Journal List > J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > v.52(7) > 1009078

Choi and Yoon: Effect of 0.1% Sodium Hyaluronate and 0.05% Cyclosporine on Tear Film Parameters after Cataract Surgery

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of topical 0.1% sodium hyaluronate (HA) and 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA) on tear film parameters after cataract surgery.

Methods

A total of 109 eyes of 86 patients who underwent cataract surgery were divided into four groups: 74 eyes without dry eye syndrome (groups 1 and 2) and 35 eyes with dry eye syndrome (groups 3 and 4). Groups 1 (37 eyes) and 3 (17 eyes) used 0.1% HA only, while Groups 2 (37 eyes) and 4 (18 eyes) used both 0.1% HA and 0.05% CsA. Tear film breakup time (BUT), Schirmer's test, tear clearance rate (TCR) and keratoepitheliopathy were evaluated before surgery and 1 week, 1 month, 2, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Results

BUT, Schirmer's test and TCR recovered at postoperative 3 months in groups 1 and 3, after 2 months in group 2 and after 1 month in group 4. Keratoepitheliopathy recovered at postoperative 1 month in groups 1, 2 and 4, after 2 months in group 3.

Conclusions

The combined use of topical 0.1% HA with 0.05% CsA is helpful in restoring tear film parameters after cataract surgery especially in patients with dry eye syndrome.

References

1. The definition of classification of dry eye diseases: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf. 2007; 5:75–92.
2. Horwath-Winter J, Vidic B, Schwantzer G, Schmut O. Early changes in corneal sensation, ocular surface integrity, and tear-film function after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:2316–21.
crossref
3. Li XM, Hu L, Hu J, Wang W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea. 2007; 26(9 Suppl 1):S16–20.
crossref
4. Pflugfelder SC, Solomon A, Stern ME. The diagnosis and management of dry eye: a twenty-five-year review. Cornea. 2000; 19:644–9.
5. Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG. Cyclosporine: immunology, pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986; 31:159–69.
crossref
6. Hemady R, Tauber J, Foster CS. Immunosuppressive drugs in immune and inflammatory ocular disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 1991; 35:369–85.
crossref
7. Jabs DA, Wingard J, Green WR, et al. The eye in bone marrow transplantation. III. Conjunctival graft-vs-host disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:1343–8.
8. Bhan AK, Fujikawa LS, Foster CS. T-cell subsets and Langerhans cells in normal and diseased conjunctiva. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 94:205–12.
crossref
9. Gilbard JP, Rossi SR, Azar DT, Heyda KG. Effect of punctal occlusion by Freeman silicone plug insertion on tear osmolarity in dry eye disorders. CLAO J. 1989; 15:216–8.
10. Lee EH, Jang JW, Lew HM. The changes of tear osmolarity and protein after silicone punctal plug insertion in dry eye. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1509–14.
11. Yen MT, Pflugfelder SC, Feuer WJ. The effect of punctal occlusion on tear production, tear clearance, and ocular surface sensation in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 131:314–23.
crossref
12. Pflugfelder SC, De Paiva CS, Villarreal AL, Stern ME. Effects of sequential artificial tear and cyclosporine emulsion therapy on conjunctival goblet cell density and transforming growth factor-beta2 production. Cornea. 2008; 27:64–9.
13. Wilson SE, Perry HD. Long-term resolution of chronic dry eye symptoms and signs after topical cyclosporine treatment. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:76–9.
crossref
14. Roberts CW, Carniglia PE, Brazzo BG. Comparison of topical cyclosporine, punctal occlusion, and a combination for the treatment of dry eye. Cornea. 2007; 26:805–9.
crossref
15. Raphael M, Bellefqih S, Piette JC, et al. Conjunctival biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome: correlations between histological and immunohistochemical features. Histopathology. 1988; 13:191–202.
crossref
16. Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Stern ME, et al. Analysis of topical cyclosporine treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome: effect on conjunctival lymphocytes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:1489–96.
17. O'Brien PD, Collum LM. Dry eye: diagnosis and current treatment strategies. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004; 4:314–9.
18. Small DS, Acheampong A, Reis B, et al. Blood concentrations of cyclosporin a during long-term treatment with cyclosporin a ophthalmic emulsions in patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 18:411–8.
crossref
19. Laibovitz RA, Solch S, Andriano K, et al. Pilot trial of cyclosporine 1% ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea. 1993; 12:315–23.
crossref
20. Turner K, Pflugfelder SC, Ji Z, et al. Interleukin-6 levels in the conjunctival epithelium of patients with dry eye disease treated with cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion. Cornea. 2000; 19:492–6.
crossref
21. Stevenson D, Tauber J, Reis BL. Efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye disease: a dose-ranging, randomized trial. The Cyclosporin A Phase 2 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:967–74.
22. Moon JW, Lee HJ, Shin KC, et al. Short term effects of topical cyclosporine and viscoelastic on the ocular surfaces in patients with dry eye. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007; 21:189–94.
crossref
23. Xu KP, Yagi Y, Tsubota K. Decrease in corneal sensitivity and change in tear function in dry eye. Cornea. 1996; 15:235–9.
crossref
24. Hiroko BM. Cataract surgery in the presence of other ocular comorbidities. Steinert RF, editor. Cataract Surgery: Technique, Complication and Management. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Saunders;2004. chap. 32.
25. Walker TD. Benzalkonium toxicity. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004; 32:657.
26. Cho YK, Kim MS. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009; 23:65–73.
crossref
27. Donnenfeld ED, Solomon R, Roberts CW, et al. Cyclosporine 0.05% to improve visual outcomes after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1095–100.
crossref

