Journal List > J Korean Soc Hypertens > v.17(4) > 1089775

Kim, Han, Kim, Kim, Choi, and Shin: Association of Hypertension and Obesity with Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Microalbuminuria in a General Population in South Korea

ABSTRACT

Background:

Both left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and microalbuminuria (MA) are well described markers or surrogate for cardiovascular outcome. Many factors are known to be related to the two markers which are encountered together in some patients. But the epidemiological backgrounds for the two markers are not clearly demonstrated so far.

Methods:

Measurements of echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and MA were introduced to the population survey in Yangpyeong County, Korea in 2005 and 2006 for 1,767 among 2,028 subjects. The criteria for MA were 17-250 mg/g of albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) in male and 25-355 mg/g in female. 1,636 data were analyzed.

Results:

Age was 60.9 ± 10.4 years and the proportion of female was 59.4% (972). Body mass index (BMI) was 24.7 ± 3.21 kg/m2 and blood pressure were 124.1 ± 17.3 mm Hg/80.0 ± 10.5 mm Hg. LVMI was 45.3 ± 11.6 g/m2.7 and ACR was 23.9 ± 150.9 mg/g. Prevalence of LVH and MA were 23.5% and 12.2%, respectively. In male/female, odds ratios for MA were 1.035 (range, 1.010-1.061)/1.01 (range, 0.988-1.032) for age, 0.962 (range, 0.882-1.049)/0.941 (range, 0.881-1.006) for BMI, 1.754 (range, 1.097-2.804)/ 2.158 (range, 1.413-3.298) for hypertension (HTN), 4.87 (range, 2.883-8.226)/2.154 (range, 1.311-3.539) for diabetes, 1.005 (range, 0.999-1.012)/1.007 (range, 1.002-1.012) for cholesterol, and 1.011 (range, 0.987-1.035)/1.011 (range, 0.994-1.029) for LVH.

Conclusions:

In a population level, even if diabetes was strongest factor for MA, HTN is also independent factor for MA in both genders.

References

1. Statistics Korea . Statistical report of causes of death in Korea in 2010 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; c1996 [cited 2011 Dec 12]. Available from. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=250282&pageNo=6&row-Num=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
2. Kannel WB, Wilson PW. Comparison of risk profiles for cardiovascular events: implications for prevention. Adv Intern Med. 1997; 42:39–66.
3. Rodrigues SL, Angelo LC, Pereira AC, Krieger JE, Mill JG. Determinants of left ventricular mass and presence of metabolic risk factors in normotensive individuals. Int J Cardiol. 2009; 135:323–30.
crossref
4. Levy D, Anderson KM, Savage DD, Kannel WB.
Christiansen JC., Castelli WP. Echocardiographically detected left ventricular hypertrophy: prevalence and risk factors. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1988. 108:7–13.
5. Gosse P, Dallocchio M. Left ventricular hypertrophy: epidemiological prognosis and associated critical factors. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14(Suppl D):16–21.
crossref
6. Gardin JM, McClelland R, Kitzman D, Lima JA, Bommer W, Klopfenstein HS, et al. M-mode echocardiographic predictors of six- to seven-year incidence of coronary heart disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, and mortality in an elderly cohort (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87:1051–7.
crossref
7. Casale PN, Devereux RB, Milner M, Zullo G, Harshfield GA, Pickering TG, et al. Value of echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass in predicting cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive men. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105:173–8.
crossref
8. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322:1561–6.
crossref
9. Barzilay JI, Peterson D, Cushman M, Heckbert SR, Cao JJ, Blaum C, et al. The relationship of cardiovascular risk factors to microalbuminuria in older adults with or without diabetes mellitus or hypertension: the cardiovascular health study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 44:25–34.
crossref
10. Mulyadi L, Stevens C, Munro S, Lingard J, Bermingham M. Body fat distribution and total body fat as risk factors for microalbuminuria in the obese. Ann Nutr Metab. 2001; 45:67–71.
crossref
11. Kim SJ, Lee BH, Sohn IS, Kang HS, Choue CW, Kim KS, et al. The relation of circadian blood pressure variation to left ventricular mass, diastolic function and QT interval. J Korean Soc Hypertens. 2003; 9:49–56.
12. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978; 58:1072–83.
crossref
13. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57:450–8.
crossref
14. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Koren MJ, Meyer RA, Laragh JH. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:1056–62.
crossref
15. Shin J, Lee JU, Kim KS, Kim SG, Kim JH, Lim HK, et al. Influence of abdominal circumference on the inappropriateness of left ventricular mass and diastolic function in non-obese patients. J Cardiol. 2007; 49:323–9.
16. Warram JH, Gearin G, Laffel L, Krolewski AS. Effect of duration of type I diabetes on the prevalence of stages of diabetic nephropathy defined by urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7:930–7.
crossref
17. Lieb W, Mayer B, Stritzke J, Doering A, Hense HW, Loewel H, et al. Association of low-grade urinary albumin excretion with left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Echocardiographic Substudy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21:2780–7.
18. Fox ER, Taylor J, Taylor H, Han H, Samdarshi T, Arnett D, et al. Left ventricular geometric patterns in the Jackson cohort of the Atherosclerotic Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: clinical correlates and influences on systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Am Heart J. 2007; 153:238–44.
crossref
19. Song Y, Park S, Seo Y, An J, Kim K, Park P. Relation between microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate by creatinine and cystatin C. J Lab Med Qual Assur. 2008; 30:259–65.
20. Agewall S, Fagerberg B. Risk factors that predict development of microalbuminuria in treated hypertensive men. The Risk Factor Intervention Study Group. Angiology. 1996; 47:963–72.
21. Campos-Pastor MM, Escobar-Jimenez F, Mezquita P, Herrera-Pombo JL, Hawkins-Carranza F, Luna JD, et al. Factors associated with microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000; 48:43–9.
crossref
22. Cederholm J, Eliasson B, Nilsson PM, Weiss L. Gudbjornsdottir S; Steering Committee of the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Microalbuminuria and risk factors in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 67:258–66.
23. Jensen JS, Borch-Johnsen K, Jensen G, Feldt-Rasmussen B. Atherosclerotic risk factors are increased in clinically healthy subjects with microalbuminuria. Atherosclerosis. 1995; 112:245–52.
crossref
24. Kim CH, Kim HK, Park JY, Park HS, Hong SK, Park SW, et al. Association of microalbuminuria and atherosclerotic risk factors in non-diabetic subjects in Korea. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998; 40:191–9.
crossref
25. Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Levy D. The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry. The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 1991; 266:231–6.
26. Ferrara AL, Vaccaro O, Cardoni O, Panarelli W, Laurenzi M, Zanchetti A. Is there a relationship between left ventricular mass and plasma glucose and lipids independent of body mass index? Results of the Gubbio Study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2003; 13:126–32.
crossref

Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population
Total (n=1,635) Male (n=665) Female (n=971) p-value
General characteristics and anthropometrics
Age (yr) 60.94 ± 10.40 61.53 ± 10.27 60.53 ± 10.48 0.0574
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.71 ± 3.21 24.23 ± 3.06 25.04 ± 3.27 <0.0001
Waist circumference (cm) 87.77 ± 8.27 88.21 ± 7.91 87.46 ± 8.50 0.0677
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 124.13 ± 17.39 125.69 ± 17.03 123.06 ± 17.56 0.0026
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 80.01 ± 10.52 81.6 ± 10.91 78.93 ± 10.10 <0.0001
Clinical examination
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 197.67 ± 37.24 189.23 ± 34.86 203.45 ± 37.73 <0.0001
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 155.99 ± 97.21 168.22 ± 108.94 147.62 ± 87.37 <0.0001
HDL (mg/dL) 46.06 ± 10.88 44.83 ± 11.32 46.91 ± 10.49 0.0002
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.94 ± 0.17 1.05 ± 0.15 0.87 ± 0.13 <0.0001
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) 102.8 ± 24.01 104.62 ± 23.99 101.55 ± 23.96 0.0109
Echocardiographic indices
Heart rate (beats per minute) 65.21 ± 9.67 64.95 ± 10.13 65.39 ± 9.34 0.3652
IVSd (cm) 0.93 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.12 0.91 ± 0.13 <0.0001
LVDd (cm) 4.89 ± 0.46 5.03 ± 0.45 4.79 ± 0.44 <0.0001
PWTd (cm) 0.87 ± 0.11 0.9 ± 0.10 0.84 ± 0.11 <0.0001
LV mass (g) 154.74 ± 39.61 170.49 ± 39.25 143.95 ± 36.11 <0.0001
LV mass index (g/m2.7) 45.32 ± 11.64 43.92 ± 10.19 46.27 ± 12.44 <0.0001
Spot urine examination
Urine albumin (mg/dL) 1.73 ± 7.97 2.06 ± 10.34 1.5 ± 5.81 0.2063
Urine creatine (mg/dL) 103.8 ± 60.39 123.33 ± 64.61 90.43 ± 53.38 <0.0001
Albumin creatinine ratio (mg/g) 23.92 ± 150.86 23.22 ± 152.15 24.4 ± 150.05 0.8765

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

p-value for sex comparison by independent t-test.

HDL, high density lipoprotein; IVSd, end-diastolic interventricular septal thickness; LV, left ventricular; LVDd, end-diastolic left ventricular dimension; PWTd, end-diastolic posterior wall thickness.

Table 2.
Distribution of metabolic abnormality, echocardiographic LVH and albuminuria in the study population
Total Male Female p-value
HTN medication 438 (26.8) 137 (20.6) 301 (31.0) <0.0001
HTN 684 (41.8) 265 (39.9) 419 (43.2) 0.1836
DM medication 132 (8.1) 50 (7.5) 82 (8.4) 0.4993
DM 207 (12.7) 90 (13.5) 117 (12.1) 0.375
LVH 384 (23.5) 126 (19.0) 258 (26.6) 0.0004
Microalbumiuria 200 (12.2) 86 (12.9) 114 (11.7) 0.5405
Macroalbumiuria 18 (1.1) 9 (1.4) 9 (0.9) -
LVH with albuminuria 58 (3.5) 20 (3.0) 38 (3.9) 0.3304

Values are presented as number (%).

p-value by chi-square test. HTN defined by systolic blood pressure ≥140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90mmHg, or taking antihypertensive medication. DM defined by fasting serum glucose ≥126mg/dL or taking antihypertensive medication.

LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes.

Table 3.
Correlation coefficients of age, obesity and blood pressure with left ventricular mass index and albumin creatinine ratio
Male Female
LVMI ACR LVMI ACR
r p r p r p r p
Age (yr) 0.05077 0.191 0.04946 0.2028 0.35465 <0.0001 0.08462 0.0083
Body mass index (kg/m2) 0.35994 <0.0001 -0.02081 0.5921 0.37471 <0.0001 -0.03064 0.3402
Waist circumference (cm) 0.2797 <0.0001 0.00738 0.8495 0.33609 <0.0001 -0.00276 0.9315
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 0.19302 <0.0001 0.11342 0.0034 0.28867 <0.0001 0.09955 0.0019
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 0.10664 0.0059 0.02656 0.4942 0.13731 <0.0001 0.05074 0.1141
LVMI 0.03465 0.3724 0.01076 0.7378

r means Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

LVMI, left ventricular mass index; ACR, albumin creatinine ratio (mg/g).

Table 4.
Sex stratified mean comparison of covariates across the microalbumiuria
Male Female
Normal Microalbumiuria p-value Normal Microalbumiuria p-value
Age (yr) 61.02 ±10.20 64.56 ±10.25 0.0018 60.11 ± 10.53 63.42 ± 9.72 0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.22 ±3.01 24.25 ±3.34 0.9386 25.04 ± 3.27 25.02 ± 3.28 0.9377
Waist circumference (cm) 88.07 ±7.80 89.07 ±8.59 0.2503 87.36 ± 8.44 88.15 ± 8.91 0.3338
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 124.84 ±15.33 130.81 ±24.40 0.0228 121.83 ± 16.85 131.56 ± 19.93 < <0.0001
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 81.36 ±10.01 83.02 ±15.25 0.3086 78.39 ± 9.62 82.64 ± 12.39 0.0004
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 188.3 ±35.17 194.81 ±32.54 0.092 201.99 ± 37.56 213.5 ± 37.53 0.0015
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 164.18 ±106.51 192.46 ±120.26 0.019 143.45 ± 81.31 176.34 ± 117.62 0.0032
HDL (mg/dL) 44.84 ±11.28 44.78 ±11.63 0.9632 46.85 ± 10.52 47.29 ± 10.37 0.6657
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) 102.09 ±19.78 119.83 ±37.72 <0.0001 100.18 ± 20.85 110.98 ± 38.01 < <0.0001
LV mass index (g/m2.7) 43.71 ±10.28 45.16 ±9.61 0.2003 45.89 ± 12.46 48.91 ± 12.07 0.0119

p-value by independent t-test.

HDL, high density lipoprotein; LV, left ventricular.

Table 5.
Multiple logistic regression analysis regarding the covariates related to microalbumiuria
Crude model Age adjusted model Multiple model
Male Age (yr) 1.035 (1.012-1.059) 1.035 (1.010-1.061)
BMI 0.962 (0.882-1.049)
HTN 1.754 (1.097-2.804)
DM 4.87 (2.883-8.226)
Cholesterol 1.005 (0.999-1.012)
LVH 1.014 (0.993-1.035) 1.012 (0.991-1.033) 1.011 (0.987-1.035)
Female Age (yr) 1.027 (1.007-1.048) 1.01 (0.988-1.032)
BMI 0.941 (0.881-1.006)
HTN 2.158 (1.413-3.298)
DM 2.154 (1.311-3.539)
Cholesterol 1.007 (1.002-1.012)
LVH 1.018 (1.004-1.033) 1.011 (0.996-1.027) 1.011 (0.994-1.029)

Values are presented as OR (95% CI).

HTN defined by systolic blood pressure ≥140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90mmHg, or taking antihypertensive medication. DM defined by fasting serum glucose ≥126mg/dL or taking antihypertensive medication.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.

TOOLS
Similar articles