<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ViewNLM-v2.3.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties open_access?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Korean Neurosurg Soc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Korean Neurosurg Soc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JKNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2005-3711</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1598-7876</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Korean Neurosurgical Society</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">22792424</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3393862</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3340/jkns.2012.51.5.276</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Clinical Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Long Term Outcomes of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Typical Trigeminal Neuralgia-Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Jong Kwon</given-names></name><degrees>M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1-jkns-51-276"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>Hyuk Jai</given-names></name><degrees>M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1-jkns-51-276"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>Hak Cheol</given-names></name><degrees>M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1-jkns-51-276"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>Seok Keun</given-names></name><degrees>M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1-jkns-51-276"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>Young Jin</given-names></name><degrees>M.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1-jkns-51-276"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1-jkns-51-276">Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.</aff><author-notes><corresp>Address for reprints: Young Jin Lim, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-872, Korea. Tel: +82-2-958-8408, Fax: +82-2-958-8380, <email>youngjinns@yahoo.co.kr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>5</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>5</month><year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &#xA9; 2012 The Korean Neurosurgical Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0"><license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0</ext-link>) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><sec><title>Objective</title><p>Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is the least invasive surgical option for patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, the indications and long term outcomes of GKRS are still controversial. Additionally, a series with uniform long-term follow-up data for all patients has been lacking. In the present study, the authors analyzed long-term outcomes in a series of patients with TN who underwent a single GKRS treatment followed by a minimum follow-up of 60 months.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>From 1994 to 2009, 40 consecutive patients with typical, intractable TN received GKRS. Among these, 22 patients were followed for &gt;60 months. The mean maximum radiation dose was 77.1 Gy (65.2-83.6 Gy), and the 4 mm collimator was used to target the radiation to the root entry zone.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The mean age was 61.5 years (25-84 years). The mean follow-up period was 92.2 months (60-144 months). According to the pain intensity scale in the last follow-up, 6 cases were grades I-II (pain-free with or without medication; 27.3%) and 7 cases were grade IV-V (&lt;50% pain relief with medication or no pain relief; 31.8%). There was 1 case (facial dysesthesia) with post-operative complications (4.54%).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>The long-term results of GKRS for TN are not as satisfactory as those of microvascular decompression and other conventional modalities, but GKRS is a safe, effective and minimally invasive technique which might be considered a first-line therapy for a limited group of patients for whom a more invasive kind of treatment is unsuitable.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Trigeminal neuralgia</kwd><kwd>Gamma knife radiosurgery</kwd><kwd>Long-term follow-up</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating pain syndrome that is characterized by agonizing, paroxysmal, and lancinating pain. The recommended first-line treatment for TN is medical therapy, but this often fails to provide pain relief. Thus, second-line treatment modalities are given to patients whose symptoms are intractable or who cannot tolerate medication. These treatment modalities include invasive procedures such as microvascular decompression (MVD), and ablative procedures such as gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), percutaneous balloon microcompression, radiofrequency rhizotomy, and glycerol rhizolysis. GKRS is an attractive surgical modality for TN<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-jkns-51-276">14)</xref>. Recently, GKRS has been used as a treatment modality in several centers for patients with concurrent medical illness who are poor candidates for MVD or who refuse more invasive surgery<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17-jkns-51-276">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20-jkns-51-276">20)</xref>. Other treatment modalities provide short-term pain relief at a rate of 80-90%; GKRS also produces short-term alleviation of pain at similar rates, usually within 6-12 months after the operation<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2-jkns-51-276">2</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3-jkns-51-276">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-jkns-51-276">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9-jkns-51-276">9</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11-jkns-51-276">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15-jkns-51-276">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18-jkns-51-276">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23-jkns-51-276">23</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29-jkns-51-276">29</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31-jkns-51-276">31)</xref>. Pain relief after MVD and radiofrequency rhizotomy for long-term periods has been well reported. In previous studies, patients who underwent MVD and radiofrequency reported favorable long-term pain relief of for more than 5 years<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jkns-51-276">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-jkns-51-276">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10-jkns-51-276">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25-jkns-51-276">25</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28-jkns-51-276">28</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32-jkns-51-276">32)</xref>. However, long-term outcomes of GKRS for TN have been published in only a few reports<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jkns-51-276">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-jkns-51-276">22</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29-jkns-51-276">29)</xref>. Thus, we conducted the present study to analyze the long-term outcomes in a series of patients with TN who underwent single GKRS treatment and were followed up for a minimum of 60 months.</p></sec><sec sec-type="materials|methods"><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>Between March 1995 and March 2009, 40 patients with typical TN underwent GKRS at our clinic. Indications for GKRS included medically intractable pain, &gt;65 years of age, refusal of invasive procedures, or failure of previous invasive procedures. Among them, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with TN undergoing GKRS treatment that had a minimum follow-up of 60 months. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment history, and the radiosurgical modality were reviewed in 22 patients whose median follow-up was 92.2 months (range : 60-144 months).</p><p>All patients were treated with Leksell Gamma Knife (Eleckta Instruments, Stockholm, Sweden) under local anesthesia. As a planning tool, the KULA system was used until 2001, and the Leksell Gamma Plan System (Eleckta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has been used since 2001. All patients were treated using a single isocenter through a 4-mm collimator helmet targeting the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1-jkns-51-276">Fig. 1</xref>). Maximum doses ranged from 65.2-83.6 Gy. The mean maximal dose to the target was 77.1 Gy (range, 65.2-83.6 Gy).</p><p>Long-term outcomes were established by face to face interview with a written questionnaire after the treatment in the outpatient clinic. The questionnaire was devised based on the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain scale<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24-jkns-51-276">24)</xref> but modified at our institution to better incorporate the use of adjuvant medications. Facial pain outcomes were categorized into one of the following classes : grade I, no pain, no medication; grade II, no pain with medication; grade III, &gt;50% improved pain with medication; grade IV, &#x2264;50% improved pain with medication; and grade V, no pain relief. Patients with grade I-II on the pain scale (equivalent to BNI grades I and IIIa) were considered to have a good treatment outcome. Patients with grade IV-V on the pain scale (equivalent to BNI grades IV and V) were considered to have a poor treatment outcome (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1-jkns-51-276">Table 1</xref>). Descriptive statistics were determined by standard methods for calculation of median or mean values. Statistical verification was determined using SPSS statistic software, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A <italic>p</italic> value &lt;0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>RESULTS</title><p>The demographic characteristics of the 22 patients are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2-jkns-51-276">Table 2</xref>. The mean age was 61.5 years (range 25-84 years), and the mean symptom duration from onset to treatment was 46.8 months (range 1-84 months). Six patients were previously treated with MVD. The most common distribution of pain involved the second and third divisions of the trigeminal nerve, observed in a total of 40.9% of patients (9 out of 22 patients). Thirteen patients had right-sided pain, and 9 had left-sided pain.</p><p>During the last follow-up period, 6 patients (27.3%) had good treatment outcomes (represented by grades I and II), and 7 patients (31.8%) had poor treatment outcomes (represented by grades IV and V) during a median follow-up period of 92.2 months (range 60-144 months). Of the 6 patients with good outcomes, 4 patients (18.2%) experienced complete pain relief without medication, and 2 (9.1%) had complete pain relief with medications. Of the 7 patients with poor outcomes, 5 patients (22.7%) experienced &#x2264;50% improved pain with medication, and 2 (9.1%) had no pain relief (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3-jkns-51-276">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Subgroup analysis of excellent, good, and poor outcomes found 2 statistically significant factors related to achieving and maintaining complete pain relief : symptomatic periods before treatment (<italic>p</italic>=0.035) and previous surgery (<italic>p</italic>=0.008). However, sex, age, pain distribution, and laterality of pain did not correlate with facial pain improvement (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4-jkns-51-276">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Out of a total of 22 patients, 16 patients had been treated with medication only before GKRS (primary group), and 6 had gone through MVD prior to GKRS (secondary group). During the final follow-up period, patients with good outcomes were 37.5% and 0% in the primary and secondary group, respectively; patients with poor outcomes, on the other hand, were 12.5% and 83.3% in the primary and secondary group, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5-jkns-51-276">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Of the 22 patients, only one patient (4.54%) experienced facial numbness after GKRS, with grade III pain on the pain scale. GKRS was performed in this patient to a maximum dose of 83.6 Gy. This patient experienced full recovery after 12 months. None of the patients had neuropathic pain, dry eye, keratitis, or jaw weakness after GKRS.</p></sec><sec sec-type="discussion"><title>DISCUSSION</title><p>TN patients in whom medical therapy fails are recommended to undergo several treatment modalities, including MVD, radiofrequency rhizotomy, percutaneous balloon microcompression and GKRS. In general, the most effective surgical treatment is considered to be MVD in healthy patients because it has a demonstrated effective initial pain-free rate and good long-term outcomes. Barker et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jkns-51-276">1)</xref> reported that the pain-free rate was maintained at 70% of 1185 patients for a median of 6.2 years after MVD. Severe complications that developed include 2 deaths (0.2%) and 16 patients (1%) with ipsilateral hearing loss. Tronnier et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27-jkns-51-276">27)</xref> reported that 65% of patients had excellent outcomes at 10 years, and 63% at 20 years after MVD. In this study, the mortality rate was 0.8%, and facial hypesthesia developed in 12.5% of patients. Broggi et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jkns-51-276">4)</xref> reported that 53-94% of MVD patients were pain-free after a long-term follow-up. They also reported that the mortality of MVD was 0.3% and that cranial nerve dysfunction rates ranged from 0.1-3%. Additionally, radiofrequency rhizotomy also demonstrated an effective long-term outcome for TN patients. Taha et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26-jkns-51-276">26)</xref> found that 75% were pain-free at 10 years, and 23% experienced facial dysesthesia. In previous studies, patients who underwent MVD reported long-term pain relief at rates of 62-89%, and patients who underwent radiofrequency reported long-term pain relief at rates of 20-82% for &gt;5 years after achieving a short-term pain relief rate of &gt;90%<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jkns-51-276">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jkns-51-276">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-jkns-51-276">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10-jkns-51-276">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25-jkns-51-276">25</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28-jkns-51-276">28</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32-jkns-51-276">32)</xref>. However, severe complications have occurred in TN patients who underwent MVD or radiofrequency rhizotomy at rates of approximately 2-19%<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1-jkns-51-276">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4-jkns-51-276">4</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5-jkns-51-276">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10-jkns-51-276">10</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25-jkns-51-276">25</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28-jkns-51-276">28</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32-jkns-51-276">32)</xref>.</p><p>In previous reports with long-term follow-up, GKRS for TN patients has long term outcomes slightly inferior to MVD and radiofrequency rhizotomy, but with lower complication rates. Urgosik et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29-jkns-51-276">29)</xref> reported that 80% of 107 patients had good outcomes (patients with 60% &lt;residual pain) at a median of 5 years. Little et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jkns-51-276">12)</xref> reported that 83% of 136 patients had good outcomes (BNI pain score of Class I, II, or III) at a median of 6.3 years. Riesenburger et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-jkns-51-276">22)</xref> reported that 58.5% achieved good outcomes (BNI pain score of Class I, II, or III) at a follow-up period of 48 months. These reports have demonstrated that GKRS is a safe technique for the management of TN, as trigeminal sensory disturbance, the main complication of radiosurgery for TN, only developed in approximately 10% of the patients. In addition, GKRS patients did not develop any of the severe complications which patients that had undergone MVD or radiofrequency rhizotomy experienced<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14-jkns-51-276">14)</xref>. However, most of the other reports on GKRS and TN combined the longer-term follow-up patients with more recently treated patients, thus making it more difficult to identify long-term results.</p><p>In the present study, we strictly evaluated long-term outcomes at a follow-up period of a minimum of 5 years. Thus, our data demonstrate that patients experience lasting pain relief with few complications after GKRS, although patients with good outcomes are fewer than in the previous long-term follow-up studies of outcomes after GKRS. This seems to be due to the fact that only patients with no pain regardless of medication were included in the "good outcome" patient group in our study, whereas published reports on long-term follow-up studies on GKRS included patients with medication-controlled pain in the "good outcome" group. Because pain negatively impacts upon the quality of life of chronic TN patients, we think that the goal of treatment in TN should be complete pain relief. Therefore, we believe it is better to grade patient outcome by the reporting of pain-free outcomes that clearly separates effective pain relief from continued pain. In the current study, patients with pain that had decreased by 50% or more with the use of medication were classified separately as patients with fair outcomes. As a result, our data demonstrated that patients with good and fair outcomes comprise 72.7% of all treated patients, which is a similar outcome to that in previous reports. Therefore, from the results of this 5-year long-term follow-up study, we suggest that the proportion of patients with good outcomes, consisting purely of pain-free patients with or without medication, after GKRS was 27.3%.</p><p>Published reports have used radiation dose protocols ranging from 70-100 Gy<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7-jkns-51-276">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8-jkns-51-276">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21-jkns-51-276">21</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31-jkns-51-276">31)</xref>. In general, higher doses of radiation are related to better outcomes, but complications, including facial sensory loss and paresthesia, increase at doses greater than 90 Gy<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19-jkns-51-276">19</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21-jkns-51-276">21)</xref>.</p><p>Generally, maximal radiation doses between 70-90 Gy are used to treat TN. In previous long-term follow-up studies, the mean maximal radiation dose was approximately 80 Gy, and complications included facial numbness, which affected approximately 10% of the treated patients<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jkns-51-276">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22-jkns-51-276">22</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29-jkns-51-276">29)</xref>. In the present study, the mean maximal dose was 77.7 Gy, which is lower than that utilized in other recent studies; this is partly due to the long follow-up period which started from 1995, and partly because the dose was slightly lowered to avoid the development of lasting complications. In our study, only one patient (4.54%) experienced facial dysesthesia. Thus, we believe that lower radiation doses are associated with lower complication rates.</p><p>Several studies have found prognostic factors for short-term outcomes. The presence of previous surgery is regarded as a predictive factor significantly associated with a poor short-term outcome<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6-jkns-51-276">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13-jkns-51-276">13</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16-jkns-51-276">16</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20-jkns-51-276">20)</xref>. However, long-term pain relief factors have not been well studied until recently. Little et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12-jkns-51-276">12)</xref> recently reported that at long term follow-up, 75% of patients who were treated with primary GKRS achieved long-term pain relief at 7 years, but only 10% of patients in whom previous surgery had achieved a similar outcome. Similarly, our study found that good outcomes in primary GKRS group (37.5%) was better than in secondary GKRS group (0%), respectively. Also, the presence of previous surgery was observed to be a statistically significant factor related to achieving and maintaining complete pain relief according to our subgroup analysis of good and poor outcomes. Based upon these findings, we have come to believe that there is significant correlation between previous surgery and poor long-term outcomes.</p><p>Several limitations of our study are worth mentioning. First, although the pain intensity scale is validated tools for the quantification of pain, they are subjective outcome measures because they are dependent on personal interpretations and variation. Second, the small sample size and retrospective study design limit the power of our outcome observations.</p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions"><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>GKRS performed at lower radiation doses not only decreased complication rates, but also lessened the development of more severe complications in the long run. However, the long-term results of GKRS for TN are not as satisfactory as those of MVD and other conventional modalities. Although GKRS achieves relatively good outcomes of initial pain relief, our results suggest a steady rate of late failure, particularly among patients who performed secondary GKRS following prior surgery. Proper patient selection is essential in management of TN. GKRS is a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment modality for only limited group of patients who are not suited to more invasive treatment.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1-jkns-51-276"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barker</surname><given-names>FG</given-names><suffix>2nd</suffix></name><name><surname>Jannetta</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bissonette</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Larkins</surname><given-names>MV</given-names></name><name><surname>Jho</surname><given-names>HD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><year>1996</year><volume>334</volume><fpage>1077</fpage><lpage>1083</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8598865</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2-jkns-51-276"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brisman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for primary management for trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2000</year><volume>93</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11143236</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3-jkns-51-276"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brisman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife surgery with a dose of 75 to 76.8 Gray for trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2004</year><volume>100</volume><fpage>848</fpage><lpage>854</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15137604</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4-jkns-51-276"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broggi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferroli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Franzini</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Servello</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Dones</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia : comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis</article-title><source>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry</source><year>2000</year><volume>68</volume><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10601403</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5-jkns-51-276"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broggi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Franzini</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lasio</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Giorgi</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Servello</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Long-term results of percutaneous retrogasserian thermorhizotomy for "essential" trigeminal neuralgia : considerations in 1000 consecutive patients</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>1990</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>783</fpage><lpage>786</lpage><comment>discussion 786-787</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2352596</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6-jkns-51-276"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chao</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><name><surname>Reuther</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnett</surname><given-names>GH</given-names></name><name><surname>Suh</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Review of the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with gamma knife radiosurgery</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>2008</year><volume>86</volume><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>146</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18334855</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7-jkns-51-276"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kondziolka</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lunsford</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name><name><surname>Flickinger</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeulen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Duma</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia : a multiinstitutional study using the gamma unit</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>1996</year><volume>84</volume><fpage>940</fpage><lpage>945</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8847587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8-jkns-51-276"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kondziolka</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Perez</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Flickinger</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Habeck</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lunsford</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia : results and expectations</article-title><source>Arch Neurol</source><year>1998</year><volume>55</volume><fpage>1524</fpage><lpage>1529</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9865796</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9-jkns-51-276"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kubicek</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Orner</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerbi</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dusenbery</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Long-term follow-up of trigeminal neuralgia treatment using a linear accelerator</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>2004</year><volume>82</volume><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15637446</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10-jkns-51-276"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>YG</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microvascular decompression and percutaneous rhizotomy in trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>1997</year><volume>68</volume><issue>1-4 Pt 1</issue><fpage>196</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9711716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11-jkns-51-276"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Villavicencio</surname><given-names>AT</given-names></name><name><surname>Burneikiene</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Romanelli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>McNeely</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>CyberKnife radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Neurosurg Focus</source><year>2005</year><volume>18</volume><fpage>E9</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15913285</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12-jkns-51-276"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Little</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Shetter</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Shetter</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Bay</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Long-term pain response and quality of life in patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>2008</year><volume>63</volume><fpage>915</fpage><lpage>923</lpage><comment>discussion 923-924</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19005382</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13-jkns-51-276"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Longhi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rizzo</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicolato</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Foroni</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Reggio</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerosa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia : results and potentially predictive parameters--part I : idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>2007</year><volume>61</volume><fpage>1254</fpage><lpage>1260</lpage><comment>discussion 1260-1261</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18162905</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14-jkns-51-276"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamlyn</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zakrzewska</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stereotactic radiosurgery for primary trigeminal neuralgia : state of the evidence and recommendations for future reports</article-title><source>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry</source><year>2004</year><volume>75</volume><fpage>1019</fpage><lpage>1024</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15201363</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15-jkns-51-276"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lunsford</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Surg Neurol</source><year>2000</year><volume>54</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>287</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11221773</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16-jkns-51-276"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maesawa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Salame</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Flickinger</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Pirris</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondziolka</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lunsford</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2001</year><volume>94</volume><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11147887</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17-jkns-51-276"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McNatt</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Giannotta</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Zee</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Apuzzo</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrovich</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>2005</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>1295</fpage><lpage>1301</lpage><comment>discussion 1301-1303</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15918946</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18-jkns-51-276"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petit</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagda</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>DiBiase</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chin</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia : evaluating quality of life and treatment outcomes</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><year>2003</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>1147</fpage><lpage>1153</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12829153</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19-jkns-51-276"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pollock</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Phuong</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name><name><surname>Foote</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Stafford</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorman</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>High-dose trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery associated with increased risk of trigeminal nerve dysfunction</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>2001</year><volume>49</volume><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>62</lpage><comment>discussion 62-64</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11440460</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20-jkns-51-276"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pollock</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Phuong</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorman</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Foote</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Stafford</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2002</year><volume>97</volume><fpage>347</fpage><lpage>353</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12186463</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21-jkns-51-276"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>R&#xE9;gis</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>M&#xE9;tellus</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazorthes</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Porcheron</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Peragut</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of gamma knife on secondary trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>1998</year><volume>70</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>210</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9782253</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22-jkns-51-276"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Riesenburger</surname><given-names>RI</given-names></name><name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Schirmer</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Zerris</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Mahn</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Outcomes following single-treatment Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia with a minimum 3-year follow-up</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2010</year><volume>112</volume><fpage>766</fpage><lpage>771</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19780644</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23-jkns-51-276"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Shetter</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiedler</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Speiser</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia : the initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><year>2000</year><volume>47</volume><fpage>1013</fpage><lpage>1019</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10863073</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24-jkns-51-276"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Shetter</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Ponce</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiedler</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Speiser</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2002</year><volume>97</volume><issue>5 Suppl</issue><fpage>529</fpage><lpage>532</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12507090</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25-jkns-51-276"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sindou</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Leston</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Howeidy</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Decullier</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chapuis</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Micro-vascular decompression for primary Trigeminal Neuralgia (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients</article-title><source>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</source><year>2006</year><volume>148</volume><fpage>1235</fpage><lpage>1245</lpage><comment>discussion 1245</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16804643</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26-jkns-51-276"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taha</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tew</surname><given-names>JM</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Buncher</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A prospective 15-year follow up of 154 consecutive patients with trigeminal neuralgia treated by percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency thermal rhizotomy</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>1995</year><volume>83</volume><fpage>989</fpage><lpage>993</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7490643</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27-jkns-51-276"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tronnier</surname><given-names>VM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rasche</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamer</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kienle</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunze</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia : comparison of long-term outcome after radiofrequency rhizotomy and microvascular decompression</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><year>2001</year><volume>48</volume><fpage>1261</fpage><lpage>1267</lpage><comment>discussion 1267-1268</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11383728</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28-jkns-51-276"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tyler-Kabara</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kassam</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Horowitz</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Urgo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadjipanayis</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Levy</surname><given-names>EI</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia : comparison of results following microvascular decompression</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2002</year><volume>96</volume><fpage>527</fpage><lpage>531</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11883838</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29-jkns-51-276"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Urgosik</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Liscak</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Novotny</surname><given-names>J</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Vymazal</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Vladyka</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Treatment of essential trigeminal neuralgia with gamma knife surgery</article-title><source>J Neurosurg</source><year>2005</year><volume>102</volume><issue>Suppl</issue><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15662776</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30-jkns-51-276"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Urgosik</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Vymazal</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Vladyka</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Lisc&#xE1;k</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife treatment of trigeminal neuralgia : clinical and electrophysiological study</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>1998</year><volume>70</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9782252</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31-jkns-51-276"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermulen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Posewitz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Stereotact Funct Neurosurg</source><year>1998</year><volume>70</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>192</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9782251</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32-jkns-51-276"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zakrzewska</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Patient's assessment of outcome after three surgical procedures for the management of trigeminal neuralgia</article-title><source>Acta Neurochir (Wien)</source><year>1993</year><volume>122</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>230</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8372712</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="F1-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>A single 4-mm isocenter was used to irradiate the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-g001"/></fig><table-wrap id="T1-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Pain intensity scale compared with BNI scale</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-i001"/><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>BNI : Barrow Neurological Institute</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T2-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Clinical demographic characteristics in 22 patients with TN</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-i002"/><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>TN : trigeminal neuralgia</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T3-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Treatment outcomes after GKRS at last follow up</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-i003"/><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>GKRS : gamma knife radiosurgery</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T4-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Subgroup analysis of good outcomes and poor outcomes</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-i004"/><table-wrap-foot><fn><p>MVD : microvascular decompression</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T5-jkns-51-276" position="float"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>Pain after the last follow-up period in the primary and secondary groups</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jkns-51-276-i005"/></table-wrap></floats-group></article>
