<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JYMS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>J Yeungnam Med Sci</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2799-8010</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12701/jyms.2022.00311</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jyms-2022-00311</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Novel cystography parameter to predict early recovery from urinary continence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a retrospective study</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">The sagittal view on cystography to predict urinary incontinence</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8783-9567</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Yeong Uk</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-jyms-2022-00311"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-jyms-2022-00311"/>
</contrib>
<aff id="af1-jyms-2022-00311">
Department of Urology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, <country>Korea</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-jyms-2022-00311">Corresponding author: Yeong Uk Kim, MD Department of Urology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 42415, Korea Tel: +82-53-620-3170 • Fax: +82-53-657-1455 • E-mail: <email>jojo9174@hanmail.net</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>7</month>
<year>2023</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>7</month>
<year>2022</year></pub-date>
<volume>40</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>252</fpage>
<lpage>258</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>15</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000a9; 2023 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<license>
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ext-link>) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<sec><title>Background</title>
<p>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether postoperative cystography findings can predict early and long-term recovery from incontinence after radical prostatectomy (RP), compared with the other cystography parameters.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>I retrospectively reviewed 118 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) for localized prostate cancer at single institution between January 2016 and April 2021. One hundred and seven patients were included in the study. Postoperative cystography was routinely performed 7 days after surgery. The bladder neck to pubic symphysis ratio, vesicourethral angle, and bladder neck anteroposterior length (BNAP) ratio (the bladder neck-posterior margin distances divided by the anteroposterior lengths) were evaluated. Continence was defined as cessation of pad use. The association between these variables and urinary incontinence was also analyzed.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>The urinary incontinence recovery rates 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP were 43.92%, 66.35%, 87.85%, and 97.19%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a lower BNAP ratio and wider vesicourethral angle were significantly associated with continence restoration at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. In addition, in terms of days of pad usage, lower BNAP ratio, wider vesicourethral angle, and bladder neck preservation were significantly associated with recovery from urinary incontinence within 12 months as assessed by Cox proportional hazard analysis.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrated that vesicourethral angle and BNAP ratio were independent predictors of early recovery from post-prostatectomy incontinence. I suggest that both the sagittal and coronal views of postoperative cystography help anticipate early continence restoration after RARP.</p></sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Cystography</kwd>
<kwd>Prostate neoplasms</kwd>
<kwd>Prostatectomy</kwd>
<kwd>Urinary incontinence</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. However, post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is a significant surgical complication after RP that can influence a patient&#x02019;s quality of life. The major causes of PPI include damage to the urethral sphincter, bladder instability, and destruction of pelvic support &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-jyms-2022-00311">1</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-jyms-2022-00311">3</xref>&#x0005d;. Despite the fact that there are several surgical techniques for preventing PPI, such as nerve-sparing techniques, bladder neck preservation, and posterior reconstruction &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-jyms-2022-00311">4</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-jyms-2022-00311">6</xref>&#x0005d;, PPI remains a major obstacle.</p>
<p>Recent studies have indicated that perioperative imaging can be used to predict PPI. Mendoza et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-jyms-2022-00311">7</xref>&#x0005d; reported that longer urethral lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were associated with faster continence recovery at all postoperative time points. Coakley et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-jyms-2022-00311">8</xref>&#x0005d; also found that a longer membranous urethra on endorectal MRI before RP was significantly associated with a more rapid return to continence &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-jyms-2022-00311">8</xref>&#x0005d;. However, immediate assessment of postoperative urethral length may be more important than preoperative urethral length in predicting PPI because urethral length can be shorter after surgery.</p>
<p>In contrast, several studies have reported that postoperative cystography, a simple method that is routinely performed to check for urinary leakage after surgery, can predict PPI. Olgin et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-jyms-2022-00311">9</xref>&#x0005d; reported that the post-prostatectomy bladder neck location on cystography correlates with continence rates and predicts patients at risk of prolonged incontinence &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-jyms-2022-00311">9</xref>&#x0005d;. Sugi et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-jyms-2022-00311">10</xref>&#x0005d; also demonstrated that a narrow vesicourethral angle measured by cystography is a useful predictor of PPI.</p>
<p>Although these studies have shown promising results, the efficacy of postoperative cystography in predicting early recovery from PPI is controversial because there are no systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of postoperative cystography. In addition, previous studies on the efficacy of postoperative cystography assessed only two-dimensional aspects, such as the coronal view. Therefore, I focused on the three-dimensional aspect as a predictor of early recovery from PPI by using not only the coronal view but also the sagittal view on cystography. In this study, I investigated the efficacy of a new cystography parameter (i.e., the sagittal view) to predict early and long-term recovery from incontinence after RP, comparing it with a well-known previous cystography parameter (i.e., the coronal view) on postoperative cystography.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<boxed-text>
<p>Ethical statements: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Yeungnam University Hospital (IRB No: 2020-04-061-001), which waived the need for informed consent owing to the retrospective design of the study.</p>
</boxed-text>
<sec>
<title>1. Study populations</title>
<p>I retrospectively reviewed 118 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) for localized prostate cancer at single institution between January 2016 and April 2021. One hundred and seven patients were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: radiation therapy within 1 year, urine leakage from the anastomosis during cystography, previous urethral or prostate surgery, and no nerve-sparing procedure.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2. Surgical procedures</title>
<p>All patients underwent RARP performed by an experienced surgeon at a single institution. The surgeon performed the procedures as follows: bladder neck reconstruction (if needed), posterior reconstruction, and vesicourethral anastomosis. All patients underwent posterior reconstruction using the Rocco stitch &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-jyms-2022-00311">11</xref>&#x0005d;. Vesicourethral anastomosis was performed using a bidirectional barbed (V-Loc 90; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) running suture in all patients. Unilateral or bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing procedures were performed in all patients according to their clinical stage.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3. Postoperative cystography</title>
<p>Cystography was routinely performed postoperatively 7 days before urethral catheter removal. The bladder was filled with 150-mL saline solution with contrast medium, and front, semilateral, and lateral-view images were acquired. If vesicourethral anastomosis leakage was observed, the cystography was repeated after 7 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>4. Cystography parameters</title>
<p>I calculated the bladder neck to pubic symphysis (BNPS) ratio (defined as the bladder neck-pubis symphysis distance divided by the total pubis symphysis height) (<xref rid="f1-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>) and vesicourethral angle (measured as the angle of the bladder neck relative to the bilateral margin over the pelvic inlet) (<xref rid="f1-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1B</xref>). I also calculated the anteroposterior length of the bladder and distance from the most posterior margin of the bladder to the bladder neck using lateral-view cystography. To control for potential differences in magnification by cystography, the bladder neck-posterior margin distances were divided by the anteroposterior lengths, called the bladder neck anteroposterior length (BNAP) ratio (<xref rid="f1-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C</xref>). All cystography parameters were analyzed by a single urologist who was blinded to the continence results.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>5. Outcome assessment</title>
<p>All 107 patients were routinely followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP. The patients reported daily pad use and the last date of pad usage at each visit. Continence was defined as the cessation of pad use.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>6. Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Univariate analysis was performed using the Student <italic>t</italic>-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to confirm independent predictive factors for urinary incontinence. According to the time of pad use, the Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of recovery from urinary incontinence. In addition, cut-off values for independent factors of urinary incontinence on cystography parameters were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 19.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The patient characteristics are shown in <xref rid="t1-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. The recovery rates for urinary incontinence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were 43.92%, 66.35%, 87.85%, and 97.19%, respectively. The cumulative recovery curve for urinary incontinence is shown in <xref rid="f2-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>.</p>
<p>Univariate analysis for predictive factors of continence recovery at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery is shown in <xref rid="t2-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>. In the univariate analysis, bladder neck preservation was significantly associated with early continence restoration 1 month after RARP. Lower BNAP ratio and wider vesicourethral angle were statistically significant predictors of PPI at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP. However, a lower BNPS ratio was associated with continence recovery at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a lower BNAP ratio and wider vesicourethral angle were significantly associated with continence restoration at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (<xref rid="t3-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). The Cox-Snell R-squared values were 0.577, 0.579, and 0.375 at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, respectively. Meanwhile, in terms of the days of pad usage, lower BNAP ratio, wider vesicourethral angle, and bladder neck preservation were significantly associated with recovery from urinary incontinence within 12 months in the Cox proportional hazard analysis (<xref rid="t4-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<p>In the ROC curve analysis, the BNAP ratio and vesicourethral angle were superior to the bladder neck location in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and Youden&#x02019;s index (<xref rid="t5-jyms-2022-00311" ref-type="table">Table 5</xref>). In addition, the areas under the curve of the BNAP ratio and vesicourethral angle 1 month after surgery were higher than those of the BNPS ratio (0.898, 0.918, and 0.650, respectively). The optimal cut-off values for the BNAP ratio, vesicourethral angle, and BNPS ratio 1 month after surgery were 0.224, 108.5, and 0.584, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>As early recovery from PPI is still an important factor associated with the patients&#x02019; quality of life, many perioperative parameters and surgical techniques related to early recovery from urinary incontinence after RARP have been reported &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-jyms-2022-00311">8</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-jyms-2022-00311">11</xref>&#x0005d;. In particular, immediate postoperative imaging such as MRI or cystography may facilitate PPI prognosis. However, immediate postoperative MRI is expensive for assessing only the early recovery from PPI in real practice. Thus, many studies have reported the efficacy of postoperative cystography as a predictive factor for early recovery from PPI &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-jyms-2022-00311">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-jyms-2022-00311">10</xref>&#x0005d;.</p>
<p>In postoperative cystography, the location of the bladder neck has been associated with early recovery from PPI in several studies. Jeong et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-jyms-2022-00311">12</xref>&#x0005d; reported a correlation between bladder neck location and early recovery from PPI in a large cohort. They concluded that a higher location of the bladder neck leads to a higher rate of early recovery from PPI. Olgin et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-jyms-2022-00311">9</xref>&#x0005d; and Kageyama et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-jyms-2022-00311">13</xref>&#x0005d; also reported that a lower bladder neck position may predict prolonged urinary incontinence after RARP. They argued that damage to the levator ani muscle, pubourethral ligament, puboprostatic ligament, and median fibrous raphe, which suspend and support the bladder, prostate, and urethra, may lead to a decrease in the bladder neck location and change in the vesicourethral angle. They hypothesized that this contributes to normal continence impairment. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the location of the bladder neck and recovery of urinary incontinence at any point in this study. I hypothesized that, despite the low bladder neck location, there would not be a change in force transmission during the stress state if the bladder neck angle was still wide.</p>
<p>Several recent studies have reported that a wide bladder neck angle on postoperative cystography is a predictive factor for PPI recovery. Sugi et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-jyms-2022-00311">10</xref>&#x0005d; reported that a narrow vesical angle is significantly associated with urinary incontinence at 1 month and 1 year after RARP. Shao et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-jyms-2022-00311">14</xref>&#x0005d; also suggested that a shaped bladder neck angle was a significant predictor of urinary incontinence 6 months after RARP. However, there were several limitations in previous studies regarding the vesicourethral angle. For example, in Sugi et al. &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-jyms-2022-00311">10</xref>&#x0005d;, several surgeons performed RARP. In this study, patients with a wide bladder neck angle on postoperative cystography showed early restoration of urinary incontinence after RARP, as the clinical variables were completely controlled. At the onset of the normal voiding phase in men, the bladder neck is opened and the posterior vesicourethral angle changes sharply, with striated urethral sphincter relaxation and anterior fibromuscular stroma contraction &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-jyms-2022-00311">15</xref>&#x0005d;. I anticipated that as the urethral stump and bladder neck were more tensioned when vesicourethral anastomosis was performed, the shape of the bladder would be more prolate, and the bladder neck angle would be narrow. Therefore, a narrow bladder neck angle is associated with restoration of urinary incontinence.</p>
<p>A unique aspect of the present study was that the BNAP ratio was associated with early continence recovery after RARP. In previous studies, postoperative cystography parameters were only measured in the coronal view of cystography &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-jyms-2022-00311">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-jyms-2022-00311">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-jyms-2022-00311">12</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-jyms-2022-00311">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-jyms-2022-00311">16</xref>&#x0005d;. However, I anticipated that the force transmission of urine from the bladder neck to the urethra could be three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional. Therefore, I focused on the sagittal view of postoperative cystography, which is an important parameter related to PPI recovery.</p>
<p>Therefore, I must consider why a lower BNAP ratio is associated with early continence recovery. When abdominal pressure increases, stable urethral support is an important mechanism for controlling urinary incontinence &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-jyms-2022-00311">17</xref>&#x0005d;. Because the mechanism of urinary incontinence after RP is similar to that of stress urinary incontinence in women, posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter in RARP can be helpful for early continence recovery &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-jyms-2022-00311">11</xref>&#x0005d;. I hypothesized that urethral support would be more stable if the bladder neck was located more posteriorly after posterior reconstruction. In addition, it can be anticipated that as the bladder neck becomes more posterior, the vesicourethral angle may narrow. Therefore, I anticipated that a low BNAP ratio would influence early recovery from PPI.</p>
<p>The NVB-sparing procedure has been strongly associated with early continence recovery after RARP in many studies &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-jyms-2022-00311">18</xref>&#x0005d;. Therefore, I analyzed the differences in postoperative cystography features according to the state of NVB sparing. In the current study, there was no significant difference in the BNPS ratio, vesicourethral angle, and BNAP ratio between the unilateral and bilateral NVB-sparing procedures. Therefore, the vesicourethral angle and BNAP ratio could be predictive factors for early continence recovery after RARP regardless of NVB sparing.</p>
<p>By analyzing the ROC curve, I evaluated the statistical significance of the BNAP ratio compared to other cystography parameters such as bladder neck location and vesicourethral angle. In the ROC curve, the BNAP ratio and vesicourethral angle values were superior to those of the bladder neck location in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the BNAP ratio can effectively predict early recovery from PPI. In addition, the combination of these parameters could predict more outcomes than each parameter alone, although I only evaluated the efficacy of each postoperative cystography parameter.</p>
<p>This study had several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study conducted at a single center. Second, I did not use the 1-hour pad test to assess the degree of incontinence on each follow-up day. Finally, preoperative cystography to measure baseline parameters was not performed in this study. Nevertheless, this is the first study to assess the efficacy of predictive parameters for PPI recovery using three-dimensional aspects of postoperative cystography. In addition, the current study presents a new concept for predicting continence recovery after RARP using postoperative cystography.</p>
<p>In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the BNAP ratio and vesicourethral angle are associated with the prediction of early recovery from urinary incontinence after RARP. Sagittal and coronal cystography views may help predict early restoration of urinary continence. In addition, the use of a combination of cystography parameters may be more helpful than the use of any single parameter alone.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="conflict"><p><bold>Conflicts of interest</bold></p><p>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding</bold></p>
<p>This work was supported by a grant from the Chunma Medical Research Foundation, Korea, 2021.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hammerer</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huland</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>J Urol</source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>157</volume>
<fpage>233</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Leach</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Trockman</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hamilton</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Haab</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zimmern</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Post-prostatectomy incontinence: urodynamic findings and treatment outcomes</article-title>
<source>J Urol</source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>155</volume>
<fpage>1256</fpage>
<lpage>9</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Walz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Burnett</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costello</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Eastham</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Graefen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guillonneau</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<fpage>179</fpage>
<lpage>92</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Srivastava</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chopra</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pham</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sooriakumaran</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Durand</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chughtai</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<fpage>438</fpage>
<lpage>44</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Freire</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Weinberg</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Soukup</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lipsitz</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>56</volume>
<fpage>972</fpage>
<lpage>80</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rocco</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carmignani</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Acquati</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gadda</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dell&#x00027;Orto</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocco</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<fpage>376</fpage>
<lpage>83</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mendoza</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stern</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>AY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jaffe</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kovell</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>J Endourol</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<fpage>51</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Coakley</surname><given-names>FV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Eberhardt</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kattan</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Scardino</surname><given-names>PT</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hricak</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging</article-title>
<source>J Urol</source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>168</volume>
<fpage>1032</fpage>
<lpage>5</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Olgin</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alsyouf</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lightfoot</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Postoperative cystogram findings predict incontinence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>J Endourol</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<fpage>1460</fpage>
<lpage>3</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sugi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kinoshita</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Taniguchi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mishima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>The narrow vesicourethral angle measured on postoperative cystography can predict urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>Scand J Urol</source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>52</volume>
<fpage>151</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rocco</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gregori</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stener</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Santoro</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bozzola</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Galli</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<fpage>996</fpage>
<lpage>1003</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: correlation with vesico-urethral anastomosis location in the pelvic cavity measured by postoperative cystography</article-title>
<source>Int J Urol</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>444</fpage>
<lpage>51</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kageyama</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nagasawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tomita</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kobayashi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>The location of the bladder neck in postoperative cystography predicts continence convalescence after radical prostatectomy</article-title>
<source>BMC Urol</source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>52</fpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>IH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chou</surname><given-names>CY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tseng</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>A specific cystography pattern can predict postprostatectomy incontinence</article-title>
<source>Ann Surg Oncol</source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>Suppl 3</issue>
<fpage>S1580</fpage>
<lpage>6</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nishio</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Soh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Syukuya</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sadaoka</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Iwahata</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Role of male pelvic floor muscles and anterior fibromuscular stroma in males on &#x003b1;(1)-blocker treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study</article-title>
<source>Int J Urol</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<fpage>724</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Association between cystographic anastomotic urinary leakage following retropubic radical prostatectomy and early urinary incontinence</article-title>
<source>Yeungnam Univ J Med</source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<fpage>142</fpage>
<lpage>7</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Petros</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Woodman</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>The integral theory of continence</article-title>
<source>Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct</source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<fpage>35</fpage>
<lpage>40</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-jyms-2022-00311">
<label>18</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Reeves</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Preece</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kapoor</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Everaerts</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Corcoran</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>
<source>Eur Urol</source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>68</volume>
<fpage>692</fpage>
<lpage>704</lpage>
</element-citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Tables</title>
<fig id="f1-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Fig. 1.</label><caption><p>Postoperative cystography parameters. (A) Bladder neck to pubic symphysis, (B) vesicourethral angle, and (C) bladder neck anteroposterior (BNAP) length. BNPS, bladder neck to pubic symphysis.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="jyms-2022-00311f1.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Fig. 2.</label><caption><p>Cumulative recovery curve from urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="jyms-2022-00311f2.tif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption><p>Characteristics of all patients</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Variable</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Data</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of patients</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.50&#x000B1;6.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prostate volume (mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.26&#x000B1;12.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Preoperative PSA (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.46&#x000B1;27.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Duration of catheterization (day)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.16&#x000B1;3.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathologic state</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;&#x02264;T2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57 (53.3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;&#x02265;T3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (46.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NVB sparing</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Unilateral</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 (22.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Bilateral</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83 (77.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bladder neck preservation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67 (62.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Recovery of incontinence (mo)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47 (43.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71 (66.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94 (87.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104 (97.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Regain of continence (day)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.88&#x000B1;86.21</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-jyms-2022-00311"><p>Values are presented as number only, mean±standard deviation, or number (%).</p><p>PSA, prostate-specific antigen; NVB, neurovascular bundle.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t2-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption><p>Univariate analysis for predictive factors of PPI at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Factor</th>
<th colspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">1 Mo<hr/></th>
<th colspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">3 Mo<hr/></th>
<th colspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">6 Mo<hr/></th>
<th colspan="3" valign="middle" align="center">12 Mo<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Incontinence (n=60)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Continence (n=47)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Incontinence (n=36)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Continence (n=71)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Incontinence (n=13)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Continence (n=94)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Incontinence (n=3)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Continence (n=104)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.23&#x000B1;6.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.83&#x000B1;6.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.629</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.92&#x000B1;6.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.79&#x000B1;6.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.500</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67.54&#x000B1;5.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.35&#x000B1;6.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.526</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.33&#x000B1;6.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.59&#x000B1;6.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.379</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prostate volume (mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.45&#x000B1;14.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.46&#x000B1;8.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.92&#x000B1;12.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.43&#x000B1;12.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.843</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.57&#x000B1;12.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.35&#x000B1;12.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.834</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.09&#x000B1;16.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.91&#x000B1;12.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.097</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Preoperative PSA (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.05&#x000B1;24.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.26&#x000B1;31.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.551</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.27&#x000B1;29.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.04&#x000B1;26.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.454</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.15&#x000B1;16.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.78&#x000B1;28.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.748</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.05&#x000B1;3.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.79&#x000B1;27.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.467</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathologic stage (n)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.942</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.524</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;T2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;T3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NVB sparing (n)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.800</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.345</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.139</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.345</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Unilateral</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Bilateral</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bladder neck preservation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.134</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.288</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Postoperative cystography parameter</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;BNAP ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.267&#x000B1;0.059</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.188&#x000B1;0.022</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.299&#x000B1;0.047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.198&#x000B1;0.031</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.335&#x000B1;0.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.217&#x000B1;0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.336&#x000B1;0.055</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.229&#x000B1;0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Vesicourethral angle</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.51&#x000B1;12.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">116.29&#x000B1;5.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.84&#x000B1;11.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">112.15&#x000B1;9.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.13&#x000B1;9.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108.56&#x000B1;11.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.60&#x000B1;189.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">107.01&#x000B1;12.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;BNPS ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.509&#x000B1;0.163</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.410&#x000B1;0.155</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.526&#x000B1;0.165</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.434&#x000B1;0.160</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.007</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.574&#x000B1;0.186</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.450&#x000B1;0.159</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.011</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.585&#x000B1;0.235</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.462&#x000B1;0.164</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.210</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn2-jyms-2022-00311"><p>Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number.</p><p>PPI, post-prostatectomy incontinence; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; NVB, neurovascular bundle; BNAP, bladder neck anteroposterior length; BNPS, bladder neck to pubic symphysis.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t3-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Table 3.</label>
<caption><p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictive factors of PPI at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" valign="middle" align="left">Factor</th>
<th colspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Postoperative 1 mo (47/107)<hr/></th>
<th colspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Postoperative 3 mo (71/107)<hr/></th>
<th colspan="2" valign="middle" align="center">Postoperative 6 mo (94/107)<hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">OR (95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">OR (95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">OR (95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.943 (0.838&#x02013;1.062)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.336</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.039 (0.888&#x02013;1.217)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.631</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.919 (0.718&#x02013;1.175)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.501</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prostate volume (mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.092 (1.020&#x02013;1.170)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.030 (0.950&#x02013;1.118)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.471</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.024 (0.920&#x02013;1.141)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.661</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Preoperative PSA (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.997 (0.968&#x02013;1.027)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.851</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.036 (1.000&#x02013;1.074)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.051</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.029 (0.943&#x02013;1.123)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.524</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathologic stage</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.248 (0.192&#x02013;8.096)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.817</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.142 (0.013&#x02013;1.499)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.105</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.945 (0.115&#x02013;98.425)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.524</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NVB sparing</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.684 (0.188&#x02013;15.065)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.641</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.044 (0.002&#x02013;1.223)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.177 (0.222&#x02013;45.477)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No bladder neck preservation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.279 (0.057&#x02013;1.367)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.290 (0.369&#x02013;49.912)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.245</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.147 (0.014&#x02013;1.516)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNAP ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.795 (2.829&#x02013;5.089)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.867 (2.181&#x02013;5.384)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.648 (2.694&#x02013;5.041)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vesicourethral angle</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.800 (0.701&#x02013;0.913)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.885 (0.806&#x02013;0.971)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.010</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.866 (0.765&#x02013;0.980)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNPS ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.098 (0.000&#x02013;34.073)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.436</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.013 (0.000&#x02013;9.100)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.193</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.155 (0.024&#x02013;21.325)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.295</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3-jyms-2022-00311"><p>PPI, post-prostatectomy incontinence; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; NVB, neurovascular bundle; BNAP, bladder neck anteroposterior; BNPS, bladder neck to pubic symphysis.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t4-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Table 4.</label>
<caption><p>Cox proportional hazard analysis for predictive factors of PPI within 12 months after surgery</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Factor </th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HR (95% CI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.029 (0.995&#x02013;1.063)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prostate volume (mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.993 (0.976&#x02013;1.010)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.412</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Preoperative PSA (ng/mL)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.001 (0.993&#x02013;1.009)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.880</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pathologic stage (T3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.786 (0.501&#x02013;1.232)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.293</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bilateral NVB sparing</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.061 (0.527&#x02013;2.138)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.868</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No bladder neck preservation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.608 (0.393&#x02013;0.938)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNAP ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.416 (0.146&#x02013;0.987)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vesicourethral angle</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.056 (1.032&#x02013;1.080)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNPS ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.924 (0.208&#x02013;4.109)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.917</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn4-jyms-2022-00311"><p>PPI, post-prostatectomy incontinence; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; NVB, neurovascular bundle; BNAP, bladder neck anteroposterior; BNPS, bladder neck to pubic symphysis.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t5-jyms-2022-00311" position="float">
<label>Table 5.</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of the cystography parameters for predictive factors of continence recovery 1 month after surgery in ROC curve analysis</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Parameter</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Sensitivity</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Specificity</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Youden&#x02019;s index</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Optimal cut-off</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">AUC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">95% CI</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNPS ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.350</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.957</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.307</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.584</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.650</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.546&#x02013;0.754</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vesicourethral angle</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.915</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.817</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.732</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.918</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.866&#x02013;0.970</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BNAP ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.800</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.979</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.779</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.224</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.898</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.835&#x02013;0.961</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn5-jyms-2022-00311"><p>ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; BNPS, bladder neck to pubic symphysis; BNAP, bladder neck anteroposterior.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</back></article>