6 results  1 of 1 

1 Sealing capability and marginal fit of titanium versus zirconia abutments with different connection designs
Nazmiye Şen, Ibrahim Bülent Şermet, Nezahat Gürler
J Adv Prosthodont.2019;11(2):105-111.   Published online 2019 April 26     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.105
      
2 Digital evaluation of axial displacement by implant-abutment connection type: An in vitro study
Sung-Jun Kim, KeunBaDa Son, Kyu-Bok Lee
J Adv Prosthodont.2018;10(5):388-394.   Published online 2018 October 22     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388
      
3 Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading
Su-Jung Park, Suk-Won Lee, Richard Leesungbok, Su-Jin Ahn
J Adv Prosthodont.2016;8(5):388-395.   Published online 2016 October 21     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388
      
4 Effect of abutment screw length and cyclic loading on removal torque in external and internal hex implants
Hnd Hadi Mohammed, Jin-Han Lee, Ji-Myung Bae, Hye-Won Cho
J Adv Prosthodont.2016;8(1):62-69.   Published online 2016 February 23     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.62
      
5 Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection
Cem Sahin, Simel Ayyildiz
J Adv Prosthodont.2014;6(1):35-38.   Published online 2014 February 14     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.35
      
6 Finite element analysis on the connection types of abutment and fixture
Byeong-Hyeon Jung, Gyeong-Je Lee, Dong-Wan Kang
J Korean Acad Prosthodont.2012;50(2):119-127.   Published online 2012 April 30     DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.2.119
      

 1 of 1