Journal List > Restor Dent Endod > v.37(1) > 1089990

This corrects the article "".
Song and Kim: Success and failure of endodontic microsurgery

Table 1.
Studies on the success rate of endodontic microsurgery
Study Sample size Follow up period Recall rate Magnification Root-end preparation Root-end filling material Root-end filling material Methodology
Rubinstein & Kim(1999)32 128 14 mon 94/128 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 96.8 Prospective
Rubinstein & Kim(2002)41 91 5 – 7 yr 59/91 Microscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
Chong et al. (2003)16 122 1 – 2 yr 108/122 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
IRM
92
87
Prospective
Taschieri et al. (2006)18 80 1 yr 71/80 Endoscope Loupe Ultrasonic EBA 94.9
90.6
RCT
Tsesis et al. (2006)20 110 > 6 mon 88/110 Microscope No aid Ultrasonic Bur IRM 91.1
44.2
Retrospective
Taschieri et al. (2007)33 30 1 yr 28/30 Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 93 Prospective
Von Arx et al. (2007)34 194 1 yr 191/194 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Retroplast, Super EBA 83.8 Prospective
Von Arx et al. (2007)30 183 1 yr 177/183 Endoscope Sonic MTA, Super EBA 83 Prospective
Taschieri et al. (2008)35 113 > 2 yr 100/113 Microscope Endoscope Ultrasonic Super EBA 92
90
RCT
Saunder et al. (2008)14 321 4 – 72 mon 276/321 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA 88.8 Prospective
Kim et al. (2008)8 263 1 – 5 yr 192/263 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 91.5 Prospective
Christiansen et al.(2009)13 52 1 yr 46/52 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA
GP Smoothing
96
52
RCT
Von Arx et al. (2010)31 353 1 yr 339/353 Microscope Sonic MTA
Retroplast
91.3
79.5
Prospective
Song et al. (2011)10 54 1 – 7 yr 42/54 Microscope Ultrasonic MTA, Super EBA 92.9 Prospective

MTA, mineral trioxide aggregate; GP, gutta-percha; RCT, randomized controlled trial study.

TOOLS
Similar articles