Journal List > J Gastric Cancer > v.12(1) > 1076842

Kim, Yoon, Eom, and Park: History of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Korea

Abstract

Laparoscopic gastrectomy was begun in 1995 in Korea. But, there was 4 years gap to reactivate in 1999. High incidence of gastric cancer and increasing proportion of early cancer through national screening program along with huge effort and enthusiasm of laparoscopic gastric surgeon, and active academic exchange with Japanese doctors contributed development of laparoscopic gastrectomy in Korea. Study group activity of Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group and Collaborative Action for Gastric Cancer (COACT) group were paramount to evoke large scale multicenter clinical study and various well performed clinical studies. This review encompasses mainly international publications about this area so far in Korea.

Introduction

Although laparoscopic surgery was started in 1990 from cholecystectomy in Korea, there were long time gap to begin gastrectomy. Because D2 or D2 plus alpha gastrectomy had been accepted as a standard surgery at that time, laparoscopic surgery was just naïve looking for skillful gastric surgeons. Conservative surgeons never dreamed trying laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) although they have acknowledged Kitano's paper for at least 15 years. Confronting conservative opinions, young courageous and ambitious surgeons tried various advanced procedures and also felt Instruments and energy device was not enough to guarantee delicate dissection for gastric cancer. However, gradual technological development follows surgeon's imagination and need for minimal invasive surgery (MIS). In the late 1990s, at least four surgeons began LG. In the year 1995, Kim(1) presented video for LG in the Korean Surgical Society (KSS) meeting for the first time, but there were strong critics because of oncological safety. 4 years later, Kim and Han(2) presented video again to evoke modest impetus and critics tone was much down at that time because MIS has been accepted widely through successful way of a cholecystectomy in the mean time. Small group of young surgeons interested in LG strived to get adequate surgical skills and better instruments and devices. In the meantime, academic exchange between pioneering expertise Japanese surgeons opened surgical horizon widely. Uyama et al.(3) introduced fine dissection technique using ultrasonic shears and, Noshiro et al.(4) showed delicate dissection utilizing suction electrocautery dissecting instrument. In the year 2002, at least 10 young surgeons started newly developed style of laparoscopic gastrectomy. It was much nearer to radical surgery to be accepted as an option for early gastric cancer. Start was slow but, spread was so rapid after 2002 to initiate organizing study group and performing multicenter clinical study. Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group was started and activated in 2003. The achievements in laparoscopic surgery like the publication has increased since 1996, and international publication started from 2003 and the number of articles and sum of impact factor has continuously increased (Fig. 1, 2).
This review encompasses all achievements of Korean laparoscopic gastric surgeons in terms of international publication with high impact factor. Although, domestic publication and other activities is not included, tremendous effort for well performed study greatly contributed improving quality of life of the patients and treatment for gastric cancer.

The Dawning of the Laparoscopy Age (1996~2002)

After the first laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer was performed in 1991,(5) it has been performed in Korea since 1995. Choi et al.(6) first reported that six patients had been successfully performed LADG between September 1995 and February 1996. Yi et al.(7) first demonstrated that the LADG is superior to the open distal gastrectomy (ODG) regarding to the postoperative recovery, such as pain and hospital day. Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy in gastric cancer was started in Korea.(8)

The Rapid Penetration of LG (2003-2007)

Articles with impact factor and the concept of advancement of laparoscopy in gastric cancer had been published since 2003. First prospective randomized study for comparison of LADG and ODG in Korea demonstrated that LADG has a clear advantage over ODG in terms of resulting in fewer pulmonary complications while maintaining the curability of EGC.(9) In phase II clinical trial, Lee et al.(10) showed the feasibility of LADG in terms of similar compliance rate to ODG. Retrospective study showed perioperative recovery were faster in laparoscopy than in open surgery without difference of number of retrieved nodes, postoperative morbidities and mortality despite the longer operation of laparoscopy.(11)
Regarding the SN biopsy, detection rate was reported 90~94%.(12,13) Sensitivity in using both isotope and dye was 87.5% higher than that in using dye or isotope only.(12) However, SN biopsy was recommended cautiously because of SNs at the level II nodes.(13)
The learning curve regarding the operation time and the rate of complications reached the plateau after 30~50 cases of LADG.(14) Therefore, hand-assisted distal gastrectomy may be a bridge learning technique in laparoscopic gastrectomy.(15) High body mass index in female patients, old age, and male gender was found be risk factors of morbidity.(16)

