Journal List > J Vet Sci > v.19(2) > 1041601

Birhanu, Lee, Park, Song, and Park: In silico analysis of putative drug and vaccine targets of the metabolic pathways of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae using a subtractive/comparative genomics approach

Abstract

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a Gram-negative bacterium that resides in the respiratory tract of pigs and causes porcine respiratory disease complex, which leads to significant losses in the pig industry worldwide. The incidence of drug resistance in this bacterium is increasing; thus, identifying new protein/gene targets for drug and vaccine development is critical. In this study, we used an in silico approach, utilizing several databases including the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), the Database of Essential Genes (DEG), DrugBank, and Swiss-Prot to identify non-homologous essential genes and prioritize these proteins for their druggability. The results showed 20 metabolic pathways that were unique and contained 273 non-homologous proteins, of which 122 were essential. Of the 122 essential proteins, there were 95 cytoplasmic proteins and 11 transmembrane proteins, which are potentially suitable for drug and vaccine targets, respectively. Among these, 25 had at least one hit in DrugBank, and three had similarity to metabolic proteins from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, another pathogen causing porcine respiratory disease complex; thus, they could serve as common therapeutic targets. In conclusion, we identified glyoxylate and dicarboxylate pathways as potential targets for antimicrobial therapy and tetra-acyldisaccharide 4′-kinase and 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic-acid transferase as vaccine candidates against A. pleuropneumoniae.

Introduction

The respiratory disease known as porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) is a widespread problem on intensive pig farms worldwide. PRDC is a polymicrobial disease that is caused by various viral and bacterial agents, including Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, which are considered to be the primary pathogen in pigs [27]. Coinfection with these two pathogens is known to cause more severe disease than infection with either pathogen alone or with other agents [5].
A. pleuropneumoniae is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacterium that belongs to the family Pasteurellaceae. The organism is known to cause porcine pleuropneumonia, a severe contagious respiratory disease that often leads to very rapidly evolving pleuropneumonia, which is characterized by hemorrhagic necrotizing pneumonia and fibrinous pleuritis, and most commonly affects pigs aged 18 to 20 weeks [14]. The polysaccharide capsule and exotoxins of A. pleuropneumoniae are the major virulence determinants and are responsible for the pathogenesis of pleuropneumonia [215].
Over the last two decades, increasing numbers of A. pleuropneumoniae strains have been isolated that are resistant to a number of commonly utilized drugs for treating pleuropneumonia in pigs [193740]. This alarming increase in the incidence of antimicrobial resistance has initiated a search for new therapeutics against these ‘superbugs’. Current developments in the fields of genomics and proteomics have opened new avenues into the development of new antimicrobial agents and vaccine targets for combating drug resistance [31].
Different researchers have discussed the significance of in silico approaches for the identification of vaccine and drug targets. Morya et al. [24] identified drug targets in Staphylococcus aureus by analyzing its metabolic pathways. Likewise, vaccine and therapeutic drug targets in methicillin-resistant S. aureus [35], Mycobacterium abscessus [32], Mycobacterium ulcerans [3], Vibrio cholerae [4], and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae [6] were identified by using the same approach.
However, there are no reported therapeutic target data available for the metabolic pathways in A. pleuropneumoniae. Herein, using the available genome sequences and genetic/proteomic database resources, we identified putative targets for antibiotics and vaccine therapy in A. pleuropneumoniae by undertaking an in silico comparative and subtractive genomic/proteomic metabolic pathway analysis approach.

Materials and Methods

Comparative metabolic pathway analysis of the pathogen and its hosts

The genomic nucleotide and protein sequences of three strains of A. pleuropneumoniae (serovar 5, [Refseq: NC_009053.1], serovar 7 [NC_010939.1], and serovar 3) and the genome sequences of pig (host; taxid: 9821) and human (Homo sapiens) were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. The metabolic pathways of host and pathogen were compared to distinguish the unique and common metabolic pathways by using BLASTP (NCBI, USA). To identify potential drug targets in the pathogen, search engines like NCBI-BLAST and saved databases were used (Fig. 1).

KEGG comparison of the metabolic pathways in the pathogen and its host

The sequences of proteins in the metabolic pathways of the pathogen and its host were compared. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases (KEGG, Japan) were used to retrieve and compare the metabolic pathways in the whole genome sequences of three strains of A. pleuropneumoniae [17]. A manual comparison of the metabolic pathways of the natural host (pig), human, and A. pleuropneumoniae was conducted. Pathways that were not present in pig and human, but were present in the pathogen, were considered unique pathways, while the others were considered common pathways. The amino acid sequences of the proteins in the common and unique pathways of the pathogen were identified and downloaded from the NCBI database.

Non-homologous essential pathogen protein selection

A two-step comparison method was used to identify the non-homologous essential proteins in the bacterium. Proteins of A. pleuropneumoniae were first compared to the host proteome to select non-homologous proteins, then, the identified non-homologous proteins were compared with the essential proteins in the Database of Essential Genes (DEG). The non-homologous sequences of A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 5B were aligned with the experimentally verified essential genes of Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20 (NC000907) and with the protein sequences from 36 others Gram-positive and -negative bacteria in the DEG [22].
Comparative searches of host proteins were limited by using the available options under BLASTP criteria. Screening of hits was based on a threshold expectation value (e-value) of 0.005, matching similarity of ≤ 35%, and minimum bit score of 100. The identified proteins were further filtered using DEG microbial BLASTP based on their essentiality, with a cutoff e-value of 10−10 and a least possible bit score of 100 [22].

Prioritizing the essential non-homologous proteins as drug targets

The identified essential non-homologous proteins of the bacterium were prioritized as potential therapeutic targets, based on their molecular and structural organization. Protein molecular weight was determined with the computational tools and drug target-associated data available in the Swiss-Prot database (UniProt) [36]. The biological significance and subcellular localization of the proteins was predicted by CELLO v.2.5 (multi-class support vector machine classification system) [41], and the transmembrane regions were predicted by using TMHMM v2.0 [20]. In addition, the experimentally and computationally solved three-dimensional structures were determined by using the Protein Data Bank (PDB, USA) [1] and ModBase [28], respectively. To predict the protective antigens and subunit vaccines, VaxiJen v2.0 was used [8].

Druggability of non-homologous essential proteins of A. pleuropneumoniae

DrugBank (ver. 4.3) [38], which contains unique bioinformatic and cheminformatic data on drugs and drug targets, was used to determine the druggability of the identified essential proteins. The proteins were aligned by using the default parameters with the available drug entries, which included U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved small molecule drugs, biotech (protein/peptide) drugs, nutraceuticals, and experimental drugs.

Results

In this study, A. pleuropneumoniae L20 (serotype 5b), with 104 identified pathways, was selected. The sequences of three different A. pleuropneumoniae strains are deposited in the NCBI-KEGG database. A. pleuropneumoniae JL03 (serotype 3) and A. pleuropneumoniae AP76 (serotype 7) have 105 and 106 pathways, respectively. We selected the strain with all of the common pathways for further analysis.
Comparison of the selected pathways in the pathogen to the 295 and 299 pathways in pig and human, respectively, showed that 29 pathways were unique to the pathogen. Twenty of these pathways were metabolic pathways (Table 1). More than 900 proteins were involved in the common and unique metabolic pathways; however, only 273 of them were non-homologous to both pig and human, based on the established KEGG cutoff value.
We aligned these non-homologous proteins with the essential protein sequences of Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20 (NC000907), which shares 85% genome similarity with A. pleuropneumoniae, in the DEG and identified 122 essential non-homologous proteins in A. pleuropneumoniae. These essential proteins were involved in 40 different metabolic pathways, and, of these 122 proteins, 13 were from 6 different unique metabolic pathways, which were only present in the pathogen.
These non-homologous proteins were compared with all of the essential proteins of the 37 bacteria in the DEG. The greatest numbers of homologous proteins were found for the essential proteins of Synechococcus elongate PCC 7942, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv II, and Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1, with 130, 127, and 126 hits, respectively. The smallest number of hits was for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium str. 14028S, with only nine homologous proteins (Fig. 2).
The cellular localization of each non-homologous protein was determined by using the CELLO database, and the results showed 95 cytoplasmic, 11 transmembrane, 4 periplasmic, and 2 outer membrane proteins as well as 10 proteins with undetermined localization. In the unique pathways, there were 7 cytoplasmic, 2 transmembrane, 1 periplasmic, and 1 outer membrane proteins and 2 with undetermined cellular localization. However, the TMHMM server predicted 14 transmembrane proteins, and 9 (64.3%) of them matched with the CELLO prediction (Table 2). Furthermore, 11 of them showed an antigenicity prediction > 0.4 in VaxiJen v2.0 (Table 3).
DrugBank was used to categorize the druggability of the identified essential proteins. Of the non-homologous essential proteins, 24 had a hit in DrugBank of an approved, nutraceutical, investigational, or experimental drug (Table 4). Six genes, appser1_11470, accC, guaA, rpoA, asd, and murC, had hits in DrugBank, with an e-value limit of 10−25. Each of these genes had at least a one hit of an approved, nutraceutical, or experimental drug.
The molecular weight of each essential protein was determined by using UniProt. Among the 122 essential non-homologous proteins, 120 had a low molecular weight (< 110 kDa; Table 2).
The essential proteins of A. pleuropneumoniae were then cross-checked for similarity to the proteins of M. hyopneumoniae, which is a major component of PRDC. Three proteins with similarity to essential proteins of M. hyopneumoniae were identified: DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit alpha, rpoA; methionine-tRNA ligase, metG; and glutamate-tRNA ligase, gltX.

Discussion

Previously, the development of new antimicrobial agents and vaccine therapies was limited by our understanding of the biology of the target microbial agents. However, in this post-genomic era, advances in the fields of genomics and proteomics have allowed for in silico investigations of new drugs and vaccine targets, by using genomic and protein sequence resources [6]. A. pleuropneumoniae, a bacterium known to cause PRDC in pigs [27], is often resistant to most of the drugs commonly used to treat the disease [37]. Thus, alternative therapeutic agents are greatly needed. In this study, by using an in silico approach, we identified unique proteins in the metabolic pathways of A. pleuropneumoniae as potential targets for antimicrobial and vaccine therapy.
Multiple unique metabolic pathways were identified in A. pleuropneumoniae that are not present in their natural host. The presence of these unique pathways offers an opportunity to identify antimicrobials that specifically target the pathogen, and thus, should be safe. Targeting essential genes/proteins in unique metabolic pathways, which are required for survival and replication, provides an extra advantage for designing potent therapeutic agents, since they should interfere with the survival and/or replication of the pathogen [2342].
Determining the cellular localization of a protein is an essential step toward identifying it as a potential target for therapeutic intervention [33]. This leads to elucidation of the function of each protein, which helps to differentiate between targets for antimicrobial agents and those for vaccine therapy [12]. Most of the identified non-host essential cytoplasmic proteins could serve as targets for antimicrobial treatment, while the transmembrane proteins, as suggested by the TMHMM, could be potential vaccine targets [16]. These transmembrane proteins may be selected toxins/surface-exposed proteins and may be used for the production of a preventive vaccine that initiates antibody-mediated immunity [7].
Most of the identified essential proteins of A. pleuropneumoniae (120/122) had a low molecular weight, thereby providing a broad opportunity for selecting and utilizing these proteins as targets for therapeutic intervention. Low molecular weight proteins are likely to be soluble and purified easily, which makes them suitable drug targets [9]. Moreover, the existence of FDA-approved, nutraceutical, or experimental drugs with the ability to bind proteins similar to the identified essential proteins of the pathogen demonstrates the potential druggability of these proteins as therapeutic targets and offers the opportunity of using different combinations of drugs to treat Actinobacillus infections in pigs. In fact, five FDA-approved drugs with hits in essential non-host A. pleuropneumoniae proteins were identified in this study.
Penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) and peptidoglycan synthetase, which are from a unique pathway in A. pleuropneumoniae, have been previously characterized as drug targets in other pathogens. In S. aureus, PBP2 is the only bifunctional penicillin-binding protein [1329], and the transpeptidase domain of the protein was reported to be critical for the survival and replication of the bacterium [28]. Peptidoglycan synthetase, FtsI, a cell division protein, is essential for the synthesis of peptidoglycan and catalyzes the synthesis of cross-linked peptidoglycan from lipid-linked precursors [2534]. Hence, inhibition of these proteins/enzymes using one or more drugs might reduce the infection rate and incidence of drug resistance in A. pleuropneumoniae.
The remaining transmembrane proteins, either from unique or common pathways, which showed antigenic and MHC cleavability, have been suggested as targets for vaccine therapy. Specifically, tetra-acyldisaccharide 4′-kinase and 3-deoxy-Dmanno-octulosonic-acid transferase, two transmembrane proteins in unique pathways, are involved in the synthesis of lipid A in the lipopolysaccharide layer [10]. Hence, these proteins could be targets for a host antibody response, since Gram-negative bacteria resist the host defense mechanism by upregulating their expression in the outer membrane. This upregulation results in an increased host response, which suggests the potential of these proteins as vaccine candidates [212639].
