Journal List > J Nutr Health > v.48(5) > 1081412

Ahn, Kim, Kim, Pyun, Yeo, and Nam: Nutrition knowledge, eating attitudes, nutrition behavior, self-efficacy of childcare center foodservice employees by stages of behavioral change in reducing sodium intake

Abstract

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to examine sodium-related nutrition knowledge, eating attitudes, eating behaviors, and self-efficacy by stages of behavioral change in reducing sodium intake among childcare center foodservice employees.

Methods:

Subjects (n = 333) were categorized according to two groups based on the stages of change; Pre-action stage (PA group: precontemplation/contemplation/preparation stage), Action stage (A group: action/maintenance stage).

Results:

A major source of sodium-related nutrition information was TV/radio (56.6%) and only 166 people (49.8%) have experienced nutrition education specific to sodium. Although the A group showed slightly higher scores for nutrition knowledge than the PA group, the difference was not significant. The percentages of correct answers for ‘daily goal of sodium intake for adults (27.0%)’, ‘calculation of sodium content in nutrition labeling (30.3%)’ were low for both groups. The A group (total score: 40.3) had more desirable eating attitudes regarding reducing sodium intake than the PA group (36.6, p < 0.001). The total score for eating behaviors was slightly higher in the A group (49.6) than in the PA group (48.5), but without statistical significance. The A group (total score: 58.2) also received higher scores for self-efficacy regarding reducing sodium intake than the PA group (52.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

This study suggests that nutrition education for childcare center foodservice employees should be expanded and customized education should be implemented according to the stages in reducing sodium intake. It is also suggested that food companies make efforts to develop low-sodium products.

REFERENCES

1.Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statics 2013: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VI-1). Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2013.
2.Koo S., Kim Y., Kim MK., Yoon JS., Park K. Nutrient intake, lifestyle factors and prevalent hypertension in Korean adults: results from 2007-2008 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(3):329–340.
crossref
3.Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR). Health plan 2020. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2011.
4.Lee C., Kim DI., Hong J., Koh E., Kang BW., Kim JW., Park HK., Kim CI. Cost-benefit analysis of sodium intake reduction policy in Korea. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(3):341–352.
crossref
5.Kim MK., Han JI., Chung YJ. Dietary behavior related to salty food intake of adults living in a rural area according to saline sensitivity. Korean J Nutr. 2011. 44(6):537–550.
crossref
6.Yim KS. The effects of a nutrition education program for hypertensive female elderly at the public health center. Korean J Community Nutr. 2008. 13(5):640–652.
7.Yoon JS., Lee MJ. Calcium status and bone mineral density by the level of sodium intake in young women. Korean J Community Nutr. 2013. 18(2):125–133.
crossref
8.Lim HJ. A study on the sodium and potassium intakes and urinary excretion of adults in Busan. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(6):737–751.
crossref
9.The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans. 1st revision. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society;2010.
10.Yon M., Lee Y., Kim D., Lee J., Koh E., Nam E., Shin H., Kang BW., Kim JW., Heo S., Cho HY., Kim CI. Major sources of sodium intake of the Korean population at prepared dish level: based on the KNHANES 2008 & 2009. Korean J Community Nutr. 2011. 16(4):473–487.
11.Park YH., Kang M., Baik HW., Oh SW., Park SJ., Paik HY., Choe JS., Lee JY., Kang MS., Joung H. A study on the perception as HANSIK (Korean food) for the common dishes in Korean adults residing in Seoul and metropolitan area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(5):555–578.
crossref
12.Park S., Kim DJ., Shin WS. Adaptability and preference to Korean food with foreigners who reside in Seoul, Korea. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(6):782–794.
crossref
13.Park SJ., Paik HY., Lee SY. The influence of mixed NaCl-KCl salt on sodium intake and urinary excretion of sodium and potassium. Korean J Nutr. 2007. 40(6):500–508.
14.Ahn S., Park S., Kim JN., Han SN., Jeong SB., Kim HK. Salt content of school meals and comparison of perception related to sodium intake in elementary, middle, and high schools. Nutr Res Pract. 2013. 7(1):59–65.
crossref
15.Moon EH., Kim KW. Evaluation of nutrition education for hypertension patients aged 50 years and over. Korean J Community Nutr. 2011. 16(1):62–74.
crossref
16.Jung EJ., Son SM., Kwon JS. The effect of sodium reduction education program of a public health center on the blood pressure, blood biochemical profile and sodium intake of hypertensive adults. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(6):752–771.
crossref
17.Jung YY., Shin EK., Lee HJ., Lee NH., Chun BY., Ann MY., Lee YK. Development and evaluation of a nutrition education program on sodium reduction in elementary school students. Korean J Community Nutr. 2009. 14(6):746–755.
18.Kim JN., Park S., Ahn S., Kim HK. A survey on the salt content of kindergarten lunch meals and meal providers' dietary attitude to sodium intake in Gyeonggi-do area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2013. 18(5):478–490.
crossref
19.Shin H., Lee Y. The effectiveness of Na reduction program for cook in childcare center: focus on self-reevaluation and strengthen consciousness. Korean J Community Nutr. 2014. 19(5):425–435.
crossref
20.Lee JH., Ryu K. Influence of school food service employees' nutrition education on nutrition knowledge. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2006. 16(6):777–786.
21.Shin EK., Lee HJ., Jun SY., Park EJ., Jung YY., Ahn MY., Lee YK. Development and evaluation of nutrition education program for sodium reduction in foodservice operations. Korean J Community Nutr. 2008. 13(2):216–227.
22.Choi MY., Kim HY. Nutrition knowledge, dietary self-efficacy and eating habits according to student's stage of regular breakfast or exercise. Korean J Community Nutr. 2008. 13(5):653–662.
23.Wolf RL., Lepore SJ., Vandergrift JL., Wetmore-Arkader L., McGinty E., Pietrzak G., Yaroch AL. Knowledge, barriers, and stage of change as correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption among urban and mostly immigrant black men. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008. 108(8):1315–1322.
crossref
24.Suh Y., Chung YJ. The effect of nutrition education on the improvement of psychosocial factors related to vegetable and fruit intake of elementary school children in pre-action stages. Korean J Nutr. 2010. 43(6):597–606.
crossref
25.Ahn Y., Kim KW. Beliefs regarding vegetable consumption, self-efficacy and eating behaviors according to the stages of change in vegetable consumption among college students. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(1):1–13.
crossref
26.Prochaska JO., DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983. 51(3):390–395.
crossref
27.Ahn SH., Kwon JS., Kim K., Yoon JS., Kang BW., Kim JW., Heo S., Cho HY., Kim HK. Study on the eating habits and practicability of guidelines for reducing sodium intake according to the stage of change in housewives. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(6):724–736.
crossref
28.Suh Y., Seok YH., Chung YJ. Relationship of dietary self-efficacy and illness beliefs, perceived benefits and perceived barriers for the reduction of sodium intake in the elderly. Korean J Nutr. 2012. 45(4):324–335.
crossref
29.Jung EJ., Kwon JS., Ahn SH., Son SM. Blood pressure, sodium intake and dietary behavior changes by session attendance on salt reduction education program for pre-hypertensive adults in a public health center. Korean J Community Nutr. 2013. 18(6):626–643.
crossref
30.Song DY., Park JE., Shim JE., Lee JE. Trends in the major dish groups and food groups contributing to sodium intake in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1998-2010. Korean J Nutr. 2013. 46(1):72–85.
crossref
31.Cho MH., Kim SJ., Lee KH. A study on preference of salinity and temperature of soups served in the institutional foodservice establishments. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2008. 18(4):601–607.
32.Kim SJ., Cho MH., Lee KH. Comparative study between the salini-ties of soups preferred by customers and provided at institutional foodservice establishments. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2009. 19(3):444–450.
33.Kim HH., Lee YK. Analysis of presumed sodium intake of office workers using 24-hour urine analysis and correlation matrix between variables. Korean J Nutr. 2013. 46(1):26–33.
crossref
34.Chang SO. Effect of a 6-month low sodium diet on the salt taste perception and pleasantness, blood pressure and the urinary sodium excretion in female college students. Korean J Nutr. 2010. 43(5):433–442.
crossref
35.Choi YS., Chang N., Joung H., Cho SH., Park HK. A study on the guideline amounts of sugar, sodium and fats in processed foods met to children's taste. Korean J Nutr. 2008. 41(6):561–572.
36.Kim JA., Kim YH., Ann MY., Lee YK. Measurements of salinity and salt content by menu types served at industry foodservice operations in Daegu. Korean J Community Nutr. 2012. 17(5):637–651.
crossref
37.Chang SO. The amount of sodium in the processed foods, the use of sodium information on the nutrition label and the acceptance of sodium reduced ramen in the female college students. Korean J Nutr. 2006. 39(6):585–591.

Table 1.
General characteristics of the subjects
Variables Total (n = 333)
Age (years) 48.5 ± 8.41
Age group (years)2)
  Prime-aged (20~44) 97 (29.5)
  Middle-aged (45~64) 225 (68.4)
  Old-aged (≥ 65) 7 (2.1)
Height (cm) 158.4 ± 4.7
Weight (kg) 57.7 ± 7.6
BMI (kg/m2) 23.0 ± 2.8
Area
  Seoul 255 (76.6)
  Gyeonggi-do & ChungChong-Do 78 (23.4)
Interest in sodium-related diet management3)
  Very much interested 182 (54.8)
  Interested 80 (24.1)
  Average 65 (19.6)
  Not interested 4 (1.2)
  Not interested at all 1 (0.3)
Sources of nutrition information about sodium4)
  TV/radio 155 (56.6)
  Hospitals/public health centers/healthcare centers 40 (14.6)
  Internet 36 (13.1)
  Newspapers/magazines 22 (8.0)
  Books/Families & friends 9 (3.3)
  Others 12 (4.4)
Subjects experienced in nutrition education about sodium (n = 166)
Frequency of experiences (times) (n = 159)
  1 79 (49.7)
  2~3 61 (38.4)
  ≥ 4 19 (11.9)
Contents of education (n = 564)5)  
  Relevance of sodium to blood pressure 96 (17.0)
  Relevance of sodium to diseases 96 (17.0)
  Sodium content in foods 81 (14.4)
  Selecting low sodium foods 65 (11.5)
  Cooking methods to lower sodium content level 120 (21.3)
  Salty taste assessment 30 (5.3)
  Salinity measuring instrument 76 (13.5)

N (%)

1) Mean ± SD

2) No response: 4

3) No response: 1

4) No response: 59

5) multiple responses

Table 2.
Nutrition knowledge regarding sodium
Variables Total (n = 333) Pre-action (n = 65) Action (n = 268)
1. Salt is thoroughly consisted of sodium. 62.81) 60.0 63.4
2. We need salt intake for water balance in body. 79.3 86.2 77.6
3. The goal for sodium intake per day for an adult is 2,000 mg. 27.0 32.3 25.8
4. Soy sauce and Soybean paste do not contain sodium. 89.5 87.7 89.9
5. Sodium influences level of blood pressure, but it is not relevant to osteoporosis.∗∗2) 83.2 72.3 85.8
6. Eating salty foods with vegetables help excrete sodium from body. 70.9 72.3 70.5
7. Natural foods such as milk and meat without seasoning do not contain sodium. 69.7 66.2 70.5
8. Vegetables with dressing should be cooked last to lessen sodium level. 73.9 66.2 75.8
9. Foods are seasoned when the cooking is finished, after it cools down in order to reduce sodium intake. 83.8 84.6 83.6
10. The end point of a salimeter should touch the ingredients to assess the salinity of the soup. 75.1 70.8 76.1
11. Processed foods contain high level of sodium than natural foods (grain, vegetables, etc.). 92.5 92.3 92.5
12. Adequate sodium intake is very important to infants because their intake will influence the eating habits when they become adults. 96.1 96.9 95.9
13. This nutrition labeling shows you that potato chips (90 g) contain sodium 150 mg. 30.3 30.8 30.2
Nutrition knowledge score3)
  About sodium (7 items) 5.7 ± 1.24) 5.6 ± 1.3 5.8 ± 1.1
  About reducing sodium skills (6 items) 3.6 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 1.1 3.6 ± 1.1
  Total 9.3 ± 1.8 9.2 ± 2.1 9.4 ± 1.7

1) %, Percentages of correct answers

2) ∗∗p < 0.01 by χ-test

3) Correct answer was given 1 point. The possible total score: 0~13

4) Mean ± SD

Table 3.
Eating attitudes regarding reducing sodium intake
Variables Total (n = 333) Pre-action (n = 65) Action (n = 268)
1. I think that my current eating habit will influence my health.∗1) 4.5 ± 0.72) 4.3 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.7
2. I think wrong dietary habits should be corrected. 4.5 ± 0.6 4.4 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6
3. I think nutrition information should be applied to dietary life. 4.4 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 0.6
4. I think my foods should be as bland as possible.∗∗∗ 4.4 ± 0.7 4.2 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6
5. I think that I should reduce the usage of salt and soy sauce when cooking. 4.4 ± 0.6 4.3 ± 0.6 4.5 ± 0.6
6. I think that I should be informed of sodium content in foods. 4.4 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 0.6 4.4 ± 0.6
7. I prefer having foods salty.∗∗∗ 2.3 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 0.9
8. I prefer to have soup, stew when I have a meal.∗∗∗ 2.8 ± 1.1 3.3 ± 1.0 2.7 ± 1.1
9. I prefer to eat kimchi, salty pickles when I have a meal.∗∗∗ 3.1 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 0.9
10. I prefer to eat noodles, ramen, udon, naengmyeon.∗∗∗ 2.9 ± 1.1 3.4 ± 1.0 2.8 ± 1.1
Total score3)∗∗∗ 39.6 ± 4.5 36.6 ± 4.4 40.3 ± 4.3

1) ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by t-test

2) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very disagree) ~ 5 (very agree). 3) The possible total score: 10-50, To calculate the total score, items from 7 to 10 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating attitude.

Table 4.
Eating behaviors
Variables   Total (n = 333)     Pre-action (n = 65)     Action (n = 268)  
How often do you... (days/week) 0-2 3-5 6-7 0-2 3-5 6-7 0-2 3-5 6-7
1. Eat meals regularly 22.2 38.9 38.9 26.1 38.5 35.4 21.4 38.9 39.7
2. Eat too many meals 23.2 52.3 24.5 34.4 45.9 19.7 20.6 53.8 25.6
3. Eat multigrain rice∗1) 15.2 37.0 47.8 23.8 41.3 34.9 13.1 35.9 51.0
4. Eat protein foods (meat, fish, eggs, beans) more than two meals a day 21.1 51.4 27.5 23.4 45.3 31.3 20.5 52.9 26.6
5. Eat vegetables, seaweeds more than two meals a day 15.6 54.0 30.4 18.7 51.6 29.7 14.9 54.6 30.5
6. Eat dairy foods (milk, soy milk), anchovy 30.1 50.0 19.9 26.2 60.0 13.8 31.0 47.5 21.5
7. Eat fruits 13.1 41.2 45.7 9.4 46.9 43.7 14.0 39.8 46.2
8. Eat greasy foods 74.1 22.3 3.6 60.0 35.4 4.6 77.6 19.0 3.4
9. Eat sweets (candy, chocolate, soft drinks) 83.2 13.7 3.1 79.0 16.1 4.9 84.2 13.1 2.7
10. Drink alcoholic beverages 90.1 7.9 2.0 82.7 12.1 5.2 91.8 7.0 1.2
11. Eat soup and stew 36.0 50.3 13.7 26.1 58.5 15.4 38.4 48.3 13.3
12. Eat soup of ramen and noodles 70.4 24.3 5.3 60.3 30.2 9.5 72.9 22.9 4.2
13. Eat fermented salty fishes and seafoods 79.1 17.1 3.8 75.8 17.7 6.5 79.9 17.0 3.1
14. Eat kimchi and salty pickles 39.9 37.5 22.6 41.5 35.4 23.1 39.5 38.0 22.5
15. Eat stir-fried foods with salt, soy sauce, hot-pepper sauce 37.0 51.5 11.5 42.9 49.2 7.9 35.6 52.1 12.3
16. Eat foods with salt, soy sauce, hot-pepper sauce∗∗ 75.3 20.0 4.7 72.6 14.5 12.9 76.0 21.3 2.7
17. Eat processed foods and canned foods∗∗ 91.8 6.3 1.9 85.2 8.2 6.6 93.3 5.9 0.8
18. Eat-out and have delivery foods∗∗ 90.1 7.7 2.2 80.7 12.9 6.4 92.4 6.4 1.2
19. Eat fast foods (hamburger, pizza) 94.2 4.2 1.6 86.9 8.2 4.9 96.0 3.2 0.8
20. Eat salty snacks∗∗ 94.7 3.3 2.0 86.8 6.6 6.6 96.7 2.5 0.8
Eating behaviors score2) General eating (1~10) 23.3 ± 3.23) 22.8 ± 3.3 23.4 ± 3.2
Sodium-related eating (11~20) 26.3 ± 2.9 25.8 ± 3.3 26.5 ± 2.7
Total 49.6 ± 4.8 48.5 ± 5.3 49.9 ± 4.6

%, no response: 1 (1), 2 (10), 3 (11), 4 (6), 5 (7), 6 (7), 7 (5), 8 (5), 9 (12), 10 (31), 11 (5), 12 (12), 13 (12), 14 (2), 15 (3), 16 (13), 17 (17), 18 (20), 19 (22), 20 (28)

2) p < 0.05, p < 0.01 by χ -test

3) The sum of eating behavior scores. To calculate the total score, each item was measured from 1 (0-2 days/week) to 3 (6-7 days/week) and the items of 8-20 were scored reversely. The higher score means the better eating behaviors. The possible total score: 20-60

Mean ± SD

Table 5.
Self-efficacy regarding reducing sodium intake
Variables Total (n = 333) Pre-action (n = 65) Action (n = 268)
I can do the followings to reduce sodium intake ...      
1. Use smaller bowl for soup∗∗∗1) 3.8 ± 0.82) 3.5 ± 0.9 3.9 ± 0.8
2. Eat the main ingredients in ramen and noodles∗∗ 4.0 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 0.9
3. Eat raw vegetables instead of kimchi and salty pickles 3.5 ± 1.0 3.3 ± 1.0 3.5 ± 1.0
4. Eat foods with vinegar, fruit sauce instead of salt and soy sauce∗∗ 3.4 ± 1.0 3.1 ± 0.9 3.5 ± 1.0
5. Avoid processed foods and canned foods∗∗∗ 4.1 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.9 4.2 ± 0.8
6. Avoid eating-out and delivery foods 4.0 ± 0.9 3.8 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 1.0
7. Avoid dipping sauce (soy sauce, etc.) when eating 3.8 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.9 3.8 ± 0.9
8. Do not add salt at the table∗∗ 4.0 ± 0.9 3.8 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 0.9
9. Select processed foods after checking sodium content of nutrition labeling 3.5 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 1.0
10. Season foods after finishing cooking∗∗∗ 3.9 ± 0.9 3.4 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 0.8
11. Use natural seasoning instead of salt and MSG∗∗∗ 4.2 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.9 4.2 ± 0.8
12. Cook with low sodium sauce∗∗∗ 3.5 ± 1.0 3.1 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 1.0
13. Remove salt from salted fish soaking in water 3.8 ± 0.9 3.6 ± 0.9 3.9 ± 0.9
14. Serve sauce with roasted meat without seasoning 3.7 ± 0.9 3.6 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.9
15. Serve sauce separately from cutlet, omelet rice and fried rice 4.0 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 0.9
Total score3)∗∗∗ 57.1 ± 9.2 52.5 ± 9.7 58.2 ± 8.7

1) ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by t-test

2) Mean ± SD, Subjects were asked to respond in 5-point scales ranging from 1 (very difficult ~ 5 (very easy).

3) Possible total score: 15~75. The higher score means the higher self-efficacy.

Table 6.
Pearson correlation coefficient among variables
  Nutrition knowledge Eating attitudes Eating behaviors Self-efficacy
Nutrition knowledge 1.00 0.01 0.08 0.01
Eating attitudes 0.01 1.00 0.41∗∗∗1) 0.53∗∗∗
Eating behaviors 0.08 0.41∗∗∗ 1.00 0.37∗∗∗
Self-efficacy 0.01 0.53∗∗∗ 0.37∗∗∗ 1.00

1) ∗∗∗p < 0.001

TOOLS
Similar articles