Diabetes Metab J Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2233-6079 2233-6087 Korean Diabetes Association 10.4093/dmj.2021.0264 dmj-2021-0264 Original Article Drug/Regimen A Real-World Study of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lobeglitazone in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-2351 KimBo-Yeon1 KwonHyuk-Sang2 KimSuk Kyeong3 NohJung-Hyun4 ParkCheol-Young5 ParkHyeong-Kyu6 SongKee-Ho3 WonJong Chul7 YuJae Myung8 LeeMi Young9 LeeJae Hyuk10 LimSoo11 ChunSung Wan12 JeongIn-Kyung13 ChungChoon Hee9 HanSeung Jin14 KimHee-Seok15 MinJu-Young15 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6417-8412 KimSungrae16 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Goyang, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Department of Drug Safety Research, Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation, Seoul, Korea Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea Corresponding author: Sungrae Kim, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea, E-mail: kimsungrae@catholic.ac.kr 11 2022 8 03 2022 46 6 855 865 27 09 2021 7 12 2021 Copyright © 2022 Korean Diabetes Association 2022 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have been associated with various safety concerns including weight gain, bladder cancer, and congestive heart failure (CHF). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a novel TZD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in real practice.

 Methods

In this non-interventional, multi-center, retrospective, and observational study conducted at 15 tertiary or secondary referral hospitals in Korea, a total of 2,228 patients with T2DM who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg for more than 1 year were enrolled.

 Results

Overall adverse events (AEs) occurred in 381 patients (17.10%) including edema in 1.97% (n=44). Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases were identified in 0.81% (n=18) and 0.81% (n=18), respectively. One case of CHF was reported as an AE. Edema occurred in 1.97% (n=44) of patients. Hypoglycemia occurred in 2.47% (n=55) of patients. Fracture occurred in 1.17% (n=26) of all patients. Lobeglitazone significantly decreased HbA1c level, resulting in a mean treatment difference of −1.05%± 1.35% (P<0.001), and decreased total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, it increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, regardless of statin administration. The patients who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg showed an apparent reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline during the first 6 months of treatment. The HbA1c levels remained stable between months 6 and 42.

 Conclusion

Lobeglitazone has long-term safety profile, good glycemic-lowering effect and long-term durability of glycemic control in real-world clinical settings.

 Diabetes mellitus type 2 Lobeglitazone Observational study Thiazolidinediones Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lobeglitazone (trade name, Duvie, Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation, Seoul, Korea) is a novel thiazolidinedione (TZD). TZD-based drugs improve insulin resistance by regulating the activity of genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism by stimulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) receptors [1]. Lobeglitazone increases cell response to insulin without increasing insulin secretion in the pancreas. Therefore, the burden on the pancreas is less than that in other anti-diabetic treatments that increase insulin secretion. In addition, it is reported to be effective in protecting pancreatic β-cells [2,3]. Furthermore, TZD exhibit cardioprotective effects by increasing the secretion of adiponectin [4], expanding blood vessels [5], and alleviating inflammation [5,6]. It is also involved in lipid metabolism, which is known to lower small-dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [7].

Lobeglitazone clinical trials were conducted in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) atients for 6 months to up to 12 months [8,9], and the efficacy and safety results of lobeglitazone are relatively limited. In pre-marketing clinical trials, a controlled group of patients was enrolled but elderly or patients taking concomitant drugs were excluded to minimize other possible effects in determining the efficacy and safety of the drug. Consequently, in real clinical practice, unforeseen events not detected in the pre-marketing stage may occur because of the extensive and longer duration of treatment involving a variety of patients with various underlying conditions and diseases. Therefore, an ongoing safety assessment under real-world settings is needed. TZD use has been associated with the risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), fractures, bladder cancer (long-term use), edema, and weight gain [1,10–12]. Treatment with lobeglitazone has been shown to be safer than other TZDs in patients with bladder cancer and bone fractures [8]. However, currently, there is a lack of large-scale, long-term safety and efficacy data of lobeglitazone in Korea. This is a non-interventional, multi-centered, retrospective and observational study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone in patients with T2DM in real world.

 METHODS Subjects and study design

This non-interventional multi-center observational study (Retrospective study to Evaluate the Safety of DuvieR in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [DISCOVERY] study) was conducted at 15 tertiary or secondary referral hospitals in Korea. A total of 2,228 patients with T2DM who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg for more than one year between February 1, 2014 and December 20, 2018 were enrolled. The subjects’ data was collected from anonymized medical records in a clinical setting during the study period, and were recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) at the discretion of the researcher. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT05043467).

 Study assessments

In brief, the survey items covered baseline demographic characteristics such as age, sex, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), duration of diabetes, diabetic complications, medical history, lobeglitazone administration information (total treatment period, start and end date of administration, reason for discontinuation of lobeglitazone), and concomitant medication (type and dose).

Safety assessment items included the incidence of major adverse events (AEs) and any AEs that occurred during the lobeglitazone therapy. Major AEs were: edema, weight gain, fractures, bladder cancer, anemia, hypoglycemia, macular edema, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, coronary arterial occlusion, and CHF. AEs including blood pressure change, increased liver enzymes (>3×), and dizziness were also identified.

To assess the efficacy of lobeglitazone 0.5 mg, changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose levels, and lipid parameters (total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 42, and 48 months after administration were identified.

 Ethics statement

This study proposal was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of each study center listed below: Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital IRB (2020-02-025), Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital IRB, Konkuk University Hospital IRB, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital IRB, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital IRB, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital IRB, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital IRB, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital IRB, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital IRB, Myongji Hospital IRB, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital IRB, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital IRB, Kyung Hee University Hospital IRB, Ajou University Hospital IRB, and Bucheon St Mary’s Hospital IRB. Written informed consent by the patients was waived due to a retrospective nature of our study.

 Statistical analysis Statistical methods

Safety analysis involved all patients who received at least one dose of lobeglitazone and at least one post-safety follow-up. Efficacy analysis involved patients who were naïve to lobeglitazone or lobeglitazone add-on therapy.

Data management and statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The patient characteristics are summarized and tabulated. Data are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables, whereas the categorical variables are expressed as percentages of patients and number of events. Since the data were not normally distributed, a Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was performed to evaluate changes in laboratory variables from baseline to follow-up. All tests were two-sided and performed at 5% level of significance.

 Sample size

According to the retrospective study of Rajagopalan et al. [10], the frequencies of CHF and related hospitalization were 2.0% and 0.7%, respectively. Based on the rates of hospitalization due to CHF, the sample size needed was at least 2,180 to detect a rare serious AE assuming a rate of 0.7% at a fraction of 50% and a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

 RESULTS Patient characteristics

The baseline characteristics of study participants in the safety set are presented in Table 1. The safety analysis set included total patients (n=2,228), and the efficacy analysis set involved drug-naïve patients at the baseline and following the addition of only lobeglitazone without changing other anti-diabetic agents (n=1,651). Among patients in the safety analysis set, the mean age was 64.07±11.53 years, and males constituted 61.18%. The mean duration of diabetes was 13.01±8.07 years. The mean BMI was 25.09±3.50 kg/m2. In terms of diabetic treatment status, 264 patients (11.85%) in the safety analysis set were drug-naïve and 1,964 patients (88.15%) were exposed to concomitant anti-diabetic medications, which mainly included metformin (n=1,557, 69.88%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (n=1,379, 61.89%), sulfonylurea (SU; n=912, 40.93%), sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (n=42, 1.89%), and insulin (n=228, 10.23%). Mean duration of lobeglitazone treatment was 28.59±9.84 months in the safety analysis set.

 Safety

The safety analysis set included 2,228 patients. The results of weight gain after taking lobeglitazone 0.5 mg are presented in Table 2. The mean weight change was 2.11±3.85 kg (3.29%± 5.85%). The percentage of the study participants with weight gain exceeding 5% compared to baseline was 16.83% in the safety analysis set. The percentage of patients who gained weight did not vary with age. Overall, AEs occurred 381 patients (17.10%) (Table 3). AEs of special interest are listed in Table 3. Of these AEs, edema was detected in 1.97% (n=44). In this study, edema was observed more frequently in females than in males (n=29 [1.30%] vs. n=15 [0.67%], respectively). Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases occurred in 0.81% (n=18) and 0.81% (n=18), respectively. One case of CHF was reported as an AE. Hypoglycemia occurred in 2.47% (n=55) patients. Insulin or SU was used to treat hypoglycemia in 87.27% of patients. Fractures occurred in 1.17% (n=26) of all patients. Of these, 61.54% were female and the number of fractures increased with age. Increases in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase occurred in 0.22% (n=5) and 0.27% (n=6) of patients, respectively. No cases of jaundice were reported as an AE.

 Efficacy Effects of lobeglitazone on glucose and lipid parameters

The effects of lobeglitazone were analyzed in the efficacy analysis set (n=1,651) and expressed as mean±SD changes in HbA1c, glucose, and lipid parameters from baseline until the end of treatment (Table 4). Lobeglitazone 0.5 mg significantly decreased HbA1c from the baseline level of 8.17%±1.36% to the final level at the end of study, 7.12%±1.13%, resulting in a mean treatment difference of −1.05%±1.35% (P<0.001). Glucose was also improved at the end of treatment (mean treatment difference −34.05±62.00 mg/dL, P<0.001). Treatment with lobeglitazone 0.5 mg significantly decreased the levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, and LDL-C and increased HDL-C, regardless of statin therapy (not administrated statin, all P<0.001) (Table 4).

