Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.27(1) > 1076351

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2015 Feb;27(1):52-62. Korean.
Published online February 28, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.1.52
© 2015 Korean Society of Adult Nursing
Influence of Frailty, Nutritional Status, Positive Thinking and Family Function on Health Conservation of the Elderly at Home
Hae Kyung Chang
Department of Nursing, Hanseo University, Seosan, Korea.

Corresponding author: Chang, Hae Kyung. Department of Nursing, Hanseo University, 46 Hanseo 1-ro, Seosan 356-706, Korea. Tel: +82-41-660-1070, Fax: +82-41-660-1087, Email: hkchang@hanseo.ac.kr
Received November 09, 2014; Revised February 05, 2015; Accepted February 07, 2015.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between frailty, nutritional status, positive thinking, family function, and health conservation and to identify the factors influencing health conservation of the elderly at home.

Methods

The research design was a descriptive survey using a convenience sampling. Data were collected from 142 elders using self-reported questionnaires. Data were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 20.0 program for descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression.

Results

The average health conservation score was 98.85. There were significant correlations between frailty, nutritional status, positive thinking, family function and health conservation. As a result of the multiple linear regression analysis, positive thinking, perceived health status, spouse and frailty accounted for 69% of the variance in health conservation of the elderly at home.

Conclusion

These influencing factors on health conservation can be taken into account in the development of nursing intervention programs for improving health conservation of the elderly at home.

Keywords: Health; Frail; Nutritional status; Thinking; Family

Tables


Table 1
General Characteristics of the Subjects and Differences in Health Conservation according to General Characteristics (N=142)
Click for larger image


Table 2
Degree of Health Conservation and Research Variables
Click for larger image


Table 3
Correlations Coefficient among the Research Variables
Click for larger image


Table 4
Influencing Factors on the Subject's Health Conservation
Click for larger image

Notes

This work was supported by Hanseo University Research Fund, 2013.

References
1. Statistics Korea. 2013 Life tables for Korea [Internet]. Seoul: Statics Korea; 2014 [cited 2015 January 5].
2. Jeong YH, Ko SJ, Kim EJ. In: A study on the effective chronic disease management. Research report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2013 Dec.
Research 2013-31-19.
3. Kang YH, Kim MY, Lee ELZ. The relationship of perceived health status, activities of daily living and nutrition status in the community-dwelling Korean elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2008;38(1):122–130.
4. Sung KW. Scale development on health conservation of the institutionalized elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2005;35(1):113–124.
5. Levine ME. Adaptation and assessment: a rational for nursing intervention. American Journal of Nursing 1966;66(11):2450–2453.
6. Hwang HS, Kwon IS, Park BJ, Cho BL, Yoon JL, Won CW. The validity and reliability of Korean frailty index. Journal of the Korean Geriatric Society 2010;14(4):191–202.
7. Keller HH. Nutrition and health-related quality of life in frail older adults. Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 2004;8(4):245–252.
8. Waem M, Rubenowitz E, Wihelmson K. Predictors of suicide in the old elderly. Gerontology 2003;49(5):328–334.
9. Kim HJ, Oh YH, Oh GS, Suh DW, Shin YC, Jung JY. Development and validation study of the positive thinking scale. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology 2006;11(4):767–784.
10. Chang HK, Sohn JN, Cha BK. Influencing factors on ego-integrity of aged. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2004;13(1):64–71.
11. Yu HH, Kim IS. Health status, dietary patterns, and living habits of the elderly in Jeon-ju. Nutritional Sciences 2002;5(2):91–102.
12. Smilkstein G, Ashworth C, Montano D. Validity and reliability of the family APGAR as a test of family function. Journal of Family Practice 1982;15(2):303–311.
13. Kang SK, Young BB, Lee HR, Lee DB, Shin UT. A study of family APGAR scores for evaluating family function. Korean Academy of Family Medicine 1984;15(12):6–13.
14. Seligman ME. Positive psychology: an introduction. American Psychologist 2000;55(1):5–14.
15. Marquez DX, Bustamante EE, Blissmer BJ, Prohaska TR. Health promotion for successful aging. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2009;3(1):12–19. [doi: 10.1177/1559827608325200]
16. Weinstein ND. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science 1989;246:1232–1233.
17. Diener E. Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist 2000;55(1):34–43. [doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34]
18. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE, Gandek B. In: How to score and interpret single item health status measure: a manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Boston: QualyMetric; 2001.
19. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30(6):473–483.
20. Mols F, Denollet J. Type D personality in the general population: a systematic review of health status, mechanisms of disease, and work-related problems. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2010;8:1–10. [doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-9]
21. Kim SH. Older people's expectations regarding ageing, health promoting behaviour and health status. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2009;65(1):84–91. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04841.x]
22. Oh WO, Kim EJ. Factors influencing health conservation among elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing 2009;16(2):134–143.
23. Park YS, Seo DS, Kwon YH. Factors influencing Yangsaeng in elders(Yangsaeng; traditional oriental health promotion). Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2011;41(1):72–79. [doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.1.72]
24. Ma SH, Jeung KY, Hong SH, Shin EY, Yoo SH, Kim MY, et al. Correlation between frailty level and disability of the elderly and frailty related factors. Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2009;30(8):588–597. [doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2009.30.8.588]
25. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, Williamson JD, Anderson G. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. Journal of Gerontology 2004;59(3):255–263.
26. Chang HK, Oh WO. Factors influencing ego-integrity in community dwelling elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing 2011;18(4):529–537.
27. Sung KW. Comparison of health conservation for elders in assisted living facilities and nursing homes. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2005;35(7):1379–1389.
28. Kim HK, Chang HK, Lee MR, Son YJ, Han SJ, Yang NY. Influence of malnutrition and social network on health-related quality of life in elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing 2013;20(2):98–107. [doi: 10.7739/jkafn.2013.20.2.98]
29. Kim HJ, Oh YH, Oh GS, Suh DW, Shin YC, Jung JY. Development and validation study of the positive thinking scale. Korean Journal of Health Psychology 2006;11(4):767–784.
30. Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Balfour JL, Higby HR, Kaplan GA. Antecedents of frailty over three decades in an older cohort. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 1998;53(1):S9–S16.
TOOLS
Similar articles

Needs for Home Care Nursing in the Vulnerable Elderly

The Follow-up Study of Changes in Frailty in Elderly Receiving Home Health Care of the Public Health Center

Nutritional Risk of the Elderly Receiving a Home-Delivered Meal Service Program and the Factors for Nutritional Risk

Influences of Social Support, Self-esteem and Hope on Health Conservation of the Vulnerable Elderly with Diabetes

Frailty and elderly in urology: implications for postoperative complications