Journal List > Nat Prod Sci > v.25(2) > 1129721

Kim, Lee, Subedi, Kim, and Lee: Chemical Constituents of Impatiens balsamina Stems and Their Biological Activities

Abstract

The purification of the MeOH extract from Impatiens balsamina by repeated column chromatography led to the isolation of one new tetrahydronaphthalene (1), together with eleven known compounds (212). The structure of the new compound (1) was determined by spectral data analysis (1H and 13C-NMR, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, NOESY, and HR-ESI-MS). Isolated compounds (112) were evaluated for their inhibitory effects on NO production in LPS-activated murine microglial BV-2 cells and their effects on NGF secretion from C6 glioma cells. Compounds 3, 7, and 10 reduced NO levels in LPS-activated murine microglial cells with IC50 values of 26.89, 25.59, and 44.21 µM, respectively. Compounds 1, 5, and 9 upregulated NGF secretion to 153.09 ± 4.66, 156.88 ± 8.86, and 157.34 ± 3.30%, respectively.

Introduction

Impatiens balsamina (Balsaminaceae), also known as Garden balsam, is widely distributed in Korea, China and India. I. balsamina has been used as Chinese medicine to treat anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory herb, also has been used as a Korean traditional medicine for the treatment of scrofulosis, carbuncle, and dysentery.123 Previous phytochemical investigations on I. balsamina reported the isolation of triterpenoid saponins, quinones, coumarin, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds, and there were several reports on various biological activities.45678910 Our earlier phytochemical investigation on white petal of I. balsamina resulted in the isolation of anti-neurodegenerative biflavonoid glycosides and antiinflammatory phenolic compounds.910 In a continuing search for bioactive constituents from Korean medical plant sources, we investigated the MeOH extract of stems of I. balsamina. The purification of hexane and EtOAc fractions by repeated column chromatography led to the isolation of one new tetrahydronaphthalene (1), together with eleven known compounds (212). The structure of 1 was established on spectral data analysis (1H and I. balsamina-NMR, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY). Isolated compounds (112) were evaluated for their inhibitory effects on nitric oxide (NO) production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated murine microglial cells and their effects on NGF secretion from C6 glioma cells.

Experimental

General experimental procedures

Optical rotations were measured on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter using methanol solvent. Ultraviolet (UV) spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu UV-1601 UV-vis spectrometer. High Resolution ESI Mass Spectrometer data were obtained with a Waters SYNAPT G2 mass spectrometer. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker IFS-66/S Fourier-transform IR spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on Varian UNITY INOVA 500 NMR spectrometer at 500 MHz (1H) and 125 MHz (13C), and Bruker AVANCE III 700 NMR spectrometer at 700 MHz (1H) and 175 MHz (I. balsamina). Preparative HPLC was performed using a Gilson 321 pump with a Shodex Refractive Index Detector, YMC-Triart C18 5 µm column (250 × 10 mm) and HAISIL 100 silica 5 µm column (250 × 10 mm). Silica gel 60 (Merck, 70 – 230 mesh and 230 – 400 mesh) and RP-C18 silica gel (Merck, 230 – 400 mesh) was used for column chromatography. LPLC was performed over a LiChroprep Lobar-A silica 60 column (Merck, 240 mm × 10 mm i.d.) equipped with a FMI QSY-0 pump. Merck precoated silica gel F254 plates and reversed-phase (RP)-18 F254s plates (Merck) were used for thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Spots were detected on TLC under UV light or by heating after spraying with anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid.

Plant materials

The dried stems of I. balsamina (2 kg) were collected at Asan in Chungcheongnam-Do, Korea, in August 2014. The plants were identified by one of the authors (K.R.L.). A voucher specimen (SKKU-NPL-1425) of the plant was deposited in the herbarium of the School of Pharmacy at Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