 Durability of glycemic control following lobeglitazone therapy

The durability of glycemic control was analyzed in 1,651 patients. Changes in HbA1c levels for 42 months in different groups are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Patients who received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg (add-on group vs. drug naïve group) showed an apparent reduction in HbA1c from baseline during the first 6 months of treatment (add-on, 8.1%±1.3% and 7.2%±1.2%, respectively; drug naïve, 8.5%±1.9% and 6.9%±1.2%, respectively), and the HbA1c levels remained stable in both groups of patients between months 6 and 42 (Fig. 1). Fig. 2 showed change in HbA1c levels for 42 months in the three groups (the efficacy analysis set vs. maintenance of anti-diabetic medications vs. change of anti-diabetic medications). HbA1c levels at baseline, 6 and 42 months in the efficacy analysis set were 8.2%±1.4%, 7.1%±1.2%, and 7.1%±1.2%, respectively and the HbA1c levels remained stable between months 6 and 42 (Fig. 2). Treatment in anti-diabetic medications starting from the initial lobeglitazone remained unchanged until the final HbA1c test (maintenance group) in 81.0% (n=1,337) patients. In this group, HbA1c levels at baseline, 6 and 42 months in the efficacy analysis set were 8.1%±1.4%, 7.0%±1.1%, and 6.8%±0.9%, respectively (Fig. 2). Glycemic control and long-term durability were higher in the maintenance group following treatment with anti-diabetic medications than in those who switched to other anti-diabetic medications (Fig. 2).

 DISCUSSION

In the present study, treatment with lobeglitazone 0.5 mg showed a good long-term safety profile. However, lobeglitazone treatment increased body weight by 2.11 kg (3.29%) and led to edema in 1.97% patients during the treatment. Lobeglitazone treatment improved glycemic control in patients with T2DM, and also significantly improved lipid parameters. In particular, lobeglitazone was associated with excellent long-term glycemic control.

Previous TZDs were associated with various safety concerns including weight gain, bladder cancer, CHF, and so on [1,11,13–18]. Both efficacy and safety are important in determining the clinical benefit of anti-diabetic agents. Weight gain and edema are well known AEs of TZDs. As previously stated, lobeglitazone treatment increased body weight by 2.11 kg (3.29%) and resulted in edema in 1.97% patients during the study period. Lobeglitazone treatment increased body weight by 0.89 and 1.65 kg at 24 and 52 weeks, respectively, in previous efficacy and safety trials of lobeglitazone monotherapy [8,9]. In a meta-analysis, pioglitazone therapy led to a weight gain of 1.76 kg [19]. Compared with previous studies of lobeglitazone and pioglitazone, the present real-world study revealed a higher body weight gain, plausibly due to the effects of other concomitant therapies such as SU and insulin, and also the real-world, retrospective design and long-term treatment duration.

Overall, AEs occurred in 17.10% of patients in this study. Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases were found in 0.81% and 0.81%, respectively. Lobeglitazone is associated with a very low risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease in this study. Only a single case of CHF was reported as an AE despite long-term observation of a large number of patients. The findings suggest that clinicians do not need to desist from prescribing lobeglitazone due to the risk of CHF in patients with T2DM. Edema was detected in 1.97% of patients. In this study, edema was observed more frequently in females than in males (1.30% vs. 0.67%, respectively). Edema is already known to be related to TZDs, and it may result from a reduction in the renal excretion of sodium along with an increase in sodium and free water retention [20]. Other possible mechanisms for edema include increased sympathetic nervous system activity, altered interstitial ion transport, and alterations in endothelial permeability [21–23]. In the results of a previous study, more female patients and more insulin users developed TZD-related fluid retention [20]. Hypoglycemia occurred in 2.47% of all patients, but it occurred in 87.27% of those exposed to add-on therapy comprising insulin or SU, suggesting the hypoglycemic effects of concomitant anti-diabetic therapies.

TZD, a PPARγ agonist, promotes adipogenesis, and inhibits osteoblastogenesis, and its long-term use is associated with impaired bone quality and an increased risk of bone fracture [24–26]. In this study, fractures were reported in 1.17% patients. Although 61.18% of total patients were male, 61.54% of fractures occurred in females and the incidence of fracture increased with age. Compared with clinical studies involving other TZDs [12,27], lobeglitazone showed lower risk of bone fracture (1.17%) than those of other TZDs. Lobeglitazone monotherapy did not significantly alter femur neck and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) compared with placebo [8,9]. Lim et al. [28] evaluated the effects of a 52-week treatment with lobeglitazone 0.5 mg on BMD as a primary end point. The study showed that treatment with lobeglitazone 0.5 mg over 52 weeks was not detrimental to BMD compared with placebo.

Compared with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, a novel TZD such as lobeglitazone requires lower doses for glycemic control [29]. Lobeglitazone also affected adipocyte biology in a previous study [30]. Further, in a previous animal study, lobeglitazone had no detrimental effects on osteoblast biology [31]. Therefore, the lower dose and the distinct effect of lobeglitazone on adipocyte biology may contribute to a reduced risk of bone fracture.

A few observational studies have reported that TZD increases the risk of bladder cancer [11,15,18]. No cases of bladder cancer have been reported in our study. Based on previous preclinical studies [32,33], lobeglitazone does not increase the risk of bladder cancer. Because lobeglitazone shows a lower effective dose—due to its higher affinity to PPARγ—and as it is mainly metabolized by the liver with negligible renal excretion, lobeglitazone may have a lower risk of bladder cancer than other TZDs [34,35]. However, this study cannot confirm the safety of lobeglitazone on bladder cancer, underscoring the need for a further large prospective study to investigate the risk.

In this study, lobeglitazone showed an apparent reduction in HbA1c from baseline during the first 6 months of treatment (add-on, 8.1%±1.3% and 7.2%±1.2%, respectively; drug naïve, 8.5%±1.9% and 6.9%±1.2%, respectively). Further, the HbA1c levels remained stable in patients in both groups by month 42. These results suggest glycemic efficacy and long-term durability of lobeglitazone. No change in anti-diabetic medications was required in 81.0% of all patients who were treated with upfront lobeglitazone until the final HbA1c test. Glycemic control and long-term durability were better in the maintenance group exposed to anti-diabetic medications. Maintenance therapy without changing anti-diabetic agents implies strong long-term durability in glycemic control. In a previous study investigating the role of different anti-diabetic agents as add-on treatments to metformin in patients with T2DM, the addition of a TZD to metformin yielded the most durable glycemic response [36]. Lobeglitazone, a novel PPARγ agonist, was based on a modification of the rosiglitazone structure to introduce a p-methoxyphenoxy group at the 4-position of the pyrimidine moiety [34,37]. This contributes to the enhanced binding affinity of lobeglitazone for PPARγ; docking analysis suggests that the binding affinity of lobeglitazone is 12 times higher than those of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone [34,38]. TZDs represent peripheral insulin sensitizers [1], but lobeglitazone showed beneficial effects on pancreatic β-cell survival and function in an animal study [2]. These factors may affect the long-term durability of glycemic control with lobeglitazone. Treatment with lobeglitazone also improved lipid parameters in this study consistent with other clinical studies of lobeglitazone [8,9,39].

This study has several limitations. First, the mean age of participants in this study was 64.07±11.53 years, and the proportion of young patients was extremely low. Further, the mean diabetic duration of participants was relatively long. These limitations may affect the study results. In a previous Korean study, young adults with diabetes were more likely to manifest higher insulin resistance [40]. Second, as this study enrolled patients who had received lobeglitazone 0.5 mg for more than 1 year between February 1, 2014 and December 20, 2018, there were no data on patients who were excluded due to AE or lack of effectiveness within one year. However, in general, there is limited convincing data with a paucity of long-term research in this area, so this study is nonetheless expected to represent a meaningful contribution. Third, due to its retrospective design, the results might have been affected by selection bias. Nonetheless, as our study involved multiple centers including 15 hospitals and various patient groups, the results of the study can be generalized.

In conclusion, our results reinforce the long-term safety and durability of the glycemic lowering effect of lobeglitazone 0.5 mg in real-world clinical practice.

 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all members of DISCOVERY study group involved in conducting and managing this study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception or design: B.Y.K., J.H.N., C.Y.P., K.H.S., S.K.

Data acquisition, analysis, or interpretation: S.K.K., H.S.K., J.Y.M., S.K.

Drafting the work or revision: B.Y.K., H.S.K., J.H.L., S.L., S.W.C., I.K.J., C.H.C., S.J.H.

