Journal List > Ann Dermatol > v.31(Suppl) > 1129260

Seo, Jeong, Shin, Choi, and Lee: Dermal Infection with Trichophyton rubrum in an Immunocompetent Patient
Dear Editor:
Dermatophytosis is a common skin disease affecting the surface of the skin, including the stratum corneum, hair and nails. However, it is also possible for dermatophytes to invade the dermis and subcutaneous fat layer, resulting in deep dermatophytosis1. Deep infection by dermatophytes is defined as the growth of dermatophytes in the dermis and subcutis, and is believed to result from lesions in superficial dermatophytosis or rupture of infected follicles into the dermis2. The deep lesions are usually accompanied by superficial dermatophytosis3.
A 78-year-old female presented with reddish patches with purulent discharge on the left lower leg without any trauma for 1 week. She had a history of hypertension, angina and previously undiagnosed onychomycosis, but no other illnesses that would lower immunity. Physical examination showed localized coin-sized erythematous swollen patches with a central ulcer on the left lower leg (Fig. 1A, B). KOH and fungal culture preparation of epidermal scales and purulent discharge were all found to be negative five and two times each, respectively. The histopathologic evaluation demonstrated ill-demarcated, non-encapsulated granulomatous inflammation and an abscess composed of multinucleated giant cells, lymphohistiocytes, and neutrophils in the deep dermis and subcutaneous fat layer. Immunohistochemistry revealed negativity for Gram stain and many acute angle branching hyphae in the deep dermis with periodic acid-Schiff and Gomori Methenamin-silver stain (GMS) (Fig. 1C, D). Trichophyton rubrum was identified by REBA Fungus-ID® (Optipharm M&D, Inc., Wonju, Korea) in biopsy tissue (Fig. 2). Based on clinical and histologic findings, the patient was diagnosed with deep dermatophytosis. We received the patient's consent form about publishing all photographic materials.
The patient was initially treated with oral ciprofloxacin for 4 weeks and terbinafine for 10 weeks. After 14 weeks with clinical improvement, many hyphae were still observed on follow-up biopsy of the deep dermis with GMS stain, and we replaced terbinafine with oral fluconazole for 12 weeks. After 3 months, the skin lesion was completely resolved, and there was no evidence of new lesions. Deep dermatophytosis is a rare disease, with few prior reported cases. In a recent article, Kim et al.3 provided a descriptive review of 46 cases of deep dermatophytosis, of which 38 (83%) were immunocompromised. Most patients had pre-existing superficial dermatophytosis. Kershenovich et al.4 reported 10 cases of deep dermatophytosis. In all cases, a concurrent superficial dermatophyte infection was documented, and all patients were immunocompromised. Because deep dermatophytosis in immunocompetent patients is very rarely reported35, we did not suspect the condition at first.
Kershenovich et al.4 reported that terbinafine was effective in the treatment of deep dermatophytosis, and the average duration of treatment with terbinafine was 7 weeks (range, 4~12 weeks). However, despite sufficient use of terbinafine, the treatment was not effective in our patient. Therefore, we decided to replace it with fluconazole, a good treatment option for deep dermatophytosis.
We report a rare case of dermal infection of T. rubrum in an immunocompetent patient. Even if patients are immunocompetent, clinicians need to consider the possibility of deep dermatophytosis with untreated ulcerative lesions. A history of superficial dermatophytosis and skin biopsy can be helpful to confirm the diagnosis.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

(A) Localized coin-sized erythematous swollen patches with a central ulcer on the left lower leg before treatment. (B) The lesion after treatment. (C) Ill-demarcated, non-encapsulated granulomatous inflammation composed of multinucleated giant cells, lymphohistiocytes, and neutrophils in the deep dermis (H&E, ×100). (D) Many acute angle-branching hyphae appeared in the deep dermis with Gomori Methenamin-silver stain (GMS, ×400).

ad-31-S32-g001
Fig. 2

Results of reverse blot hybridization assay with REBA Fungus-ID®. DNA from the tissue (lane 1) showed positive reaction to Trichophyton rubrum; DNA from paraffin block showed negative reaction. Lane 1: tissue, lane 2: paraffin block, lane 3: positive control for T. rubrum, lane 4: negative control.

ad-31-S32-g002

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

1. Toyoki M, Hase M, Hirasawa Y, Umeyama T, Miyazaki Y, Kano R, et al. A giant dermatophyte abscess caused by Trichophyton rubrum in an immunocompromised patient. Med Mycol J. 2017; 58:E63–E66.
2. Inaoki M, Nishijima C, Miyake M, Asaka T, Hasegawa Y, Anzawa K, et al. Case of dermatophyte abscess caused by Trichophyton rubrum: a case report and review of the literature. Mycoses. 2015; 58:318–323.
crossref
3. Kim SH, Jo IH, Kang J, Joo SY, Choi JH. Dermatophyte abscesses caused by Trichophyton rubrum in a patient without pre-existing superficial dermatophytosis: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2016; 16:298.
crossref
4. Kershenovich R, Sherman S, Reiter O, Huss SR, Didkovsky E, Mimouni D, et al. A unique clinicopathological manifestation of fungal infection: a case series of deep dermatophytosis in immunosuppressed patients. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017; 18:697–704.
crossref
5. Su H, Li L, Cheng B, Zhu J, Zhang Q, Xu J, et al. Trichophyton rubrum infection characterized by Majocchi's granuloma and deeper dermatophytosis: case report and review of published literature. Mycopathologia. 2017; 182:549–554.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Jong-Kil Seo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8822-6466

Ki-Heon Jeong
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-0932

Min Kyung Shin
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9834-7931

Jong Soo Choi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-3970

Mu-Hyoung Lee
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0902-6843

Similar articles