20110278. PMCID: PMC2832824.
26. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, et al. 2004; Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5:R80. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. PMID: 15461798. PMCID: PMC545600.
27. Shin JA, Jeong SI, Kim M, Yoon JC, Kim HS, Park EM. 2015; Visceral adipose tissue inflammation is associated with age-related brain changes and ischemic brain damage in aged mice. Brain Behav Immun. 50:221–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.008. PMID: 26184082.
28. Shin JA, Kim YA, Kim HW, Kim HS, Lee KE, Kang JL, Park EM. 2018; Iron released from reactive microglia by noggin improves myelin repair in the ischemic brain. Neuropharmacology. 133:202–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.038. PMID: 29407213.
29. McClatchy DB, Martínez-Bartolomé S, Gao Y, Lavallée-Adam M, Yates JR 3rd. 2020; Quantitative analysis of global protein stability rates in tissues. Sci Rep. 10:15983. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72410-y. PMID: 32994440. PMCID: PMC7524747.
30. Li M, Su S, Cai W, Cao J, Miao X, Zang W, Gao S, Xu Y, Yang J, Tao YX, Ai Y. 2020; Differentially expressed genes in the brain of aging mice with cognitive alteration and depression- and anxiety-like behaviors. Front Cell Dev Biol. 8:814. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00814. PMID: 33015035. PMCID: PMC7493670.
31. Giannos P, Prokopidis K. 2022; Gene expression profiles of the aging rat hippocampus imply altered immunoglobulin dynamics. Front Neurosci. 16:915907. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.915907. PMID: 35692421. PMCID: PMC9174800.
32. Wolff CA, Gutierrez-Monreal MA, Meng L, Zhang X, Douma LG, Costello HM, Douglas CM, Ebrahimi E, Pham A, Oliveira AC, Fu C, Nguyen A, Alava BR, Hesketh SJ, Morris AR, Endale MM, Crislip GR, Cheng KY, Schroder EA, Delisle BP, et al. 2023; Defining the age-dependent and tissue-specific circadian transcriptome in male mice. Cell Rep. 42:111982. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111982. PMID: 36640301. PMCID: PMC9929559.
33. Frasca D, Blomberg BB. 2016; Inflammaging decreases adaptive and innate immune responses in mice and humans. Biogerontology. 17:7–19. DOI: 10.1007/s10522-015-9578-8. PMID: 25921609. PMCID: PMC4626429.
34. Altara R, Manca M, Hermans KC, Daskalopoulos EP, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Hermans RJ, Struijker-Boudier HA, Blankesteijn MW. 2015; Diurnal rhythms of serum and plasma cytokine profiles in healthy elderly individuals assessed using membrane based multiplexed immunoassay. J Transl Med. 13:129. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0477-1. PMID: 25903806. PMCID: PMC4414365.
35. Bielecki B, Jatczak-Pawlik I, Wolinski P, Bednarek A, Glabinski A. 2015; Central nervous system and peripheral expression of CCL19, CCL21 and their receptor CCR7 in experimental model of multiple sclerosis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 63:367–376. DOI: 10.1007/s00005-015-0339-9. PMID: 25957582. PMCID: PMC4572056.
36. Williams WM, Torres S, Siedlak SL, Castellani RJ, Perry G, Smith MA, Zhu X. 2013; Antimicrobial peptide β-defensin-1 expression is upregulated in Alzheimer's brain. J Neuroinflammation. 10:127. DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-127. PMID: 24139179. PMCID: PMC3817866.
37. Castillo E, Leon J, Mazzei G, Abolhassani N, Haruyama N, Saito T, Saido T, Hokama M, Iwaki T, Ohara T, Ninomiya T, Kiyohara Y, Sakumi K, LaFerla FM, Nakabeppu Y. 2017; Comparative profiling of cortical gene expression in Alzheimer's disease patients and mouse models demonstrates a link between amyloidosis and neuroinflammation. Sci Rep. 7:17762. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2021;11:18377. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97918-9. PMID: 34504282. PMCID: PMC8429626.
38. Asano S, Kameyama M, Oura A, Morisato A, Sakai H, Tabuchi Y, Chairoungdua A, Endou H, Kanai Y. 2007; L-type amino acid transporter-1 expressed in human astrocytomas, U343MGa. Biol Pharm Bull. 30:415–422. DOI: 10.1248/bpb.30.415. PMID: 17329830.
39. Wang B, Wang M, Ao D, Wei X. 2022; CXCL13-CXCR5 axis: regulation in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 1877:188799. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188799. PMID: 36103908.
40. Landino K, Tanaka T, Fantoni G, Candia J, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. 2021; Characterization of the plasma proteomic profile of frailty phenotype. Geroscience. 43:1029–1037. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-020-00288-9. PMID: 33200349. PMCID: PMC8110642.
41. Fritze J, Ginisty A, McDonald R, Quist E, Stamp E, Monni E, Dhapola P, Lang S, Ahlenius H. 2020; Loss of Cxcr5 alters neuroblast proliferation and migration in the aged brain. Stem Cells. 38:1175–1187. DOI: 10.1002/stem.3207. PMID: 32469107.
42. Pilz G, Sakic I, Wipfler P, Kraus J, Haschke-Becher E, Hitzl W, Trinka E, Harrer A. 2020; Chemokine CXCL13 in serum, CSF and blood-CSF barrier function: evidence of compartment restriction. Fluids Barriers CNS. 17:7. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-020-0170-5. PMID: 32089130. PMCID: PMC7038591.
43. Brismar K, Hilding A, Lindgren B. 1995; Regulation of IGFBP-1 in humans. Prog Growth Factor Res. 6:449–456. DOI: 10.1016/0955-2235(96)00006-3. PMID: 8817689.
44. Benbassat CA, Maki KC, Unterman TG. 1997; Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-1 and -3 in aging men: relationships to insulin, glucose, IGF, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels and anthropometric measures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1484–1491. DOI: 10.1210/jc.82.5.1484.
45. Fan J, Li YH, Bagby GJ, Lang CH. 1995; Modulation of inflammation-induced changes in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein-1 by anti-TNF antibody. Shock. 4:21–26. DOI: 10.1097/00024382-199507000-00003. PMID: 7552773.
46. Soto L, Martín AI, Millán S, Vara E, López-Calderón A. 1998; Effects of endotoxin lipopolysaccharide administration on the somatotropic axis. J Endocrinol. 159:239–246. DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1590239. PMID: 9795364.
47. Nijaguna MB, Patil V, Urbach S, Shwetha SD, Sravani K, Hegde AS, Chandramouli BA, Arivazhagan A, Marin P, Santosh V, Somasundaram K. 2015; Glioblastoma-derived macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) induces microglial release of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) to promote angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 290:23401–23415. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.664037. PMID: 26245897. PMCID: PMC4645610.
48. Gu Y, Seong DH, Liu W, Wang Z, Jeong YW, Kim JC, Kang DR, Lee RJE, Koh JH, Kim SH. 2024; Exercise improves muscle mitochondrial dysfunction-associated lipid profile under circadian rhythm disturbance. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 28:515–526. DOI: 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.6.515. PMID: 39467715. PMCID: PMC11519723.
49. Mortimer T, Smith JG, Muñoz-Cánoves P, Benitah SA. 2025; Circadian clock communication during homeostasis and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 26:314–331. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-024-00802-3. PMID: 39753699.
Fig. 1
Diurnal gene expression profiles in the brains of young and aged mice.
Venn diagrams (a), heat maps (b) and volcano plots (c, d) showing diurnal differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the brains of young and aged male (A) and female (B) mice during the light (10:00 AM) and dark (10:00 PM) phases. (C) Venn diagrams of DEGs in the brains of young (a) and aged (b) mice of both sexes during the light and dark phases. N = 3 in each phase. The numbers of genes with increased (upward arrows) or decreased (downward arrows) expression during the dark phase compared to the light phase are indicated in the Venn diagrams. In the heat maps and volcano plots, the top ten genes with the highest statistical significance between phases (asterisks), genes shared between young and aged mice (upright light blue and pink triangles for male and female, respectively), between young male and female mice (upright white triangles), and between aged male and female mice (an upright grey triangle) are denoted.
Fig. 2
Diurnal expressions of FMO2, HIF3
α and INMT in the brains of young and aged mice during the light and dark phases. (A) Western blots of FMO2 and HIF3α and their quantification in the brains of young and aged male mice during the light (10:00 PM) and dark (10:00 PM) phases. (B) Western blots of FMO2 and INMT and their quantification in the brains of young and aged female mice during the light and dark phases. N = 3 in each phase. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. Representative immunofluorescence staining for FMO2 (green), DAPI (blue), and merged images in the cortex (C; Scale bar = 50 µm) and cornu ammonis area 3 of the hippocampus (D; Scale bar = 100 µm) in young female mice during the light and dark phases. A red box in the diagram of the brain section indicate the regions analyzed. Representative images were obtained from one set of experiments, and three experiments were performed independently. FMO2, flavin-containing monooxygenase 2; HIF3α, hypoxia-inducible factor 3α; INMT, indolamine N methyltransferase.
Fig. 3
Biological processes associated with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the aged brains during the light and dark phases.
Venn diagrams (a), up-keyword biological processes (b), and top ten gene ontology (GO) biological processes of DEGs (c) in the brains of aged male (A) and female (B) mice compared with the corresponding sex of young mice during the light (10:00 AM) and dark (10:00 PM) phases. N = 3 in each phase. The numbers of genes showing increased (upward arrows) or decreased (downward arrows) expression compared with young mice at each phase are indicated in the Venn diagrams.
Fig. 4
Genes related to inflammation and immune responses in the aged brains during the light and dark phases.
Heat maps (a) and volcano plots (b) depicting the expression of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the aged brains of male mice during the light (A) and dark (B) phases and in female mice during the light (C) and dark (D) phases compared with the corresponding sex of young mice in each phase. N = 3 in each phase. In the heat maps and volcano plots, the top ten genes with the highest statistical significance between young and aged mice during each phase (asterisks), common genes whose expression increased during both phase in the aged brains of each sex (upright light blue and pink triangles for male and female, respectively) and both sexes (upright grey triangles) are denoted.
Fig. 5
Distinct diurnal patterns of cytokine levels in the peripheral blood and brain of aged mice during the light and dark phases.
Heat maps depicting expressions of cytokines showing ≥ 2 fold-changes in the plasma of male (A) and female (B) aged mice compared to young mice during the light (L, 10:00 AM) and dark (D, 10:00 PM) phases (n = 3 in each). ◄ indicates common cytokines commonly altered in the plasma of aged mice of both sexes. Representative cytokine array blots showing CXCL13 (C) and IGFBP1 (D) in the plasma of young and aged male and female mice during the light and dark phases. Western blots of CXCL13 and IGFBP1 and their quantification in the brains of young and aged male (E) and female (F) mice during the light and dark phases (n = 5 in each). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. CXCL13, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 13; IGFBP1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1.
Fig. 6
Increased expression of IGFBP1 in the brain of aged female mice.
Representative immunofluorescence staining for IGFBP1 (green), DAPI (blue), and merged images (Scale bar = 50 µm) in the cortex (A), striatum (B) and corpus callosum (C) of young and aged female mice during the dark phase (10:00 PM). A red box in the diagram of the brain section indicate the regions analyzed. Representative images were obtained from one set of experiments, and three experiments were performed independently. Scale bar = 50 µm. IGFBP1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1.



PDF
Citation
Print


XML Download