Extraction and isolation

The dried stems of I. balsamina (2 kg) were extracted with 80% MeOH at room temperature. The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to yield MeOH extract (294 g), which was suspended in distilled H2O (2.4 L) and then successively partitioned with hexane, CHCl3, EtOAc and n-BuOH, yielding 20, 11, 6, and 28 g, respectively. The EtOAc fraction (5 g) was separated over a silica gel column with a solvent system of CHCl3/MeOH/water (7:1:0.1) to yielded five sub-fractions (E1–E5). Sub-fraction E1 (1.8 g) was chromatographed on a RP-C18 silica gel column with 30% aqueous MeOH to yield nine sub-fractions (E11–E19). Fraction E12 (430 mg) was purified by RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (30% MeOH) to yield 2 (9 mg, tR = 17.1 min). Fraction E2 (1.1 g) was separated by RP-C18 silica gel column with 30% aqueous MeOH to give nine sub-fractions (E21–E29). Sub-fraction E23 (161 mg) was purified using RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (30% MeOH) to yield 1 (20 mg, tR = 15.1 min), 6 (24 mg, tR = 21.1 min), and 3 (7 mg, tR = 22.4 min). E3 (557 mg) was subjected to RP-C18 silica gel column with 45% aqueous MeOH to give five sub-fractions (E31–E35). Fraction E31 (148 mg) was purified by RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (30% CH3CN) to yield 4 (100 mg, tR = 11.1 min). Fraction E5 (235 mg) was purified using RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (20% CH3CN) to yield 5 (32 mg, tR = 21.2 min). The hexane soluble fraction was chromatographed on a silica gel column with hexane/EtOAc (20:1 to 1:1) to give eight sub-fractions (H1–H8). Fraction H2 (546 mg) was subjected to using a RP-C18 silica gel column with 95% aqueous MeOH to yield 11 (9 mg, tR = 34.4 min). Fraction H3 (918 mg) was separated to RP-C18 silica gel column with 90% aqueous MeOH to yield eight sub-fractions (H31–H38). Subfraction H32 (85 mg) was purified using RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (90% MeOH) to yield 7 (9 mg, tR = 36.9 min). Fraction H36 (117 mg) was purified by semi-prep. HPLC (CHCl3/MeOH 120:1) to give 12 (88 mg, tR = 11.0 min). Fraction H5 (2.4 g) was chromatographed on a RP-C18 silica gel column (95% aqueous MeOH) to give twelve sub-fractions (H51–H512). Subfraction H56 (89 mg) was purified using RP-C18 semi-prep. HPLC (95% MeOH) to yield 8 (4 mg, tR = 17.8 min). Fraction H57 (169 mg) was purified by semi-prep. HPLC (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) to yield 9 (3 mg, tR = 15.3 min). Fraction H512 (112 mg) was purified using semi-prep. HPLC (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) to give 10 (7 mg, tR = 8.8min).

1β,2α,4β-Triol-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (1)

Colorless gum. : αD25nps-25-130-i001 : −35.8 (c 0.10, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3348, 2938, 2836, 1448, 1412, 1055, 1025; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 201 (0.75), 213 (0.45), 217 (0.38), 262 (0.02) nm; 1H and I. balsamina NMR : see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 181.0865 [M+H]+; (calcd. for C10H13O3, 181.0865).

1β,2β,4β-Triol-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (2)

Colorless gum. αD25nps-25-130-i002 : −57.8 (c 0.11, MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3340, 2944, 2832, 1460, 1408, 1054, 1021; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (1.28), 211 (1.11), 215 (0.92), 256 (0.04) nm; 1H and I. balsamina NMR : see Table 1.

(7R,8S)-Dihydrodehydrodiconiferyl alcohol-9-β-O-D-glucopyranoside (3)

White gum; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 6.99 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-2), 6.85 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz, H-6), 6.79 (1H, s, H-6′), 6.75 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-5), 6.72 (1H, s, H-2′), 5.58 (1H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-7), 4.35 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-1), 3.85 (3H, s, 3′-OCH3), 3.82 (3H, s, 3-OCH3), 3.56 (2H, t, J = 6.5Hz, H-9′), 2.62 (2H, m, H-7′), 1.81 (2H, tt, J = 13.1, 6.5 Hz, H-8′); I. balsamina NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 147.6 (C-3), 146.1 (C-4), 146.0 (C-4′), 143.8 (C-3′), 135.6 (C-1′), 133.2 (C-1), 128.3 (C-5′), 118.4 (C-6), 116.8 (C-6′), 114.6 (C-5), 112.8 (C-2′), 109.4 (C-2), 102.8 (C-1), 87.8 (C-7), 76.8 (C-5), 76.7 (C-3), 73.7 (C-2), 70.9 (C-9), 70.2 (C-4), 61.3 (C-6), 60.8 (C-9′), 55.4 (3′-OCH3), 55.1 (3-OCH3), 51.5 (C-8), 34.4 (C-8′), 31.5 (C-7′).

