Journal List > Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother > v.7(2) > 1516090593

Shin: Sex-specific challenges in cardiovascular disease among women: gaps in recognition, diagnosis, and management

Abstract

Despite being the leading cause of mortality among women, cardiovascular disease remains underrecognized and undertreated due to sex-related differences in clinical presentation, risk factors, and healthcare delivery. Women are often excluded from clinical trials, undergo fewer diagnostic evaluations, and are less likely to receive guideline-directed therapies. Additionally, female-specific risk factors, such as pregnancy-related disorders, early menopause, and autoimmune diseases, are frequently overlooked. Addressing these disparities through sex-specific risk assessment, increased clinician awareness, and inclusion of women in research is imperative to optimize prevention and treatment strategies and reduce cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality in women.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women, with a mortality rate exceeding that of all cancers combined [1]. Despite a longer life expectancy (86.6 years on average, approximately 6 years longer than men), Korean women experience lower overall health quality [2]. Chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes are highly prevalent, particularly among older women. As the proportion of women relative to men increases with aging, it is critical to accurately understand and address women's cardiovascular health. Nevertheless, the importance of CVD in women's health is frequently underestimated and overlooked by both the public and healthcare providers [13]. Despite legislative efforts, women remain underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, resulting in limited evidence regarding sex-specific treatment efficacy and safety [3].
Women's heart disease presents unique challenges, including atypical symptoms, nontraditional risk factors (such as pregnancy-related conditions and autoimmune diseases), and differential responses to therapy. These sex-specific differences in epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes are inadequately addressed by conventional prevention and management strategies. To reduce the burden of CVD in women, there is an urgent need for increased awareness, tailored screening, and more aggressive preventive measures.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN AGE DISTRIBUTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY

Globally, life expectancy is increasing, with Korea experiencing one of the highest growth rates. Women generally live longer than men, and as age increases, the proportion of women relative to men also rises. Among those aged 70 years and older, women outnumber men by approximately 1.5 times. Women's longer life expectancy (by approximately 6 to 8 years) results in a higher prevalence of CVD compared to men in Korea [4]. Although Korean women live longer than men, they experience poorer health outcomes due to chronic diseases, mental health issues, and socioeconomic disparities [4].
Mortality rates from circulatory system diseases (including hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and heart disease) show that women's mortality rate is 126.7 per 100,000 individuals, which is higher than men's rate of 115.5 in Korea [5]. According to 2020 mortality statistics, CVD was a major cause of death for both sexes, yet women exhibited a 1.1 times higher mortality rate compared to men, with a notable increase in deaths starting from the age of 70 years [5]. This disparity in mortality rates is partly due to the misconception that heart disease is predominantly a "men’s disease," resulting in lower awareness among women. Additionally, studies indicate that women are less likely to receive explanations about heart disease from their physicians [6].

AWARENESS OF WOMEN'S HEART DISEASE

A 50-year-old woman has a 40% lifetime risk of developing CVD, a 30% risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), and a 20% risk of heart failure [710]. Nevertheless, CVD is still perceived primarily as a disease affecting men. Public and healthcare professional awareness of CVD among women remains low. Although 74% of women have at least one cardiovascular risk factor, fewer than 20% recognize their personal risk [11]. In the United States, surveys indicate higher awareness of breast cancer and diabetes compared to heart disease, despite heart disease being the leading cause of death among women. Awareness is particularly low among younger women, those of lower socioeconomic status, and those with less education [11]. They have limited recognition of heart disease, low awareness of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and typically take less initiative in managing these risks. Physicians also exhibit lower awareness of heart disease in women. Studies reveal that physicians evaluate risk factors more conservatively in women than in men, perform fewer diagnostic tests (such as coronary angiography), and refer women to cardiologists less frequently [6,11,12]. Consequently, women receive less preventive care for heart disease than men.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN CVD

Biological and hormonal differences significantly contribute to sex-specific patterns in CVD. Estrogen confers cardiovascular protection in premenopausal women, but its decline during menopause—typically beginning in the late 40s—marks a turning point, elevating the risks of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and ischemic heart disease. Notably, the prevalence of hypertension becomes higher among women compared to men after age of 70 years.
Anatomically, women have smaller coronary arteries and reduced endothelial function, rendering them more susceptible to microvascular dysfunction and inflammation [13]. These factors contribute to distinct pathophysiological characteristics, including nonobstructive CAD and increased susceptibility to plaque erosion rather than rupture [14]. Coronary artery calcification—a marker of atherosclerosis—is associated with greater relative mortality risk in women than in men, even at low scores [15,16].
Clinically, ischemic heart disease in women often manifests with atypical symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, nausea, indigestion, dizziness, back pain, or pain in the neck and shoulders. These atypical presentations contribute to delays in diagnosis and treatment [13,17]. While CAD in men typically causes occlusive lesions impairing blood flow, coronary artery lesions in women are often nonocclusive and associated with functional abnormalities due to microvascular disorders, leading to atypical symptoms. Diagnostic tools such as exercise stress testing and coronary angiography demonstrate lower sensitivity and specificity in women due to these nonobstructive or functional abnormalities [17].
Certain conditions disproportionately affect women, including spontaneous coronary artery dissection (especially in younger women during the perinatal period) and stress-induced cardiomyopathy, which occurs more frequently in women aged 60 to 70 years [18,19]. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is difficult to diagnose unless suspected, as it often occurs suddenly in young, healthy women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Women are also twice as likely as men to develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [7], highlighting the importance of sex-specific approaches to diagnosis and management.

SEX DIFFERENCES IN CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS

While traditional cardiovascular risk factors—namely, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity, and physical inactivity—affect both sexes, their impact differs in women [13,20,21]. Women experience steeper increases in blood pressure with age and tend to have higher nighttime blood pressure, factors that significantly elevate their CVD risk. Women with type 2 diabetes have a 50% higher risk of CVD mortality than men with diabetes [12]. According to the 2022 Fact Sheet of the Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis, the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was higher among women than men (25.0% vs. 22.9%), showing a significant increase in women over time [22]. The prevalence of dyslipidemia increases notably with age, with particularly marked rises observed in women (26.0% in their 20s, 34.6% in their 30s, 56.7% in their 50s, and 71.0% in their 60s). According to the 2021 Fact Sheet from the Society of Cardiometabolic Syndromes, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was also higher in women aged 65 years and older than in men (49.4% vs. 40.2%) [23]. Although women generally have lower rates of abdominal obesity and hypertriglyceridemia, the prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is significantly higher in women compared to men. Women with obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and elevated triglycerides have a notably increased risk of CVD.
Women also face unique cardiovascular risk factors, including pregnancy-related risks, autoimmune diseases, early menopause, and depression [24]. Conditions such as preeclampsia, preterm delivery, hypertensive pregnancy disorders, gestational diabetes, and postpartum weight retention considerably raise a woman’s long-term risk of CVD [24]. Women with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus have a twofold to threefold higher risk of myocardial infarction. Early menopause is similarly associated with an increased risk of CVD [25]. Depression is more common in women and is linked to higher CAD risk [12]. Therefore, assessments of atherosclerotic CVD risk should explicitly incorporate women-specific risk factors. Additionally, routine screening for pregnancy history, autoimmune conditions, and regular postpartum cardiovascular follow-up are strongly recommended [20]. Furthermore, treatments for breast cancer (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy) also contribute to long-term CVD risk in women [13].

GAPS IN DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND SECONDARY PREVENTION

Despite growing awareness, substantial gaps persist in the prevention and management of CVD in women. Women are less likely than men to receive evidence-based diagnostic evaluations, guideline-directed medical therapies, and interventions such as statins or reperfusion treatments [20]. Statin therapy is less frequently prescribed to women, despite similar benefits in reducing atherosclerotic CVD risk [12]. Compared to men, women are less likely to achieve guideline-recommended targets for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose levels, and they are less frequently physically active or nonobese [26].
Young women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are less likely to receive timely reperfusion therapy and more likely to experience delays compared to similarly aged men. These sex disparities are particularly pronounced among patients transferred to percutaneous coronary intervention facilities or those undergoing fibrinolytic therapy [27]. Delays in initiating guideline-directed medical therapy in women result in higher rates of readmission, reinfarction, and mortality within the first year after myocardial infarction [28]. A meta-analysis indicated that men were approximately one-third more likely to be enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation than women [29]. Furthermore, among individuals with or at high risk for CVD, appropriate preventive medications were prescribed more frequently to older women but less frequently to younger women compared to their male counterparts [30].
Sociocultural factors may exacerbate these disparities, with traditional gender roles contributing to delayed care-seeking behaviors and reduced prioritization of personal health due to caregiving responsibilities. Comprehensive strategies addressing both biological and sociocultural barriers are essential for closing the gender gap in cardiovascular care.

CONCLUSIONS

CVD in women remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, largely due to atypical symptom presentations, limited awareness, and insufficient sex-specific research. Biological, pathophysiological, and sociocultural differences contribute to distinct clinical characteristics and disparities in the prevalence, awareness, and management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors between women and men. Additionally, women experience unique risk factors—including hypertensive pregnancy disorders, gestational diabetes, and preterm birth—that are frequently overlooked in conventional risk assessment models.
These differences underscore the necessity of age- and sex-specific strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CVD. While heart-healthy behaviors and early risk identification are crucial, existing guidelines often fail to adequately reflect the specific needs of women. Developing and implementing gender-tailored prevention frameworks can improve risk stratification and facilitate individualized therapeutic approaches.
To effectively reduce the burden of CVD among women, greater efforts are required to increase public and professional awareness, enhance clinician education, and promote the inclusion of women in cardiovascular research. Advancing sex-specific clinical evidence is critical for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing outcomes for women with CVD.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

The author received no financial support for this study.