Figure 1.
Changes in tear film breakup time, Schirmer's test, tear clearance rate and keratoepitheliopathy after cataract surgery in the non-dry eye groups. HA = hyaluronate; CsA = cyclosporine A.* p < 0.05 compared with each group.
jkos-52-800f1.tif
Figure 2.
Changes in tear film breakup time, Schirmer's test, tear clearance rate and keratoepitheliopathy after cataract surgery in the dry eye groups. HA = hyaluronate; CsA = cyclosporine A.* p < 0.05 compared with each group.
jkos-52-800f2.tif
Table 1.
Changes in the tear film and ocular surface parameters after cataract operation in patients without dry eye
    Baseline 1 week after treatment 1 month after treatment 2 months after treatment 3 months after treatment 6 months after treatment
Group 1 Tear film breakup time (sec) 10.19 ± 2.17 4.78 ± 1.27* 7.24 ± 2.89* 7.81 ± 2.93* 9.81 ± 3.04 9.89 ± 2.58
  Schirmer's test (mm) 11.41 ± 1.98 5.24 ± 1.55* 6.38 ± 3.52* 7.86 ± 3.92* 11.30 ± 3.97 11.86 ± 3.58
  Tear clearance rate ((Log2)-1) 5.95 ± 1.18 3.97 ± 1.52* 3.49 ± 0.73* 3.54 ± 0.93* 5.54 ± 1.45 5.73 ± 1.22
  Keratoepitheliopathy score 0.16 ± 0.37 4.78 ± 1.11* 0.24 ± 0.43 0.24 ± 0.43 0.24 ± 0.43 0.27 ± 0.73
Group 2 Tear film breakup time (sec) 10.08 ± 1.55 5.14 ± 1.49* 7.05 ± 2.26* 9.86 ± 2.53 9.86 ± 2.69 10.14 ± 2.04
  Schirmer's test (mm) 10.76 ± 2.60 4.68 ± 1.83* 6.70 ± 3.19* 10.54 ± 3.07 10.32 ± 2.65 10.51 ± 2.55
  Tear clearance rate ((Log2)-1) 5.97 ± 1.14 4.05 ± 1.45* 3.51 ± 0.69* 5.35 ± 1.42 5.65 ± 1.25 5.89 ± 1.43
  Keratoepitheliopathy score 0.24 ± 0.43 4.81 ± 1.73* 0.19 ± 0.40 0.24 ± 0.43 0.41 ± 0.86 0.43 ± 0.87

* p<0.05 compared with baseline.

Table 2.
Changes in the tear film and ocular surface parameters after cataract operation in patients with dry eye
    Baseline 1 week after treatment 1 month after treatment 2 months after treatment 3 months after treatment 6 months after treatment
Group 3 Tear film breakup time (sec) 4.16 ± 0.83 3.26 ± 1.15* 3.11 ± 1.20* 3.26 ± 0.99* 3.95 ± 1.08 4.21 ± 0.92
  Schirmer's test (mm) 4.11 ± 0.88 2.89 ± 0.94* 3.47 ± 0.90* 3.37 ± 0.96* 3.95 ± 0.97 4.21 ± 0.85
  Tear clearance rate ((Log2)-1) 3.47 ± 0.70 2.42 ± 0.96* 2.74 ± 1.10* 2.63 ± 1.01* 3.11 ± 0.81 3.16 ± 0.96
  Keratoepitheliopathy score 2.21 ± 1.36 5.95 ± 2.15* 3.58 ± 1.61* 2.58 ± 1.54 2.05 ± 1.31 1.95 ± 1.31
Group 4 Tear film breakup time (sec) 4.15 ± 0.88 3.05 ± 1.10* 4.25 ± 0.79 4.15 ± 0.75 4.95 ± 1.73 7.75 ± 1.52
  Schirmer's test (mm) 4.20 ± 0.89 2.85 ± 0.81* 4.05 ± 0.83 4.10 ± 0.85 4.15 ± 0.88 6.50 ± 2.01
  Tear clearance rate ((Log2)-1) 3.45 ± 0.69 2.45 ± 0.89* 3.25 ± 0.79 3.30 ± 0.66 3.40 ± 0.68 4.40 ± 1.93
  Keratoepitheliopathy score 2.35 ± 1.31 5.60 ± 1.79* 3.20 ± 1.82 3.05 ± 1.54 1.80 ± 1.28 1.55 ± 1.15

* p<0.05 compared with baseline

p<0.05 improvement compared with baseline.

TOOLS
Similar articles