Kaempferol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (4)

Yellow needles; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 8.08 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 6.91 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′, 5′), 6.43 (1H, s, H-8), 6.23 (1H, s, H-6), 5.28 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-1); I. balsamina NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 178.1 (C-4), 164.7 (C-7), 161.7 (C-5), 160.1 (C-4′), 157.7 (C-9), 157.1 (C-2), 134.0 (C-3), 130.8 (C-2′, 6′), 121.4 (C-1′), 114.7 (C-3′, 5′), 104.3 (C-10), 102.7 (C-1), 98.5 (C-6), 93.6 (C-8), 77.2 (C-5), 76.7 (C-3), 74.3 (C-2), 70.0 (C-4), 61.2 (C-6).

Nicotiflorin (5)

Yellow needles; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 8.09 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 6.91 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′, 5′), 6.42 (1H, s, H-8), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz, H-6), 5.15 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-1), 4.54 (1H, d, J = 0.9 Hz, H-1‴), 3.66 (1H, m, H-2‴), 3.55 (1H, dd, J = 9.5, 3.3 Hz, H-3‴), 1.14 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H-6‴); I. balsamina NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 178.0 (C-4), 164.8 (C-7), 161.6 (C-5), 160.1 (C-4′), 158.0 (C-9), 157.2 (C-2), 134.1 (C-3), 130.1 (C-2′, 6′), 121.4 (C-1′), 114.7 (C-3′, 5′), 104.2 (C-10), 103.2 (C-1″), 101.0 (C-1‴), 98.6 (C-6), 93.5 (C-8), 76.8 (C-3″), 75.8 (C-5″), 74.4 (C-2″), 72.5 (C-4‴), 70.9 (C-2‴), 70.7 (C-3‴), 70.0 (C-4″), 68.3 (C-5‴), 67.2 (C-6″), 16.5 (C-6‴).

p-Hydroxybenzoic acid (6)

White gum; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 7.90 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2′, 6′), 6.84 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3′, 5′); I. balsamina NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 170.1 (C-7), 163.3 (C-4), 133.0 (C-2, 6), 122.8 (C-1), 116.0 (C-3, 5).

β-Amyrin (7)

Colorless gum; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 5.19 (1H, t, J = 3.6 Hz, H-12), 3.22 (1H, dd, J = 11.0, 4.6 Hz, H-3), 1.14 (3H, s, H-27), 1.01 (3H, s, H-26), 0.97 (3H, s, H-23), 0.94 (3H, s, H-25), 0.88 (6H, s, H-29, 30), 0.84 (3H, s, H-28), 0.80 (3H, s, H-24); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 145.4 (C-13), 121.9 (C-12), 79.3 (C-3), 55.4 (C-5), 47.8 (C-9), 47.4 (C-18), 47.0 (C-19), 41.9 (C-14), 40.0 (C-8), 39.0 (C-4), 38.8 (C-1), 37.3 (C-10), 37.2 (C-22), 34.9 (C-21), 33.5 (C-29), 32.8 (C-7), 32.7 (C-17), 31.3 (C-20), 28.6 (C-28), 28.3 (C-23), 27.3 (C-2), 27.1 (C-16), 26.3 (C-15), 26.2 (C-27), 23.9 (C-30), 23.7 (C-11), 18.5 (C-6), 17.0 (C-26), 15.8 (C-25), 15.7 (C-24).

Erythrodiol (8)

Colorless gum; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 5.20 (1H, t, J = 3.5 Hz, H-12), 3.55 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-28a), 3.22 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-28b), 3.22 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz, H-3), 1.17 (3H, s, H-27), 1.00 (3H, s, H-23), 0.95 (3H, s, H-26), 0.94 (3H, s, H-25), 0.89 (3H, s, H-29), 0.88 (3H, s, H-30), 0.79 (3H, s, H-24); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 144.2 (C-13), 122.4 (C-12), 79.0 (C-3), 69.7 (C-28), 55.2 (C-5), 47.6 (C-9), 46.5 (C-19), 42.4 (C-18), 41.7 (C-14), 39.8 (C-8), 38.9 (C-4), 38.6 (C-1), 37.0 (C-10, 17), 34.1 (C-21), 33.2 (C-29), 32.6 (C-7), 31.0 (C-20), 30.9 (C-22), 28.0 (C-23), 27.2 (C-2), 25.9 (C-27), 25.6 (C-15), 23.6 (C-11), 23.5 (C-30), 22.0 (C-16), 18.3 (C-6), 16.7 (C-26), 15.6 (C-24), 15.5 (C-25).

α-Spinasterol (9)

White needles; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 5.16 (1H, dd, J = 15.7, 8.7 Hz, H-22), 5.03 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 8.6 Hz, H-23), 3.60 (1H, tt, J = 10.9, 4.5 Hz, H-3), 1.03 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-3), 0.85 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H-26), 0.56 (3H, s, H-18); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 139.8 (C-8), 139.4 (C-22), 129.7 (C-23), 117.7 (C-7), 71.3 (C-3), 56.1 (C-17), 55.4 (C-14), 51.5 (C-24), 49.7 (C-9), 43.5 (C-13), 41.0 (C-20), 40.5 (C-5), 39.7 (C-12), 38.2 (C-4), 37.4 (C-1), 34.4 (C-10), 32.1 (C-25), 31.7 (C-2), 29.9 (C-6), 28.7 (C-16), 25.6 (C-28), 23.2 (C-15), 21.8 (C-11), 21.6 (C-26), 21.3 (C-21), 19.2 (C-27), 13.2 (C-19), 12.5 (C-29), 12.3 (C-18).

29-Nor-20-oxolupeol (10)

White gum; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 4.8 Hz, H-3), 2.58 (1H, td, J = 11.3, 6.0 Hz, H-19), 2.15 (3H, s, H-30), 1.02 (3H, s, H-26), 0.97 (6H, s, H-23, 27), 0.83 (3H, s, H-25), 0.78 (3H, s, H-28), 0.76 (3H, s, H-24); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 213.1 (C-20), 79.2 (C-3), 55.5 (C-5), 52.9 (C-19), 50.5 (C-9), 49.9 (C-18), 43.3 (C-14), 42.9 (C-17), 41.0 (C-8), 40.1 (C-22), 39.1 (C-4), 38.9 (C-1), 37.4 (C-10), 37.3 (C-13), 35.2 (C-16), 34.4 (C-7), 29.4 (C-30), 28.2 (C-23), 27.9 (C-21), 27.6 (C-15), 27.5 (C-2), 27.4 (C-12), 21.1 (C-11), 18.5 (C-6), 18.2 (C-28), 16.3 (C-25), 16.1 (C-26), 15.6 (C-24), 14.7 (C-27).

Lupenone (11)

Colorless gum; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 4.69 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-29a), 4.57 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 1.4 Hz, H-29b), 1.69 (3H, brs, H-30), 1.07 (6H, s, H-24, 26), 1.03 (3H, s, H-23), 0.96 (3H, s, H-27), 0.93 (3H, s, H-25), 0.80 (3H, s, H-28); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 218.2 (C-3), 150.9 (C-20), 109.4 (C-29), 54.9 (C-5), 49.8 (C-9), 48.2 (C-18), 47.9 (C-19), 47.3 (C-4), 43.0 (C-14), 42.9 (C-17), 40.8 (C-8), 40.0 (C-22), 39.6 (C-2), 38.2 (C-13), 36.9 (C-10), 35.5 (C-16), 34.1 (C-1), 33.6 (C-7), 29.8 (C-21), 27.4 (C-15), 26.6 (C-23), 25.1 (C-12), 21.5 (C-11), 21.0 (C-24), 19.7 (C-6), 19.3 (C-30), 18.0 (C-28), 16.0 (C-25), 15.8 (C-26), 14.5 (C-27).

Lupeol (12)

White gum; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 4.69 (1H, d, J = 2.3 Hz, H-29a), 4.57 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 1.4 Hz, H-29b), 3.19 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 4.9 Hz, H-3), 2.37 (1H, td, J = 11.1, 5.8 Hz, H-19), 1.68 (3H, brs, H-30), 1.03 (3H, s, H-26), 0.97 (3H, s, H-27), 0.95 (3H, s, H-23), 0.83 (3H, s, H-25), 0.79 (3H, s, H-24), 0.76 (3H, s, H-28); I. balsamina NMR (CDCl3, 175 MHz): δ 151.2 (C-20), 109.4 (C-29), 79.1 (C-3), 55.6 (C-5), 50.5 (C-9), 48.7 (C-19), 48.3 (C-18), 43.2 (C-17), 43.1 (C-14), 41.1 (C-8), 40.3 (C-22), 39.0 (C-1, 4), 38.3 (C-13), 37.2 (C-10), 35.6 (C-16), 34.4 (C-7), 30.1 (C-21), 28.4 (C-23), 27.9 (C-15), 27.7 (C-2), 25.4 (C-12), 21.3 (C-11), 19.7(C-30), 18.6 (C-6), 18.3(C-28), 16.5 (C-25), 16.3 (C-26), 15.7 (C-24), 14.7 (C-27).

