Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.46(5) > 1080246

Park and Yoo: The Application of Endoscopic Surgery to Gynecologic Conditions

Abstract

The advancements in optics, video technologies and endoscopic instrumentations have led to the expansion of endoscopy into the current therapeutic surgical practice of benign and malignant gynecologic conditions. So, minimally invasive and organ-preserving surgery can be performed in terms of organ-specific difficulties in the field of gynecology instead of conventional surgical techniques that require laparotomy and uterotomy. Also, the recent introduction of computer-aided instruments seems to have the potential to revolutionize endoscopic surgery. Major advantages of an endoscopic surgery include minimization of patient discomfort and analgesics requirements, a short period of hospitalization, rapid recuperation, superior cosmetics, easier intra-operative access to the pelvic floor, cul-de sac and intrauterine cavity, less blood loss and less postoperative adhesion. Today every gynecologists should have the knowledge and skill of the endoscopic surgery in order to gain great benefits from endoscopic surgery. In this article, recent advancements in the endoscopic surgery of gynecological conditions are reviewed.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
jkma-46-437-g001
Figure 2
jkma-46-437-g002
Figure 3
jkma-46-437-g003
Figure 4
jkma-46-437-g004
Figure 5
jkma-46-437-g005
Figure 6
jkma-46-437-g006
Figure 7
jkma-46-437-g007
Figure 8
jkma-46-437-g008
Figure 9
jkma-46-437-g009
Figure 10
jkma-46-437-g010
Figure 11
jkma-46-437-g011
Figure 12
jkma-46-437-g012
Figure 13
jkma-46-437-g013
Figure 14
jkma-46-437-g014
Figure 15
jkma-46-437-g015
Figure 16
jkma-46-437-g016
Figure 17
jkma-46-437-g017
Figure 18
jkma-46-437-g018
Figure 19
jkma-46-437-g019
Figure 20
jkma-46-437-g020
Figure 21
jkma-46-437-g021
Figure 22
jkma-46-437-g022
Figure 23
jkma-46-437-g023
Figure 24
jkma-46-437-g024
Table 1
jkma-46-437-i001
Table 2
jkma-46-437-i002
Table 3
jkma-46-437-i003
Table 4
jkma-46-437-i004
Table 5
jkma-46-437-i005
Table 6
jkma-46-437-i006
Table 7
jkma-46-437-i007
Table 8
jkma-46-437-i008

References

1. Hulka JF, Reich H, editors. Textbook of laparoscopy. 1994. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;3–7.
2. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989. 5:213–216.
crossref
3. Baggish MS, Barbot J, editors. Diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy. 1999. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;1–10.
4. Palter SF, Olive DL. Office microlaparoscopy under local anesthesia for chronic pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996. 3:359–364.
crossref
5. Campo R, Gordts S, Rombauts L, Brosens I. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1999. 71:1157–1160.
6. Sueoka K, Asada H, Tsuchiya S, Kobayashi N, Kuroshima M, Yoshimura Y. Falloposcopic tuboplasty for bilateral tubal occlusion. A novel infertility as an alternative for in-vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod. 1998. 13:71–74.
crossref
7. Wood GP. Laparoscopic examination of the normal infertile woman. Obstet Gynecol. 1983. 62:642–643.
8. Kresch AJ, Seifer DB, Sachs LB, Barrese I. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 1984. 64:672–674.
9. Tulandi T, Sammour A. Evidence-based management of ectopic pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 12:289–292.
crossref
10. Vergote I, De Brabanterb J, Fylesc A, Bertelsend K, Einhorne N, Tropea CG, et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet. 2001. 357:176–182.
crossref
11. Van Dam PA, DeCloedt J, Tjalma A, Buytaert P, Becquart D, Vergote I. Trocar implantation metastasis after laparoscopy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Can the risk be reduced? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 181:536–541.
crossref
12. Fayez JA. An asessment of the role of operative laparoscopy in tuboplasty. Fertil Steril. 1983. 39:476–480.
13. Yoon TK, Sung HR, Cha SH, Lee CN, Cha KY. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Fertil Steril. 1997. 67:18–22.
crossref
14. Dessolle L, Soriano D, Poncelet C, Benifla JL, Madelenat P, Darai E. Determinants of pregnancy rate and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy for infertility. Fertil Steril. 2001. 76:370–374.
crossref
15. Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001. 8:495–500.
crossref
16. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Bess O, Nezhat CH, Mashiach R. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy:a report of a new technique in 57 cases. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1994. 39:39–44.
17. Wang CJ, Yen CF, Lee CL, Soong YK. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000. 7:510–514.
crossref
18. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000. 7(1):9–15.
crossref
19. Wattiez A, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA. Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse. Urol Clin North Am. 2001. 28:151–157.
crossref
20. Esposito C, Garipoli V, Di Matteo G, De Pasquale M. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts in newborns. Surg Endosc. 1998. 12:1152–1154.
crossref
21. Fatum M, Rojansky N. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001. 56:50–59.
crossref
22. Dargent DF. Laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Clin North Am. 2001. 81:949–965.
crossref
23. Magrina JF. Laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic cancers. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 43:619–640.
crossref
24. Emanuel MH, Wamsteker K, Hart AA, Metz G, Lammes FB. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 93:743–748.
crossref
25. Lewis BV, Magos AL. Endometrial ablation. 1993. 1st ed. New York: Churchill livingstone;19–26.
26. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:1389–1402.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles