Factors associated with Meaning in Life among Elderly Female Community Dwellers Living Alone

Si Eun Lee; Boon Han Kim

doi:10.12799/jkachn.2016.27.3.221

Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.27(3) > 1058423

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee and Kim: Factors associated with Meaning in Life among Elderly Female Community Dwellers Living Alone

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2016; 27(3): 221-230.

Published online: 30 September 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2016.27.3.221

Factors associated with Meaning in Life among Elderly Female Community Dwellers Living Alone

Si Eun Lee, Boon Han Kim

College of Nursing, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kim, Boon han. College of Nursing, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2220-0700, Fax: +82-2-2295-2074, bhkim@hanyang.ac.kr

Received 5 June 2016 Revised 31 August 2016 Accepted 3 September 2016

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to examine the factors associated with meaning in life among elderly female community dwellers aged 65 or older who were living alone.

Methods

A quota sample of 222 elderly female living alone was recruited. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Welch's test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression using the SPSS 22.0 program.

Results

The factors associated with meaning in life included age, education level, perceived economic status, perceived health status, social support, and loneliness. This regression model explained 66% of the variance in meaning in life.

Conclusion

Based on the results, comprehensive nursing intervention programs for enhancing meaning in life are required.

Keywords: Aged, Life, Loneliness, Social support, Female

Figures and Tables

Table 1

General Characteristics of Participants and Meaning in Life according to General Characteristics (N=222)

Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	Meaning in life
Characteristics	Categories	n (%) or M±SD	M±SD	t or F	p
Age (year) (range: 66~97)	Total	79.72±6.30		10.95^‡ a>b, c^§	<.001
	65~74^a	50 (22.5)	45.02±14.55
	75~84^b	122 (55.0)	36.80±12.16
	≥85^c	50 (22.5)	33.30±13.65
Education level	No formal^a	78 (35.1)	28.94±10.37	42.35 a<b<c^†	<.001
	Elementary school graduate^b	94 (42.3)	40.06±12.03
	≥Middle school graduate^c	50 (22.6)	47.66±12.71
Solitary cause	Bereavement	194 (87.4)	37.88±13.74	1.71	.184
	Divorced/separated	22 (9.9)	35.27±11.19
	Single	6 (2.7)	46.83±16.80
Religion	Yes	158 (71.2)	39.26±13.69	2.42	.016
Religion	No	64 (28.8)	34.42±13.00	2.42	.016
Perceived economic status (range: 1~3)	Total	2.07±0.84		40.75 a>b>c^†	<.001
	Good^a	7 (3.2)	61.29±5.41
	Moderate^b	64 (28.8)	45.98±11.47
	Poor^c	151 (68.0)	33.34±11.98
Socioeconomic status	Low-income	68 (30.6)	31.49±12.96	4.86	<.001
Socioeconomic status	General	154 (69.4)	40.68±13.01	4.86	<.001
Number of chronic diseases (range: 0~4)	Total	1.80±0.90		-2.55	.012
	0~1	84 (37.8)	40.96±15.07
	≥2	138 (62.2)	35.98±12.37
Medications	Yes	198 (89.2)	37.43±13.60	1.35	.177
Medications	No	24 (10.8)	41.42±13.72	1.35	.177

^†Scheffé post hoc test; ^‡Welch analysis of variance; ^§Games-Howell post hoc test.

Table 2

Descriptive Statistics of Measured Variables (N=222)

Categories	Variables	M±SD	Possible range	Actual range
Physical factors	Perceived health status	2.42±0.91	1~5	1~5
Physical factors	IADL	11.26±1.83	10~33	10~17
Social factor	Social support	37.35±7.88	12~60	16~52
Psychological factor	Loneliness	46.75±11.86	20~80	23~77
Spiritual factor	Meaning in life	37.86±13.64	10~70	12~70

IADL=instrumental activities of daily living.

Table 3

Correlations between Measured Variables (N=222)

Variables	1	2^†	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
Variables	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)	r (p)
1. Age	1
2. Education level^†	-.43 (<.001)	1
3. Perceived economic status	-.25 (<.001)	.54 (<.001)	1
4. Number of chronic diseases	.25 (<.001)	-.17 (.014)	-.15 (.025)	1
5. Perceived health status	-.24 (<.001)	.32 (<.001)	.41 (<.001)	-.48 (<.001)	1
6. IADL	.40 (<.001)	-.46 (<.001)	-.30 (<.001)	.23 (.001)	-.43 (<.001)	1
7. Social support	-.16 (.019)	.31 (<.001)	.49 (<.001)	-.19 (.004)	.38 (<.001)	-.33 (<.001)	1
8. Loneliness	.14(.038)	-.38 (<.001)	-.51 (<.001)	.20 (.002)	-.45 (<.001)	.39 (<.001)	-.62 (<.001)	1
9. Meaning in life	-.35 (<.001)	.51 (<.001)	.59 (<.001)	-.21 (.002)	.48 (<.001)	-.44 (<.001)	.57 (<.001)	-.72 (<.001)	1

IADL=instrumental activities of daily living; ^†Spearman correlation coefficients.

Table 4

Factors associated with Meaning in Life (N=222)

Variables	B	SE	β	t	p
(Constant)	79.77	10.16		7.85	<.001
Age	-0.39	0.10	-.18	-3.76	<.001
Education level^†	-3.38	1.51	-.10	-2.23	.027
Religion^‡	-1.08	1.27	-.04	-0.85	.395
Perceived economic status	2.89	0.92	.18	3.15	.002
Socioeconomic status^§	1.69	1.39	.06	1.22	.226
Number of chronic diseases	0.63	0.71	.04	0.90	.371
Perceived health status	1.81	0.80	.12	2.25	.026
IADL	-0.17	0.38	-.02	-0.45	.652
Social support	0.19	0.09	.11	2.04	.043
Loneliness	-0.55	0.07	-.47	-8.17	<.001
	R²=.66, Adjusted R²=.64, F=41.01, p<.001

IADL=instrumental activities of daily living; ^†Dummy variable (0: ≥middle school, 1: ≤elementary school); ^‡Dummy variable (0: yes, 1: no); ^§Dummy variable (0: general, 1: low-income).

References

1. Jung KH. Elderly living alone status and policy strategy. Policy Report. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2015. 12. Report No.: 2015-32.

2. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2014 a national survey on the living status and welfare needs of the aged. Policy Report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2014. 12. Report No.: 11-1352000-001426-12.

3. Frankl VE. Man's search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy. 3rd ed. New York: Simon & Schuster;1984. p. 189.

4. Frankl VE. Man's search for meaning: The classic tribute to hope from the Holocaust. London: Rider;2004. p. 116.

5. Kim KM, Ryu SA, Choi IC. The effect of meaning in life on happiness and health in late life. Korean J Psychol. 2011; 30(2):503–523.

6. Ju H, Shin JW, Kim CW, Hyun MH, Park JW. Mediational effect of meaning in life on the relationship between optimism and well-being in community elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013; 56(2):309–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.008.

7. Damasio BF, Koller SH. How search for meaning interacts with complex categories of meaning in life and subjective well-being? Span J Psychol. 2015; 18:1–10. DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2015.1.

8. Kang JA, Kim JS. The relationship between stress and successful aging among the Korean elderly: The role of emotional regulation difficulties and meaning of life. J Korea Gerontol Soc. 2014; 34(1):151–168.

9. Lee SE, Kim BH. Predictors of depression in community dwelling older women living alone. J Korean Gerontol Nurs. 2016; 18(1):1–11. DOI: 10.17079/jkgn.2016.18.1.1.

10. Heisel MJ, Neufeld E, Flett GL. Reasons for living, meaning in life, and suicide ideation: Investigating the roles of key positive psychological factors in reducing suicide risk in community-residing older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2016; 20(2):195–207. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1078279.

11. Gong SJ, Kim KH. Factors related to meaning in life in elderly. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2010; 22(4):438–447.

12. Chen Y, Hicks A, While AE. Loneliness and social support of older people in China: A systematic literature review. Health Soc Care Community. 2014; 22(2):113–123. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12051.

13. Fitzpatrick JJ. Life perspective rhythm model. In : Fitzpatrick JJ, Whall AL, editors. Conceptual models of nursing: Analysis and application. Bowie, MD: Brady;1983. p. 295–302.

14. Wilkinson JM. JJ Kim YS Kim JW Park JH Park SH Yang . Nursing process and critical thinking. 5th ed. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2008.

15. Seoul Statistics. The present status in elderly living alone [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Statistics;2014. cited 2016 January 2. Available from: http://stat.seoul.go.kr/octagonweb/jsp/WWS7/WWSDS7100.jsp.

16. Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M, Kleban MH. A research and service oriented multi-level assessment instrument. J Gerontol. 1982; 37(1):91–99.

17. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3):179–186.

18. Won CW, Yang KY, Rho YG, Kim SY, Lee EJ, Yoon JL, et al. The development of Korean Activities of Daily Living (K-ADL) and Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) Scale. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2002; 6(2):107–120.

19. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support. J Personal Assess. 1988; 52(1):30–41. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.

20. Shin JS, Lee YB. The effects of social supports on psychosocial well being of the unemployed. Korean J Welf. 1999; 37(1):241–269.

21. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980; 39(3):472–480.

22. Kim OS. Korean version of the revised UCLA loneliness scale: Reliability and validity test. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1997; 27(4):871–879.

23. Stegar MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J Couns Psychol. 2006; 53(1):80–93. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80.

24. Won DR, Kim KH, Kwon SJ. Validation of the Korean version of meaning in life questionnaire. Korean J Health Psychol. 2005; 10(2):211–225.

25. Kim SY. Effects of death anxiety and meaning of life on somatization of grandparent raising grandchildren. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015; 45(2):262–270. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.262.

26. Jung YM. Factors influencing meaning in life among the middle-aged. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011; 23(3):209–220.

27. Lee KJ, Lee E. Factors affecting spiritual well-being in underprivileged older women living alone. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2011; 18(4):538–546.

28. Simon MA, Chang ES, Zhang M, Ruan J, Dong X. The prevalence of loneliness among U.S. Chinese older adults. J Aging Health. 2014; 26(7):1172–1188. DOI: 10.1177/0898264314533722.

29. Baek HC, Lee JH. Factors affecting suicidal ideation of the low-income elderly living alone. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2014; 25(3):180–186. DOI: 10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.3.180.

30. Fitzpatrick JJ. The importance of temporality for nursing science and professional practice. Nurs Sci Q. 2008; 21(3):223–225. DOI: 10.1177/0894318408320153.

TOOLS

Similar articles