Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.44(1) > 1002974

Kim and Kim: Effects of 4% Hypertonic Saline Solution Mouthwash on Oral Health of Elders in Long Term Care Facilities

Abstract

Purpose

This study was done to examine the effects of 4% hypertonic saline solution mouthwash and tooth brushing education on the oral health of elders living in long term care facilities.

Methods

In this quasi-experimental study, the participants were assigned to a 2% experimental group (n=20), a 4% experimental group (n=20), and a control group (n=20). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, repeated measures ANOVA, Fisher exact test, Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test and multiple response analysis with the SAS program.

Results

Regular tooth brushing and use of 4% hypertonic saline solution mouthwash by elders provided better oral health by decreasing xerostomia, oral tongue plaque, halitosis, and the number of oral bacteria.

Conclusion

The results indicate that regular tooth brushing with continuous 4% hypertonic saline solution mouth washing education promotes oral health for elders in long term care facilities, thus the dental care described in this study is recommended for elders in long term facilities.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Homogeneity Test for General Characteristics (N=60)
jkan-44-13-i001

*One-way ANOVA; Fisher exact test; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; CD=The number of combined disease; GD=Long term care insurance grade; ADL=Activities of daily living; MD=Metal working dentures fixed stars.

Table 2
Homogeneity Test for Variables related to Oral Health (N=60)
jkan-44-13-i002

*One-way ANOVA; Kruskal Wallis test; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; IQR=Interquartile range; CFU=Colony forming unit (1=1×104).

Table 3
Comparison of Oral Health Status, Xerostomia, Oral Tongue Coating, Halitosis between Groups (N=60)
jkan-44-13-i003

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4
Comparison of Number of Oral Bacteria (CFU) between Pre-test and Post-test 1 and 2 Weeks (N=60)
jkan-44-13-i004

*Wilcoxon signed ranks test; Exp=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; IQR=Interquartile range; CFU=Colony Forming Unit (1=1×104).

Notes

This article is a condensed form of the first author's doctoral thesis from The Catholic University of Korea.

References

1. Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33(2):81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00219.x.
2. Shenkin JD, Baum BJ. Oral health and the role of the geriatrician. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49(2):229–230.
3. Petersen PE. Global policy for improvement of oral health in the 21st century-implications to oral health research of World Health Assembly 2007, World Health Organization. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009; 37(1):1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00448.x.
4. Vanobbergen JN, De Visschere LM. Factors contributing to the variation in oral hygiene practices and facilities in long-term care institutions for the elderly. Community Dent Health. 2005; 22(4):260–265.
5. Chalmers J, Johnson V, Tang JH, Titler MG. Evidence-based protocol: Oral hygiene care for functionally dependent and cognitively impaired older adults. J Gerontol Nurs. 2004; 30(11):5–12.
6. Frenkel H, Harvey I, Newcombe RG. Improving oral health in institutionalised elderly people by educating caregivers: A randomised controlled trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29(4):289–297.
7. McDowell S. Are we using too much Betadine? RN. 1991; 54(7):43–45.
8. Park MS. The effect of oral health care education for care providers in a long-term care facility [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2010.
9. Park HJ, Shin HS. The effects of mouth care with sterile normal saline on chemotherapy-induced stomatits. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1995; 25(1):5–16.
10. Carl W. Oral complications in cancer patients. Am Fam Physician. 1983; 27(2):161–170.
11. Kim CY, Chung SC, Sohn WS. Comparison of the anti-plaque and anti-inflammatory effect of the dentifrices contatining NaCl and bamboo salt. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 1991; 15(2):269–280.
12. Lee S. The effect of the dentifrice included bamboo salt, rosin etc on oral environment [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University;2004.
13. Andrius OK. Histologic changes of gingiva of rats after irrigation with sea water. J Dent Res. 1966; 45(4):1224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345660450043401.
14. Satdhabudha A, Poachanukoon O. Efficacy of buffered hypertonic saline nasal irrigation in children with symptomatic allergic rhinitis: A randomized double-blind study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 76(4):583–588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.022.
15. Park MS. The effect of oral health care education for care providers in a long-term care facility [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2010.
16. Nieweg R, van Tinteren H, Poelhuis EK, Abraham-Inpijn L. Nursing care for oral complications associated with chemotherapy. A survey among members of the Dutch Oncology Nursing Society. Cancer Nurs. 1992; 15(5):313–321.
17. Beck S. Impact of a systematic oral care protocol on stomatitis after chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs. 1979; 2(3):185–199.
18. Park YJ, Hong MS. The influence of saline and betadine solution for gargle in the leukemic patients receiving chemotherapy. Chonnam J Nurs Sci. 1996; 1(1):41–58.
19. Chung SH. The effect of essential oil mouthrinse on oral health of the community indwelling elderly [dissertation]. Seoul: The Catholic University;2005.
20. Winkel EG, Roldán S, Van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Sanz M. Clinical effects of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, cetylpyridinium chloride and zinc-lactate on oral halitosis. A dual-center, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30(4):300–306.
21. Süslü N, Bajin MD, Süslü AE. Effects of buffered 2.3%, buffered 0.9%, and non-buffered 0.9% irrigation solutions on nasal mucosa after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 266(5):685–689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0807-5.
22. Lee KN, Tae YS. The effects of mouth care on oral discomfort of cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 1999; 11(4):785–795.
23. Ship JA. Diagnosing, managing, and preventing salivary gland disorders. Oral Dis. 2002; 8(2):77–89.
24. Epstein JB, Polsky B. Oropharyngeal candidiasis: A review of its clinical spectrum and current therapies. Clin Ther. 1998; 20(1):40–57.
25. Lee MK, Kim HR, Ro BI. Identification of candida species by analysis of rRNA spacer regions. Korean J Med Mycol. 2006; 11(1):13–18.
26. Kim BJ, Gong SH, Kim YH, Seol ME, Lee SG, Lee EM, et al. Care of cancer patients: Symptom management. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hyunmoon;2001.
27. Wolff LF, Pihlstrom BL, Bakdash MB, Schaffer EM, Jensen JR, Aeppli DM, et al. Salt and peroxide compared with conventional oral hygiene. II. Microbial results. J Periodontol. 1987; 58(5):301–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.5.301.
28. Sauvaget E, David M, Bresson V, Retornaz K, Bosdure E, Dubus JC. Nebulized hypertonic saline and acute viral bronchiolitis in infants: Current aspects. Arch Pediatr. 2012; 19(6):635–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2012.03.018.
29. Keojampa BK, Nguyen MH, Ryan MW. Effects of buffered saline solution on nasal mucociliary clearance and nasal airway patency. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131(5):679–682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.05.026.
TOOLS
Similar articles