Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to assess sex-related differences in the presentation to an emergency department, perioperative management, and outcomes of complicated appendicitis.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients under 18 years who presented to the emergency department and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis from 2012 through 2022 at a single tertiary medical center in Israel. We analyzed data from the patients’ medical records, in terms of age, sex, duration of symptoms, clinical presentation, laboratory or imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes.
Results
Among 300 patients (123 females [41.0%]), no significant sex differences were observed in the age, duration of symptoms, clinical presentation, and laboratory, imaging, or intraoperative findings. We noted that the female patients showed a more frequent antibiotic escalation from ceftriaxone-metronidazole to piperacillin-tazobactam (males, 14.7% vs. females, 25.2%; P = 0.020) and a longer median hospital length of stay (6.0 days [interquartile range, 5.0-8.0] vs. 7.5 days [5.0-10.0]; P = 0.048). No difference was observed in the rates of resistant bacteria detected from the intraoperatively obtained intra-abdominal fluids (males, 14.1% vs. females, 18.7%; P = 0.103). In a sub-analysis on patients undergoing the antibiotic escalations, the females showed a longer median duration of symptoms before hospitalization (males, 2.0 days [interquartile range, 1.0-3.0] vs. females, 3.0 days [2.0-4.5]; P = 0.031), and a higher frequency of intra-abdominal fluids on postoperative ultrasonography (23.1% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.049).
Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical condition in children. The lifetime risk of appendicitis is 8.6% for males and 6.7% for females (1). While male predominance is well-documented in appendicitis, it remains underexplored in terms of potential sex-related disparities in presentation, emergency management, and clinical outcomes, specifically in pediatric emergency care.
Studies have suggested that female patients may be at a higher risk for delayed diagnosis and increased rates of negative appendectomy (2-4). Teixeira et al. (5) identified female sex as an independent predictor of perforation in patients of all ages with appendicitis. In pediatric patients, Salö et al. (6) found that females had higher rates of gangrenous appendicitis and operative complications, concluding that these findings and the reasons behind them needed further studies.
We aimed to investigate the sex-based differences in the emergency presentation and perioperative outcomes of children diagnosed with complicated appendicitis, focusing on potential delays in presentation to the emergency department (ED), early clinical assessment, and postoperative morbidity.
This retrospective study was conducted on pediatric patients under 18 years who presented to the ED and were diagnosed with complicated appendicitis requiring laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2012 through December 2022 at the Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes per the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision for appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis was defined as intraoperatively confirmed gangrenous or perforated appendicitis with or without peritonitis, and laparoscopic appendectomy as using trocars through the umbilicus, left lower abdomen, or suprapubic region, as per the standard practice. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of our hospital with a waiver for informed consent (IRB no. RMC-0560-18).
Upon the ED arrival, all pediatric patients who presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain, accompanied by symptoms such as fever, vomiting, or diarrhea, underwent standardized evaluations. This included physical examinations, laboratory tests, such as white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, or electrolytes, and preoperative abdominal ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography.
All the patients who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis received empirical intravenous antibiotics, such as ceftriaxone plus metronidazole. In the case of intraoperatively confirmed appendiceal perforation, the intraperitoneal fluid was aspirated for culture and if necessary, drained. For the patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis, follow-up blood tests were routinely obtained on postoperative day 3. In cases of persistent leukocytosis or documented fever, a postoperative US was performed on the same or following day. If the US demonstrated intra-abdominal fluid, antibiotic therapy was escalated to piperacillin-tazobactam.
We collected data from the patients’ medical records, in terms of their age, sex, duration of symptoms, clinical presentation (fever, vomiting, or diarrhea), values of preoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein concentration, fecalith on computed tomography or US, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes. The intraoperative findings included the presence of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, periappendiceal abscess, or peritonitis. The postoperative outcomes included the use of piperacillin-tazobactam, resistant bacteria in the abdominal fluids, hospital length of stay, and rehospitalization.
Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed for continuous variables to determine whether they are normally distributed. Accordingly, continuous variables were compared using independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests, for normally distributed and non-normally distributed variables, respectively. Pearson chi-square tests of independence or Fisher exact tests were performed for categorical variables, as needed. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-tailed P < 0.05. All analyses were performed using Python (Python Software Foundation, https://www.python.org).
Out of 300 patients with complicated appendicitis, 123 were female (41.0%). Patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. None of the laparoscopic operations required a conversion to laparotomy. Notably, there were no cases of surgical site infection as defined by a superficial or deep incisional surgical site infection. There were no sex-based differences in the intraoperative findings. We noted that the female patients showed more frequent use of piperacillin-tazobactam (males, 14.7% vs. females, 25.2%; P = 0.020) and a longer median hospital length of stay (6.0 days [interquartile range, 5.0-8.0] vs. 7.5 days [5.0-10.0]; P = 0.048).
A sub-analysis was conducted on patients who required antibiotic regimen escalations to piperacillin-tazobactam during the first hospital stay. As a result, the females showed a longer median duration of symptoms before hospitalization (males, 2.0 days [interquartile range, 1.0-3.0] vs. females, 3.0 days [2.0-4.5]; P = 0.031), and a higher frequency of intra-abdominal fluids on the postoperative US (23.1% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.049; Table 2). No difference was observed in the rates of resistant bacteria in the abdominal fluids between the sexes.
This study highlights important sex-related disparities in pediatric emergency care for complicated appendicitis. Despite similar clinical presentations and laboratory findings at the time of ED evaluation, we found that compared to the male patients, females with complicated appendicitis might have a slower recovery with persistent manifestations, as shown by the longer hospital length of stay and more frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (Table 1). These findings suggest a more advanced disease in the female patients at ED presentation, raising the question of whether the observed disparities stem from biological differences in disease progression or a delay in seeking medical care among girls. The female patients’ slower recovery was also represented by the longer duration of symptoms in the sub-analysis (Table 2).
The findings align with previous research showing sex disparities in emergency medical decision-making. Similar trends have been observed in adult cardiovascular emergencies (7), where women experience longer delays in seeking care and higher rates of complications. The reasons for this disparity are multifaceted, encompassing societal norms, differences in symptom perception, varying levels of health literacy, and economic factors. The disparity highlights a concerning pattern where women may be underutilizing crucial hospital-based services, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and poorer health outcomes in acute medical situations (8-10). However, to the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to document similar trends in complicated appendicitis in pediatric emergency settings.
This study has an inherent limitation in its single tertiary center and retrospective design, possibly limiting the generalizability of the findings. Differences in healthcare access, referral patterns, and institutional management protocols across various settings could influence the observed sex disparities. However, this is one of the few studies that specifically investigated sex disparities in pediatric emergency surgical care, providing insight into the understudied area. In addition, by focusing on a well-defined and homogeneous cohort of patients with complicated appendicitis and analyzing standardized perioperative data, we tried to minimize potential confounders related to disease severity at ED presentation.
In conclusion, female pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis may experience a more serious postoperative morbidity. These findings underscore the need for increased awareness among caregivers and primary care providers regarding the potential for delayed presentation of appendicitis in females, in order to recognize and prioritize early evaluation of abdominal pain in female patients. Timely ED presentation may help reduce postoperative complications and improve outcomes.
Notes
Author contributions
Conceptualization: YD and AMN
Data curation: YD
Formal analysis: AMN
Investigation: MP and IS
Methodology: YD and MP
Supervision: DK and IS
Validation: MP
Writing-original draft: all authors
Writing-review and editing: all authors
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
1. Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, et al. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016; 11:34.
2. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132:910–25.

3. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA. 2001; 286:1748–53.

4. Beecher S, O'Leary DP, McLaughlin R. Hospital tests and patient related factors influencing time-to-theatre in 1000 cases of suspected appendicitis: a cohort study. World J Emerg Surg. 2015; 10:6.

5. Teixeira PG, Sivrikoz E, Inaba K, Talving P, Lam L, Demetriades D. Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2012; 256:538–43.
6. Salö M, Ohlsson B, Arnbjörnsson E, Stenström P. Appendicitis in children from a gender perspective. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015; 31:845–53.

7. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Sex differences in patient acceptance of cardiac transplant candidacy. Circulation. 1995; 91:2753–61.

8. Cameron KA, Song J, Manheim LM, Dunlop DD. Gender disparities in health and healthcare use among older adults. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19:1643–50.

Table 1.
Patients’ characteristics by sex (N = 300)
| Characteristics | Male (N = 177) | Female (N = 123) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 10.8 (7.0-14.4) | 11.2 (8.1-14.0) | 0.151 |
| Duration of symptoms, d | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.263 |
| Fever | 59 (33.3) | 53 (43.1) | 0.082 |
| Vomiting | 109 (61.6) | 85 (69.1) | 0.180 |
| Diarrhea | 22 (12.4) | 13 (10.6) | 0.623 |
| Preoperative white blood cells, cells/mm³ | 15.9 (12.1-19.0) | 16.0 (13.0-19.6) | 0.981 |
| Preoperative C-reactive protein, mg/L | 6.0 (2.3-14.0) | 8.0 (2.8-16.8) | 0.455 |
| Fecalith on ultrasound/CT | 62 (35.0) | 40 (32.5) | > 0.999 |
| Intraoperative findings | |||
| Gangrenous appendicitis | 89 (50.3) | 52 (42.3) | 0.220 |
| Perforated appendicitis | 54 (30.5) | 45 (36.6) | 0.273 |
| Periappendiceal abscess | 15 (8.5) | 13 (10.6) | 0.543 |
| Peritonitis | 19 (10.7) | 13 (10.6) | 0.964 |
| Postoperative courses | |||
| Use of piperacillin-tazobactam | 26 (14.7) | 31 (25.2) | 0.020 |
| Resistant bacteria in abdominal fluids* | 25 (14.1) | 23 (18.7) | 0.103 |
| Hospital length of stay, d | 6.0 (5.0-8.0) | 7.5 (5.0-10.0) | 0.048 |
| Rehospitalization | 9 (5.1) | 7 (5.7) | 0.824 |
Table 2.
Patients’ characteristics according to the administration of piperacillin-tazobactam (N = 57)
| Characteristics | Male (N = 26) | Female (N = 31) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 8.7 (5.5-13.3) | 10.0 (7.5-11.7) | 0.811 |
| Duration of symptoms, d | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 3.0 (2.0-4.5) | 0.031 |
| Fever | 13 (50.0) | 17 (54.8) | 0.713 |
| Vomiting | 19 (73.1) | 24 (77.4) | 0.707 |
| Diarrhea | 6 (23.1) | 7 (22.6) | 0.963 |
| Preoperative white blood cells, cells/mm³ | 15.0 (11.2-20.3) | 15.7 (13.6-18.0) | 0.972 |
| Preoperative C-reactive protein, mg/L | 12.6 (11.3-19.5) | 16.0 (10.7-22.8) | 0.362 |
| Intraoperative findings | |||
| Gangrenous appendicitis | 4 (15.4) | 8 (25.8) | 0.331 |
| Perforated appendicitis | 11 (42.3) | 11 (35.5) | 0.590 |
| Periappendiceal abscess | 3 (11.5) | 4 (12.9) | 0.624 |
| Peritonitis | 8 (30.8) | 8 (25.8) | 0.683 |
| Postoperative courses | |||
| Intra-abdominal fluids* | 6 (23.1) | 10 (32.3) | 0.049 |
| Resistant bacteria in abdominal fluids | 19 (73.1) | 22 (71.0) | 0.863 |
| Hospital length of stay, d | 11.0 (8.0-13.8) | 12.0 (9.0-16.5) | 0.177 |



PDF
Citation
Print



XML Download