Journal List > Brain Neurorehabil > v.4(1) > 1054686

TOOLS
Kim and Seo: Treating Apraxia of Speech (AOS) using the Motor Learning Guided (MLG) Approach -A case report-
Case Report
Brain & NeuroRehabilitation

Brain & NeuroRehabilitation 2011; 4(1): 64-68.

Published online: 31 March 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.0000/bn.2012.4.1.64

Treating Apraxia of Speech (AOS) using the Motor Learning Guided (MLG) Approach -A case report-

In-Sop Kim, Ph.D., In-Hyo Seo, M.S.1

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Illinois State University, 1Voice & Speech Clinic, USA.

1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Dankook University Medical Center, Korea.

Corresponding author: In-Sop Kim, College of Arts and Sciences, Communication Sciences and Disorders, Illinois State University, 215E Fairchild Hall, Campus Box 4720, Normal, IL 61790-4720, USA. Tel: 309-438-8934, Fax: 309-438-5221, ikim3@ilstu.edu

Copyright © 2010 The Korean Rheumatism Association

References

1. Ballard KJ, Granier JP, Robin DA. Review understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology. 2000. 14:969–995.
2. McNeil MR, Robin DA, Schmidt RA. McNeil MR, editor. Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. Clinical Management of Sensorimotor Speech Disorders. 1997. New York: Thieme;311–344.
3. McNeil MR, Weismer G, Adams S, Mulligan M. Oral structure nonspeech motor control in normal, dysarthric, and apraxic speakers: Isometric force and static position control. JSHR. 1990. 33:255–268.
4. Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Motor Speech Disorders. 1975. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company;278–287.
5. Rosenbek JC, Kent RD, LaPointe LL. Rosenbek JC, McNeil MR, Aronson AE, editors. Apraxia of speech: An overview and some perspectives. Apraxia of Speech: Physiology-acousticlinguistics-management. 1984. San Diego: College-Hill Press;1–72.
6. Wambaugh JL. A summary of treatments for apraxia of speech and review of replicated approaches. Semin Speech Lang. 2002. 23:295–308.
7. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science. 1992. 3:207–217.
8. Anderson DI, Magill RA, Sekiya H, Ryan G. Support for an explanation of theguidance effect in motor sill learning. J Mot Behav. 2005. 37:231–238.
9. Kim IS. Effect of feedback schedules and number of practice trials on motor retention of novel speech behaviors. 2007. Florida State University;Unpublished dissertation.
10. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 1999. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics;323–355.
11. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning. 1988. Champaign, III: Human Kinetics;364–400.
12. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit. 1990. 16:677–691.
13. Adams S, Page A, Jog M. Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease. JMSLP. 2002. 10:215–238.
14. Chamberlin C, Lee T. Singer RN, Murphy M, Tennant LK, editors. Arranging practice conditions and designing instruction. Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. 1993. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company;231–241.
15. Shea CH, Morgan RL. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn Mem. 1979. 5:179–187.
16. Knock BA, Ballard K, Robin D, Schmidt R. Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology. 2000. 14:653–668.
17. Hageman CF, Simon P, Backer B, Burda AN. Comparing MIT and motor learning therapy in a nonfluent aphasic speaker. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Speech Language-Hearing Association. 2002. Atlanta, Georgia.
18. Hula SN, Robin DA, Maas E, Ballard KJ, Schmidt RA. Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition, retention, and transfer of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. JSLHR. 2008. 42:1482–1498.
19. Lasker JP, Stierwalt AG, Hageman CF, LaPointe LL. Using motor learning guided theory and augmentative and alternative communication to improve speech production in profound apraxia: A case example. JMSLP. 2008. 16:225–233.
20. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg C. Motor Learning and Performance. 2008. UK: Human Performance Publishers;255–310.
TOOLS
Similar articles