Journal List > Korean J Women Health Nurs > v.19(4) > 1089452

Wang, Park, and Kim: Comparison of Prenatal Health Management State and Educational Needs for Pregnant Women with Advanced Maternal Age and Under the Age of 35

Abstract

Purpose

This study was done to confirm prenatal health management and educational needs for pregnant women with advanced maternal age (AMA) and pregnant women under 35 years of age.

Methods

This study was a descriptive research in which self-report questionnaires were used. Participants were 279 pregnant women (83 AMA and 196 less than 35).

Results

Only 32.5% of AMA women had received prenatal education and 51.8% reported wanting internet education. AMA women, compared to the under 35 women, had higher levels of self-awareness of health problems and possibility of health problems but lower levels of alcohol experience before pregnancy. For prenatal health management, scores were low for prenatal exercise, prenatal education and nutrition. For prenatal health management education, AMA women reported high levels of need for education on health problems.

Conclusion

The results indicate that prenatal health management education must be given considering differences in age-related requirements by emphasizing health care and obstetric complications during pregnancy for AMA womenand anemia and information on substance use during pregnancy for women under 35. Reliable internet-based education programs need to be developed using available information and communication technology for the increasing number of employed pregnant women.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Sociodemographic Background of Advanced Maternal Age (≥35) and Maternal Age (<35) (N=279)
kjwhn-19-230-i001
Table 2
Obstetric Characteristics of Advanced Maternal Age (≥35) and Maternal Age (<35) (N=279)
kjwhn-19-230-i002

Fisher's exact test.

Table 3
State and Need of Prenatal Education between Advanced Maternal Age (≥35) and Maternal Age (<35) (N=279)
kjwhn-19-230-i003

EPE=experience of prenatal education.

Multiple response.

Table 4
Prenatal Health Management of Advanced Maternal Age (≥35) and Maternal Age (<35) (N=279)
kjwhn-19-230-i004

AMA=advanced maternal age (age≥35).

Table 5
Prenatal Educational Need of Advanced Maternal Age (≥35) and Maternal Age (<35) (N=279)
kjwhn-19-230-i005

AMA=advanced maternal age (age≥35).

Notes

This study was supported by the research fund of Sahmyook University.

References

1. Ahn JY. The utilization and satisfaction of websites on prenatal education and contents analysis. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;2002. Unpublished master's thesis.
2. Ataullah I, Freeman-Wang T. The older obstetric patient. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 15:46–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.curobgyn.2004.09.006.
crossref
3. Bae JY. Development of a health educational program for maternal health. Korean Parent Child Health J. 2006; 9:101–115.
4. Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, Tough S. Advanced maternal age and risk perception: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-100.
crossref
5. Cha H. A study on the factors affecting prenatal care of pregnant women. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;1998. Unpublished master's thesis.
6. Cheil General Hospital & Women's Health care Center. Elderly pregnant women need to be most careful of pregnancy complications, gestational diabetes. Cheil Gen Hosp Womens Health Care Cent News. 2012; 16:2.
7. Cho DS, Kim YM, Hur MH, Oh HS, Kim EY. Mother's prenatal care and delivery service satisfaction according to mode of delivery. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2009; 15:353–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2009.15.4.353.
8. Choi JH, Han HJ, Hwang JH, Chung SR, Moon H, Park MI, et al. Meta analysis of clinical studies of pregnancy and delivery in elderly gravida. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49:293–308.
9. Chun YJ. A study on the educational needs and satisfaction of primigravida during the antepartal period. J Korean Acad Womens Health Nurs. 1998; 4:187–202.
10. Dick W, Carey L, Carey JO. DS Kim MH Kang YH Seol . The systematic design of instruction. Paju: Academy Press;2009. (Original Work published 2009).
11. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39:175–191.
12. Hwang NM. The necessity for establishing a public prenatal health promotion and education system. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2010; 163:50–64.
13. Kim DS, Kim YT, Kim TH, Kim SM. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Korea:a comprehensive approach to prenatal care. Seoul: Korean Women's Development Institute;2011.
14. Kim KW, Lee KH. Women experience of risk situation on the high-risk pregnancy. J Korean Acad Womens Health Nurs. 1998; 4:121–133.
15. Kim MJ, Na ED, Lee KJ, Cha DH, Shin JS, Lee HY. Pregnancy prognosis according to pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 55:300–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/KJOG.2012.55.5.300.
crossref
16. Korea National Statistics Office. 2011 Polisumer 6. 2010. Retrieved August, 30, 2010. from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/14/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=178657.
17. Korea National Statistics Office. 2012 Birth·mortality statistics. 2013. Retrieved February 26, 2013. from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=271935.
18. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: A web-based survey. Birth. 2010; 37:106–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00390.x.
crossref
19. Lee EJ, Kim YH, Kwon JY, Park YW. Pregnancy outcome according to gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies on the basis of the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53:687–693.
crossref
20. Lee MK, Shin HS, Lee YJ, Kim JH. Impact of advanced maternal and paternal age on perinatal outcomes. J Korean Acad soc Nurs Educ. 2012; 18:95–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.1.095.
21. Lee ML. A study on the relationship between pregnant women's health belief and performance of antenatal care. Seoul: Ewha Womans University;1984. Unpublished a doctor's thesis.
22. Mills TA, Lavender T. Advanced maternal age. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2011; 21:107–111.
crossref
23. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A study on efficient management of high risk pregnant women in Korea. Seoul: Author;2005.
24. Montan S. Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19:110–112.
crossref
25. Park CH, Lee CU. Effect of antenatal education on pregnant women. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2002; 8:34–54.
crossref
26. Park HJ, Lee SH, Cha DH, Kim IH, Jun HS, Lee KJ, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women aged 35 and older. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49:2066–2074.
27. Sung MH, Ju MS, Ju GS. Effect of prepared childbirth education on the knowledge and delivery participation levels of the spouses of primiparas. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2003; 9:213–223.
28. Tough S, Benzies K, Newburn-Cook C, Tofflemire K, Fraser-Lee N, Faber A, et al. What do women know about the risks of delayed childbearing? Can J Public Health. 2006; 97:330–334.
crossref
29. Yeom GJ, Choi SY, Kim IO. The influencing factors on alcohol use during pregnancy. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2011; 15:71–81.
30. Yoon JW. Prenatal maternal health behaviors and related factors. Seoul: Korea University;2000. Unpublished master's thesis.
TOOLS
Similar articles