Measurement of NO Production and Cell Viability

Murine microglial BV-2 cells were plated into a 96-well plate (3 × 104 cells/well). After 24 h, cells were pretreated with samples for 30 min and then stimulated with 100 ng/mL of LPS for another 24 h. Nitrite, a soluble oxidation product of NO, was measured in culture media using the Griess reaction. The supernatant (50 µL) was harvested and mixed with an equal volume of Griess reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% N-1-naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride in 5% phosphoric acid). After 10 min, the absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Sodium nitrite was used as a standard to calculate the NO2 - concentration. Cell viability was tested by the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. NG-Mono-methyl-L-arginine was evaluated as a positive control.

NGF and cell viability assays

C6 glioma cells were used to measure NGF release into the medium. C6 cells were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. C6 cells were seeded into 24-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well). After 24 h, the cells were treated with DMEM containing 2% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin with 20 µM of each sample for one day. The cell viability of the C6 cells was tested via an MTT assay. 6-shogaol was evaluated as a positive control.

Result and Discussion

The structures of compounds 212 were determined by comparison of their spectroscopic data with those in the literatures to be 1β,2β,4β-triol-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene (2),11 (7R,8S)-dihydrodehydrodiconiferyl alcohol-9-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (3),12 kaempferol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (4),13 nicotiflorin (5),14 p-hydroxybenzoic acid (6),15 β-amyrin (7),16 erythrodiol (8),17 α-spinasterol (9),18 29-nor-20-oxolupeol (10),19 lupenone (11),20 and lupeol (12)21 (Fig. 1).
Compound 1 was obtained as a colorless gum. The molecular formula was determined to be C10H12O3, based on molecular ion peak [M+H]+ at m/z 181.0865 (calcd for C10H13O3, 118.0865) in the positive-ion HR-ESI-MS. The IR spectrum of 1 indicated the presence of hydroxy group (3348 cm−1). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 showed the presence of a 1,2-disubstituted aromatic ring protons at δH 7.56 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.41 (1H, dd, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz), 7.34 (1H, td, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz), and 7.29 (1H, td, J = 7.3, 1.5 Hz), three oxygenated proton signals at δH 4.89 (1H, m), 4.41 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), and 4.09 (1H, ddd, J = 10.1, 7.3, 3.4 Hz) and one methylene proton signal at δH 2.21 (1H, ddd, J = 13.5, 4.7, 3.4 Hz), and 2.12 (1H, ddd, J = 13.5, 10.1, 4.7 Hz). The I. balsamina NMR spectrum displayed 10 carbon signals, including aromatic carbon signals at δC 137.6, 137.5, 128.1, 127.6, 127.4, and 127.1, three oxygenated carbon signals at δC 73.6, 68.9, and 66.6, one methylene carbon signal at δC 37.1. These NMR data were similar to 1α,2α,4β-triol-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, except for chemical shifts and coupling constants of methine protons.22 The location of hydroxyl groups was confirmed by 1H-1H COSY correlations and HMBC data (Fig. 2). The relative configuration of 1 established based on coupling constants (3J1,2 = 7.3 Hz, 3J2,3 = 10.1, 3.4 Hz, and 3J3,4 = 4.7 Hz) of 1H-NMR spectra, leading oxygenated protons at C-1, C-2, and C-4 to be as axial, axial, and equatorial positions, respectively (Fig. 2).2223 In the NOESY spectrum, correlations of H-3ax with H-1 and H-4 indicated that OH groups at C-1 and C-4 were to be in the same orientation, and cross peak H-2/H-3eq showed that OH groups at C-1 and C-2 were to be in the opposite orientation (Fig. 2). Thus, the structure of 1 was established as 1β,2α,4β-triol-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene.
The isolated compounds (112) were evaluated for their inhibitory effects on NO production in LPS-activated murine microglial cells and their effects on NGF secretion from C6 glioma cells. Among them, compounds 3, 7, and 10 reduced NO levels in LPS-activated murine microglial BV-2 cells with IC50 values of 26.89, 25.59, and 44.21 µM, respectively. Compounds 1, 5, and 9 upregulated NGF secretion to 153.09 ± 4.66, 156.88 ± 8.86, and 157.34 ± 3.30%, respectively (Tables 2 and 3).

