Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs Adm > v.24(3) > 1098659

Choi and Lee: Effects of Job Embeddedness and Nursing Professionalism on Intent to Stay in Hospital Nurses

Abstract

Purpose:

This study was performed to investigate the effects of job embeddedness and nursing professionalism on intent to stay in hospital nurses.

Methods:

The study was a cross-sectional survey. Participants were 242 nurses working at four general hospitals in P city of Gyeongbuk Province, Korea. Data were collected from August 29 to September 10, 2016. Structured questionnaires were used and analyzed with the SPSS/PC program.

Results:

The scores were, for job embeddedness, 3.19 (out of 5.0), nursing professionalism, 3.50 (out of 5.0), and intent to stay, 5.30 (out of 8.0). The three variables were all different according to participants' general characteristics. Factors influencing intent to stay were organization fitness (one of 4 sub-factors of job embeddedness), social recognition (one of 5 sub-factors of nursing professionalism) and age (one of participants' general characteristics). These three variables explained 34% of intent to stay.

Conclusion:

To increase competent career nurses' intent to stay, nursing and hospital managers must develop and implement programs that help improve nurses’ organization fitness to adjust well in their organization and healthcare institutions and nursing organizations must continue efforts to raise social recognition of nurses and to improve nurses’ working conditions.

REFERENCES

1. Hospital Nurses Association. 2008 Business report. Seoul: Hospital Nurses Association;2009.
2. Kim MR. Influential factors on turnover intention of nurses: the effect of nurse's organizational commitment and career commitment to turnover intention. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2007; 13(1):335–344.
3. Lee EH, Cho KS, Son HM. A study of hospital nurse's intention to keep nursing job. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2017; 20(1):15–27.
4. Cowin L. The effects of nurses' job satisfaction on retention: An Australian perspective. The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2002; 32(5):283–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200205000-00008.
5. Kim MJ. 2006. The effect of nursing organizational culture on nurses' intention of retention [master's thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University;2006. p. 1–53.
6. Kwon KJ, Chu MS, Kim JA. The impact of nursing professionalism on the nursing performance, job satisfaction and retention intention among clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2009; 15(2):182–192.
7. Lee NY, Lee SO, Whang JH. Factors affecting on hospital nurse intention of retention. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2022; 14(3):1479–1491.
8. Back GR. Effect of hospital nurses' professionalism, job em-beddedness, and nursing organizational culture on intention of retention [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sungshin Women's University;2016. p. 1–56.
9. Sung MH, Choi EY. The relationships between professional self-concept, nursing performance and retention intention of emergency department nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2012; 19(2):244–252. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2012.19.2.244.
10. Jean JH, Yom YH. Role of empowerment and emotional intelligence in the relationship between job embeddedness and turnover among general hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2014; 20(3):302–312. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.3.302.
11. Reitz OE, Anderson MA, Hill PD. Job embeddedness and nurse retention. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2010; 34(3):190–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181e702b7.
crossref
12. Son SY, Choi JS. Effect of job embeddedness and job satisfaction on turnover intention in nurses. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2015; 27(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.2.180.
crossref
13. Yeun EJ, Kwon YM, Ahn OH. Development of a nursing professional value scale. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005; 35(6):1091–1100. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2005.35.6.1091.
14. Adams D, Miller BK. Professionalism in nursing behaviors of nurse practitioners. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2001; 17(4):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpnu.2001.25913.
crossref
15. Choi YS. Nursing professionalism, job satisfaction and turnover intention of nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals-focused on “I” city. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2014; 15(5):2695–2702. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2695.
16. Ko SH, Chung BY. Nursing professionalism and job satisfaction of nurses in general hospital. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2004; 10(3):335–344.
17. Moon YS, Han SJ. Impact of self-efficacy and nursing professionalism on organizational commitment in nurses. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2011; 17(1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2011.17.1.072.
crossref
18. Duchscher JB. A process of becoming: The stages of new nursing graduate professional role transition. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2008; 39(10):441–452. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20081001-03.
crossref
19. Mitchell TR, Lee TW. The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2001; 23:189–246. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20081001-03.
20. Choi SM. Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Job Embeddedness for Korean Nurses. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society. 2017; 19(4):2145–2157.
crossref
21. Kim SH, Lee MA. Effects of emotional labor and communication competence on turnover intention in nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2014; 20(3):325–314. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.3.332.
crossref
22. Gambino KM. Motivation for entry, occupational commitment and intent to remain: A survey regarding registered nurse retention. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 66(11):2532–2541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05426.x.
crossref
23. Kim EH, Lee EJ. Mediation and moderation effects of job em-beddedness between nursing performance and turnover in- tention of nurses. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2014; 15(8):5042–5052. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.8.5042.
24. Tourangeau AE, Cranley LA. Nurse intention to remain employed: Understanding and strengthening determinants. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 55(4):497–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03934.x.
crossref
25. Han SS, Kim MH, Yun EK. Factors affecting nursing professionalism. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2008; 14(1):73–79.
crossref
26. Cho EJ, Bang KS. Nursing professionalism, self-efficacy and nurse parent partnership in pediatric nurses. Child Health Nursing Research. 2013; 19(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2013.19.2.94.
crossref
27. Kang KN. Factors influencing turnover intention of nurses in small-medium sized hospitals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2012; 18(2):155–165. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2012.18.2.155.
crossref
28. Yoon HK, Choi JH, Lee EY, Lee HY, Park MJ. Effects of decision making competency, nursing professionalism, and job satisfaction on turnover impulse among nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2013; 19(5):658–667. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2013.19.5.658.
crossref

Table 1.
General Characteristics of Participants (N=242)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD
Age (year) <25 61 (25.2)
25~<30 107 (44.2)
30~<35 37 (15.3)
35~<40 21 (8.7)
≥40 16 (6.6)
28.71±6.27
Gender Male 8 (3.3)
Female 234 (96.7)
Marital status Single 179 (74.0)
Married 63 (26.0)
Religion Yes 65 (26.9)
No 177 (73.1)
Education Diploma 126 (52.1)
Bachelor 111 (45.9)
≥Master 5 (2.0)
Total clinical experience (year) <3 89 (36.8)
3~<5 45 (18.6)
5~<10 57 (23.6)
10~<15 30 (12.4)
≥15 21 (8.6)
6.48±5.96
Position Staff nurse 197 (81.4)
Charge nurse 20 (8.3)
≥Nurse manager 25 (10.3)
Work department Medical wards 93 (38.4)
Surgical wards 106 (43.8)
Other 43 (17.8)
Experienced turnover Yes 90 (37.2)
No 152 (62.8)
Monthly income (10,000 won) <200 9 (3.7)
200~<300 206 (85.1)
≥300 27 (11.2)
Hospital size (bed) <400 83 (34.3)
≥400 159 (65.7)
Table 2.
Participants’ Job Embeddedness, Nursing Professionalism, and Intent to Stay (N=242)
Variables M±SD Min~Max Range
Job embeddedness 3.19±0.45 1.00~5.00 1~5
Organization fitness 3.23±0.53 1.86~5.00
Job benefits 3.10±0.51 1.40~5.00
Community fitness 3.39±0.62 1.67~5.00
Job team 2.99±0.79 1.00~5.00
Nursing professionalism 3.50±0.40 1.00~5.00 1~5
Professional self-concept 3.59±0.46 2.00~5.00
Social recognition 3.36±0.54 1.63~4.63
Nursing professionalism 3.70±0.46 2.20~5.00
Role of nursing practice 3.63±0.44 2.20~5.00
Dependence of nursing 3.12±0.64 1.00~4.67
Intent to stay 5.30±1.29 1.00~8.00 1~8
Table 3.
Differences of Job Embeddedness, Nursing Professionalism, and Intent to Stay according to Participants' General Characteristics (N=242)
Characteristics Categories Job embeddedness Nursing professionalism Intent to stay
M±SD t or F (p) Duncan M±SD t or F (p) Duncan M±SD t or F (p) Duncan
Age (year) <25a 3.04±0.37 1.44 3.43±0.37 2.26 5.10±1.30 5.02
25~<30b 3.17±0.43 (<.001) 3.50±0.41 (.063) 5.08±1.32 (<.001)
30~<35c 35~<40d 3.17±0.45 3.42±0.46 a, b, c<d, e 3.52±0.45 3.51±0.37 5.52±1.04 5.60±1.14 a, b<c, d, e
≥40e 3.63±0.47 3.77±0.29 6.16±1.09
Gender Male 3.32±0.34 0.86 3.72±0.53 1.54 4.46±0.97 -1.90
Female 3.18±0.45 (.391) 3.50±0.39 (.126) 5.33±1.29 .059
Marital status Married 3.36±0.49 3.45 3.58±0.36 1.70 5.80±1.17 3.64
Single 3.13±0.42 (<.001) 3.48±0.41 (.090) 5.13±1.28 (<.001)
Religion Yes 3.27±0.51 1.78 3.57±0.41 1.66 5.35±1.43 0.31
No 3.12±0.42 (.078) 3.48±0.39 (.099) 5.29±1.24 (.757)
Education Diplomaa 3.19±0.43 8.12 3.47±0.41 3.05 5.24±1.30 5.81
Bachelorb 3.15±0.44 (<.001) 3.52±0.38 (.049) 5.29±1.24 (<.001)
≥Masterc 3.96±0.64 a,b<c 3.91±0.18 a, b<c 7.20±0.40 a, b<c
Total clinical experience (year) <3a 3.08±0.36 6.76 3.48±0.41 1.30 5.19±1.23 4.90
3~<5b 3.15±0.38 (<.001) 3.48±0.39 (.271) 4.91±1.35 (<.001)
5~<10c 3.18±0.47 a<b, c, d<e 3.49±0.39 5.21±1.31 a, b, c<d, e
10~<15d 3.31±0.45 3.52±0.44 5.90±0.96
≥15e 3.59±0.50 3.69±0.31 6.03±1.28
Position Staff nursea 3.13±0.42 9.84 3.48±0.39 2.98 5.15±1.28 7.84
Charge nurseb 3.34±0.49 (<.001) 3.52±0.38 (.053) 5.96±1.10 (<.001)
≥Nurse managerc 3.51±0.50 a<b, c 3.37±0.39 5.98±1.16 a<b, c
Work department Medical wards 3.13±0.49 2.13 3.48±0.40 1.81 5.28±1.26 .08
Surgical wards 3.21±0.43 (.100) 3.49±0.43 (.148) 5.29±1.36 (.983)
Etc 3.16±0.71 3.50±0.35 5.34±1.18
Experienced turnover Yes 3.28±0.41 -2.34 3.54±0.37 -1.03 5.33±1.32 -.19
None 3.14±0.46 (.020) 3.48±0.41 (.305) 5.30±1.28 (.853)
Monthly income (10,000 won) <200a 200~<300b 3.28±0.47 3.13±0.42 13.19 (<.001) 3.67±0.18 3.47±0.40 6.22 (.002) 5.56±1.31 5.19±1.29 5.74 (.004)
≥300c 3.58±0.50 a, b<c 3.73±0.36 b<a, c 6.06±1.05 b<a, c
Hospital size (bed) <400 3.40±0.46 5.61 3.56±0.42 1.42 5.48±1.23 1.51
≥400 3.08±0.40 (<.001) 3.48±0.38 (.157) 5.21±1.31 (.133)
Table 4.
Correlation among Job Embeddedness, Nursing Professionalism, and Intent to Stay (N=242)
Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
1. Organization fitness 1
2. Job benefits .70 1
(<.001)
3. Community fitness .47 .56 1
(<.001) (<.001)
4. Job team .27 .25 .24 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001)
5. Professional self-concept .43 .36 .33 .25 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001)
6. Social recognition .36 .39 .27 .19 .70 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (.003) (<.001)
7. Nursing professionalism .39 .39 .36 .28 .75 .68 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001)
8. Role of nursing practice .32 .29 .27 .19 .78 .69 .78 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (.004) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001)
9. Dependence of nursing .17 .09 .10 .09 .08 .10 .11 .16 1
(.007) (.147) (.129) (.189) (.228) (.123) (.089) (.016)
10. Intent to stay .50 .40 .32 .21 .38 .43 .40 .35 .14 1
(<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (<.001) (.028)
Table 5.
Influence Factors on Intent to Stay (N=242)
Variables B SE β t p
Organization fitness 0.88 0.14 .36 6.27 <.001
Social recognition 0.67 0.14 .28 4.94 <.001
Age 0.03 0.01 .15 2.79 .006
R2=.34 Adj. R=.33, F=41.17, p<.001
TOOLS
Similar articles