Journal List > Infect Chemother > v.44(3) > 1035145

Lee, Kim, Kim, Hong, and Lee: Opinions of Infectious Disease Specialists on the Current Method for Isolation of Group 1 Nationally Notifiable Infectious Diseases in Korea

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to collect the opinions of doctors who are specialists in infectious disease with regard to the current method used for isolation of patients with group 1 nationally notifiable infectious diseases in Korea. A web-based survey was conducted from June 27 to July 7, 2011. Relevant questions included: 1) adequacy of the current policy of forced hospital isolation; evaluation of current guidelines for release from hospital isolation; and 3) priority for policy switching from forced hospital isolation to home isolation. The rate of response to the survey was 28.4% (40 out of 140). First, the majority of infectious disease specialists in Korea believed that the current method of forced hospital isolation for patients with group 1 infectious diseases should be changed to the home isolation method. Second, if the Korean government changes its policy to home isolation, the top priority of the policy switch would be typhoid fever, followed by paratyphoid fever, shigellosis, cholera, and EHEC (enterohemorigic Escherichia coli). Regarding current guidelines for release from hospital isolation, in cases of shigellosis, EHEC, and hepatitis A, the majority of respondents supported the current guidelines, while they were not able to make collective opinions in cases of cholera and typhoid/paratyphoid fever. We were able to confirm that the majority of specialists want to change the current isolation method. Therefore, the Korean government should consider switching their policy from forced hospital isolation to home isolation.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Opinions of Infectious Disease Specialists on Current Isolation Guidelines
ic-44-185-i001

aNumbers in parentheses refer to average scores of the priority for policy switching according to each infectious disease. Therefore, the lower score, the higher the priority.

References

1. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Preventive medicine and public health. 2011. Seoul: Gye Chuk Mun Wha Sa Publishing Co.
2. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 guideline for infectious diseases. Accesed 20 February 2012. Available at: https://schoolhealth.kedi.re.kr/LuBoard/SHealth/SHDataBbsView.php?LstNum1=871&PageNum=7&GbnCode=01.
3. Heymann DL. Control of communicable diseases manual. 2008. 19th ed. Washington D.C: APHA Press.
4. Guerrant RL, Van Gilder T, Steiner TS, Thielman NM, Slutsker L, Tauxe RV, Hennessy T, Griffin PM, DuPont H, Sack RB, Tarr P, Neill M, Nachamkin I, Reller LB, Osterholm MT, Bennish ML, Pickering LK. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the management of infectious diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2001. 32:331–351.
crossref
5. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L. the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Settings. Accessed 20 February 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/isolation2007.pdf.
6. PHLS Advisory Committee on Gastrointestinal Infections. Preventing person-to-person spread following gastrointestinal infections: guidelines for public health physicians and environmental health officers. Commun Dis Public Health. 2004. 7:362–384.
7. Kim ES. Dongkook University. Determining of duration of patient isolation and analysis of related factors in group 1 nationally notifiable communicable diseases. 2011. Seoul: KCDC.
TOOLS
Similar articles