Journal List > J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg > v.38(3) > 1091660

Kim: Bone graft material using teeth

Abstract

Autogenous tooth bone graft material contains organic and inorganic components for osteoinductive and osteoconductive healing. The clinical availability and safety of this material have been confirmed by various experimental and clinical studies. In the future, allogenic and xenogenic tooth bone graft materials, ideal scaffold using teeth for stem cells and bone growth factors, and endodontic and tooth restorative material will be developed.

I. Introduction

Teeth are known as a composite of organic and inorganic components consisting of minerals of the calcium phosphate range, collagen, and other organic elements. The minerals of teeth have biological calcium phosphate of 5 phases (hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate, octacalcium phosphate, amorphous calcium phosphate [TCP], and brushite). These 5 phases in calcium phosphate interact with each other; it is assumed that good bony remodeling can be made when calcium phosphate is put into a living system. The apatite in osseous tissue takes the form of ceramic/high molecule's nanoscale composite. The apatite in humans' osseous tissue is low-crystalline, and its particle size is at the level of scores of nanometers. On the other hand, a hydroxyapatite created through sintering at high temperature is high-crystalline and dozens of times larger than apatite in osseous tissue due to grain growth occurring in the course of sintering. When its crystallinity is high, and its particle size is big, the biodegradation of apatite in the body is almost impossible, and its osteoconduction capacity is low. Moreover, it cannot be degraded by macrophage. Low-crystalline carbonic apatite has the most effective osteoconduction capacity1,2.
The chemical compositions of teeth and bone are very similar. Enamel is 96% inorganic ingredients and 4% organic ingredients and water. Dentin has a 65% : 35% ratio, whereas cementum has the ratio of 45-50% : 50-55%. Finally, alveolar bone is made up of 65% inorganic ingredients and 35% organic ingredients. Tooth dentin and cementum contain a number of bone growth factors including type I collagen and bone morphogenic protein (BMP). Type I collagen accounts for 90%, with the rest consisting of noncollagenous proteins, biopolymer, lipid, citrate, lactate, etc. Noncollagenous proteins are phosphophoryn, sialoprotein, glycoprotein, proteoglycan, BMP, etc. They can perform the role of promoting bone resorption and bone formation. Therefore, bone graft materials using teeth are considered to be potentially useful in clinics3-5.

II. Osteoinduction of Teeth

Dentin matrix has long been proven to be osteoinductive and rich in BMP6-8. Organic component accounts for about 20% of dentin weight and mostly consists of type I collagen. Moreover, it was proven to have BMP promoting cartilage and bone formation, differentiating undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes and osteogenic cells9-12. Noncollagenous proteins of dentin such as osteocalcin, osteonectin, phosphoprotein, and sialoprotein are known to be involved in bone calcification13,14.
Bessho et al.15 have extracted BMP from bone matrix, dentin matrix, and wound tissue after extracting teeth from rabbits. Each BMP was confirmed to have induced the formation of new bone when xenogenic implantation was performed. Bessho et al.15 have extracted human dentin matrix containing 4 mol/L guanidine HC1 and refined it into liquid chromatography and found in SDS-PAGE and IEF that purified BMP is homogenous, inducing the formation of new bone within 3 weeks of implantation in muscle pouches in Wistar rats. Dentin matrix-derived BMP is not the same as bone matrix-derived BMP, but they are very similar. In other words, two types of BMP exhibit the same action in the body16. Matrix protein patterns in teeth must have osteoinductive potential even though it does not perfectly match the protein in alveolar bone. Moreover, the apatite in teeth has long been known to play the role of protecting proteins17. Boden et al.18 suggested that LIM mineralization protein 1 (LMP-1) is an essential positive regulator of osteoblast differentiation and maturation and bone formation. Wang et al.19 found that LIM-1 was expressed primarily in predentin, odontoblasts, and endothelial cells of the blood vessels of teeth.
Many researchers have observed that alveolar bone formation occur around bone graft materials as a result of experiments on animals20-24. Chung25,26 registered the patent for the technology of extracting proteins from teeth in 2002 and 2004; this carries important meaning, showing evidence that teeth contain BMP. Ike and Urist27 suggested that root dentin prepared from extracted teeth may be recycled for use as carrier of rhBMP-2 because it induces new bone formation in the periodontium. Murata et al.28 suggested that demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) does not inhibit BMP-2 activity and shows better release profile of BMP-2. Human recycled DDM are unique, absorbable matrix with osteoinductivity, and DDM should be an effective graft material as carrier of BMP-2 and a scaffold for bone-forming cells for bone engineering.

III. Osteoconduction and Biocompatibility of Bone Graft Material Using Teeth

Since 1993, Kim et al.29,30 have conducted basic studies such as component analysis, research through electron microscope, and production of block-type bone graft materials after incinerating human teeth at high temperature and then pulverizing to particle size of 0.149 mm. The main component of toothash powder has been identified to be HA and β-TCP, which are osteoconductive bone graft materials with biocompatibility and which can be absorbed over time29,30. Since then, the results of related experiments have been reported such as guided bone regeneration using lyodura, comparative experimental study with other bone substitutes on the market, tissue response using transmitted microscopy after implantation, cytotoxicity, and hypersensitivity test31-34. A clinical research has done retrospective observation on 10 patients into whom particulate dentin-plaster of Paris (mix in 2 : 1 proportion) was implanted after cyst enucleation. The cystic defects were all bigger than 20 mm, and the follow-up period was 50-57 months (average of 52.2 months). Although wound dehiscence and complications of infection have developed in 3 patients after cyst enucleation, they were cured through resuturing using the buccal mucosa flap and incision & drainage. It has clinically proven to be a convenient bone graft material with excellent biocompatibility after long-time observation35. A variety of research has been performed for the comparison with xenogenous bone graft material (Bio-Oss; Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland), the evaluation of healing process after placing into defects around the implant, multiple application of platelet-rich plasma, healing process after inducing osteoporosis, multiple application of tissue adhesive, multiple application of chitosan, and healing process after guided bone regeneration. Toothash has proven to be an osteoconductive bone graft material with excellent biocompatibility. It has been introduced as toothash or particulate dentin in overseas academic journals36-40.

IV. Development and Clinical Application of Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Material

Teeth extracted from humans are considered dental waste. Therefore, they should be disposed of by waste removal services. Because of this legal restriction, the commercialization of teeth is impossible in Korea.
Long ago, to reduce the risk of nerve injury while extracting mandibular impacted third molar, intentional partial odontectomy was introduced in the literature on oral and maxillofacial surgery; its safety has also been proven41. Similarly, the author has reported a related surgery and confirmed that the remaining root and osseous tissue were united without unusual complications based on long observation42. Operations for leaving the root of a tooth intact intentionally to prevent alveolar bone atrophy among completely edentulous patients have been introduced and applied clinically for a long time in the field of dental medicine43-45. Some scholars have reported evidences that an implant did not affect osseointegration even though the implant penetrated an impacted tooth in the course of placement46. Autogenous tooth bone graft material has been developed after the autogenous tooth root was reconfirmed to have excellent compatibility with alveolar bone via these papers.
When the DDM of the extracted teeth from a person is used as bone graft material for him/her, it is safe because there is little immune rejection response. Kim and colleagues47,48 have developed the technology of making bone graft materials with autogenous tooth after partial demineralization and freezing-drying and commercialized it domestically and internationally for the first time.
Kim et al.49 analyzed the inorganic component of extracted fresh tooth and specimen treated with autogenous tooth bone graft material and found that the crown mainly consists of high-crystalline calcium phosphate, and that the root is mainly made up of low-crystalline calcium phosphate. If dentin and cementum which make up most of the teeth are used as bone graft materials, good bony remodeling by osteoconduction can be expected because the main minerals of bone tissue are low-crystalline apatite. The analyses of mandibular cortical bone taken from patients, crown of autogenous tooth bone graft material, root of autogenous tooth bone graft material, irradiated mineralized allogeneic cancellous bone (ICB; Rocky Mountain Tissue Bank, Denver, CO, USA), xenograft bone (Bio-Oss), and synthetic bone MBCP (Biomatlante, Vigneux de Bretagne, France) showed that the x-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of dentin of autogenous tooth bone graft material and allograft bone was most similar to autogenous bone, and this finding has been announced50. Many authors have published case reports as well as the results of clinical studies on sinus bone graft, ridge augmentation, guided bone regeneration, socket preservation or graft, and they have proven to be useful materials for hard tissue defect restoration51-59.
Lee60 performed quantitative analysis of the proliferation and differentiation of the MG-63 cell line on the bone grafting material using human tooth. This study demonstrated that the cellular adhesion and proliferation activity of MG-63 cells on partially demineralized dentin matrix (PDDM) were comparable and could be controlled with enhanced osteogenic differentiation. Jeong et al.61 conducted experimental research on bone formation after the autogenous tooth bone graft of a miniature pig, recorded average bone formation of 43.74% after 4 weeks, and concluded that it was a good substitute for autogenous bone graft. Kim et al.62 and Lee et al.63 have performed sinus bone graft and guided bone regeneration using autogenous tooth bone from humans and took the tissue specimen 2 months and 4 months later for histomorphometric analysis. They found favorable new bone formation as a result and suggested that autogenous tooth bone graft materials can be used in various bone grafts.
Nilsson et al.64 said that a lot of BMP was needed to realize proper osteoinduction when used alone. Therefore, an appropriate carrier is needed. For the autogenous tooth bone graft material, BMP and bone growth factors in dentin can be used as they are. There have been reports that DDM by itself can play the role of carrier of exogenous BMP and growth factors as well as have an osteoinductive effect27,65.
Meanwhile, teeth can have a huge amount of organic component even though they have been left for a long time after being extracted because the solid apatite of external teeth can preserve the internal organic component for long17. Therefore, excellent bone healing effect can be expected if the organic component of internal teeth is released slowly through an appropriate demineralization process and stem cells, growth factors, and BMP are seeded inside the teeth.

V. Conclusion

The safety of autogenous tooth bone graft material has been established. Moreover, it is a useful material that can substitute free autogenous bone graft, showing bone healing via excellent osteoinduction and osteoconduction because it contains both organic and inorganic components. When the amount of bone graft material is insufficient, other bone graft material can be combined. Nowadays, research on osteoinductive and osteoconductive bone graft material using homogenous and xenogeneous tooth, development of ideal scaffold to convey stem cells and growth factors, endodontic treatment and tooth restorative material are being conducted actively. The author expects tangible achievements to be made soon.

References

1. Lee SH. Low crystalline hydroxyl carbonate apatite. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2006. 44:524–533.
2. Lee DD, Glimcher MJ. Three-dimensional spatial relationship between the collagen fibrils and the inorganic calcium phosphate crystals of pickerel (Americanus americanus) and herring (Clupea harengus) bone. J Mol Biol. 1991. 217:487–501.
crossref
3. Nanci A. Ten cate's oral histology. 2008. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.;202–211.
4. Min BM. Oral biochemistry. 2007. Seoul: Daehan Narae Pub Co.;22–26.
5. Bhaskar SN. Orban's oral histology and embryology. 1980. 9th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Co.;47. 107. 180. 252.
6. Yeomans JD, Urist MR. Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol. 1967. 12:999–1008.
crossref
7. Bang G, Urist MR. Bone induction in excavation chambers in matrix of decalcified dentin. Arch Surg. 1967. 94:781–789.
crossref
8. Butler WT, Mikulski A, Urist MR, Bridges G, Uyeno S. Noncollagenous proteins of a rat dentin matrix possessing bone morphogenetic activity. J Dent Res. 1977. 56:228–232.
crossref
9. Urist MR, Strates BS. Bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res. 1971. 50:1392–1406.
crossref
10. Turnbull RS, Freeman E. Use of wounds in the parietal bone of the rat for evaluating bone marrow for grafting into periodontal defects. J Periodontal Res. 1974. 9:39–43.
crossref
11. Inoue T, Deporter DA, Melcher AH. Induction of cartilage and bone by dentin demineralized in citric acid. J Periodontal Res. 1986. 21:243–255.
crossref
12. Kawai T, Urist MR. Bovine tooth-derived bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res. 1989. 68:1069–1074.
crossref
13. Feng JQ, Luan X, Wallace J, Jing D, Ohshima T, Kulkarni AB, et al. Genomic organization, chromosomal mapping, and promoter analysis of the mouse dentin sialophosphoprotein (Dspp) gene, which codes for both dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1998. 273:9457–9464.
crossref
14. Ritchie HH, Ritchie DG, Wang LH. Six decades of dentinogenesis research. Historical and prospective views on phosphophoryn and dentin sialoprotein. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998. 106:Suppl 1. 211–220.
15. Bessho K, Tagawa T, Murata M. Purification of rabbit bone morphogenetic protein derived from bone, dentin, and wound tissue after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990. 48:162–169.
crossref
16. Bessho K, Tanaka N, Matsumoto J, Tagawa T, Murata M. Human dentin-matrix-derived bone morphogenetic protein. J Dent Res. 1991. 70:171–175.
crossref
17. Schmidt-Schultz TH, Schultz M. Intact growth factors are conserved in the extracellular matrix of ancient human bone and teeth: a storehouse for the study of human evolution in health and disease. Biol Chem. 2005. 386:767–776.
crossref
18. Boden SD, Liu Y, Hair GA, Helms JA, Hu D, Racine M, et al. LMP-1, a LIM-domain protein, mediates BMP-6 effects on bone formation. Endocrinology. 1998. 139:5125–5134.
crossref
19. Wang X, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Zhang L. Immunohistochemical localization of LIM mineralization protein 1 in pulp-dentin complex of human teeth with normal and pathologic conditions. J Endod. 2008. 34:143–147.
crossref
20. Al-Talabani NG, Smith CJ. Continued development of 5-day old tooth-germs transplanted to syngeneic hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) cheek pouch. Arch Oral Biol. 1978. 23:1069–1076.
