The Clinical Relevance of Same-session Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Guided Tissue Sampling for Biliary Stricture

Jae Hee Cho

doi:10.4166/kjg.2019.73.4.193

Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.73(4) > 1121256

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

See the article "".

TOOLS

Cho: The Clinical Relevance of Same-session Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Guided Tissue Sampling for Biliary Stricture

Editorial

The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019; 73(4): 193-195.

Published online: 26 April 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2019.73.4.193

The Clinical Relevance of Same-session Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Guided Tissue Sampling for Biliary Stricture

Jae Hee Cho

Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

Correspondence to: Jae Hee Cho, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea. Tel: +82-32-460-2187, Fax: +82-32-460-3408, jhcho9328@gachon.ac.kr

Korean Society of Gastroenterology

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Accuracy of Same Session EUS and ERCP Guided Tissue Sampling

EUS-TS, endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue sampling; ERCP-TS, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided tissue sampling; IPMN, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Notes

^{Financial support} None.

^{Conflict of interest} None.

References

1. Jo JH, Cho CM, Jun JH, et al. Same-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34:799–805.

2. Moura DTH, de Moura EGH, Matuguma SE, et al. EUS-FNA versus ERCP for tissue diagnosis of suspect malignant biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study. Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6:E769–E777.

3. Novis M, Ardengh JC, Libera ED, et al. Prospective comparative study of ERCP brush cytology and EUS-FNA for the differential diagnosis of biliary strictures. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2010; 37:190–198.

4. Oppong K, Raine D, Nayar M, Wadehra V, Ramakrishnan S, Charnley RM. EUS-FNA versus biliary brushings and assessment of simultaneous performance in jaundiced patients with suspected malignant obstruction. JOP. 2010; 11:560–567.

5. Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KF, et al. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80:97–104.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs: Jae Hee Cho
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-0091
Similar articles