Journal List > Korean J Neurotrauma > v.8(2) > 1058903

Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Post-Operative Epidural Hematoma after Intracranial Surgery

Abstract

Objective:

Patients undergoing intracranial operations often suffer from post-operative epidural hematoma (EDH). The incidence and risk factors for with the occurrence of EDH after intracranial operations are not well described previously. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors and the incidence of post-operative EDH adjacent and regional to the craniotomy.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study of 23 (2.4%) patients, between January 2005 and December 2011, who underwent epidural hematoma evacuation after primary intracranial during this period, 941 intracranial operations were performed. The control group (46 patients) and hematoma group (23 patients) were categorized on the basis of having undergone the same pre-operative diagnosis and treatment within 3 months of their operations. The ages of the hematoma and control group were individually matched to similar ages within 10 years of each other to minimize bias of age.

Results:

Univariate analysis showed that the significant pre-operative and intra-operative factors associated with postoperative EDH were a pre-operative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scored <8 (crude odds ratio 8.295), prothrombin ratio >1.0 (p=0.014), prothrombin time (PT) >11.3 sec (p=0.008), intra-operative blood loss >650 mL (p=0.003) and craniotomy size >7,420 mm2 (p=0.023). In multivariate analysis, intra-operative blood loss exceeding 650 mL (median of total patients) placed a patient at significantly increased risk for post-operative EDH.

Conclusion:

Recognizing the limitations of the study, large intra-operative blood loss, wide craniotomy area, prolonged PT and a pre-operative GCS <8 are presented implicated with an increased risk of post-operative EDH after intracranial surgery.

REFERENCES

1). Altschuler E., Moosa H., Selker RG., Vertosick FT Jr. The risk and efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of thromboembolic complications in patients with primary malignant brain tumors. Neurosurgery. 27:74–76. discussion 77. 1990.
crossref
2). Awad JN., Kebaish KM., Donigan J., Cohen DB., Kostuik JP. Analysis of the risk factors for the development of post-operative spinal epidural haematoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87:1248–1252. 2005.
crossref
3). Ban SP., Son YJ., Yang HJ., Chung YS., Lee SH., Han DH. Analysis of complications following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 48:244–250. 2010.
crossref
4). Fukamachi A., Koizumi H., Nagaseki Y., Nukui H. Postoperative extradural hematomas: computed tomographic survey of 1105 intracranial operations. Neurosurgery. 19:589–593. 1986.
crossref
5). Garber ST., Sivakumar W., Schmidt RH. Neurosurgical complications of direct thrombin inhibitors—catastrophic hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury in a patient receiving dabigatran. J Neurosurg. 116:1093–1096. 2012.
crossref
6). Gentleman D., Johnston RA. Postoperative extradural hematoma associated with induced hypertension. Neurosurgery. 17:105–106. 1985.
crossref
7). Gerlach R., Raabe A., Zimmermann M., Siegemund A., Seifert V. Factor XIII deficiency and postoperative hemorrhage after neurosurgical procedures. Surg Neurol. 54:260–264. discussion 264-265. 2000.
crossref
8). Guangming Z., Huancong Z., Wenjing Z., Guoqiang C., Xiaosong W. Should epidural drain be recommended after supratentorial craniotomy for epileptic patients? Surg Neurol. 72:138–141. discussion 141. 2009.
crossref
9). Haft H., Liss H., Mount LA. Massive epidural hemorrhage as a complication of ventricular drainage. J Neurosurg. 17:49–54. 1960.
crossref
10). Holden MP. Dangers of aspirin before cardiac surgery. BMJ. 305:365–366. 1992.
crossref
11). Hussain SA., Selway R., Harding C., Polkey CE. The urgent postoperative CT scan: a critical appraisal of its impact. Br J Neurosurg. 15:116–118. 2001.
12). Institute SAS. The sas system for windows, version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 1996.
13). Jeon JS., Chang IB., Cho BM., Lee HK., Hong SK., Oh SM. Immediate postoperative epidural hematomas adjacent to the craniotomy site. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 39:335–339. 2006.
14). Kalfas IH., Little JR. Postoperative hemorrhage: a survey of 4992 intracranial procedures. Neurosurgery. 23:343–347. 1988.
crossref
15). Le Roux AA., Nadvi SS. Acute extradural haematoma in the elderly. Br J Neurosurg. 21:16–20. 2007.
crossref
16). Manian FA., Meyer PL., Setzer J., Senkel D. Surgical site infections associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: do postoperative factors play a role? Clin Infect Dis. 36:863–868. 2003.
17). Palmer JD., Sparrow OC., Iannotti F. Postoperative hematoma: a 5-year survey and identification of avoidable risk factors. Neurosurgery. 35:1061–1064. discussion 1064-1065. 1994.
18). Park JE., Kim SH., Yoon SH., Cho KG., Kim SH. Risk factors predicting unfavorable neurological outcome during the early period after traumatic brain injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 45:90–95. 2009.
crossref
19). Rapanà A., Lamaida E., Pizza V. Multiple postoperative intracerebral haematomas remote from the site of craniotomy. Br J Neurosurg. 12:364–368. 1998.
20). Sinar EJ., Lindsay KW. Distant extradural haematoma complicating removal of frontal tumours. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 49:442–444. 1986.
crossref
21). Soff GA. A new generation of oral direct anticoagulants. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 32:569–574. 2012.
crossref
22). Sokolowski MJ., Garvey TA., Perl J 2nd., Sokolowski MS., Cho W., Mehbod AA, et al. Prospective study of postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: incidence and risk factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 33:108–113. 2008.
23). Thiagarajah S. Postoperative care of neurosurgical patients. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 21:139–156. 1983.
crossref
24). Troupp H. Extradural hematoma during craniotomy. Report of five cases. J Neurosurg. 40:783–785. 1974.
25). Yacubian EM., de Andrade MM., Jorge CL., Valério RM. Cerebellar hemorrhage after supratentorial surgery for treatment of epilepsy: report of three cases. Neurosurgery. 45:159–162. 1999.
crossref
26). Yoshino Y., Aoki N., Oikawa A., Ohno K. Acute epidural hematoma developing during twist-drill craniostomy: a complication of percutaneous subdural tapping for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma. Surg Neurol. 53:601–604. 2000.
crossref

FIGURE 1.
Results of computed tomography (CT) examinations. A: CT scan showing intracranial hematoma at right basal ganglia with midline shifting. B: Post-operative immediate brain CT scan showed almost completely removed intracerebral hemorrhage, and also showed large amount of epidural hematoma (EDH) with aggravated mass effect. C: After reoperation was performed to remove the EDH beneath the previous craniectomy site, brain CT scan showed no residual epidural hematoma. A marginal amount of intracerebral hemorrhage remained.
kjn-8-79f1.tif
FIGURE 2.
Data concerning craniotomy extent. Craniotomy extent was measured from plain lateral skull X-ray that is, from maximal perpendicular diameter (radius a and b) of the craniotomy. The resulting size of craniotomy was then approximated using the formular for a circle (size=π×ab).
kjn-8-79f2.tif
TABLE 1.
Clinical characteristics of the control and hematoma groups
    Control group [n=46 (%, 66.7%)] Hematoma group [n=23 (%, 33.3%)] p-value
Gender Male 30 (65.2) 13 (56.5) 0.482
  Female 16 (34.8) 10 (43.5)  
Age Mean±SD 50.2±12.5 50.4±14.0 0.948
Diabetes mellitus No 44 (95.6) 21 (91.3) 0.596
  Yes 2 (4.4) 2 (8.7)  
Hypertension No 34 (73.9) 16 (69.6) 0.703
  Yes 12 (26.1) 7 (30.4)  
Alcohol use No 32 (69.6) 16 (69.6) 0.999
  Yes 14 (30.4) 7 (30.4)  
Tobacco use No 37 (80.4) 19 (82.6) 0.999
  Yes 9 (19.6) 4 (17.4)  
Hemoglobin (g/dL) Mean±SD 13.7±1.5 13.7±1.8 0.836
Hematocrit (%) Mean±SD 40.7±4.4 40.6±5.4 0.904
Platelet count (×109/L) Mean±SD 215.5±55.5 227.6±76.1 0.458
Prothrombinratio (INR) Mean±SD 1.0±0.1 1.0±0.1 0.290
Prothrombin time (sec) Median (minimum-maximum) 11.1 (9.4-17.7) 11.6 (10.6-13.3) 0.002∗
Prothrombin percent (%) Median (minimum-maximum) 99.9 (10.5-142.3) 97.9 (80.8-116.6) 0.390
aPTT Mean±SD 25.7±3.8 25.3±3.7 0.657
Anti platelet and No 42 (91.3) 23 (100.0) 0.293
anticoagulant use Yes 4 (8.7) 0 (0.0)  
GCS (pre-op) Median (minimum-maximum) 15.0 (3.0-15.0) 12.0 (3.0-15.0) 0.095
GCS Category A (13-15) 34 (74.0) 11 (47.8) 0.085
  B (9-12) 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1)  
  C (3- 8) 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1)  
Operation time (min) Median (minimum-maximum) 222.5 (90.0-670.0) 240.0 (100.0-1,020.0) 0.259
Intra-op EBL (mL) Median (minimum-maximum) 500.0 (10.0-2,000.0) 1,000.0 (70.0-8,000.0) <0.0001∗
Epidural drain No 32 (69.6) 15 (65.2) 0.715
  Yes 14 (30.4) 8 (34.8)  
Durotomy No 9 (19.6) 3 (13.0) 0.738
  Yes 37 (80.4) 20 (87.0)  
Craniotomy area (mm2) Median (minimum-maximum) 8,265.1 (2,642.1-15,848.8) 5,729.6 (1,209.6-25,717.4) 0.018∗

∗probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. INR: international normalized ratio, aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin, GCS: Glasgow Outcome Scale, pre-op: pre-operative, intra-op: intra-operative, EBL: estimated blood loss, SD: standard deviation

TABLE 2.
Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis (pre-operative patient details)
    Control group (n=46) Hematoma group (n=23) Univariate
    No. (%) No. (%) Crude OR (95% CI) p-value
Gender Female 16 (34.8) 10 (43.5) 2.303 (0.433-12.236) 0.328
Age ≥65 years 5 (10.9) 5 (21.7) 2.195 (0.576- 8.362) 0.250
Diabetes mellitus Yes 2 (4.3) 2 (8.7) 2.732 (0.226-33.004) 0.429
Hypertension Yes 12 (26.1) 7 (30.4) 1.356 (0.356- 5.171) 0.656
Alcohol use Yes 14 (30.4) 7 (30.4) 1.000 (0.329- 3.038) 0.999
Tobacco use Yes 9 (19.6) 4 (17.4) 0.871 (0.243- 3.114) 0.831
Antiplatelet anticoagulant use Yes 4 (8.7) 0 (0.0) - 0.993
anticoagulant use GCS category A 34 (73.9) 11 (47.8) 1.000 0.082
  B 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1) 5.107 (0.981-26.591)  
  C 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1) 8.295 (1.027-67.032)∗  

∗95% Confidence interval were excluded 1.0. GCS: Glasgow Outcome Scale, OR: odds ratio

TABLE 3.
Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis (pre-operative laboratory data)
    Control group (n=46) Hematoma group (n=23) Univariate
    No. (%) No. (%) Crude OR (95% CI) p-value
Hemoglobin (g/dL) ≥12 41 (89.1) 18 (78.3) 0.500 (0.145-1.727) 0.273
Hematocrit (%) ≥35 42 (91.3) 20 (87.0) 0.667 (0.149-2.979) 0.596
Platelet count (109/L) ≥150 39 (84.8) 19 (82.6) 0.863 (0.237-3.142) 0.823
Prothrombinratio (INR) ≥1.0 16 (34.8) 16 (69.6) 3.747 (1.304-10.765) 0.014∗
Prothrombintime (sec) ≥11.3 20 (43.5) 20 (87.0) 16.000 (2.064-124.045) 0.008∗
Prothrombinpercent (%) ≥120 4 (8.7) 0 (0.0) - 0.993
aPTT ≥26.3 23 (50.0) 9 (39.1) 0.641 (0.231-1.780) 0.394

∗probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. INR: international normalized ratio, aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin, OR: odds ratio

TABLE 4.
Univariate conditional logistic regression analysis (intra-operative data)
    Control group (n=46) Hematoma group (n=23) Univariate
    No. (%) No. (%) Crude OR (95% CI) p-value
Operation time (mins) ≥230 22 (47.8) 14 (60.9) 2.171 (0.614-7.673) 0.229
Intra-op EBL (mL) ≥650 16 (34.8) 19 (82.6) 9.862 (2.214-43.937) 0.003∗
Epidural drain Yes 14 (30.4) 8 (34.8) 1.250 (0.409-3.821) 0.696
Durotomy Yes 37 (80.4) 20 (87.0) 2.171 (0.364-12.944) 0.395
Craniomy size (mm2) ≥7,420 18 (39.1) 16 (69.6) 3.845 (1.202-12.302) 0.023∗

∗probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. intra-op: intra-operative, EBL: estimated blood loss, OR: odds ratio

TABLE 5.
Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis
    Control group (n=46) Hematoma group (n=23) Multivariate
    No. (%) No. (%) Adjusted OR (95% CI)∗ Adj. p-value∗
Prothrombinratio (INR) ≥1.0 16 (34.8) 16 (69.6) 0.807 (0.091-7.181) 0.847
Prothrombintime ≥11.3 20 (43.5) 20 (87.0) 26.128 (0.727-939.032) 0.074
GCS category A 34 (73.9) 11 (47.8) 1.000 0.744
  B 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1) 2.279 (0.252-20.614)  
  C 6 (13.0) 6 (26.1) 2.142 (0.073-62.557)  
Intra-op EBL (mL) ≥650 16 (34.8) 19 (82.6) 21.900 (1.616-296.750) 0.020∗
Craniotomysize (mm2) ≥7,420 18 (39.1) 16 (69.6) 3.689 (0.522-26.070) 0.191

∗probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. INR: international normalized ratio, GCS: Glasgow outcome scale, intra-op: intraoperative, EBL: estimated blood loss, OR: odds ratio

TABLE 6.
Correlation analysis of the parameters associated with coagulopathy and intraoperative blood loss exceeding 650 mL
  Estimated blood loss above 650 mL (n=35)
  Pearson's r p-value
Prothrombinpercent (%) 0.140 0.424
Prothrombinratio (INR) 0.061 0.727
aPTT -0.067 0.701
Platelet count (×109/L) 0.045 0.798

INR: international normalized ratio, aPTT: activated partial thromboplastin

TOOLS
Similar articles