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Structures of compounds 112 isolated from I. balsamina

nps-25-130-g001
Fig. 2

Key 1H-1H COSY (), HMBC (→) and NOESY (◂···▸) correlations of 1.

nps-25-130-g002
Table 1

1H and I. balsamina NMR data of 1 and 2 in CD3OD. (δ in ppm, 500 MHz for 1H and 125 MHz for I. balsamina)a

nps-25-130-i001

aJ values are in parentheses and reported in Hz; the assignments were based on 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC experiments.

Table 2

Inhibitory effects of compounds 112 on NO production in LPS-activated BV-2 cells

nps-25-130-i002

aIC50 value of each compound was defined as the concentration (µM) that caused 50% inhibition of NO production in LPS-activated BV-2 cells.

bCell viability after treatment with 20 µM of each compound was determined by MTT assay and is expressed in percentage (%). The results are averages of three independent experiments, and the data are expressed as mean ± SD.

cL-NMMA as positive control.

Table 3

Effects of compounds 112 on NGF secretion in C6 cells

nps-25-130-i003

aC6 cells were treated with 20 µM of the compounds. After 24 h, the content of NGF secreted into C6-conditioned media was measured by ELISA. The level of secreted NGF is expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (set at 100%). Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

bCell viability after treatment with 20 µM of each compound was determined by the MTT assay and is expressed as a percentage (%). Results are the mean of three independent experiments, and the data are expressed as the mean ± SD.

c6-shogaol was used as positive control.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012R1A5A2A28671860). We are thankful to the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) for the NMR and mass spectrum data.

References

1. Meenu B, Neeraja ED, Rejimon G, Varghese A. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015; 7:16–21.
2. Ding ZS, Jiang FS, Chen NP, Lv GY, Zhu CG. Molecules. 2008; 13:220–229.
3. Kang SN, Goo YM, Yang MR, Ibrahim RIH, Cho JH, Kim IS, Lee OH. Molecules. 2013; 18:6356–6365.
4. Shoji N, Umeyama A, Yosikawa K, Nagai M, Arihara S. Phytochemistry. 1994; 37:1437–1441.
5. Panichayupakaranant P, Noguchi H, De-Eknamkul W, Sankawa U. Phytochemistry. 1995; 40:1141–1143.
6. Li Q, Zhang X, Cao J, Guo Z, Lou Y, Ding M, Zhao Y. Fitoterapia. 2015; 105:234–239.
7. Ishiguro K, Ohira Y, Oku H. J Nat Prod. 1998; 61:1126–1129.
8. Imam MZ, Nahar N, Akter S, Rana MS. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012; 142:804–810.
9. Kim CS, Subedi L, Kim SY, Choi SU, Choi SJ, Son MW, Kim KH, Lee KR. Phytochem lett. 2015; 14:215–220.
10. Kim CS, Bae M, O J, Subedi L, Suh WS, Choi SZ, Son MW, Kim SY, Choi SU, Oh DC, Lee KR. J Nat Prod. 2017; 80:471–478.
11. Rashid A, Read G. J Chem Soc. 1969; 15:2053–2058.
12. Zhao XC, Du JL, Xie YG, Zhang Y, Jin HZ. Chem Nat Compd. 2018; 54:556–558.
13. Jayasinghe ULB, Balasooriya BAIS, Bandara AGD, Fujimoto Y. Nat Prod Res. 2004; 18:499–502.
14. Park SY, Kim SJ, Lee SY, Bae KH, Kang SS. Nat Prod Sci. 2008; 14:281–288.
15. Rho T, Yoon KD. Nat Prod Sci. 2017; 23:253–257.
16. Wang H, Tian X, Chen YZ. J Chin Chem Soc. 2002; 49:433–436.
17. Ge YC, Zhang HJ, Lei JX, Wang KW. Chem Nat Compd. 2018; 54:600–602.
18. Choi SZ, Lee SO, Choi SU, Lee KR. Arch Pharm Res. 2003; 26:521–525.
19. Kotowicz C, Catalan CAN, Griffin CL, Herz W. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2005; 33:737–742.
20. Puapairoj P, Naengchomnong W, Kijjoa A, Pinto MM, Pedro M, Nascimento MS, Silva AM, Herz W. Planta Med. 2005; 71:208–213.
21. Fotie J, Bohle DS, Leimanis ML, Georges E, Rukunga G, Nkengfack AE. J Nat Prod. 2006; 69:62–67.
22. Chen XM, Qian SH, Feng F. Chine Chem Lett. 2010; 21:440–442.
23. Naemura K, Wakebe T, Hirose K, Tobe Y. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 1997; 15:2585–2595.
TOOLS
Similar articles