Journal List > Korean J Lab Med > v.30(6) > 1011692

Korean J Lab Med. 2010 Dec;30(6):559-566. Korean.
Published online December 02, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.559
Copyright © 2010 The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
Current Status and Proposal of a Guideline for Manual Slide Review of Automated Complete Blood Cell Count and White Blood Cell Dfferential
Hee-Yeon Woo, M.D.,1 Sang-Yong Shin, M.D.,1 Hyosoon Park, M.D.,1 Young Jae Kim, M.D.,2 Hee-Jin Kim, M.D.,3 Young Kyung Lee, M.D.,4 Seok-Lae Chae, M.D.,5 Yoon Hwan Chang, M.D.,6 Jong Rak Choi, M.D.,7 Kyungja Han, M.D.,8 Sung Ran Cho, M.D.,9 and Kye Chul Kwon, M.D.10
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.
5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Korea.
6Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
7Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
8Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
9Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
10Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Corresponding author: Hyosoon Park, M.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyeong-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-746, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2001-2368, Fax: +82-2-2001-2364, Email: hspcp@naver.com
Received April 30, 2010; Revised July 01, 2010; Accepted September 15, 2010.

Abstract

Background

Manual slide review (MSR) is usually triggered by the results of automated hematolgy analyzers, but each laboaratory has different ciriteria for MSR. This study was carried out to investigate the current status of MSR criteria of automated complete blood cell count (CBC) and white blood cell (WBC) differential results and to propose a basic guideline for MSR.

Methods

Total 111 laboratories were surveyed regarding MSR using questionnaires. The questionnaire asked: kinds of automated hematology analyzers used and the presence of criteria triggering MSR in seven categories: 1) CBC results, 2) 5 differential WBC counts, 3) 3 differential WBC counts, 4) automated reticulocyte counts, 5) delta check, 6) instrument flags (or messages), 7) clinical information (wards or diseases). Based on the survey results, we determined basic and extended criteria for MSR. With these criteria, we consulted nine hematology experts to get a consensus.

Results

All 111 laboratories had their own MSR criteria. Among 111 laboratories, 98 (88.3%) used more than three criteria for MSR including CBC results and 5-part WBC differential count results and 95 (85.6%) had criteria of flags triggering MSR. For MSR criteria with numeric values, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of upper and lower threshold values were obtained. The basic guideline for MSR was made.

Conclusions

We proposed a basic guideline for MSR. This guideline would be helpful to hematology laboratories for their daily operation and providing more rapid and accurate CBC and WBC differential results.

Keywords: Hematology; Manual slide review; Guideline

Tables


Table 1
Distribution of automated hematology analyzers
Click for larger image


Table 2
Distribution of criteria for MSR according to the number of criteria used
Click for larger image


Table 3
Distribution of lower and upper threshold values for CBC parameters triggering MSR
Click for larger image


Table 4
Distribution of lower and upper threshold values for 5-part WBC differential counts triggering MSR
Click for larger image


Table 5
Distribution of flags triggering MSR
Click for larger image


Table 6
Distribution of lower and upper threshold values for automated reticulocyte count triggering MSR
Click for larger image


Table 7
Distribution of delta check values triggering MSR
Click for larger image


Table 8
Presence of MSR criteria according to clinical information (wards)
Click for larger image


Table 9
A proposed guideline for MSR
Click for larger image

Notes

This work was supported by the "2008 Quality Improvement Research Program of the Laboratory Accreditation Committee, Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine (KSLM)".

References
1. Kang SH, Kim HK, Ham CK, Lee DS, Cho HI. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Int J Lab Hematol 2008;30:480–486.
2. Stroop DM, Triplett RC, Perrotta G, Roberts LP, Schramm RC, Comer K, et al. Comparison of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3000-SL and the Coulter-STKS hematology analyzers. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1994;24:250–258.
3. Bentley SA, Johnson A, Bishop CA. A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers. Am J Clin Pathol 1993;100:626–632.
4. Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Knöbl P, Korninger L, Schwarzinger I. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:573–577.
5. Buttarello M, Plebani M. Automated blood cell counts: state of the art. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:104–116.
6. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005;353:498–507.
7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference leukocyte (WBC) differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrumental methods: approved standard. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and laboratory standards institute; 2007. CLSI document H20-A2; pp. 1-63.
8. Novis DA, Walsh M, Wilkinson D, St Louis M, Ben-Ezra J. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:596–601.
9. Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson E. International consensus group for hematology. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005;11:83–90.
10. Lantis KL, Harris RJ, Davis G, Renner N, Finn WG. Elimination of instrument-driven reflex manual differential leukocyte counts. Optimization of manual blood smear review criteria in a high-volume automated hematology laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:656–662.
11. Hyun BH, Gulati GL, Ashton JK. Differential leukocyte count: manual or automated, what should it be? Yonsei Med J 1991;32:283–291.
12. Swaim WR. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of white blood cell differential counts. Comparison of the Coulter VCS, Technicon H-1, and 800-cell manual method. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;95:381–388.
13. Gulati G, Behling E, Kocher W, Schwarting R. An evaluation of the performance of Sysmex XE-2100 in enumerating nucleated red cells in peripheral blood. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:1077–1083.
14. Lee YK, Kang HJ, Kim YM, Won CY, Cho HC. Evaluation of the ABX Pentra DX 120 for the detection of immature cells in peripheral blood. J Lab Med Qual Assur 2008;30:249–258.
15. Ruzicka K, Veitl M, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, Schwarzinger I. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:391–396.
16. Peterson P, Blomberg DJ, Rabinovitch A, Cornbleet PJ. Physician review of the peripheral blood smear: when and why. An opinion. Lab Hematol 2001;7:175–179.
TOOLS
Similar articles

Differential Blast Counts Obtained by Automated Blood Cell Analyzers

White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology

Utilization of Mean Peroxidase Index for Discrimination of Pseudoneutropenia

Purpose and Criteria for Blood Smear Scan, Blood Smear Examination, and Blood Smear Review

Differential leukocyte count: manual or automated, what should it be?