The Period of Maturity (2008~2011)

Prospective randomized study about the comparison of the LADG and ODG first showed the improvement of the quality of life for up to 3 months in the LADG group regarding EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-STO 22 questionnaires.(17) Interim analysis of KLASS I trial showed that there was no significance difference in the morbidity and mortality between LADG and ODG groups.(18)
Retrospective study also demonstrated that despite the longer operation time, LADG group had lower complication rates and similar total number of retrieved lymph nodes comparing ODG group.(19) Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 14.0% and 0.6% in retrospective study.(20) Comorbidity, lack of experience, and degree of lymph node dissection were risk factors in studies.(20-22) There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidity or mortality between young and elderly group.(23) Regarding the high body mass index, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications except operation time.(24) Kang et al.(25) recommend that surgeons should pay attention to bleeding in Billroth I reconstruction and stump leakage in Billroth II reconstruction. The overall 5-year survival rate (95.5~96.9%) in LADG group was not significantly different from those in ODG group.(26,27)
Da Vinci system was introduced and used for operation of gastric cancer in 2005 in Korea. Song et al.(28) first reported that robot-assisted gastrectomy was found be safe and effective in treating early gastric cancer. Retrospective studies showed robot assisted gastrectomy was comparable to laparoscopy in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes despite of initial experience of robotic operation.(29-31)
LATG has been widely accepted and performed in early gastric cancer in this period. However, morbidity was 13.8~26.9% in LATG higher than in open total gastrectomy.(32) Various methods about esophagojejunostomy and lymph node dissection were investigated and found be feasible in LATG.(33,34)
In a porcine model, laparoscopic wedge resection or segmental resection with sentinel basin dissection first appears to be safe and technically feasible.(35) To improve the accuracy of SN mapping, Indocyanine green and (99m)Tc-tin colloid injections(36) and 2 mm thin slice frozen section and rapid immunohistochemistry were investigated.(37) Also high FOXP3+ Treg density of the SLN as a indepently significant predictor of non-SLN metastasis(38) and skip metastasis(39) were studied for false negative of SN biopsy.
Laparoscopy assisted function preserving gastrectomy such as the jejuna pouch interposition was tried and found be feasible and better in quality of life than conventional laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy.(40)

Conclusion

During the past 10 years, LG became a standard procedure in Korea through active learning, education, and academic communication. Well designed large scale powerful clinical studies are actively ongoing. International collaboration may further activate various valuable studies to develop minimal invasive gastric surgery for gastric cancer worldwide. Quality of life of the patients and safety of surgery would be improved further. Next goal must be to develop function preserving surgeries and selection of appropriate surgery for individual patients, to develop robotic surgery, computer-assisted visualization, and other electronic instruments more and simultaneously to reduce cost of surgery through technological innovation, and not to resist technology dependent surgery just because of medical cost.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Number of articles published as Korean and SCI paper. SCI = Science Citation Index.
jgc-12-13-g001
Fig. 2
Progress of total impact factors from 1996 to 2011.
jgc-12-13-g002

