This article has been
cited by other articles in ScienceCentral.
The
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology (KJA) is beginning EPUB ahead of print (EAOP). EPUB has become a lion in scientific journals. Since the KJA steering committee adopted online publication in 2010, we have published 11 volumes and 3 issues using the traditional "paper publication first, followed by online publication" approach. As an indicator of the low efficiency of that strategy, the publication lag of the KJA has become so long that we have been obliged to consider reform. While the rejection speed is adequate (
Table 1), the publication speed has slowed to a crawl (
Table 2). We believe that EAOP will increase the publication speed.
To explain the jargon of journals, journal publishers rate the efficiency of a journal based on both rejection speed and publication speed. There are three indicators of publication speed: acceptance lag (time between receiving and accepting an article), lead lag (time between acceptance and publication), and publication lag (time between receiving and publishing, equal to the acceptance lag plus the lead lag).
The most recent publication lag of the KJA exceeded 250 days, which is far greater than the instinctive threshold for timely publication. Although the acceptance lag depends on the reviewers, the lead lag depends on journal policy, which is where we have started our reforms. The KJA has maintained the old practice of saving accepted manuscripts to ensure that consistent numbers of articles are published in each volume. This practice requires an additional 45–60 days before publication and consists of several cycles of author proofreading, editor proofreading, author confirmation, and creation of the final PDF.
Tort et al. [
1] showed that earlier online appearance of an article before publication increases the impact factor of a journal, while a long lead lag reduces both the efficiency and the impact factor under the old scenario of "publication-first, online-later." With our new practice of "online-first, publication-later," readers will be able to see our online manuscripts irrespective of the lead lag. Consequently, we will need to redefine the term 'lead lag' [
2].
Every anesthesiology study and every manuscript conveys the authors' commitment to increasing medical knowledge and improving the practice of anesthesiology. Therefore, to ensure timely publication of their work, we are beginning EAOP in June 2016.
Table 1
KJA Rejection Speed Indicators
Rejection lag (days) |
|
Total (n = 819) |
In-house review* (n = 307) |
Peer-review (n = 512) |
2011 |
38 (26, 73) |
- |
38 (26, 73) |
2012 |
50 (22, 53) |
- |
35 (22, 53) |
2013 |
16 (5, 30) |
5 (3, 10) |
29 (22, 65) |
2014 |
10 (6, 26) |
6 (4, 7) |
29 (19, 50) |
2015 |
10 (7, 31) |
7 (6, 10) |
43 (27, 70) |
2016 |
8 (5, 15) |
6 (4, 9) |
32 (23, 41) |
Table 2
KJA Publication Speed Indicators
|
Acceptance lag (days) |
Lead lag (days) |
Publication lag (days) |
PubMed lag (days) |
2011 (n = 73) |
62 (45, 91) |
178 (165, 196) |
241 (212, 273) |
31 (22, 33) |
2012 (n = 139) |
76 (54, 108) |
213 (155, 308) |
314 (231, 383) |
16 (15, 22) |
2013 (n = 142) |
75 (52, 106) |
212 (183, 298) |
319 (257, 385) |
15 (14, 19) |
2014 (n = 154) |
70 (47, 104) |
213 (173, 393) |
325 (241, 462) |
15 (9, 21) |
2015 (n = 79) |
67 (53, 95) |
173 (127, 298) |
266 (193, 368) |
9 (9, 14) |
2016 (n = 31) |
66 (47, 102) |
205 (131, 270) |
273 (219, 370) |
21 (13, 21) |