Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.58(11) > 1010664

Kim and Kim: Clinical Features of Recurrent Intermittent Exotropia after Reoperation for Intermittent Exotropia

Abstract

Purpose

We reviewed the clinical features of intermittent exotropic patients who experienced recurrence after reoperation for intermittent exotropia, and identified the risk factors and prognoses.

Methods

The incidences, risk factors, treatment modalities, and prognoses of patients with recurrent exotropia were analyzed in 39 patients who underwent reoperation due to a relapse of exotropia after the first intermittent exotropia.

Results

Among 39 patients, 24 (61.5%) had recurrent intermittent exotropia and 15 patients had no recurrence with intermittent exotropia. There was no difference in the recurrence of intermittent exotropia with age, deviation, refraction, anisometropia, outward discrepancy, and the vertical deviation before the reoperation. However, when the first operation was performed with bilateral lateral rectus recession and the reoperation was performed with bilateral medial rectus resection or unilateral medial rectus resection, intermittent exotropia tended to recur more than when the first operation was performed with one eye with lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection, followed by reoperation with the other lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (p < 0.05). In addition, an esodeviation <10 prism diopters, orthophoria, or exotropia on the first postoperative day showed a tendency to relapse more than an esodeviation >10 prism diopters (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The factors affecting recurrence after intermittent exotropia surgery involve surgical factors such as the surgical method and the postoperative overcorrection.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Probable factors associated with onset of multiple recurred exotropia after reoperation of intermittent exotropia

jkos-58-1248-i001

Values are presented as mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

op = operation; PD = prism diopter; HT = hypertropia; ET = esotropia; XT = exotropia; BLR = both lateral muscle recession; BMR = both medial muscle resection; UMR = unilateral medial muscle resection; RR = recession and resection.

*Chi-square test; Mann-Whitney test; Student T test; §Fischer exact test.

Table 2

Clinical features of patients who underwent intermittent exotropia surgery three times

jkos-58-1248-i002

op. = operation; PD = prism diopters; F = female; M = male; BMR = both medial muscle resection; BLR = both lateral muscle recession; LMR = left medial muscle resection; RMR = right medial muscle resection.

*A negative value indicates esodeviation.

Notes

This study was presented as a narration at the 117th Annual Meeting of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017.

This study was supported by research fund from Chosun University, 2016.

Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

1. Figueira EC, Hing S. Intermittent exotropia: comparison of treatments. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 34:245–251.
2. Oh JY, Hwang JM. Survival analysis of 365 patients with exotropia after surgery. Eye (Lond). 2006; 20:1268–1272.
3. Ekdawi NS, Nusz KJ, Diehl NN, Mohney BG. Postoperative outcomes in children with intermittent exotropia from a population-based cohort. J AAPOS. 2009; 13:4–7.
4. Ruttum MS. Initial versus subsequent postoperative motor alignment in intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 1997; 1:88–91.
5. Keenan JM, Willshaw HE. The outcome of strabismus surgery in childhood exotropia. Eye (Lond). 1994; 8(Pt 6):632–637.
6. Stoller SH, Simon JW, Lininger LL. Bilateral lateral rectus recession for exotropia. a survival analysis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1994; 31:89–92.
7. Gezer A, Sezen F, Nasri N, Gözüm N. Factors influencing the outcome of strabismus surgery in patient with exotropia. J AAPOS. 2004; 8:56–60.
8. Hahm IR, Yoon SW, Baek SH, Kong SM. The clinical course of recurrent exotropia after reoperation for exodeviation. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19:140–144.
9. Kim SJ, Choi DG. The clinical analysis after reoperation for recurrent intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:321–327.
10. Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti. Early and late postoperative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82:203–208.
11. Knapp P. Management of exotropia in Transactions of the New Orleans Academy. St. Louis: CV Mosby;1971. p. 233–241.
12. Choi DG, Kim PS. The surgical outcome of intermittent exotropia and the prognostic factors. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1998; 39:1255–1263.
13. Kim WJ, Kim MM. The clinical course of recurrent intermittent exotropia after previous unilateral recess-resection surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009; 50:1386–1391.
14. Mun HJ, Kim MM. Comparison of surgical results between bilateral recession and unilateral recession-resection in 25 PD intermittent exotropia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2002; 43:2202–2207.
15. Hur J, Won IG. Surgical results of 79 cases of intermittent exotropia in children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1990; 31:114–119.
16. Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distance/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:324–328.
17. Rayner JW, Jampolsky A. Management of adult patients with large angle amblyopic exotropia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1973; 5:95–99.
18. Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia. Surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1172–1177.
19. Edelman PM. Consecutive esodeviation…then what? Am Orthopt J. 1988; 38:111–116.
TOOLS
Similar articles