References

1. Kim SH. Laparoscopic gastric resection and gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II procedure). Abstract in Korean Surg Soc Meeting. 1995. 21.
2. Kim YW, Han HS. Video presentation for laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Abstract in Korean Surg Soc. 1999.
3. Uyama I, Ogiwara H, Takahara T, Furuta T, Kikuchi K, Iida S. Laparoscopic minilaparotomy Billroth I gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer using an abdominal wall-lifting method. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995. 5:181–187.
crossref
4. Noshiro H, Shimizu S, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, Tanaka M. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight? Ann Surg. 2003. 238:680–685.
5. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994. 4:146–148.
6. Choi SH, Yoon DS, Chi HS, Min JS. Laparoscopy-assisted radical subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 1996. 37:174–180.
crossref
7. Yi NJ, Han HS, Kim YW, Min SK, Kim EG, Choi YM. Laparoscopy-assisted Billoth I gastrectomy compared with open gastrectomy. J Korean Surg Soc. 2001. 61:164–171.
8. Kim MC, Park KJ, Cho SH, Jung GJ, Lee JH, Choi SR, et al. Preliminary study for sentinel lymph node biopsy with 99MTc tin-colloid in patients with gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2002. 63:129–134.
9. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc. 2005. 19:168–173.
crossref
10. Lee JH, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Lee JR, Kim CG, Choi IJ, et al. A phase-II clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:3148–3153.
crossref
11. Lee SI, Choi YS, Park DJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Kim MC. Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2006. 202:874–880.
crossref
12. Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Kim SK, Lee JS, Kook MC, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using dye and isotope double tracers in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006. 13:1168–1174.
crossref
13. Kim MC, Kim HH, Jung GJ, Lee JH, Choi SR, Kang DY, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy using 99mTc tin colloid in gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2004. 239:383–387.
crossref
14. Jin SH, Kim DY, Kim H, Jeong IH, Kim MW, Cho YK, et al. Multidimensional learning curve in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2007. 21:28–33.
crossref
15. Kim YW, Bae JM, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Choi IJ, Kim CG, et al. The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2005. 19:29–33.
crossref
16. Lee JH, Paik YH, Lee JS, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Park SR, et al. Abdominal shape of gastric cancer patients influences short-term surgical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007. 14:1288–1294.
crossref
17. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008. 248:721–727.
crossref
18. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010. 251:417–420.
crossref
19. Lee SE, Kim YW, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Cho SJ, Lee JY, et al. Developing an institutional protocol guideline for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009. 16:2231–2236.
crossref
20. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, et al. Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:2692–2700.
crossref
21. Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Cho GS. The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg. 2008. 248:793–799.
crossref
22. Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH, Nam BH, Kook MC, Choi IJ, et al. Surgical complications and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:1625–1631.
crossref
23. Cho GS, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Kim MC, Ryu SY. Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2009. 96:1437–1442.
crossref
24. Lee HJ, Kim HH, Kim MC, Ryu SY, Kim W, Song KY, et al. Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group. The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:2473–2479.
crossref
25. Kang KC, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim W, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al. Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:1953–1961.
crossref
26. Hwang SH, Park do J, Jee YS, Kim MC, Kim HH, Lee HJ, et al. Actual 3-year survival after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Arch Surg. 2009. 144:559–564.
crossref
27. Song J, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim MC, Ryu SW, et al. Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. 17:1777–1786.
crossref
28. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009. 249:927–932.
crossref
29. Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc. 2010. 24:610–615.
crossref
30. Yoon HM, Kim YW, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Park JY, et al. Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
31. Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Pak KH, Inaba K, Obama K, Choi SH, et al. Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers. Arch Surg. 2011. 146:1086–1092.
crossref
32. Jeong GA, Cho GS, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Song KY. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2009. 146:469–474.
crossref
33. Jeong O, Park YK. Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:2624–2630.
crossref
34. Hyung WJ, Lim JS, Song J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection during total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008. 207:e6–e11.
35. Lee JH, Lee MS, Kim HH, Park do J, Lee KH, Hwang JY, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with sentinel node basin dissection in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:1070–1075.
crossref
36. Park do J, Kim HH, Park YS, Lee HS, Lee WW, Lee HJ, et al. Simultaneous indocyanine green and (99m)Tc-antimony sulfur colloid-guided laparoscopic sentinel basin dissection for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. 18:160–165.
crossref
37. Lee HS, Lee HE, Park do J, Park YS, Kim HH. Precise pathologic examination decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. 19:772–778.
crossref
38. Lee HE, Park DJ, Kim WH, Kim HH, Lee HS. High FOXP3+ regulatory T-cell density in the sentinel lymph node is associated with downstream non-sentinel lymph-node metastasis in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011. 105:413–419.
crossref
39. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Cho SJ, Lee JY, Kim CG, et al. Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009. 16:603–608.
crossref
40. Lee J, Hur H, Kim W. Improved long-term quality of life in patients with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. 17:2024–2030.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles