KoreaMed Synapse
          
         Journal List > Psychiatry Investig > v.6(3); Sep 2009
  | Full Text   | Links   |

Psychiatry Investig. 2009 Sep;6(3):185-193.
Published online 2009 June 23.  http://dx.doi.org/10.4306/pi.2009.6.3.185
Copyright © 2009 Official Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
Economic Evaluation of Add-on Levetiracetam for the Treatment of Refractory Partial Epilepsy in Korea
Guk-Hee Suh, and Sang Keol Lee
Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Medical Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Guk-Hee Suh, MD, PhD. Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Medical Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, 94-200 Yeongdeungpo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-030, Korea. Tel +82-2-2639-5289, Fax +82-2-2633-5910, Email: suhgh@chol.com
Received April 22, 2009; Revised May 28, 2009; Accepted June 01, 2009.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Objective

This study estimated the expected cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the incremental cost per seizure-free day (SFD) gained and the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained when using levetiracetam (LEV) as add-on therapy from a third-party payer perspective.

Methods

A 1-year dose-escalation decision-tree model comparing LEV plus standard therapy (ST) with ST alone was designed to combine transition probabilities, costs and outcomes. The short-term outcomes and probabilities were derived from a prospective, open-label clinical trial with 100 Korean adults with refractory partial epilepsy. All data for the direct medical costs were derived from Korean cost data extracted from reports published by the National Health Insurance Corporation.

Results

The average gain in SFDs attributed to LEV add-on was 18.3 days per patient per year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for LEV add-on were US$ 44 per SFD per patient and US$ 11,084 per QALY gained. All sensitivity analyses showed that the model was robust to the assumptions made.

Conclusion

The economic evaluation indicates that, given a wide range of assumptions, the increased cost of treating patients having refractory partial epilepsy with LEV may be partially offset by a reduction in other direct medical costs. This reduction is a consequence of an increase in the number of SFDs and improved quality of life.

Keywords: Levetiracetam, Epilepsy, Partial seizures, Seizure-free day, Quality adjusted life year, Cost.

References
1. Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Epidemiology of the epilepsies. J Neurol Neurosurg and Psychiatry 1996;61:433–443.
2. Cockerell OC, Johnson AL, Sander JW, Hart YM, Shorvon SD. Remission of epilepsy: results from the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy. Lancet 1995;346:140–144.
3. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the Inter national League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 1989;30:389–399.
4. Ben-Menachem E, Falter U. European Levetiracetam Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3,000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicentre, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. Epilepsia 2000;41:1276–1283.
5. Cereghino JJ, Biton V, Abou-Khalil B, Dreifuss F, Gauer LJ, Leppik I. Levetiracetam for partial seizures: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Neurology 2000;55:236–242.
6. Shorvon SD, Löwenthal A, Janz D, Bielen E, Loiseau P. European Levetiracetam Study Group. Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. Epilepsia 2000;41:1179–1186.
7. Patsalos PN. LEV: Chemistry, biotransformation, pharmacokinetics, and drug interactions. In: Levy RH, Mattson RH, Meldrum BS, Perucca EAntiepileptic Drugs. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. pp. 428-432.
8. Perucca E, Johannessen SI. The ideal pharmacokinetic properties of an antiepileptic drug: how close does levetiracetam come?. Epileptic Disorders 2003;5 suppl:S17–S26.
9. Zhao Q, Jiang J, Li X, Lu ZS, Hu P. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in healthy Chinese male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:614–617.
10. Pigeolet E, Jacqmin P, Sargentini-Maier ML, Stockis A. Population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in Japanese and Western adults. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007;46:503–512.
11. Luce BR, Elixhauser A. Standards for the Socioeconomic Evaluation of Health of Health Care Services. London: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
12. Heo K, Lee BI, Yi SD, Huh K, Kim JM, Lee SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in a multicentre open-label single-arm trial in Korean patients. Seizure 2007;16:402–409.
13. Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, Bryant-Comstock L, Meador K, Hermann B. Development and cross-cultural translations of a 31-item quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia 1998;39:81–88.
14. May TW, Pfäflin M, Cramer JA. Psychometric properties of the German translation of the QOLIE-31. Epilepsy Behav 2001;2:106–114.
15. Beghi E, Niero M, Roncolato M. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Quality-of-Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31). Seizure 2005;14:452–458.
16. Piperidou H, Terzoudi A, Vorvolakos T, Davis E, Heliopoulos I, Vadikolias K, et al. The Greek version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31). Qual Life Res 2006;15:833–839.
17. Devinsky O, Vickrey BG, Cramer J, Perrine K, Hermann B, Meador K, et al. Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory. Epilepsia 1995;36:1089–1104.
18. Meencke HJ, Buyle S. Assessment of a dose-response relationship of levetiracetam. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:942–946.
19. Blais L, Sheehy O, St-Hilaire JM, Bernier G, Godfroid P, LeLorier J. Economic evaluation of levetiracetam as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23:493–503.
20. National Health Insurance Corporation. 2006 National Health Insurance Statistical Yearbook. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation; 2007.
21. National Health Insurance Corporation. Major Health Insurance statistics. Health Insurance Forum 2006;5:146–150.
22. Markowitz MA, Mauskopf JA, Halpern MT. Cost-effectiveness model of adjunctive lamotrigine for the treatment of epilepsy. Neurology 1995;51:1026–1033.
23. LeLorier J, Godfroid P, Hart Y, Roberts R. Levetiracetam: an innovative and cost-effective add-on drug for refractory partial epilepsy. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2004;4:143–151.
24. Schachter SC, Sommerville KW, Ryan JE. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tiagabine, phenytoin, and carbamazepine adjunctive therapy for patients with complex partial seizure. Neurology 1999;52 suppl. 6:A143.
25. Messori A, Trippoli S, Becagli P, Cincotta M, Labbate MG, Zaccara G. Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy in patients with refractory seizures: a lifetime cost-utility analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998;53:421–427.
26. Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the incomparable? A systematic review of competing techniques for converting descriptive measures of health status into QALY-weights. Med Decis Making 2008;28:66–89.
27. Jo MW, Yun SC, Lee SI. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value in Health 2008;11:1186–1189.