Medical YouTube Videos and Evaluation

Eun Sun Kim

doi:10.4166/kjg.2018.72.6.275

Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.72(6) > 1109922

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

See the article "".

TOOLS

Kim: Medical YouTube Videos and Evaluation

Editorial

The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2018; 72(6): 275-276.

Published online: 27 December 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2018.72.6.275

Medical YouTube Videos and Evaluation

Eun Sun Kim

Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence to: Eun Sun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea. Tel: +82-2-920-6555, Fax: +82-2-953-1943; silverkes@naver.com

Korean Society of Gastroenterology

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article: Medical Professionals' Review of YouTube Videos Pertaining to Exercises for the Constipation Relief ([Related article:] Korean J Gastroenterol 2018;72:295-303)

Notes

^{Financial support} This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07048202, 2017R1C1B5076677), and by Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (Grant Number 20001533) and Korea University of College of Medicine.

^{Conflict of interest} None.

References

1. Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube videos and methods of evaluation: literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2018; 4:e3.

2. Biggs TC, Bird JH, Harries PG, Salib RJ. YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Laryngol Otol. 2013; 127:749–754.

3. Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B, et al. Popular on YouTube: a critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015; 36:e121–e126.

4. Basch CH, Hillyer GC, MacDonald ZL, Reeves R, Basch CE. Characteristics of YouTube™ videos related to mammography. J Cancer Educ. 2015; 30:699–703.

5. Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016; 40:1995–2002.

6. Reddy K, Kearns M, Alvarez-Arango S, et al. YouTube and food allergy: an appraisal of the educational quality of information. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018; 29:410–416.

7. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012; 39:899–903.

8. Garg N, Venkatraman A, Pandey A, Kumar N. YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015; 20:315–320.

9. Nagpal SJ, Karimianpour A, Mukhija D, Mohan D, Brateanu A. YouTube videos as a source of medical information during the Ebola hemorrhagic fever epidemic. Springerplus. 2015; 4:457.

10. Haymes AT, Harries V. 'How to stop a nosebleed': an assessment of the quality of epistaxis treatment advice on YouTube. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130:749–754.

11. Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40:1857–1861.

12. Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, Murugiah K. YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology. 2011; 77:558–562.

13. Benetoli A, Chen TF, Aslani P. Consumer health-related activities on social media: exploratory study. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19:e352.

14. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15:e85.

TOOLS

ORCID iDs: Eun Sun Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1820-459X
Similar articles