Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.22(3) > 1037692

Park, Jung, Park, Hwang, Lim, Jung, and Cho: Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture in Elderly Patients: Comparison between the Results of Internal Fixation Using Compression Hip Screw and Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty

Abstract

Purpose

To perform comparative analysis between the results of internal fixation using compression hip screw and cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.

Materials and Methods

From January 2001 to October 2006, we reviewd 73 patients, who were treated surgically for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, with a minimum of 2 years follow up. The patient's age was older than 60 year old. The patients were divided into two groups and evaluated, retrospectively. One group was treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (Group A, 34 cases), and the other group was treated with compression hip screw (Group B, 39 cases). We evaluated the amount of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, clinical results and complications between the two groups.

Results

The amount of intraoperative bleeding and operative time were no statistically significant between the two groups. Group A showed a better result than Group B for clinical outcome using Johnson Daily Activity of Life. Complications in the group A were comprised of dislocation (1 case), nonunion of greater trochanter (1 case), infection (1 case) and loosening (1 case), and those in the group B were comprised of loss of fixation (8 cases) and infection (1 case).

Conclusion

We found that short-term outcomes of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures were satisfactory. However, a longer-follow up period is necessary to clarify the efficacy of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
A 78-year-old female with right intertrochanteric fracture of the femur with severe osteoporosis.
(A) Preoperative radiograph shows unstable intertrochantertic fracture by Evans classification.
(B) Postoperative radiogragh shows bipolar hemiarthroplasty state augmented with circumferencial and tension band wiring.
(C) Last follow-up radiogragh at postoperative 38 months shows stable fixation.
jkfs-22-138-g001
Fig. 2
A 74-year-old male with left intertrochanteric fracture of the femur.
(A) Preoperative radiograph shows unstable intertrochantertic fracture by Evans classification.
(B) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows no restoration of medial cortex and fixation with compression hip screw.
(C) Follow up of 5 months radiograph shows cut-out of compression hip screw.
(D) The radiograph at 25 months postoperative after fixation shows healing of the fracture despite excessive cut-out of compression hip screw.
jkfs-22-138-g002
Table 1
Demographic characteristics between the group A and B
jkfs-22-138-i001

I: Independant T-test, C: Chi-square test.

Table 2
Johnson daily activity of life (Johnson, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990)
jkfs-22-138-i002
Table 3
Clinical results
jkfs-22-138-i003

Chi-square test (p=0.01).

Table 4
Complications during follow-up period
jkfs-22-138-i004

Chi-square test (p=0.01).

References

1. Bonamo JJ, Accettola AB. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with a sliding nail plate. J Trauma. 1982; 22:205–215.
2. Chan KC, Gill GS. Cemented hemiarthroplasties for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 371:206–215.
crossref
3. Donnelly WJ, Kobayashi A, Freeman MA, et al. Radiological and survival comparison of 4 methods of fixation of a proximal femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79:351–360.
4. Giliberty RP. A new concept of a bipolar endoprosthesis. Orthop Review. 1974; 3:40–45.
5. Green S, Moore T, Proano F. Bipolar prosthetic replacement for the management of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 224:169–177.
crossref
6. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, De Bocck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Primary bipolar arthroplasty compared with internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:1214–1225.
crossref
7. Holt EPJ. Hip fractures in the trochanteric region: treatment with a strong nail and early weight-bearing: a report of one hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963; 45:687–705.
8. Hwang DS, Lee KJ, Choi JH. Recovery of walking ability after treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients-comparison of compression hip screw to primary hemiarthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999; 11:22–29.
9. Jensen JS, Sonne-Holm S, Tondevold E. Unstable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980; 51:949–962.
crossref
10. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RM, Harris WH, Poss R, Muller M, Sledge CB. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72:161–168.
crossref
11. Laros GS. Intertrochanteric fractures.The role of complications of fixation. Arch Surg. 1975; 110:37–40.
12. Massie WK. Extracapsular fractures of the hip treated by impaction using a sliding nail plate fixation. Clin Orthop. 1962; 22:180–202.
13. Paprota B, Krol R, Wiatrak A. Hip arthroplasty after failed internal fixation of the trochanteric fractures in aged patients with co-existent osteoporosis. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004; 69:85–89.
14. Stern MB, Goldstein TB. The use of the Leinbach prosthesis in intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977; 128:325–331.
crossref
15. Soreide O, Lillestol J, Alho A, Hvidsen K. Acetabular protrusion following endoprosthetic hip surgery: a multifactorial study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980; 51:943–948.
crossref
16. Yoon HK, Cho DY, Shin DE, Kang SH. Comparision of functional recovery between internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty in basal intertrochanteric fracture in the over eighties. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2004; 39:115–122.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles