Journal List > J Korean Orthop Assoc > v.46(3) > 1013073

Jeong, Song, Seon, Byun, Lee, and Jung: Effectiveness of Pain Relief for Femoral Nerve Block in Multimodal Pain Control Protocols in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Purpose

Authors evaluated the effectiveness of pain relief of the femoral nerve block in multimodal pain control protocols for patients with total knee arthroplasty in early postoperative period.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-six patients who underwent TKA under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. Preemptive analgesic medication, periarticular multimodal drug injection, and IV-PCA were used for pain control in all patients. This single-blind, randomized controlled trial included 43 patients in the nerve block group and 33 patients in the control group. In the former group, the femoral nerve block was done by one author with a nerve stimulator set using 0.5% bupivacaine 20 ml and 1% lidocaine 10 ml. Pain scale was measured at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days postoperatively. In addition, amount of IV-PCA consumption, numbers of using acute pain rescuer, range of motion, straight leg raising, first ambulation time, and complications related with drugs were evaluated.

Results

Pain scale and the amount of IV-PCA consumption were significantly lower in nerve block group until 48 hours (p=0.04, 0.03), and the range of motion was better compared to the control group (p≤0.02). The number of pain rescue medicines was significantly low in nerve block group within the first 3 days postoperatively (1.36 vs 2.58). The ability to raise a straightened leg was recovered more rapidly in the control group than in the nerve block group; this difference was statistically significant (12 vs 27.9 hours, p=0.02). There were no differences in first ambulation time and incidence of complications between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

Femoral nerve block in the early period after TKA under multimodal pain control protocols showed significant improvement in pain relief and in range of motion, as well as a significant decrease in the requirement of IV PCA and acute pain rescuers.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Photograph illustrating periarticular injection in posterior part of knee joint before implant placement.
jkoa-46-237-g001
Figure 2
Photographs illustrating procedure of a femoral nerve block after sterile preparation (A) and 5 cm, 22 gauge Stimuplex insulated needle (B).
jkoa-46-237-g002
Table 1
Demography according to the Method of Pain Control
jkoa-46-237-i001

*Data show mean. control group; femoral nerve block group; ROM, range of motion; Mech. axis, mechanical axis; HSS, Hospital for Special Surgery score; FNB, femoral nerve block; N/A, not applicable.

Table 2
Pain Scale (by White AH)
jkoa-46-237-i002
Table 3
Sequential Comparison of Postoperative Pain Scale
jkoa-46-237-i003

Data show mean±SD; *independent-samples t-test, p<0.05; ROM, range of motion.

Table 4
Sequential Comparison of Postoperative Active Range of Motion of the Knee
jkoa-46-237-i004

Data show mean±SD; *independent-samples t-test, p<0.05.

Table 5
Comparison of the Amount of Volume Infused by Intravenous Patient Controlled Anesthesia
jkoa-46-237-i005

Data show mean±SD; *independent-samples t-test, p<0.05.

Table 6
Comparison of Complications by Injected Drug
jkoa-46-237-i006

*Pearson's chi-square, p>0.05; Persist Q-m weakness, persist quadriceps muscle weakness.

References

1. Williams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Haas SB, et al. Randomized trial of epidural versus general anesthesia: outcomes after primary total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. (331):199–208.
2. Enneking FK, Chan V, Greger J, Hadzić A, Lang SA, Horlocker TT. Lower-extremity peripheral nerve blockade: essentials of our current understanding. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005. 30:4–35.
crossref
3. Barrington MJ, Olive D, Low K, Scott DA, Brittain J, Choong P. Continuous femoral nerve blockade or epidural analgesia after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2005. 101:1824–1829.
crossref
4. Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, Rubenovitch J, d'Athis F. Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999. 91:8–15.
crossref
5. Singelyn FJ, Deyaert M, Joris D, Pendeville E, Gouverneur JM. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous three-in-one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 1998. 87:88–92.
crossref
6. Zaric D, Boysen K, Christiansen C, Christiansen J, Stephensen S, Christensen B. A comparison of epidural analgesia with combined continuous femoral-sciatic nerve blocks after total knee replacement. Anesth Analg. 2006. 102:1240–1246.
crossref
7. White AH. Back school and other conservative approaches to low back pain. 1983. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby;13–14.
8. Kardash K, Hickey D, Tessler MJ, Payne S, Zukor D, Velly AM. Obturator versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2007. 105:853–858.
crossref
9. Chelly JE, Greger J, Gebhard R, et al. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001. 16:436–445.
crossref
10. Wang H, Boctor B, Verner J. The effect of single-injection femoral nerve block on rehabilitation and length of hospital stay after total knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002. 27:139–144.
crossref
11. Ng HP, Cheong KF, Lim A, Lim J, Puhaindran ME. Intraoperative single-shot "3-in-1" femoral nerve block with ropivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.5% or bupivacaine 0.25% provides comparable 48-hr analgesia after unilateral total knee replacement. Can J Anaesth. 2001. 48:1102–1108.
12. Hunt KJ, Bourne MH, Mariani EM. Single-injection femoral and sciatic nerve blocks for pain control after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009. 24:533–538.
crossref
13. Allen HW, Liu SS, Ware PD, Nairn CS, Owens BD. Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998. 87:93–97.
crossref
14. Hirst GC, Lang SA, Dust WN, Cassidy JD, Yip RW. Femoral nerve block. Single injection versus continuous infusion for total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth. 1996. 21:292–297.
15. Ben-David B, Schmalenberger K, Chelly JE. Analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: is continuous sciatic blockade needed in addition to continuous femoral blockade? Anesth Analg. 2004. 98:747–749.
crossref
16. Levesque S, Delbos A. Sciatic nerve block for total-knee replacement: is it really necessary in all patients? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005. 30:410–411.
crossref
17. Bergeron SG, Kardash KJ, Huk OL, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Functional outcome of femoral versus obturator nerve block after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. 467:1458–1462.
crossref
18. Salinas FV, Liu SS, Mulroy MF. The effect of single-injection femoral nerve block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty on hospital length of stay and long-term functional recovery within an established clinical pathway. Anesth Analg. 2006. 102:1234–1239.
crossref
19. Kim JM, Lee DY, Koh IJ, Kim JI, Ra KH. Effect of regional nerve block in total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2009. 44:586–592.
crossref
20. Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, et al. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. 88:959–963.
21. Mauerhan DR, Campbell M, Miller JS, Mokris JG, Gregory A, Kiebzak GM. Intra-articular morphine and/or bupivacaine in the management of pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997. 12:546–552.
crossref
22. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Mallory TH, Dodds KL, Adams JB. Soft tissue and intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine has a beneficial effect after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. (428):125–130.
crossref
23. Klasen JA, Opitz SA, Melzer C, Thiel A, Hempelmann G. Intraarticular, epidural, and intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999. 43:1021–1026.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles