Journal List > J Korean Surg Soc > v.77(6) > 1011041

Kim, Ahn, Kwon, Jung, Ahn, Heo, Hwang, and Chung: Validation of POSSUM-physiological Score as Predictors of Post-operative Morbidity and Mortality after Emergency Operation for Peptic Ulcer Complications

Abstract

Purpose

The POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) score was developed to predict post-operative mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of this study was to validate the POSSUM physiologic score (POSSUM-P) in emergent operations for peptic ulcer complications.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent emergent operation for peptic ulcer complications at Boramae Hospital between January 2003 and April 2009. The data included patients' characteristics (underlying disease, medication, duration of symptoms), operative characteristics (operation method, morbidity, and mortality) and the items for the POSSUM-P (basic information (age, sex, etc.), circulatory and respiratory signs, electrocardiogram, blood pressure, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, potassium level, sodium level, urea level and Glasgow coma scale). The POSSUM-P was calculated and compared according to the morbidity and mortality.

Results

One hundred and twelve patients were included. As for operation methods, primary repair (48.2%) was most common, followed by truncal vagotomy with pyloroplasty (27.7%). Thirty-seven patients had morbidities including wound infections (20), pneumonias (14), fluid collections (9), and so on. Eight patients died due to sepsis or pulmonary edema. The means of POSSUM-P were significantly different between patients with and without mortality (37.8 vs. 19.2, P<0.001) and between patients with and without morbidity (26.7 vs. 17.3, P<0.001). Those were different between patients with and without postoperative pneumonia and wound infection (P=0.002 and P=0.029, respectively).

Conclusion

The POSSUM physiologic score could help to predict the mortality or morbidity after emergency operation for complications of peptic ulcer disease, especially postoperative pneumonia or wound infection.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Hospital stay according to the POSSUM-phys score.
jkss-77-391-g001
Table 1
POSSUM-physiologic score
jkss-77-391-i001

*JVP = jugular venous pulse; CXR = chest X-ray; SOB = shortness of breath; §COAD = chronic obstructive airway disease; WBC = white blood cell; ECG = electrocardiogram.

Table 2
POSSUM-operative severity score
jkss-77-391-i002

*Example of magnitude for general surgery: Minor = hernia, varicose vein, minor perianal surgery, scrotal surgery, minor transurethral resection of tumor, excision of large subcutaneous lesion; Intermediate = open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, excision of lesion requiring graft or minor excision, minor amputation, thyroid lobectomy; Major = laparotomy and small-bowel resection, colonic resection or anterior resection, major amputation, nonaortic vascular surgery, cholecystectomy and explorationof bile duct, total thyroidectomy; Major+ = Abdominoperineal excision of rectum, aortic surgery, Whipple resection, radical total gastrectomy.

Table 3
Patients' characteristics
jkss-77-391-i003

*NSAIDs = nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; DM = diabetes mellitus; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; §ICU = intensive care unit.

Table 4
Type of operations
jkss-77-391-i004

*Abscess drain and jejunostomy, open drainage, percutaneous gastrostomy; This type of operation was done because of uncontrolled bleeding from injured spleen.

Table 5
Relation between POSSUM-phys score and complication
jkss-77-391-i005
Table 6
Univariate & multivariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative complication
jkss-77-391-i006

*CI = confidence interval; χ2 test; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; §Fisher's exact test; DM = diabetes mellitus; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; **RA = rheumatoid arthritis; ††ICU = intensive care unit, ‡‡T-test.

References

1. Peptic ulcer disease [Internet]. University of Michigan Health System. cited 2007 May 4. Available from: http://www.med.umich.edu.
2. Sonnenberg A, Everhart JE. The prevalence of self-reported peptic ulcer in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1996. 86:200–205.
3. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984. 1:1311–1315.
4. Gisbert JP, Legido J, Garcia-Sanz I, Pajares JM. Helicobacter pylori and perforated peptic ulcer prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Liver Dis. 2004. 36:116–120.
5. Wolfe MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med. 1999. 340:1888–1899.
6. Dubois F. New surgical strategy for gastroduodenal ulcer: laparoscopic approach. World J Surg. 2000. 24:270–276.
7. Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L. Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol. 2003. 9:2338–2340.
8. Imhof M, Epstein S, Ohmann C, Roher HD. Duration of survival after peptic ulcer perforation. World J Surg. 2008. 32:408–412.
9. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991. 78:355–360.
10. Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE III score. Arch Surg. 2002. 137:730–736.
11. Hall JC, Hall JL. ASA status and age predict adverse events after abdominal surgery. J Qual Clin Pract. 1996. 16:103–108.
12. Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KU, Choe KJ. Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2005. 92:1099–1102.
13. Taha AS, Angerson WJ, Prasad R, McCloskey C, Gilmour D, Morran CG. Clinical trial: the incidence and early mortality after peptic ulcer perforation, and the use of low-dose aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008. 28:878–885.
14. Rahman MM, Islam MS, Flora S, Akhter SF, Hossain S, Karim F. Mortality in perforated peptic ulcer patients after selective management of stratified poor risk cases. World J Surg. 2007. 31:2341–2346.
15. Noguiera C, Silva AS, Santos JN, Silva AG, Ferreira J, Matos E, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2003. 27:782–787.
16. Jones HJ, de Cossart L. Risk scoring in surgical patients. Br J Surg. 1999. 86:149–157.
17. Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB. A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg. 1982. 195:265–269.
18. Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW, Soo KC. Adverse operative risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000. 29:164–167.
19. Kim KY, Park YK, Choi CR. A clinical analysis of the complicated duodenal ulcers. J Korean Surg Soc. 1992. 43:30–41.
20. Seo JH, Park HK, Park YH, Lee HK, Lee WG, Cho SY, et al. Prognostic factors in duodenal ulcer perforation. J Korean Surg Soc. 2001. 60:425–431.
21. Blomgren LG. Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly. World J Surg. 1997. 21:412–415.
22. Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, Tomikawa M, Akahoshi K, Ayukawa K, et al. The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001. 48:156–162.
TOOLS
Similar articles