Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.16(3) > 1051554

Park and Lee: Career Ladder System Perceived by Nurses

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate how nurses perceive the Career Ladder System(CLS).

Methods

This study was a descriptive survey using questionnaires. Questionnaires were developed by an expert group. Participants included 161 nurses working in the Children's Hospital. The data were analyzed using factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, descriptive statistics, χ2-test and ANCOVA.

Results

This study revealed that nurses who advanced in their career ladders have a significantly higher perception of participation in their professional activities and a general comprehension of the CLS more than the nurses who did not advance in their career ladders. However, nurses who advanced in their career ladders have a significantly lower perception of the expected outcome of the CLS more than nurses who did not.

Conclusions

This result showed that nurses who had experienced in clinical advancement and recognition were highly motivated with their professional activities via the CLS as well as they considered it to allow professional growth.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Summary of factor loadings, eigenvalues and percent variance explained for the appraisal tool for career ladder system
jkana-16-314-i001

*Factor1,2,4,5,6(n)=161, Factor3(n)=74

Table 2
General characteristics of the participants
jkana-16-314-i002
Table 3
Score of perception of career ladder system by each item
jkana-16-314-i003
Table 4
Comparison of homogeneity of general characteristics
jkana-16-314-i004
Table 5
Comparison of perception of CLS between advanced and not advanced
jkana-16-314-i005

*F-value of ANCOVA with age, working unit and clinical experience as covariates

References

1. Benner P. From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. 1984. California: Addison-Wesley Pub.
2. Buchan J. Evaluating the benefits of a clinical ladder for nursing staff: An international review. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999. 36(2):137–144.
3. Byun DS, Yom YH. Factors affecting the burnout of clinical nurses-focused on emotional labor. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2009. 15(3):444–454.
4. Fusilero J, Lini L, Prohaska P, Szweda C, Carney K, Mion LC. The career advancement for registered nurses excellence program. J Nurs Adm. 2008. 38(12):526–531.
5. George VM. The role of the system chief nurse executive. Nurse Lead. 2005. 3(4):45–49.
6. Korean Hospital Nurses Association. The business report year of 2009. 2010. 02. Seoul: Author.
7. Kwon IG, Sung YH, Park KO, Yu OS, Kim MA. A study on the clinical ladder system model for hospital nurses. Clin Nurs Res. 2007. 13(1):7–23.
8. Lee HS, Lim JH. SPSS 12.0 mannual for method and interpretation of statistical analysis. 2007. Seoul: Bupmunsa.
9. Nelson JM, Cook PF. Evaluation of a career ladder program in an ambulatory care environment. Nurs Econ. 2008. 26(6):353–360.
10. Nelson JM, Sassaman B, Phillips A. Career ladder program for registered nurses in ambulatory care. Nurs Econ. 2008. 26(6):393–398.
11. Nunnally J. Psychometric therapy. 1978. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
12. Park SH, Park KO, Park SA. A development of career ladder program. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2006. 12(4):624–632.
13. Riley JK, Rolband DH, James D, Norton HJ. Clinical ladder nurse's perception and satisfiers. J Nurs Adm. 2009. 39(4):182–188.
14. Shin YW, Lee HJ, Lim YJ. Predictors of the clinical competence in new graduate nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010. 16(1):37–47.
15. Wurmser T. Recognizing the clinical nurse: The Meridian Health clinical advancement and recognition of excellence program. Teach Learn Nurs. 2006. 1:22–26.
TOOLS
Similar articles