Glycerate dehydrogenase, 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase large subunit, 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, D-alanine--ligase, acyl-[acylcarrier-protein]--UDP-N-acetylglucosamine O-acyltransferase, UDP-3-O-acylglucosamine N-acyltransferase, and D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase/D-alanyl-D-alanine-endopeptidase are among the cytoplasmic proteins in unique metabolic pathways, and these can be targeted for the development of novel antimicrobial agents against A. pleuropneumoniae.
The cytoplasmic enzyme glycerate dehydrogenase (ldhA) is an essential protein from a unique pathway; moreover, it is involved in eight different metabolic pathways, but mainly in glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, which is crucial for the synthesis of carbohydrates in the anabolic pathway by converting acetyl CoA. Thus, blockage of this specific enzyme or the pathway might lead to bacterial cell death due to carbohydrate limitation. Therefore, the glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolic pathway could be a useful drug target for A. pleuropneumoniae.
Furthermore, three of the essential proteins of A. pleuropneumoniae are also essential for M. hyopneumoniae, which is another major component of PRDC [6]. The DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit alpha rpoA, which is involved in purine and pyrimidine metabolism, had a hit with an FDA-approved drug. Methionine-tRNA ligase (metG), which is an essential protein in selenocompound metabolism, had a hit in DrugBank for an experimental drug. Glutamate-tRNA ligase (gltX), an essential protein in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, catalyzes the binding of glutamate to tRNA (Glu) in a two-step reaction. Phosphorylation of this enzyme by HipA, a toxin and serine/threonine kinase, results in amino acid starvation; prevents replication, transcription, translation, and cell-wall synthesis, and it inhibits growth, leading to multidrug resistance and persistence [111830]. Targeting these proteins in both pathogens could be beneficial for preventing antimicrobial resistance and pig loss due to PRDC.
In conclusion, in silico approaches are of paramount importance when identifying target proteins and metabolic pathways as potential drug and vaccine therapy targets. In this study, we identified the glyoxylate and dicarboxylate pathways and glycerate dehydrogenase as putative targets for antimicrobial therapy against A. pleuropneumoniae; moreover, we identified tetra-acyldisaccharide 4′-kinase and 3-deoxy-D-mannooctulosonic-acid transferase as prospective vaccine targets. In addition, we identified three non-host essential proteins that are common to both A. pleuropneumoniae and M. hyopneumoniae; proteins that could serve as targets for antimicrobial therapy against both pathogens. However, although an in silico-based approach involves a series of screens for proteins that can be used as potential drug targets and vaccine candidates, the method has a major limitation in that the identified target proteins require experimental confirmation of their potential. In addition, non-protein vaccine and drug targets cannot be identified by applying this method [31]. Thus, a study should be undertaken to identify any unlisted pathogenic genes of A. pleuropneumoniae and determine the practicability of using the proteins and pathways identified as targets for drug and vaccine therapies.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Schematic of the in silico method used. Each protein was checked for homology in the respective databases. NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DEG, Database of Essential Genes; PDB, Protein Data Bank; 3D, three-dimensional.

jvs-19-188-g001
Fig. 2

Number of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae genes with essential gene hits in the Database of Essential Genes (DEG). The essential genes of A. pleuropneumoniae were identified by comparison to those of all 36 bacteria in the DEG.

jvs-19-188-g002
Table 1

Unique metabolic pathways of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae

jvs-19-188-i001

The unique pathways were identified from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database of the A. pleuropneumoniae L20 (serotype 5b) strain, which has 104 metabolic pathways. The pathways in this strain were compared with the 295 and 299 metabolic pathways of pig and human, respectively.

Table 2

Cellular localization of non-homologous essential proteins of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and their molecular weight (MW)

jvs-19-188-i002
Table 3

Antigenic prediction of the transmembrane proteins of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae using Vaxijen v.20 [8]

jvs-19-188-i003

*Threshold value used was 0.4.

Table 4

Similarity of the non-homologous proteins of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae to the binding proteins of FDA-approved drugs from DrugBank [38]

jvs-19-188-i004

FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Kyungpook National University Bokhyeon Research Fund, 2016.

Notes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28:235–242.
crossref
2. Bossé JT, Janson H, Sheehan BJ, Beddek AJ, Rycroft AN, Kroll JS, Langford PR. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection. Microbes Infect. 2002; 4:225–235.
crossref
3. Butt AM, Nasrullah I, Tahir S, Tong Y. Comparative genomics analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans for the identification of putative essential genes and therapeutic candidates. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e43080.
4. Chawley P, Samal HB, Prava J, Suar M, Mahapatra RK. Comparative genomics study for identification of drug and vaccine targets in Vibrio cholerae: MurA ligase as a case study. Genomics. 2014; 103:83–93.
crossref
5. Chung WB, Bäckström LR, Collins MT. Experimental model of swine pneumonic pasteurellosis using crude Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae cytotoxin and Pasteurella multocida given endobronchially. Can J Vet Res. 1994; 58:25–30.
6. Damte D, Suh JW, Lee SJ, Yohannes SB, Hossain MA, Park SC. Putative drug and vaccine target protein identification using comparative genomic analysis of KEGG annotated metabolic pathways of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Genomics. 2013; 102:47–56.
crossref
7. Doro F, Liberatori S, Rodríguez-Ortega MJ, Rinaudo CD, Rosini R, Mora M, Scarselli M, Altindis E, D'Aurizio R, Stella M, Margarit I, Maione D, Telford JL, Norais N, Grandi G. Surfome analysis as a fast track to vaccine discovery: identification of a novel protective antigen for Group B Streptococcus hypervirulent strain COH1. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8:1728–1737.
8. Doytchinova IA, Flower DR. Bioinformatic approach for identifying parasite and fungal candidate subunit vaccines. Open Vaccine J. 2008; 1:22–26.
crossref
9. Duffield M, Cooper I, McAlister E, Bayliss M, Ford D, Oyston P. Predicting conserved essential genes in bacteria: in silico identification of putative drug targets. Mol Biosyst. 2010; 6:2482–2489.
crossref
10. Garrett TA, Que NL, Raetz CR. Accumulation of a lipid A precursor lacking the 4′-phosphate following inactivation of the Escherichia coli lpxK gene. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273:12457–12465.
crossref
11. Germain E, Castro-Roa D, Zenkin N, Gerdes K. Molecular mechanism of bacterial persistence by HipA. Mol Cell. 2013; 52:248–254.
crossref
12. Glory E, Murphy RF. Automated subcellular location determination and high-throughput microscopy. Dev Cell. 2007; 12:7–16.
crossref
13. Goffin C, Ghuysen JM. Multimodular penicillin-binding proteins: an enigmatic family of orthologs and paralogs. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998; 62:1079–1093.
crossref
14. Gottschalk M. Actinobacillosis. In : Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of Swine. 10th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell;2012. p. 653–669.
15. Huang H, Potter AA, Campos M, Leighton FA, Willson PJ, Haines DM, Yates WD. Pathogenesis of porcine Actinobacillus pleuropneumonia, part II: roles of proinflammatory cytokines. Can J Vet Res. 1999; 63:69–78.
16. Hung MC, Link W. Protein localization in disease and therapy. J Cell Sci. 2011; 124:3381–3392.
crossref
17. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:D457–D462.
crossref
18. Kaspy I, Rotem E, Weiss N, Ronin I, Balaban NQ, Glaser G. HipA-mediated antibiotic persistence via phosphorylation of the glutamyl-tRNA-synthetase. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:3001.
crossref
19. Kim B, Min K, Choi C, Cho WS, Cheon DS, Kwon D, Kim J, Chae C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from pigs in Korea using new standardized procedures. J Vet Med Sci. 2001; 63:341–342.
crossref
20. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001; 305:567–580.
crossref
21. Li C, Ye Z, Wen L, Chen R, Tian L, Zhao F, Pan J. Identification of a novel vaccine candidate by immunogenic screening of Vibrio parahaemolyticus outer membrane proteins. Vaccine. 2014; 32:6115–6121.
crossref
22. Luo H, Lin Y, Gao F, Zhang CT, Zhang R. DEG 10, an update of the database of essential genes that includes both protein-coding genes and noncoding genomic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D574–D580.
23. Mobegi FM, van Hijum SA, Burghout P, Bootsma HJ, de Vries SP, van der Gaast-de Jongh CE, Simonetti E, Langereis JD, Hermans PW, de Jonge MI, Zomer A. From microbial gene essentiality to novel antimicrobial drug targets. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15:958.
crossref
24. Morya VK, Dewaker V, Mecarty SD, Singh R. In silico analysis metabolic pathways for identification of putative drug targets for Staphylococcus aureus. J Comput Sci Syst Biol. 2010; 3:62–69.
25. Nguyen-Distèche M, Fraipont C, Buddelmeijer N, Nanninga N. The structure and function of Escherichia coli penicillin-binding protein 3. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1998; 54:309–316.
crossref
26. Nishio M, Okada N, Miki T, Haneda T, Danbara H. Identification of the outer-membrane protein PagC required for the serum resistance phenotype in Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis. Microbiology. 2005; 151:863–873.
crossref
27. Opriessnig T, Giménez-Lirola LG, Halbur PG. Polymicrobial respiratory disease in pigs. Anim Health Res Rev. 2011; 12:133–148.
crossref
28. Pieper U, Webb BM, Dong GQ, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Fan H, Kim SJ, Khuri N, Spill YG, Weinkam P, Hammel M, Tainer JA, Nilges M, Sali A. ModBase, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:D336–D346.
crossref
29. Pinho MG, Filipe SR, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. Complementation of the essential peptidoglycan transpeptidase function of penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) by the drug resistance protein PBP2A in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183:6525–6531.
crossref
30. Potrykus K, Cashel M. (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008; 62:35–51.
crossref
31. Seib KL, Dougan G, Rappuoli R. The key role of genomics in modern vaccine and drug design for emerging infectious diseases. PLoS Genet. 2009; 5:e1000612.
crossref
32. Shanmugham B, Pan A. Identification and characterization of potential therapeutic candidates in emerging human pathogen Mycobacterium abscessus: a novel hierarchical in silico approach. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e59126.
33. Simon I, Wright M, Flohr T, Hevezi P, Caras IW. Determining subcellular localization of novel drug targets by transient transfection in COS cells. Cytotechnology. 2001; 35:189–196.
34. Spratt BG. Distinct penicillin binding proteins involved in the division, elongation, and shape of Escherichia coli K12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72:2999–3003.
crossref
35. Uddin R, Saeed K, Khan W, Azam SS, Wadood A. Metabolic pathway analysis approach: identification of novel therapeutic target against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Gene. 2015; 556:213–226.
crossref
36. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43:D204–D212.
37. Vanni M, Merenda M, Barigazzi G, Garbarino C, Luppi A, Tognetti R, Intorre L. Antimicrobial resistance of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolated from swine. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 156:172–177.
crossref
38. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Shrivastava S, Hassanali M, Stothard P, Chang Z, Woolsey J. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34:D668–D672.
39. Wu XB, Tian LH, Zou HJ, Wang CY, Yu ZQ, Tang CH, Zhao FK, Pan JY. Outer membrane protein OmpW of Escherichia coli is required for resistance to phagocytosis. Res Microbiol. 2013; 164:848–855.
crossref
40. Yoo AN, Cha SB, Shin MK, Won HK, Kim EH, Choi HW, Yoo HS. Serotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of the recent Korean Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates. Vet Rec. 2014; 174:223.
crossref
41. Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins. 2006; 64:643–651.
crossref
42. Zhang R, Lin Y. DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:D455–D458.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles