<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xml:lang="KO" article-type="research-article">
<front>
	<journal-meta>
		<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Tuberc Respir Dis</journal-id>
		<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TRD</journal-id>
		<journal-title-group>
			<journal-title>Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases</journal-title>
		</journal-title-group>
		<issn pub-type="ppub">0378-0066</issn>
		
		<publisher>
			<publisher-name>The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases</publisher-name>
		</publisher>
	</journal-meta>
	<article-meta>
		<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4046/trd.1995.42.5.737</article-id>
		<article-categories>
			<subj-group>
				<subject>Original Article</subject>
			</subj-group>
		</article-categories>
		<title-group>
			<article-title>A Comparative Study of Endotracheal Aspirates and Protected Specimen Brush in the Quantitative Cultures of the Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia</article-title>
		</title-group>
		<contrib-group>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Roo</surname>
					<given-names>Kyoung Ryeol</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Kim</surname>
					<given-names>Min Gu</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Kim</surname>
					<given-names>Gi Yang</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Jung</surname>
					<given-names>Ho Gyeong</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Park</surname>
					<given-names>Young Ho</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Kang</surname>
					<given-names>Byeng Sun</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Kim</surname>
					<given-names>Ho Chul</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
			<contrib contrib-type="author">
				<name>
					<surname>Hwang</surname>
					<given-names>Young Sil</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1"></xref>
			</contrib>
		</contrib-group>
		<aff id="A1">Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeoungsang National University Collage of Medicine, Chinju, Korea.</aff>
		<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
			<month>10</month>
			<year>1995</year>
		</pub-date>
		<pub-date pub-type="epub">
			<day>15</day>
			<month>03</month>
			<year>2016</year>
		</pub-date>
		<volume>42</volume>
		<issue>5</issue>
		<fpage>737</fpage>
		<lpage>743</lpage>
		<permissions>
			<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; The Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases</copyright-statement>
			<copyright-year>1995</copyright-year>
		</permissions>
		<abstract>
			<p>BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a frequent complication in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Quantitative culture of protected specimen brush(PSB) have shown satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However PSB method is invasive, expensive, and require a bronchoscopic procedure. But endotracheal aspiration(EA) is simple and less expensive. The purpose of our study was to investigate the diagnosic value of EA quantitative cultures.
			METHOD: We studied 15 cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia(for &gt;72h of mechanical ventilation) patients. Patients were divided into two diagnostic categories. Group I was the patients who were suspicious of clinical pneumonia, Group II was the patients for control. The obtained samples by EA and PSB were homogenized for quantitative culture with a calibrated loop method in all patients.
			RESULT: Using 103cfu/ml, 105cfu/ml as threshold in quantitative culture of PSB, EA respectively, we found that EA quantitative cultures represented a relatively sentive(70%) and relatively specific (60%) method to diagnose the ventilator-associated pneumonia.
			CONCLUSION: Although EA quantitative cultures are less specific than PSB for diagnosing ventilator-associated pneumonia. EA quantitative cultures correlated with PSB quantitative culture in patients with clinical pneumonia and may be used to treat these patients when bronchoscopic procedures are not available.</p>
		</abstract>
		<kwd-group>
			<kwd>Ventilator-associated pneumonia</kwd>
			<kwd>Endotracheal aspirate</kwd>
			<kwd>Protected brush specimen</kwd>
			<kwd>Quantitative cultures</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
	</article-meta>
</front>
</article>

		
