초록
Purpose:
The purpose of this study is to report the results of surgical treatment for malunited radius shaft fracture combined with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients with malunited radius shaft fracture with DRUJ instability from 2002 to 2015 was performed. All patients underwent corrective osteotomy for malunited radius. Anatomical distal radioulnar ligament reconstruction was additionally performed in patients who had remaining instability after correction. Preoperative and postoperative the anteroposterior stress test, range of motion, pain visual analogue scale, grip strength, modified Mayo wrist score, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score were analyzed.
Results:
A total of 13 patients with an average age of 25 years (range, 15-41 years) were included. The mean follow-up period was 35 months (range, 24-66 months). The DRUJ joint became stable in 4 patients after corrective osteotomy, and thus, no further procedures were required. For 9 patients, additional ligament reconstruction was performed at the same time after osteotomy. DRUJ stability was obtained in 11 patients at the final follow-up. One patient, who failed to achieve DRUJ stability due to insufficient correction, underwent redo-osteotomy. Mild limitation of rotation was observed in 4 patients. Clinical scores were significantly improved after surgery.
REFERENCES
1.Fuller DJ., McCullough CJ. Malunited fractures of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982. 64:364–7.
2.Altissimi M., Antenucci R., Fiacca C., Mancini GB. Long-term results of conservative treatment of fractures of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986. 202–10.
3.Cooney WP 3rd., Dobyns JH., Linscheid RL. Compli-cations of Colles’ fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980. 62:613–9.
4.Trousdale RT., Linscheid RL. Operative treatment of malunited fractures of the forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:894–902.
5.Stoffelen D., De Smet L., Broos P. The importance of the distal radioulnar joint in distal radial fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 1998. 23:507–11.
6.Nakamura T., Iwamoto T., Matsumura N., Sato K., Toyama Y. Radiographic and arthroscopic assessment of DRUJ instability due to foveal avulsion of the radioulnar ligament in distal radius fractures. J Wrist Surg. 2014. 3:12–7.
7.Omori S., Moritomo H., Murase T, et al. Changes in length of the radioulnar ligament and distal oblique bundle after Colles’ fracture. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013. 47:409–14.
8.Ward LD., Ambrose CG., Masson MV., Levaro F. The role of the distal radioulnar ligaments, interosseous membrane, and joint capsule in distal radioulnar joint stability. J Hand Surg Am. 2000. 25:341–51.
9.Adams BD., Berger RA. An anatomic reconstruction of the distal radioulnar ligaments for posttraumatic distal radioulnar joint instability. J Hand Surg Am. 2002. 27:243–51.
10.Scheker LR., Belliappa PP., Acosta R., German DS. Reconstruction of the dorsal ligament of the triangular fibrocar-tilage complex. J Hand Surg Br. 1994. 19:310–8.
11.Teoh LC., Yam AK. Anatomic reconstruction of the distal radioulnar ligaments: long-term results. J Hand Surg Br. 2005. 30:185–93.
12.Oda T., Wada T., Isogai S., Iba K., Aoki M., Yamashita T. Corrective osteotomy for volar instability of the distal radioulnar Joint associated with radial shaft malunion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007. 32:573–7.
13.Fernandez DL. Correction of posttraumatic wrist defor-mity in adults by osteotomy, bone-grafting, and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982. 64:1164–78.
14.Jupiter JB., Ring D. A comparison of early and late reconstruction of malunited fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996. 78:739–48.
15.Shea K., Fernandez DL., Jupiter JB., Martin C Jr. Corrective osteotomy for malunited, volarly displaced fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997. 79:1816–26.
16.Flinkkilä T., Raatikainen T., Kaarela O., Hämäläinen M. Corrective osteotomy for malunion of the distal radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000. 120:23–6.
17.Nagy L., Jankauskas L., Dumont CE. Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008. 466:1419–28.
18.Chia DS., Lim YJ., Chew WY. Corrective osteotomy in forearm fracture malunion improves functional outcome in adults. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011. 36:102–6.
19.Opel S., Konan S., Sorene E. Corrective distal radius osteotomy following fracture malunion using a fixed-angle volar locking plate. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014. 39:431–5.
20.Kim JP., Park MJ. Assessment of distal radioulnar joint instability after distal radius fracture: comparison of computed tomography and clinical examination results. J Hand Surg Am. 2008. 33:1486–92.
21.Kihara H., Short WH., Werner FW., Fortino MD., Palmer AK. The stabilizing mechanism of the distal radioulnar joint during pronation and supination. J Hand Surg Am. 1995. 20:930–6.
22.Stuart PR., Berger RA., Linscheid RL., An KN. The dorso-palmar stability of the distal radioulnar joint. J Hand Surg Am. 2000. 25:689–99.
23.Cole DW., Elsaidi GA., Kuzma KR., Kuzma GR., Smith BP., Ruch DS. Distal radioulnar joint instability in distal radius fractures: the role of sigmoid notch and triangular fibro-cartilage complex revisited. Injury. 2006. 37:252–8.
24.Kihara H., Palmer AK., Werner FW., Short WH., Fortino MD. The effect of dorsally angulated distal radius fractures on distal radioulnar joint congruency and forearm rotation. J Hand Surg Am. 1996. 21:40–7.
Table 1.
Grade | Definition |
---|---|
0 | No difference of laxity (symmetric) |
1 | Laxity with firm end point |
2 | Translation with unstable end point |
3 | Subluxation during rotation |
Table 2.
Case No. | Sex | Age (yr) | Interval between initial fracture and osteotomy (mo) | Preoperative stress test∗ | Location of fracture malunion | Preoperative degree of angulation† | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lateral view (°), direction | Antero-posterior (°), direction | ||||||
1 | Male | 20 | 96 | Grade 3 | Distal shaft | 11.9, volar | 3.9, varus |
2 | Male | 15 | 15 | Grade 3 | Distal shaft | 15.3, dorsal | 4.5, varus |
3 | Female | 16 | 42 | Grade 3 | Mid shaft | 10.1, dorsal | 12.5, valgus |
4 | Male | 24 | 120 | Grade 3 | Mid shaft | 17.5, dorsal | 10.8, valgus |
5 | Female | 39 | 312 | Grade 3 | Distal shaft | 12.1, dorsal | 8.2, valgus |
6 | Female | 15 | 21 | Grade 2 | Distal shaft | 18.5, dorsal | 0.2, valgus |
7 | Male | 22 | 132 | Grade 2 | Distal shaft | 4.9, dorsal | 6.1, valgus |
8 | Male | 41 | 300 | Grade 2 | Distal shaft | 9.2, dorsal | 1.4, valgus |
9 | Male | 32 | 10 | Grade 2 | Distal shaft | 10.0, dorsal | 4.5, valgus |
10 | Male | 20 | 120 | Grade 3 | Distal shaft | 10.1, dorsal | 1.3, varus |
11 | Male | 23 | 84 | Grade 2 | Distal shaft | 8.5, dorsal | 6.6, valgus |
12 | Male | 19 | 96 | Grade 3 | Distal shaft | 17.0, dorsal | 9.8, valgus |
13 | Male | 40 | 312 | Grade 3 | Mid shaft | 17.9, dorsal | 4.6, valgus |
Mean | 25 | 128 | 12.5 | 5.7 |
Table 3.
Case No. | Follow-up (mo) | DRUJ ligament reconstruction | Postoperative stress test∗ | MMWS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | Postoperative | ||||
1 | 50 | Yes | Grade 0 | 20 | 85 |
2 | 66 | Yes | Grade 3† | 65 | 75 |
3 | 28 | Yes | Grade 0 | 70 | 85 |
4 | 25 | Yes | Grade 0 | 50 | 75 |
5 | 25 | Yes | Grade 1 | 60 | 60 |
6 | 57 | Yes | Grade 0 | 60 | 60 |
7 | 24 | No | Grade 1 | 55 | 85 |
8 | 54 | No | Grade 0 | 55 | 95 |
9 | 28 | Yes | Grade 0 | 50 | 50 |
10 | 26 | No | Grade 1 | 85 | 85 |
11 | 28 | Yes | Grade 0 | 75 | 90 |
12 | 26 | Yes | Grade 0 | 70 | 90 |
13 | 24 | No | Grade 2 | 60 | 70 |
Mean | 35 | 60 | 77 |
Table 4.
Variable | pVAS | Grip strength (lb) | MMWS | DASH score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | ||||
Preoperative | 5.4±2.0 | 57.6±23.1 | 59.6±15.6 | 37.9±17.8 |
Postoperative | 2.2±1.6 | 72.3±20.6 | 77.3±13.7 | 21.2±19.8 |
p-value | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.006 | <0.001 |
LR∗ | ||||
Preoperative | 5.3±1.7 | 48.8±19.0 | 57.7±16.6 | 42.8±18.1 |
Postoperative | 2.6±1.7 | 65.5±20.2 | 74.4±14.6 | 26.1±22.1 |
p-value | 0.011 | 0.041 | 0.027 | 0.011 |
CO† | ||||
Preoperative | 5.5±2.9 | 77.5±20.6 | 63.7±14.3 | 26.8±12.5 |
Postoperative | 1.3±0.5 | 87.5±13.2 | 83.7±10.3 | 10.2±5.2 |
p-value | 0.077 | 0.109 | 0.109 | 0.068 |