crossref
21. Steidler NE, Reade PC. An histological study of the effects of extra-corporeal time on murine dental isografts. Arch Oral Biol. 1979. 24:165–169.
crossref
22. Barrett AP, Reade PC. Changes in periodontal fibre organization in mature bone/tooth isografts in mice. J Oral Pathol. 1981. 10:276–283.
crossref
23. Barrett AP, Reade PC. The relationship between degree of development of tooth isografts and the subsequent formation of bone and periodontal ligament. J Periodontal Res. 1981. 16:456–465.
crossref
24. Barrett AP, Reade PC. A histological investigations of isografts of immature mouse molars to an intrabony and extrabony site. Arch Oral Biol. 1982. 27:59–63.
crossref
25. PH Chung . Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service. Method for extracting tooth protein from extracted tooth. Korea patent. KR 10-2002-0008789. 2004. 09. 15.
26. PH Chung . Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service. Tooth protein extracted from extracted tooth and method for using the same. Korea patent. KR 10-2004-0051812. 2005. 07. 06.
27. Ike M, Urist MR. Recycled dentin root matrix for a carrier of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein. J Oral Implantol. 1998. 24:124–132.
crossref
28. Murata M, Akazawa T, Mitsugi M, Um IW, Kim KW, Kim YK. Human dentin as novel biomaterial for bone regeneration. Biomaterials-Physics and Chemistry. 2011. 127–140.
crossref
29. Kim YK, Yeo HH, Ryu CH, Lee HB, Byun UR, Cho JO. An experimental study on the tissue reaction of toothash implanted in mandible body of the mature dog. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993. 15:129–136.
30. Kim YK, Yeo HH, Yang IS, Seo JH, Cho JO. Implantation of toothash combined with plaster of Paris: experimental study. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994. 16:122–129.
31. Kim YK. The experimental study of the implantation of toothash and plaster of Paris and guided tissue regeneration using Lyodura. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996. 22:297–306.
32. Kim YK, Yeo HH. Transmitted electronic microscopic study about the tissue reaction after the implantation of toothash. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997. 23:283–289.
33. Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee JG, Lee MH, Cho JO. An experimental study on the healing process after the implantation of various bone substitutes in the rats. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. 27:15–24.
34. Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee JH. Cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity test of toothash. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001. 23:391–395.
35. Kim SG, Yeo HH, Kim YK. Grafting of large defects of the jaws with a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999. 88:22–25.
crossref
36. Kim SG, Kim HK, Lim SC. Combined implantation of particulate dentine, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001. 29:282–288.
crossref
37. Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK, Park JC, Lim SC. Use of particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination with/without platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. 17:86–94.
38. Kim SY, Kim SG, Lim SC, Bae CS. Effects on bone formation in ovariectomized rats after implantation of tooth ash and plaster of Paris mixture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004. 62:852–857.
crossref
39. Park SS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL. Osteogenic activity of the mixture of chitosan and particulate dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008. 87:618–623.
crossref
40. Kim WB, Kim SG, Lim SC, Kim YK, Park SN. Effect of Tisseel on bone healing with particulate dentin and plaster of Paris mixture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. 109:e34–e40.
crossref
41. Hatano Y, Kurita K, Kuroiwa Y, Yuasa H, Ariji E. Clinical evaluations of coronectomy (intentional partial odontectomy) for mandibular third molars using dental computed tomography: a case-control study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. 67:1806–1814.
crossref
42. Kim YK, Shim JH. Intentional partial odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molar. The Korean J Hospital Dentistry. 2006. 2:22–27.
43. Guyer SE. Selectively retained vital roots for partial support of overdentures: a patient report. J Prosthet Dent. 1975. 33:258–263.
crossref
44. Plata RL, Kelln EE, Linda L. Intentional retention of vital submerged roots in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976. 42:100–108.
crossref
45. Garver DG, Fenster RK. Vital root retention in humans: a final report. J Prosthet Dent. 1980. 43:368–373.
crossref
46. Davarpahah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional implant placement. 2: placement of implants through impacted teeth. Three case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009. 29:405–413.
47. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. 109:496–503.
crossref
48. Kim YK, Lee JY. The evaluation of postoperative safety of autogenous teeth bone graft. J Korean Acad Implant Dent. 2009. 28:29–35.
49. Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jin SC, Son JS, Kim SY, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011. 11:7442–7445.
crossref
50. Kim GW, Yeo IS, Kim SG, Um IW, Kim YK. Analysis of crystalline structure of autogenous tooth bone graft material: X-ray diffraction analysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. 37:225–228.
crossref
51. Kim YK. Clinical application and classification of bone graft material according to component. J Korean Dent Assoc. 2010. 48:263–274.
52. Kim YK, Kim SG, Kim KW, Um IW. Extraction socket preservation and reconstruction using autogenous tooth bone graft: case report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. 33:264–269.
53. Kim YK, Yi YJ. Horizontal ridge augmentation using ridge expansion and autogenous tooth bone graft: a case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2011. 27:109–115.
54. Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim KW, Kim SG, Um IW. Guide bone regeneration using autogenous teeth: case reports. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. 37:142–147.
crossref
55. Kim YK, Kim SG, Um IW. Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous tooth bone graft materials: case report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. 33:166–170.
56. Lee JH, Kim SG, Moon SY, Oh JS, Kim YK. Clinical effectiveness of bone grafting material using autogenous tooth: preliminary report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. 33:144–148.
57. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Kim YK, Oh JS, Jeong MA, Park JJ. Clinical study of graft materials using autogenous teeth in maxillary sinus augmentation. Implant Dent. 2011. 20:471–475.
crossref
58. Jeong KI, Kim SG, Oh JS, Lim SC. Maxillary sinus augmentation using autogenous teeth: preliminary report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. 33:256–263.
59. Park SM, Um IW, Kim YK, Kim KW. Clinical application of auto-tooth bone graft material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. 38:2–8.
crossref
60. Lee HJ. Quantitative analysis of proliferation and differentiation of MG-63 cell line on the bone grafting material using human tooth [dissertation]. 2011. [Seoul]: Seoul National University.
61. Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK. Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. 37:375–379.
crossref
62. Kim SG, Kim YK, Lim SC, Kim KW, Um IW. Histomorphometric analysis of bone graft using autogenous tooth bone graft. Implantology. 2011. 15:134–141.
63. Lee JY, Kim YK, Kim SG, Lim SC. Histomorphometric study of sinus bone graft using various graft material. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2011. 27:141–147.
64. Nilsson OS, Urist MR, Dawson EG, Schmalzried TP, Finerman GA. Bone repair induced by bone morphogenetic protein in ulnar defects in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986. 68:635–642.
crossref
65. Yagihashi K, Miyazawa K, Togari K, Goto S. Demineralized dentin matrix acts as a scaffold for repair of articular cartilage defects. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009. 84:210–220.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles