The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Jung-Mi Kwon; Kyung-Kyu Choi; Sang-Jin Park

doi:10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1

Journal List > J Korean Acad Conserv Dent > v.29(1) > 1056094

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kwon, Choi, and Park: The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Original Article

J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2004;29(1):1-12.

Published online: 14 January 2004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.1.1

The comparison on micro-tensile bond strengths of variable adhesive systems to Class V cavity

Jung-Mi Kwon, Kyung-Kyu Choi, Sang-Jin Park

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School of Kyung Hee University

Corresponding author: Sang-Jin Park, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduated School of Kyung Hee University 1, Hoegi Dong, Dongdaemoon Gu, Seoul, 130-702, Korea, Tel : 02) 958-9335, E-mail : psangjin@khu.ac.kr

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

1. Antonucci JM, McKinney JE, Stanabury JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement. US patent application. 160856. 1988.

2. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int. 27:203–209. 1996.

3. Van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a com-pomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class Ⅲ restoration. Am J Dent. 9:195–198. 1996.

4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res. 34:849–853. 1955.

5. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devic. 1:78–81. 1982.

6. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent. 25:355–372. 1997.

7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão P, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 26:1–20. 1998.

8. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N. Bonding durability of photocured phenyl-P in TEGDMA to smear layer-retained dentin. Quintessence Int. 24:335–342. 1993.

9. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res. 75:1706–1715. 1996.

10. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent. 23:185–194. 1998.

11. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res. 73:1212–1220. 1994.

12. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res. 75:1404–1413. 1996.

13. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine. J Dent. 24:435–442. 1996.

14. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 10:236–240. 1994.

15. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russell CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-effected dentin using adhesives. J Dent Res. 74:1679–1688. 1995.

16. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Boschian L, Burrow M, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami T. Effect of water and regional difference on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res. 76:20 Abstract 56. 1997.

17. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Pashley DH. Effect of C-factor and depth on bonding strength to dentin. J Dent Res. 76:39 Abstract 201. 1997.

18. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 13:236–240. 1994.

19. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J 3rd. Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesions. Am J Dent. 5:315–317. 1992.

20. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage : leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 20:18–25. 1995.

21. Wang T, Nakabayashi N. Effect of 2-(methacryloxy) ethyl phenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res. 70:59–66. 1991.

22. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Bonding to tooth structure : A comparison of glass-ionomer and composite resin systems. J Esthet Dent. 6:227–244. 1994.

23. Pereira PNR, Yamada T, Tei R, Tagami J. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am J Dent. 10:128–132. 1997.

24. Valeria VG, Daniel B, Karl-John S. Enamel and dentin shear bond strength of two resin-modified glass ionomers and two resin baced adhesives. J Dent. 26:497–503. 1998.

25. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res. 77:1749–59. 1998.

26. Yip HK, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glasss ionomer materials. Quintessence Int. 31:261–266. 2000.

27. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y. Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent. 25:20–25. 2000.

28. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of dentine location and tubular orientation on the bond strength between resin and dentin. J Dent. 27:265–274. 1999.

29. Non-Rinse Conditioner(NRC). Dentsply Technical Manual. Konstanz, Germany: 1998.

30. Ogata M, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J. Effect of dentin Primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent. 24:81–88. 1994.

31. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 26:27–35. 2001.

32. Perdigão J, May Jr KN, Wilder Jr AD, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid laayer. Oper Dent. 25:186–194. 2000.

33. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 16:180–187. 2000.

34. Uno S, Finger WJ. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-bonding. Quintessence Int. 26:733–738. 1995.

35. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acidic conditioners on dentin demineralization and dimension of hybrid layers. J Dent. 26:211–216. 1996.

36. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res. 73:1205–1211. 1994.

37. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 72:1434–1442. 1993.

38. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 11:117–125. 1995.

Fig. 1.

Specimen preparation for tensile bonding test: A) cavity preparation on buccal cervical area, B) adhesive systems bonding and restoration, additional composite build-up, C) vertical slice with 1mm thickness, D) trimmed specimen with hour glass shape.

Fig. 2.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Occlusal wall

Fig. 3.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths : Gingival wall

Fig. 4.

Micro-tensile Bond Strengths of occlusal and gingival wall

Fig. 5A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 5B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the GI group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 6A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 6B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 7A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 7B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the DN group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 8A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 8B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SE group on the gingival wall.

Fig. 9A.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the occlusal wall.

Fig. 9B.

SEM photograph of the adhesive interface of the SB group on the gingival wall.

Table 1.

Materials used in this study

Products		Main Components	Manufacturer
*Resin modified glass ionomer*
Fuji Ⅱ LC		fluoroaluminum silicate glass,	GC Co.
		polyacrylic acid, HEMA	(Tokyo, Japan)
Dentin Conditioner		20% polyacrylic acid with 3% AlCl3
*Compomer*
Dyract AP		resin, strontium-fluoro silicate glass
Prime & Bond NT	Etchant	36% Phosphoric acid	Dentsply Caulk
	Adhesive	UDMA, PENTA, nanofiller, acetone, trimethacrylate resin	(Milford, USA)
Non Rinse Conditioner		itaconic acid, maleic acid
*Self-etching system*
Clearfil SE Bond	Primer	MDP, HEMA, water	Kuraray Co.
	Adhesive	dimethacrylate, microfiller, MDP, HEMA	(Osaka, Japan)
*Self-priming system*
Single Bond	Etchant	37% Phosphoric acid	3M Co.
	Adhesive	HEMA, Bis-GMA, ethanol, water	(St. Paul, MN,
		Polyalkenoic acid copolymer	USA)
*Resin composite*
Clearfil AP-X		Barium glass, silicone dioxide,	Kuraray Co.
		3.0§(0.1~15§), 84.5wt％	(Osaka, Japan)

Bis-GMA=Bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate

HEMA=Hydroxyethylmethacrylate

MDP=methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate

Table 2.

Five experimental groups

Group	Materials
GI	Fuji Ⅱ LC	Dentin Conditioner
DE	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with Etching)
DN	Dyract AP	Prime&Bond NT(with NRC)
SE	Clearfil AP-X	Clearfil SE Bond
SB	Clearfil AP-X	Single Bond

Table 3.

Micro-tensile bond strength of experimental groups (Unit : MPa±SD)

Group	Occlusal wall	Gingival wall
GI	23.27± 8.63^a	15.09± 5.10^a
DE	29.84±10.54^ab	16.52± 4.14^a
DN	29.63± 9.94^abA	22.53±11.90^abA
SE	36.34±11.11^b	27.51± 7.99^b
SB	36.47±13.39^bA	30.20±12.40^bA

Mean values with the same uppercase and lowercase superscript letters are not statistically different(p>0.05).

TOOLS

Similar articles