Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.12(3) > 1035666

Chung, Yoo, Chung, and Wang: Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy in Herniated Intervertebral disc of Lumbar Spine

Abstract

Study Design

A retrospective study

Objectives

To assess the clinical outcomes and roentgenographic changes after an percutaneous endoscopic discetomy of an intervertebral disc herniation of the lumbar spine.

Summary of Literature Review

Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy can preserve normal posterior element in the treatment for herniated intervertebral disc of lumbar spine.

Materials and Methods

Fifty two patients (41 men, 11 women), who had been treated with percutaneous endoscopic discectomy due to a herniated intevertebral disc of the lubar spine and were followed at least 1 year, were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 26.5 years (21∼45) and the mean follow- up period was 42 months (12∼76). Fifteen, 28 and 9 herniated discs were extracted from L3- L4, L4- L5 and L5- S1, respectively.

Results

A fter the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy, excellent and good results were obtained in 71% (37 cases) of patients but 9% (5 cases) of patients reported poor results. A roentgenographic assessment at the final follow- up showed no instability and no degenerative spondylotic finding. However, the intervertebral disc space was decreased in only 1 case.

Conclusion

A n percutaneous endoscopic discectomy is an effective method for treating a herniated intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine. However, prudent patient selection is very important for achieving good results.

REFERENCES

1). Dandy WE. Loose cartilage from intervertebral disc sim -ulating tumor of the spinal cord. By Walter E. Dandy, 1929 Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 238:4–8.
2). Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl Surg Soc. 1934; 211:210–2154.
crossref
3). Hijikata S, Yamagishi M and Nakayama T. Perc uta -neous discectomy: A new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp. 1975; 5:5–13.
4). Kambin P, Sampson S. Posterolateral percutaneous suction excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs: report of interim results. Clin Orthop. 1986; 207:37–43.
5). Onik G, Maroon J and Shang Y. Far-lateral disc herniation; treatment by automated percutaneous discectomy. AJNR. 1990; 11(5):865–8.
6). Hijikata S. Percutaneous nucleotomy: A new concept and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop. 1989; 38:9–23.
7). Kambin P, Zhou L. Arthroscopic discectomy of the lumbar spine. Clin orthop. 1997; 337:49–57.
crossref
8). Schreiber A, Suezawa Y, Leu H. Does percutaneous nucleotomy with discoscopy replace conventional discectomy? Eight years of experience and results in treatment of herniated lumbar disc. Clin Orthop. 1989; 238:35–42.
9). Kambin P. Arthroscopic lumbar interbody fusion in white A(ed). Spine Care. St. Louis, CV Mosby. 1995; 1055-1066.
10). Kambin P. Posterolateral percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion. In Kambin P(ed). Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: Minimal intervention in spinal surgery. Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg. 1991; 117-121.
11). MacNab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. JBJS Am. 1971; 53(5):891–903.
12). Smith L. Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA. 1964; 187:137–140.
crossref
13). Smith L, Garvin PJ, Gesler RM, Gennings RB. Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus. Nature. 1963; 198:1311–1312.
crossref
14). Schaffer JL, Kambin P. Percutaneous posterolateral lumbar discectomy and decompression with a 6.9mm can -nula: Analysis of operative failures and complications. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991; 73(6):822–831.
15). Casey KF, Chang MK, O'Brein ED, Yuan HA, McCullen GM, Schaffer J and Kambin P. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: comparison of preoperative and postoperative imaging studies. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13:438–445.
crossref
16). Kambin P. The role of minimal invasive surgery in spinal disorder. Stauffer RN, editor. Advances in operative orthopaedics. 1996. 3. St Louis: Mosby yearbook Inc;p. 147–171.
17). Kambin P, Schreiber A, Shepperd J, Leu H and Schaffer J. Minimal intervention surgical techniques. Orthop Trans. 1993; 17:1132.
18). Chung JY, Joo DC. A Prospective Randomized Study of Arthroscopic and Microscopic Discectomy in Protruded Lumbar Disc Herniation. J Korean Orthop Ass. 2000; 35(1):119–126.
crossref
19). Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopyand discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med. 2000 Sep; 67(4):327–32.
20). Kambin P, Casey K, O'Brien E and Zhou L. Transforaminal arthroscopic decompression of lateral recess stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1996; 84:462–467.
crossref
21). Leu HJ, Schreiber A. Percutaneous fusion of the lumbar spine: A promising technique. Spine: State of the Art Reviews. 1992; 6:593–604.

Table 1.
MacNab classification
Excellent No pain: no restriction of activity.
Good Occasional back or leg pain of sufficient severity to interfere with the patient's ability to do his or her normal work, or to enjoy leisure activity.
Fair Improved fuctional capacity, but handicapped by intermittent pain of sufficient severity to curtail or modify work or leisure activities.
Poor No improvement or insufficient improvement to enable increase in activities; further operative intervention required.
Table 2.
Final result of Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy
Grade Excellent Good Fair Poor
Result 5 32 10 5
TOOLS
Similar articles