Abstract
Purpose
Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after thyroid surgery may cause vocal cord palsy (VCP), which leads to unexpected additional costs. In recent years, intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) has been used to lower the incidence rate of VCP. This study aimed to analyze postoperative management costs for patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
Methods
We analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent lobectomy for PTC from September 2018 to August 2019 at The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. A total of 411 patients were enrolled and all the patients had voice examinations. We investigated the total costs in the IONM and non-IONM groups during a maximum 1-year follow-up and calculated the additional costs due to VCP by subtraction of the mean values in each group.
Results
The incidence rate of VCP was 3.9% (16 of 411). Extrathyroidal extension was related to VCP in Cox regression tests and accounted for 3.2% (13 of 411). VCP rate did not show a significant difference between the IONM and non-IONM groups (4.1% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.883). Total costs for postoperative management were higher in the IONM group than in the non-IONM group (US $328.2 ± $220.1 vs. $278.7 ± $141.4, P < 0.05). However, the additional costs due to VCP were significantly lower in the IONM group than in the non-IONM group ($474.1 ± $150.3 vs. $568.9 ± $367.6, P < 0.005).
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is one of the most serious complications during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. It is associated with hoarseness, dysphonia, difficulty swallowing, aspiration, and respiratory problems [1]. RLN injury may cause vocal cord palsy (VCP). Bilateral VCP is a rare but life-threatening complication. Many patients with bilateral VCP require tracheotomy. Transient VCP occurs in ranging from 0.3% to 3%, and permanent palsy in ranging from 3% to 8% [234]. The gold standard for preventing RLN injury is routine identification. RLN visualization is still broadly considered the standard of care [5]. However, a visualized nerve does not represent a functionally intact nerve. Patients with RLN injury go through a rehabilitation treatment, including voice therapy, in order to restore the function of the injured vocal cords. These procedures of treatment result in unexpected additional costs.
Intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) has been proposed to help surgeons to localize the RLN and prevent injuries. IONM has been increasingly applied during thyroid and parathyroid surgery by surgeons in recent decades. Many studies have reported that IONM can reduce the risk of RLN injury [67]. Zheng et al. [8] reported that statistically significant differences were determined in terms of the incidence of transient VCP after using IONM. On the other hand, Pisanu et al. [9] showed in their meta-analysis that there was no significant difference in the incidence of RLN injury when using IONM versus visualization during thyroidectomy. The efficacy of IONM during thyroid and parathyroid surgery is still controversial.
Some studies have reported the cost-effectiveness of IONM in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Postoperative management costs for patients with VCP should include outpatient visits, multiple laryngoscopy and video stroboscopy, voice therapy, and vocal cord medialization procedures if necessary [10]. To the best of our knowledge, few studies have evaluated the postoperative management cost in outpatient settings.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative management costs for patients who underwent lobectomy with IONM for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (No. KC20RISI0950), which waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature.
We retrospectively reviewed 613 patients with PTC who underwent thyroid lobectomy from September 2018 to August 2019 at The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital (Seoul, Korea). A total of 192 and 10 patients were excluded from analysis because of refusal of postoperative laryngoscopy and a loss of follow-up, respectively. The medical charts and pathology reports of 411 patients were reviewed and analyzed.
The preoperative work-up included physical examination, serum thyroid function test, neck ultrasonography (US), and CT. Thyroid nodules were diagnosed based on preoperative US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. All patients who were diagnosed as PTC were evaluated by preoperative US and neck CT to confirm the size and location of tumors, presence/absence of extrathyroidal extension (ETE), lymph node status, and other abnormal findings in the neck. All patients underwent video laryngostroboscopy, perceptual voice analysis, and computerized acoustic analysis before the surgery.
General anesthesia was used for all patients with orotracheal intubation. We used a Nerve Integrity Monitor (NIM)-response 3.0 with Standard Reinforced Electromyography (EMG) endotracheal tube (Medtronic Xomed). All setup and monitoring were performed in compliance with the standard outlined in the International Neural Monitoring Study Group (INMSG) guidelines [11].
We used an intermittent nerve monitoring system. According to IONM guidelines, signals were recorded as follows: EMG amplitudes of the V1 (vagus nerve signal before surgical dissection), R1 (RLN signal at initial identification), R2 (RLN signal after thyroid removal and hemostasis), and V2 (vagus nerve signal after thyroid removal and hemostasis) [12].
All patients were regularly followed up with physical examination and thyroid function testing, every 3 months during the first year of surgery. The larynx was examined using video laryngostroboscopy (model 9200C; KayPENTAX) 2 weeks after surgery. Video-stroboscopic examination was performed to identify the following findings: vocal fold edema, subglottic edema, symmetry of arytenoids and vocal folds, vocal fold regularity, and presence of muscle tension dysphonia. When VCP was identified, vocal function exercise was performed for 6 weeks. After vocal function exercise, indirect voice therapy was applied for 1 month to improve the condition of the larynx in the patients who did not show restoration of VCP. Vocal function exercise was then performed again in these patients for 6 weeks, and video-stroboscopic examinations were repeated.
The total costs were calculated by the summation of outpatient costs and examination costs for a maximum of 1 year after surgery. Outpatient costs were incurred from the otolaryngology clinic, not from the endocrine surgery clinic, because it did not make a difference between the IONM and non-IONM groups. For the same reason, admission and operation costs were not included as well. Examination costs included video laryngostroboscopy, vocal function exercise, and indirect voice therapy.
Continuous variables were presented as means with standard deviations, and categorical variables as numbers with percentages. The Student t-test and the Pearson chi-square test or the Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of VCP, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 24.0 (IBM Corp.).
Table 1 shows the baseline clinicopathologic features of 411 enrolled patients who underwent lobectomy with IONM for PTC. The mean age was 45.3 years (range, 21–80 years). A total of 25.8% of patients were male and 74.2% were female. Tumor size ranged from 0.2 to 5.5 cm and the mean value was 1.0 cm. Of the total enrolled patients, 13 had ETE (13.2%) and 16 had VCP (3.9%). With regard to pathologic findings, about 90% were confirmed to be early-stage PTC in size (Table 1). Three hundred and sixty-six patients were pathologically classified into the T1 category (89.1%), 25 patients pT2 (6.1%), and 20 patients pT3a or pT3b (4.9%). A total of 42.6% was node-positive (n = 175).
We compared age, sex, tumor size, ETE, number of harvested and positive lymph nodes, and pathologic stage between the IONM and non-IONM groups. The tumor size in the IONM group was significantly larger than in the non-IONM group (1.3 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6, P < 0.001). In line with that, the pathologic T category also showed a significant association with the IONM use (P < 0.001). While less than 80% of patients were T1 category in the IONM group (115 of 147, 78.2%), the majority of patients in the non-IONM group were pathologically confirmed T1 category (251 of 264, 95.1%). In terms of, sex, the number of harvested and positive lymph nodes, pathologic N category, TNM stage, and ETE, our data showed no significant difference between the IONM and non-IONM groups. In particular, the VCP rate resulted in no significant difference depending on IONM use (4.1% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.883) (Table 2).
We also analyzed clinical parameters that influence VCP after lobectomy. ETE was significantly associated with VCP after lobectomy according to univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR, 14.296; 95% CI, 3.856–53.008; P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no statistical significance between tumor size and VCP in multivariate analysis (Table 3).
In Table 4, we compared outpatient costs after surgery between the IONM and non-IONM groups. The total costs were higher in the IONM group compared to the non-IONM group (US $328.2 ± $220.1 vs. $278.7 ± $141.4, P = 0.006). For patients ‘without’ postoperative VCP, the sum of costs in the IONM group was higher ($297.0 ± $145.4 vs. $263.9 ± $103.1, P = 0.009). In contrast, follow-up costs did not show a statistical difference depending on the use of IONM for patients ‘with’ VCP (P = 0.078). The additional costs due to VCP in the IONM group were significantly lower than in the non-IONM group ($474.1 ± $150.3 vs. $568.9 ± $367.6, P = 0.006).
The IONM system mainly consists of a nerve stimulator, an EMG-attached endotracheal tube, and a monitor that visualizes detected electrical signals. The movement of vocal cord muscles after nerve stimulation is transformed into graphs and figures on the monitor [13]. VCP after thyroid surgery is mainly attributable to RLN injury, which is a major concern in terms of thyroidectomy. It is known that VCP occurs in 3%–5% of patients after thyroidectomy [14]. Patients with VCP may suffer from permanent speech, swallowing dysfunction, or even airway obstruction in case of bilateral VCP. Therefore, IONM use in thyroid surgery has steadily increased over the past decades [15].
According to a survey by Feng et al. [15], 83% of surgeons in charge of thyroidectomy responded using IONM. Nevertheless, the efficacy of IONM use is debatable. Bai and colleagues reviewed 34 studies in their meta-analysis, which found a significant decrease in total, transient, and permanent RLN injury [16]. Snyder et al. [17] reported routine IONM use during thyroidectomy significantly reduced RLN injury. Demiryas et al. [18] retrospectively reviewed a total of 191 patients and the result showed a significantly lower rate of VCP in the group with IONM usage. On the other hand, Cirocchi et al. [19] reported, in a meta-analysis result from 5 randomized controlled trials with 1,558 patients, that it is difficult to discuss the superiority or inferiority of IONM over visualization. Brajcich and McHenry [20] analyzed a total of 627 patients who underwent thyroidectomy and IONM use showed no impact on the rate of permanent RLN injury during thyroidectomy. In short, evidence is still lacking as to whether IONM actually influences the rate of RLN injury or VCP.
Several studies have investigated the incidence of VCP. Misiolek et al. [21] analyzed 466 patients who underwent thyroid operation due to cancer and the rate of postoperative VCP was 4.7%. Staubitz et al. [22] reported in their multicenter study that postoperative VCP was diagnosed in 50 of the 4,598 patients (1.1%), with IONM used in 4,182 patients (91.0%) and IONM was associated with a lower risk of VCP in multivariate analysis. Yu et al. [23] investigated 344 patients who underwent high-risk thyroid surgery and reported that the VCP rate was 1.9% with IONM used for all the enrolled patients. In our retrospective data, the incidence rate of VCP was 3.9%, which was in line with previous studies. We also investigated whether VCP depended on IONM use. Despite the pathologic feature of the IONM group being more aggressive than that of the non-IONM group, there was no significant difference between each group with regard to VCP rate. In our analysis, we found that the IONM group included a more aggressive pathologic T category and a relatively large tumor size. Therefore, if we assume that both groups constituted the same pathologic category, IONM would lower the VCP incidence. A randomized controlled trial with prospective data will need to be performed to verify this hypothesis.
We investigated 411 patients who underwent lobectomy for PTC and showed the cost-effectiveness of IONM by analyzing those additional costs due to VCP in the IONM and non-IONM groups, respectively. The result was in line with some studies in the past. Wang et al. [24] reported in a stimulated-based study that IONM was cost-effective if the rate of VCP was 33.6% at 1 month, 22.9% at 2 months, 9.8% at 6 months, and 3.8% at 12 months. Rocke et al. [25] postulated visual selective IONM was the most cost-effective approach when its RLN injury rate dropped below 1.9%. Al-Qurayshi et al. [26] verified using the Markov chain model that IONM was cost-effective in patients undergoing bilateral thyroid surgery. On the other hand, Gremillion et al. [27] reported that the use of IONM increased the cost of each surgery by $387 and did not reduce the number of injured nerves. IONM cost per procedure was not taken into consideration in our cost analysis. Considering that cost per IONM procedure has nothing to do with the follow-up period, the additional costs due to VCP will have little effect on the total management cost, as the follow-up period gets longer. In the near future, we have a plan to perform a prospective analysis to verify that longer follow-up will offset the cost per procedure.
Meanwhile, IONM use has some drawbacks. Firstly, it takes additional costs. In South Korea, we have criteria to meet for getting coverage from national health insurance, such as huge goiter over 4 cm in maximal diameter, pathologically confirmed central neck node metastasis, previous unilateral VCP, or thyroid capsular invasion, especially posterior. Except for high-risk patients like that, surgeons and patients are reluctant to use IONM with higher costs including IONM cost per procedure. Secondly, IONM has a low positive predictive value (PPV). PPV refers to the probability that subjects with loss of signal at the completion of surgery will have vocal cord dysfunction postoperatively, according to INMSG guideline 2018 from the laryngoscope [28]. Wang et al. [24] conducted a prospective study with 500 total thyroidectomy patients using NIM 3.0 response equipment and PPV was 77.4%. That means, even if there was no nerve injury (negative), IONM gives no signals for about 1/4 of the patients. Thirdly, it is associated with muscle relaxants used for general anesthesia [29]. Vecuronium bromide is commonly used for the convenience of tracheal intubation. EMG signal is highly affected by how long and how much muscle relaxant is administered before nerve stimulation. Even, there has been no recommendation on the way muscle relaxant is used. Lu et al. [30] presented the use of neuromuscular blocking agents during thyroid surgery to restore neuromuscular function and allow the IONM system more effective.
In South Korea’s health insurance service system, patients pay part of the medical cost to the institution and the insurance corporation cover the rest of the cost, but it goes not to patients, but directly to the institutions. We also have the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) to prevent over-treatment and it monitors whether an institution provides patients with appropriate services or not. When a doctor does not follow the guidelines or indications, the insurance corporation may not pay the rest of the cost. We have such a highly monitored and checked medical system that thyroid surgeons tend to use IONM for only patients with a high risk that HIRA could admit. That is the reason why a smaller number of patients were enrolled in the IONM group compared to the non-IONM group.
This study has some limitations. It is a retrospective analysis in nature. Because patients were not randomly assigned, both groups showed much different baseline characteristics, such as even the number of patients and aggressiveness of PTC. Therefore, It is difficult to simply compare the total costs between 2 groups with different sizes. We overcame that statistical weakness by calculating additional costs for each group, and there was a statistical difference between the IONM and non-IONM groups (P = 0.006). In fact, the cost patients paid for the IONM procedure itself was $230 per operation. If the IONM cost per procedure had been considered as additional costs, the total additional costs of the IONM group would have overtaken that of the non-IONM group ($704.1 ± $150.3 vs. $568.9 ± $367.6). However, from a long-term perspective, VCP can affect one’s quality of life and even economic status, not for a maximum of 1 year but years even for the rest of the patient’s lifetime. Despite we did not take the procedure cost of IONM into account in this study, we hypothesize total additional costs of the IONM group will not surpass that of the non-IONM group in a long-term follow-up study, which we plan to conduct in the near future.
Few studies have been conducted on the cost-effectiveness of IONM in thyroid surgery. Rocke et al. [25] conducted a study in the setting of total thyroidectomy and found that visual identification alone is more cost-effective than IONM for most surgeons. Wang et al. [24] defined an average simulated model as a 40-year-old female patient who underwent total thyroidectomy and concluded IONM is cost-effective for permanent RLN injuries. Al-Qurayshi et al. [26] investigated the cost-effectiveness of IONM in preventing bilateral RLN injury. Our study showed for the first time that IONM is also cost-effective for patients with less aggressive PTC who just need thyroid lobectomy. More relevant studies on the cost-effectiveness of IONM in thyroid surgery need to be conducted in the future.
It is difficult to affirm that IONM reduces the prevalence of postoperative VCP. However, IONM use for patients with early staged PTC, at least, is a cost-effective option, considering that voice dysfunction may lower patients’ quality of life and increase the economic burden.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank all nurses helping the operations who have contributed to this study.
References
1. Hayward NJ, Grodski S, Yeung M, Johnson WR, Serpell J. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid surgery: a review. ANZ J Surg. 2013; 83:15–21. PMID: 22989215.
2. Jeannon JP, Orabi AA, Bruch GA, Abdalsalam HA, Simo R. Diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2009; 63:624–629. PMID: 19335706.
3. Chan WF, Lo CY. Pitfalls of intraoperative neuromonitoring for predicting postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve function during thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2006; 30:806–812. PMID: 16680596.
4. Vasileiadis I, Karatzas T, Charitoudis G, Karakostas E, Tseleni-Balafouta S, Kouraklis G. Association of intraoperative neuromonitoring with reduced recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142:994–1001. PMID: 27490310.
5. Iscan Y, Aygun N, Sormaz IC, Tunca F, Uludag M, Senyurek YG. Is craniocaudal dissect ion of recurrent laryngeal nerve safer than lateral approach: a prospective randomized study comparing both techniques by using continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022; 103:205–216. PMID: 36304193.
6. Dralle H, Sekulla C, Lorenz K, Brauckhoff M, Machens A. German IONM Study Group. Intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2008; 32:1358–1366. PMID: 18305996.
7. Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S. Randomized clinical trial of visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 2009; 96:240–246. PMID: 19177420.
8. Zheng S, Xu Z, Wei Y, Zeng M, He J. Effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring on recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates after thyroid surgery: a meta-analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013; 112:463–472. PMID: 24016611.
9. Pisanu A, Porceddu G, Podda M, Cois A, Uccheddu A. Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves versus visualization alone during thyroidectomy. J Surg Res. 2014; 188:152–161. PMID: 24433869.
10. Chandrasekhar SS, Randolph GW, Seidman MD, Rosenfeld RM, Angelos P, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, et al. Clinical practice guideline: improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148(6 Suppl):S1–S37.
11. Randolph GW, Dralle H, Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, et al. International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group. Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121 Suppl 1:S1–S16. PMID: 21181860.
12. Chiang FY, Lee KW, Chen HC, Chen HY, Lu IC, Kuo WR, et al. Standardization of intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operation. World J Surg. 2010; 34:223–229. PMID: 20020124.
13. Shin SC, Lee BJ. A new era of intraoperative neuromonitoring: beyond the electromyography endotracheal tube during thyroid surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 13:324–325. PMID: 33176401.
14. Bergenfelz A, Salem AF, Jacobsson H, Nordenström E, Almquist M. Steering Committee for the Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery (SQRTPA). Risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in patients undergoing thyroidectomy with and without intraoperative nerve monitoring. Br J Surg. 2016; 103:1828–1838. PMID: 27538052.
15. Feng AL, Puram SV, Singer MC, Modi R, Kamani D, Randolph GW. Increased prevalence of neural monitoring during thyroidectomy: global surgical survey. Laryngoscope. 2020; 130:1097–1104. PMID: 31361342.
16. Bai B, Chen W. Protective Effects of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring (IONM) for Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury in Thyroidectomy: Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:7761. PMID: 29773852.
17. Snyder SK, Sigmond BR, Lairmore TC, Govednik-Horny CM, Janicek AK, Jupiter DC. The long-term impact of routine intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Surgery. 2013; 154:704–713. PMID: 24008089.
18. Demiryas S, Donmez T, Cekic E. Effect of nerve monitoring on complications of thyroid surgery. North Clin Istanb. 2018; 5:14–19. PMID: 29607426.
19. Cirocchi R, Arezzo A, D’Andrea V, Abraha I, Popivanov GI, Avenia N, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 1:CD012483. PMID: 30659577.
20. Brajcich BC, McHenry CR. The utility of intraoperative nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery. J Surg Res. 2016; 204:29–33. PMID: 27451864.
21. Misiolek M, Waler J, Namyslowski G, Kucharzewski M, Podwinski A, Czecior E. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroid cancer surgery: a laryngological and surgical problem. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001; 258:460–462. PMID: 11769992.
22. Staubitz JI, Watzka F, Poplawski A, Riss P, Clerici T, Bergenfelz A, et al. Effect of intraoperative nerve monitoring on postoperative vocal cord palsy rates after thyroidectomy: European multicentre registry-based study. BJS Open. 2020; 4:821–829. PMID: 32543773.
23. Yu Q, Liu K, Zhang S, Li H, Xie C, Wu Y, et al. Application of continuous and intermittent intraoperative nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. J Surg Res. 2019; 243:325–331. PMID: 31255932.
24. Wang T, Kim HY, Wu CW, Rausei S, Sun H, Pergolizzi FP, et al. Analyzing cost-effectiveness of neural-monitoring in recurrent laryngeal nerve recovery course in thyroid surgery. Int J Surg. 2017; 48:180–188. PMID: 29030215.
25. Rocke DJ, Goldstein DP, de Almeida JR. A cost-utility analysis of recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in the setting of total thyroidectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 142:1199–1205. PMID: 27737451.
26. Al-Qurayshi Z, Kandil E, Randolph GW. Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative nerve monitoring in avoidance of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 2017; 104:1523–1531. PMID: 28707698.
27. Gremillion G, Fatakia A, Dornelles A, Amedee RG. Intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery: is it worth the cost? Ochsner J. 2012; 12:363–366. PMID: 23267265.
28. Schneider R, Randolph GW, Dionigi G, Wu CW, Barczynski M, Chiang FY, et al. International Neural Monitoring Study Group guideline 2018 part I: staging bilateral thyroid surgery with monitoring loss of signal. Laryngoscope. 2018; 128 Suppl 3:S1–S17.
29. Gunes ME, Dural AC, Akarsu C, Guzey D, Sahbaz NA, Tulubas EK, et al. Effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring on efficacy and safety using sugammadex in thyroid surgery: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019; 97:282–290. PMID: 31824882.
30. Lu IC, Wu CW, Chang PY, Chen HY, Tseng KY, Randolph GW, et al. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex allows for optimization of neural monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope. 2016; 126:1014–1019. PMID: 26748952.