Final approval of the manuscript: B.Y.K., H.S.K., S.K.K., J.H.N., C.Y.P., H.K.P., K.H.S., J.C.W., J.M.Y., M.Y.L., J.H.L., S.L., S.W.C., I.K.J., C.H.C., S.J.H., H.S.K., J.Y.M., S.K.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

In-Kyung Jeong was editor in chief of the Diabetes & Metabolism Journal from 2020 to 2021. Jung Hyun Noh was associate editor of the Diabetes & Metabolism Journal from 2020 to 2021. They were not involved in the review process of this article. Otherwise, there was no conflict of interest. Statistical analysis was supported by Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation. H.S.K and J.Y.M are employees of Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation and partly supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

 REFERENCES Yki-Jarvinen H Thiazolidinediones N Engl J Med 2004 351 1106 18 Kwon MJ Lee YJ Jung HS Shin HM Kim TN Lee SH The direct effect of lobeglitazone, a new thiazolidinedione, on pancreatic beta cells: a comparison with other thiazolidinediones Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019 151 209 23 Xiang AH Peters RK Kjos SL Marroquin A Goico J Ochoa C Effect of pioglitazone on pancreatic beta-cell function and diabetes risk in Hispanic women with prior gestational diabetes Diabetes 2006 55 517 22 Yu JG Javorschi S Hevener AL Kruszynska YT Norman RA Sinha M The effect of thiazolidinediones on plasma adiponectin levels in normal, obese, and type 2 diabetic subjects Diabetes 2002 51 2968 74 Dandona P Aljada A Chaudhuri A Vascular reactivity and thiazolidinediones Am J Med 2003 115 Suppl 8A 81S 86S Garg R Kumbkarni Y Aljada A Mohanty P Ghanim H Hamouda W Troglitazone reduces reactive oxygen species generation by leukocytes and lipid peroxidation and improves flow-mediated vasodilatation in obese subjects Hypertension 2000 36 430 5 Winkler K Konrad T Fullert S Friedrich I Destani R Baumstark MW Pioglitazone reduces atherogenic dense LDL particles in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study Diabetes Care 2003 26 2588 94 Kim SG Kim DM Woo JT Jang HC Chung CH Ko KS Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 24-weeks: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo controlled trial PLoS One 2014 9 e92843 Kim SH Kim SG Kim DM Woo JT Jang HC Chung CH Safety and efficacy of lobeglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 52 weeks: an open-label extension study Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015 110 e27 30 Rajagopalan R Rosenson RS Fernandes AW Khan M Murray FT Association between congestive heart failure and hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving treatment with insulin or pioglitazone: a retrospective data analysis Clin Ther 2004 26 1400 10 Mamtani R Haynes K Bilker WB Vaughn DJ Strom BL Glanz K Association between longer therapy with thiazolidinediones and risk of bladder cancer: a cohort study J Natl Cancer Inst 2012 104 1411 21 Kahn SE Zinman B Lachin JM Haffner SM Herman WH Holman RR Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT) Diabetes Care 2008 31 845 51 Fonseca V Effect of thiazolidinediones on body weight in patients with diabetes mellitus Am J Med 2003 115 Suppl 8A 42S 48S Levin D Bell S Sund R Hartikainen SA Tuomilehto J Pukkala E Pioglitazone and bladder cancer risk: a multipopulation pooled, cumulative exposure analysis Diabetologia 2015 58 493 504 Tuccori M Filion KB Yin H Yu OH Platt RW Azoulay L Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study BMJ 2016 352 i1541 Nesto RW Bell D Bonow RO Fonseca V Grundy SM Horton ES Thiazolidinedione use, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association Diabetes Care 2004 27 256 63 Singh S Loke YK Furberg CD Thiazolidinediones and heart failure: a teleo-analysis Diabetes Care 2007 30 2148 53 Mamtani R Haynes K Bilker WB Vaughn DJ Strom BL Glanz K Long-term therapy with thiazolidinediones and the risk of bladder cancer: a cohort study J Clin Oncol 2012 30 15 Suppl 1503 Filipova E Uzunova K Kalinov K Vekov T Effects of pioglitazone therapy on blood parameters, weight and BMI: a meta-analysis Diabetol Metab Syndr 2017 9 90 Tang WH Francis GS Hoogwerf BJ Young JB Fluid retention after initiation of thiazolidinedione therapy in diabetic patients with established chronic heart failure J Am Coll Cardiol 2003 41 1394 8 Yoshimoto T Naruse M Nishikawa M Naruse K Tanabe A Seki T Antihypertensive and vasculo- and renoprotective effects of pioglitazone in genetically obese diabetic rats Am J Physiol 1997 272 6 Pt 1 E989 96 Hosokawa M Tsukada H Fukuda K Oya M Onomura M Nakamura H Troglitazone inhibits bicarbonate secretion in rat and human duodenum J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999 290 1080 4 Walker AB Naderali EK Chattington PD Buckingham RE Williams G Differential vasoactive effects of the insulin sensitizers rosiglitazone (BRL 49653) and troglitazone on human small arteries in vitro Diabetes 1998 47 810 4 Wan Y PPARγ in bone homeostasis Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010 21 722 8 Patel JJ Butters OR Arnett TR PPAR agonists stimulate adipogenesis at the expense of osteoblast differentiation while inhibiting osteoclast formation and activity Cell Biochem Funct 2014 32 368 77 Billington EO Grey A Bolland MJ The effect of thiazolidinediones on bone mineral density and bone turnover: systematic review and meta-analysis Diabetologia 2015 58 2238 46 Dormandy J Bhattacharya M van Troostenburg de Bruyn AR PROactive investigators Safety and tolerability of pioglitazone in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: an overview of data from PROactive Drug Saf 2009 32 187 202 Lim S Kim KM Kim SG Kim DM Woo JT Chung CH Effects of lobeglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione, on bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 52 weeks Diabetes Metab J 2017 41 377 85 Lee HW Kim BY Ahn JB Kang SK Lee JH Shin JS Molecular design, synthesis, and hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic activities of novel pyrimidine derivatives having thiazolidinedione Eur J Med Chem 2005 40 862 74 Lim S Lee KS Lee JE Park HS Kim KM Moon JH Effect of a new PPAR-gamma agonist, lobeglitazone, on neointimal formation after balloon injury in rats and the development of atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis 2015 243 107 19 Kim KM Jin HJ Lee SY Maeng HJ Lee GY Oh TJ Effects of Lobeglitazone, a new thiazolidinedione, on osteoblastogenesis and bone mineral density in mice Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017 32 389 95 Lee HS Chang M Lee JE Kim W Hwang IC Kim DH Carcinogenicity study of CKD-501, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α and γ agonist, following oral administration to Sprague Dawley rats for 94–101 weeks Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2014 69 207 16 Moon KS Lee JE Lee HS Hwang IC Kim DH Park HK CKD-501, a novel selective PPARγ agonist, shows no carcinogenic potential in ICR mice following oral administration for 104 weeks J Appl Toxicol 2014 34 1271 84 Bae J Park T Kim H Lee M Cha BS Lobeglitazone: a novel thiazolidinedione for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes Metab J 2021 45 326 36 Kim JW Kim JR Yi S Shin KH Shin HS Yoon SH Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lobeglitazone (CKD-501), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist: a single- and multiple-dose, double-blind, randomized control study in healthy male Korean subjects Clin Ther 2011 33 1819 30 Mamza J Mehta R Donnelly R Idris I Important differences in the durability of glycaemic response among second-line treatment options when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study Ann Med 2016 48 224 34 Lee MA Tan L Yang H Im YG Im YJ Structures of PPARγ complexed with lobeglitazone and pioglitazone reveal key determinants for the recognition of antidiabetic drugs Sci Rep 2017 7 16837 Jang JY Bae H Lee YJ Choi YI Kim HJ Park SB Structural basis for the enhanced anti-diabetic efficacy of lobeglitazone on PPARγ Sci Rep 2018 8 31 Jin SM Park CY Cho YM Ku BJ Ahn CW Cha BS Lobeglitazone and pioglitazone as add-ons to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase III clinical trial with a 28-week extension Diabetes Obes Metab 2015 17 599 602 Ha KH Park CY Jeong IK Kim HJ Kim SY Kim WJ Clinical characteristics of people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes between 2015 and 2016: difference by age and body mass index Diabetes Metab J 2018 42 137 46 Figures and Tables

Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) level during 42 months in the add-on and drug-naïve groups are shown. Values are presented as HbA1c mean (number of patients).

Comparative analysis of varying glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) levels during 42 months in different groups (efficacy set total vs. antidiabetic drug maintenance vs. antidiabetic drug change). Values are presented as HbA1c mean (number of patients).

Baseline characteristics

Variable Safety set (n=2,228) Efficacy set (n=1,651)
Sex
 Male 1,363 (61.18) 1,025 (62.08)
 Female 865 (38.82) 626 (37.92)
Age, yr 64.07±11.53 63.94±11.34
Age groups, yr
 <20 1 (0.04) 1 (0.06)
 ≥20 to <30 11 (0.49) 7 (0.42)
 ≥30 to <40 33 (1.48) 18 (1.09)
 ≥40 to <50 186 (8.35) 148 (8.96)
 ≥50 to <60 524 (23.52) 392 (23.74)
 ≥60 to <70 738 (33.12) 555 (33.62)
 ≥70 to <80 531 (23.83) 382 (23.14)
 ≥80 to <90 192 (8.62) 140 (8.48)
 ≥90 12 (0.54) 8 (0.48)
Duration of diabetes, yr 13.01±8.07 12.87±7.98
Weight, kg 67.02±11.78a 67.70±11.27b
BMI, kg/m2 25.09±3.50c 25.25±3.38d
BMI groups, kg/m2
 <18.5 20 (1.47) 11 (1.14)
 ≥18.5 to <22.0 225 (16.56) 137 (14.15)
 ≥22.0 to <25.0 463 (34.07) 331 (34.19)
 ≥25.0 to <30.0 534 (39.29) 406 (41.95)
 ≥30.0 117 (8.61) 83 (8.57)
Prescribed antidiabetic drugs
 No (Naïve) 264 (11.85) 264 (15.99)
 Yes 1,964 (88.15) 1,387 (84.01)
  No. of prescribed antidiabetic drugs
   Single class 384 (17.24) 226 (13.69)
   Double classes 894 (40.12) 733 (44.40)
   Triple classes 642 (28.82) 410 (24.83)
   Quadruple classes 43 (1.93) 18 (1.09)
   Quintuple classes 1 (0.04) -
  Types of prescribed antidiabetic drugs
   DPP-4 inhibitors 1,379 (61.89) 1,053 (63.78)
   GLP-1 receptor agonist 5 (0.22) 2 (0.12)
   Insulin 228 (10.23) 128 (7.75)
   Meglitinides 18 (0.81) 10 (0.61)
   Metformin 1,557 (69.88) 1,130 (68.44)
   Pioglitazone 92 (4.13) 16 (0.97)
   Sulfonylurea 912 (40.93) 622 (37.67)
   SGLT-2 inhibitor 42 (1.89) 16 (0.97)
   α-Glucosidase inhibitor 42 (1.89) 17 (1.03)
History of diabetes complicationsg
 Diabetic foot 4 (0.18) [4] 3 (0.18) [3]
 Diabetic nephropathy 68 (3.05) [68] 44 (2.67) [44]
 Diabetic neuropathy 312 (14.00) [313] 219 (13.26) [220]
 Diabetic retinopathy 212 (9.52) [212] 161 (9.75) [161]
Liver functiong
 Aspartate aminotransferase 24.84±10.00e 24.67±8.69f
 Alanine aminotransferase 24.81±14.31e 26.58±15.19f
History of hepatobiliary disordersg,h 157 (7.05) [172] 125 (7.57) [133]
History of renal failure and impairmentg 157 (7.05) [160] 118 (7.15) [120]
 Acute kidney injury 5 (0.22) [5] 4 (0.24) [4]
 Chronic kidney disease 146 (6.55) [147] 109 (6.60) [109]
 End stage renal disease 2 (0.09) [2] 2 (0.12) [2]
 Renal failure 4 (0.18) [4] 4 (0.24) [4]
 Renal injury 1 (0.04) [1] 1 (0.06) [1]

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) [number of events].

BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; SGLT-2, sodium glucose cotransporter-2.

n=1,361,

n=970,

n=1,359,

n=968,

n=94,

n=64,

By system organ class (MedDRA version 21.1 preferred term),

Definition of hepatobiliary disorders: alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, bile duct stenosis, bile duct stone, biliary colic, cholangitis, cholecystitis, cholecystitis acute, cholecystitis chronic, cholelithiasis, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis alcoholic, fatty liver alcoholic, gallbladder polyp, hepatic cirrhosis, hepatic function abnormal, hepatic steatosis, hepatitis, hepatitis alcoholic, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatotoxicity, jaundice, liver disorder, non-alcoholic fatty liver, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, steatohepatitis.

Occurrence of weight change

Variable Safety set (n=2,228)
Weight change, kg 2.11±3.85a
Weight change, % 3.29±5.85a
BMI change, kg/m2 0.80±1.45b
BMI change, % 3.28±5.86b
Weight increased by more than 5% compared to baseline
 No 1,853 (83.17)
 Yes 375 (16.83)
  Weight change, kg 6.15±2.81
  Weight change, % 9.61±4.24
  BMI change, kg/m2 2.35±1.04c
  BMI change, % 9.62±4.25c
  Age, yr 64.62±11.41
  Age group, yrd
   <20 0
   ≥20 to <30 2 (18.18)
   ≥30 to <40 5 (15.15)
   ≥40 to <50 30 (16.13)
   ≥50 to <60 76 (14.50)
   ≥60 to <70 131 (17.75)
   ≥70 to <80 96 (18.08)
   ≥80 to <90 34 (17.71)
   ≥90 1 (8.33)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

BMI, body mass index.

n=1,141,

n=1,140,

n=374,

Number of patients per age group cluster.

Adverse event of special interest

Variable Safety set (n=2,228)
Any adverse event 381 (17.10) [623]
Aspartate aminotransferase increaseda 5 (0.22) [5]
Alanine aminotransferase increaseda 6 (0.27) [6]
Bronchitis 2 (0.09) [2]
Cancer
 Bladder cancer 0 (0.00) [0]
 Gastric cancer 1 (0.04) [1]
 Lung neoplasm malignant 1 (0.04) [1]
 Non-small cell lung cancer 1 (0.04) [1]
Cerebrovascular diseaseb 18 (0.81) [18]
Congestive heart failure 1 (0.04) [1]
Cardiovascular diseasec 18 (0.81) [19]
Constipation 9 (0.40) [9]
Diarrhea 4 (0.18) [4]
Edemad 44 (1.97) [48]
 Sexa
  Male 15 (0.67) [16]
  Female 29 (1.30) [32]
Hypoglycemiae 55 (2.47) [63]
 Sex
  Male 30 (1.35)
  Female 25 (1.12)
  Age, yr 64.78±9.94
 Insulin or sulfonylurea administration at occurrence time
  No 7 (0.32)
  Yes 48 (2.15)
Fracturef 26 (1.17) [27]
 Sex
  Male 10 (0.45)
  Female 16 (0.72)
 Age, yr 72.11±11.92
 Age group, yrg
  <20 0 (0.00)
  ≥20 to <30 0 (0.00)
  ≥30 to <40 0 (0.00)
  ≥40 to <50 1 (0.54)
  ≥50 to <60 3 (0.57)
  ≥60 to <70 6 (0.81)
  ≥70 to <80 7 (1.32)
  ≥80 to <90 8 (4.17)
  ≥90 1 (8.33)
Jaundicea 0 (0.00) [0]
Proteinuria 2 (0.09) [2]
Pneumonia 0 (0.00) [0]
Rash 0 (0.00) [0]
Upper respiratory tract infection 5 (0.22) [5]
Urinary tract infection 4 (0.18) [4]
Vomiting 0 (0.00) [0]

Values are presented as number of patients (%) [number of events] or mean±standard deviation.

By system organ class (MedDRA version 21.1 preferred term),

Definition of cerebrovascular disease: carotid arteriosclerosis, carotid artery stenosis, cerebral arteriosclerosis, cerebral artery stenosis, cerebral infarction, intracranial aneurysm, migraine, neurodegenerative disorder, syncope, vascular dementia,

Definition of cardiovascular disease: acute myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, angina unstable, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, coronary artery occlusion, microvascular coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, tachycardia,

Definition of edema: face oedema, generalised oedema, oedema, oedema peripheral, lymphoedema, periorbital oedema,

Definition of hypoglycemia: hypoglycaemia, blood glucose decreased,

Definition of fracture: ankle fracture, clavicle fracture, facial bones fracture, femoral neck fracture, femur fracture, foot fracture, fracture, lumbar vertebral fracture, open fracture, pelvic fracture, radius fracture, rib fracture, spinal compression fracture, upper limb fracture, wrist fracture, osteoporotic fracture, pathological fracture,

Number of patients per age group cluster.

Effects on HbA1c, glucose, and lipid parameter variables

Variable Efficacy set (n=1,651) P valuea
No. (%) Mean±SD
HbA1c, %
 Baseline 1,386 (83.95) 8.17±1.36
 Follow-up 1,624 (98.36) 7.12±1.13
 Changes 1,368 (82.86) −1.05±1.35 <0.0001
 Changes, % 1,368 (82.86) −11.53±14.04 <0.0001
Glucose, mg/dL
 Baseline 1,243 (75.29) 174.71±58.13
 Follow-up 1,575 (95.40) 139.10±44.88
 Changes 1,211 (73.35) −34.05±62.00 <0.0001
 Changes, % 1,211 (73.35) −14.37±29.89 <0.0001
Changes by statin administered, mg/dL
 Not administeredb
  Total cholesterol 380 (23.02) −12.54±44.05 <0.0001
  Triglyceride 356 (21.56) −31.00±110.98 <0.0001
  LDL-C 324 (19.62) −9.49±33.00 <0.0001
  HDL-C 349 (21.14) 2.06±10.29 <0.0001
 Administeredc
  Total cholesterol 491 (29.74) −4.60±32.72 0.0257
  Triglyceride 491 (29.74) −27.10±83.42 <0.0001
  LDL-C 445 (26.95) −5.16±28.26 0.0008
  HDL-C 487 (29.50) 4.15±9.79 <0.0001

SD, standard deviation; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Wilcoxon signed rank sum test,

Not administered statin from baseline to last follow-up lab test,

Kept administering statin from baseline to last follow-up lab test.