Abstract
Purpose
In this study effects of a paternal participation program during cesarean section on paternal infant attachment were investigate. The experimental treatment was an integrative nursing intervention to promote father to infant attachment.
Methods
Study design was a non-equivalent control group posttest design. The program consisted of emotional support to spouse and father towards infant attachment immediately following cesarean birth. Participants were 66 men, partners of women with normal full term pregnancy having a cesarean section with spinal or epidural anesthesia, (experimental group, 34; control group, 32). The experiment was carried out from August 1 to October 30, 2010. Control group data were obtained from May 1 to June 30, 2012. Posttest was performed 72 hours after cesarean birth. A self-report questionnaire including a paternal attachment instrument was used. Data were analyzed using t-test, propensity score matching, and analysis of covariance with the SPSS/WIN 18.0 program.
Results
Total score for paternal infant attachment in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (p<.001). After matching, significant differences were found between the two groups through all subcategories. Adjusted mean score for paternal infant attachment verified experimental effects.
References
1. Choi MS, Kim GJ. Effects of parter's doula touch during labor on the paternal attachment and role confidence to neonate and couple attachment. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2011; 17:426–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.4.426.
2. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1988.
3. Costigan CL, Cox MJ. Fathers' participation in family research: Is there a self-selection bias? J Fam Psychol. 2001; 15:706–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.706.
4. Erlandsson K, Christensson K, Fagerberg I. Fathers' lived experiences of getting to know their baby while acting as primary caregivers immediately following birth. J Perinat Educ. 2008; 17(2):28–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1624/105812408X298363.
5. Erlandsson K, Dsilna A, Fagerberg I, Christensson K. Skin-to-skin care with the father after cesarean birth and its effect on newborn crying and prefeeding behavior. Birth. 2007; 34:105–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00162.x.
6. Fegran L, Helseth S, Fagermoen MS. A comparison of mothers' and fathers' experiences of the attachment process in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17:810–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02125.x.
7. Feinberg ME, Kan ML. Establishing family foundations: Intervention effects on coparenting, parent/infant well-being, and parent-child relations. J Fam Psychol. 2008; 22:253–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.253.
8. Feldman R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing: Physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007; 48:329–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x.
9. Kang NM. Theoretical structure model for stress in transition to fatherhood. Seoul: Seoul National University;1996. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
10. Kim JY. The degree of paternal attachment to neonate. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;1994. Unpublished masters' thesis.
11. Korea Statistical Information Service. Census of population trends. 2012. Retrieved November 11, 2012. from http://www.kosis.kr.
12. Lee KH, Lee YS, Ko MS, Kim HJ, Park NJ, Park YJ, et al. Maternity & women's health nursing. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2010.
13. Lee SJ, Yoo JS, Shin M, Park CG, Lee HC, Choi EJ. The use of propensity score matching for evaluation of the effects of nursing interventions. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2007; 37:414–421.
14. Lucassen N, Tharner A, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Volling BL, Verhulst FC, et al. The association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. J Fam Psychol. 2011; 25:986–992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025855.
15. Oh JA, Oh YA, Nam YH. The paternal attachment to neonate in one hospital. Korean Parent Child Health J. 2005; 8:137–146.
16. Park HR. Effects of postbirth integrated contact on father-infant attachment. Seoul: Yonsei University;2008. Unpublished master's thesis.
17. Pestvenidze E, Bohrer M. Finally, daddies in the delivery room: Parents' education in Georgia. Glob Public Health. 2007; 2:169–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441690601054330.
18. Premberg A, Hellström AL, Berg M. Experiences of the first year as father. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008; 22:56–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00584.x.
19. Song JY. The development of the parental bonding instrument-Korean version: Evaluation of the test reliability and validity. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1992; 31:979–992.
20. Greenberg M, Morris N. Engrossment: The newborn's impact upon the father. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1974; 44:520–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1974.tb00906.x.
21. Stelter RL, Halberstadt AG. The interplay between parental beliefs about children's emotions and parental stress impacts children's attachment security. Infant Child Dev. 2011; 20:272–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/icd.693.
22. Sung MH, Choi MR, Um OB. Effects of early contact on maternal infant attachment. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2010; 16:177–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2010.16.2.177.
23. Velandia M, Matthisen AS, Uvanäs-Moberg K, Nissen E. Onset of vocal interaction between parents and newborns in skin-to-skin contact immediately after elective cesarean section. Birth. 2010; 37:192–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00406.x.
24. Wilson CL, Rholes WS, Simpson JA, Tran S. Labor, delivery, and early parenthood: An attachment theory perspective. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007; 33:505–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296952.
25. Yu CY, Hung CH, Chan TF, Yeh CH, Lai CY. Prenatal predictors for father-infant attachment after childbirth. J Clin Nurs. 2012; 21:1577–1583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04003.x1577.