REFERENCES

1. Douglas PS. Gender, cardiology, and optimal medical care. Circulation. 1986; 74:917–9. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.5.917. PMID: 3490328.
crossref
2. Harris DJ, Douglas PS. Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:475–80. DOI: 10.1056/nejm200008173430706. PMID: 10944565.
crossref
3. Kim ES, Carrigan TP, Menon V. Enrollment of women in National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded cardiovascular randomized controlled trials fails to meet current federal mandates for inclusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:672–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.025. PMID: 18702973.
crossref
4. National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Women's health: 2023 stats & facts in Korea. National Institute of Health, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; 2023.
5. Vital Statistics Division; Statistics Korea, Noh H, Seo J, Lee S, Yi N, Park S, et al. Cause-of-death statistics in 2020 in the Republic of Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2023; 66:132–42. DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2023.66.2.132.
crossref
6. Maserejian NN, Link CL, Lutfey KL, Marceau LD, McKinlay JB. Disparities in physicians’ interpretations of heart disease symptoms by patient gender: results of a video vignette factorial experiment. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009; 18:1661–7. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1007. PMID: 19785567.
crossref
7. Garcia M, Mulvagh SL, Merz CN, Buring JE, Manson JE. Cardiovascular disease in women: clinical perspectives. Circ Res. 2016; 118:1273–93. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.116.307547. PMID: 27081110.
8. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Beiser A, Levy D. Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1999; 353:89–92. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10279-9. PMID: 10023892.
crossref
9. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, Beiser A, D’Agostino RB, Kannel WB, et al. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002; 106:3068–72. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000039105.49749.6f. PMID: 12473553.
crossref
10. Vasan RS, Enserro DM, Beiser AS, Xanthakis V. Lifetime risk of heart failure among participants in the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; 79:250–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.043. PMID: 35057911.
11. Bairey Merz CN, Andersen H, Sprague E, Burns A, Keida M, Walsh MN, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding cardiovascular disease in women: the Women’s Heart Alliance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70:123–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.024. PMID: 28648386.
12. Cho L, Davis M, Elgendy I, Epps K, Lindley KJ, Mehta PK, et al. Summary of updated recommendations for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75:2602–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.060. PMID: 32439010.
13. Saeed A, Kampangkaew J, Nambi V. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017; 13:185–92. DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-13-4-185. PMID: 29744010.
crossref
14. White SJ, Newby AC, Johnson TW. Endothelial erosion of plaques as a substrate for coronary thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2016; 115:509–19. DOI: 10.1160/th15-09-0765. PMID: 26791872.
crossref
15. Kelkar AA, Schultz WM, Khosa F, Schulman-Marcus J, O’Hartaigh BW, Gransar H, et al. Long-term prognosis after coronary artery calcium scoring among low-intermediate risk women and men. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 9:e003742. DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.115.003742. PMID: 27072301.
crossref
16. Shaw LJ, Min JK, Nasir K, Xie JX, Berman DS, Miedema MD, et al. Sex differences in calcified plaque and long-term cardiovascular mortality: observations from the CAC Consortium. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39:3727–35. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy534. PMID: 30212857.
crossref
17. Leuzzi C, Modena MG. Coronary artery disease: clinical presentation, diagnosis and prognosis in women. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010; 20:426–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.02.013. PMID: 20591634.
crossref
18. Ciliberti G, Westaby J, Papadakis M, Behr ER, Sharma S, Finocchiaro G, et al. Coronary artery dissection and myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries: insights from a UK nationwide autopsy-based registry: brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023; 43:787–92. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.122.318401. PMID: 36756880.
19. Luscher TF. Sudden cardiac death of an unusual kind: spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023; 43:793–5. DOI: 10.1161/atvbaha.123.319136. PMID: 36994725.
crossref
20. Brown HL, Warner JJ, Gianos E, Gulati M, Hill AJ, Hollier LM, et al. Promoting risk identification and reduction of cardiovascular disease in women through collaboration with obstetricians and gynecologists: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Circulation. 2018; 137:e843–52. DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000582. PMID: 29748185.
crossref
21. Cho IJ, Shin MS. Current status of modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Korean women. Korean J Intern Med. 2025; 40:15–23. DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2024.077. PMID: 39434602.
crossref
22. Jin ES, Shim JS, Kim SE, Bae JH, Kang S, Won JC, et al. Dyslipidemia fact sheet in South Korea, 2022. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023; 12:237–51. DOI: 10.12997/jla.2023.12.3.237. PMID: 37800108.
crossref
23. Huh JH, Kang DR, Kim JY, Koh KK. Metabolic syndrome fact sheet 2021: executive report. CardioMetab Syndr J. 2021; 1:125–34. DOI: 10.51789/cmsj.2021.1.e15.
crossref
24. Wenger NK. Female-friendly focus: 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clin Cardiol. 2019; 42:706–9. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23218. PMID: 31211428.
crossref
25. Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Aragam K, Finneran P, Klarin D, Bhatt DL, et al. Association of premature natural and surgical menopause with incident cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2019; 322:2411–21. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.19191. PMID: 31738818.
crossref
26. Zhao M, Vaartjes I, Graham I, Grobbee D, Spiering W, Klipstein-Grobusch K, et al. Sex differences in risk factor management of coronary heart disease across three regions. Heart. 2017; 103:1587–94. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311429. PMID: 28931567.
crossref
27. D’Onofrio G, Safdar B, Lichtman JH, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, Geda M, et al. Sex differences in reperfusion in young patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO study. Circulation. 2015; 131:1324–32. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.114.012293. PMID: 25792558.
crossref
28. Khandelwal A, Bakir M, Bezaire M, Costello B, Gomez JM, Hoover V, et al. Managing ischemic heart disease in women: role of a women’s heart center. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2021; 23:56. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-021-00956-x. PMID: 34345945.
crossref
29. Samayoa L, Grace SL, Gravely S, Scott LB, Marzolini S, Colella TJ. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30:793–800. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.11.007. PMID: 24726052.
crossref
30. Hyun KK, Redfern J, Patel A, Peiris D, Brieger D, Sullivan D, et al. Gender inequalities in cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in primary healthcare. Heart. 2017; 103:492–8. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310216. PMID: 28249996.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles