Journal List > J Korean Fract Soc > v.21(4) > 1037664

Koh, Yoon, Hwang, and Park: The Relationship between Progression of Body Collapse and MRI Findings in Osteoporotic Stable Thoracolumbar Fractures

Abstract

Purpose

To find out the relationship between the initial Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) findings and the progression of vertebra collapse when treated with Jewett brace in osteoporotic stable thoracolumbar fractures.

Materials and Methods

We divided 38 cases of 37 patients of thoracolumbar osteoporotic stable thoracolumbar fractures who were treated with Jewett brace into two groups. One group was composed of those body collapse progressed more than 10% compared with the initial state, and the other group less than 10%. We analyzed the relationships between the progression of collapse and the superior endplate fractures, the fracture line extending to posterior cortex, the size of bone marrow edema, the signal intensity on T1 and T2 weighted MR images, the presence of paravertebral hematoma, and the degree of posterior extensor muscle atrophy using MR images.

Results

The body collapse was more likely to progress when there was superior endplate fracture, when it showed larger size of bone marrow edema on T1 weighted image, and transverse low signal on T2 weighted image. But extending of fracture line to posterior cortex, presence of paravertebral hematoma, and degree of posterior extensor muscle atrophy did not show any statistical correlations to progression of collapse.

Conclusion

The body collapse is more likely to progress when there was superior endplate fracture, larger low signal on T1 weighted image and low signal on T2 weighted image at initial MRI treated with Jewett brace.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Size of bone marrow edema on T1-weighted image.

(A) Grade 1 is less than 25%.
(B) Grade 2 is between 25~50%.
(C) Grade 3 is between 50~75%.
(D) Grade 4 is beyond 75%.
jkfs-21-304-g001
Fig. 2

Classification of paravertebral muscle atropy accoding to Goutallier classification.

jkfs-21-304-g002
Fig. 3

Thoracolumbar vertebra height were reported as fractions of referent height. Thoracolumbar vertebra height (%)=2Hf / (Hs+Hi) *100. Compression ratio = 1-thoracolumbar vertebra height (%).

jkfs-21-304-g003
Fig. 4

Progression of compression of whole patient in relation to follow up period.

jkfs-21-304-g004
Fig. 5

(A) Initial plain radiogragh.

(B, C) CT sagittal image and sagittal T2-weighted image, an superior endplate fracture line is found, but the fracture line which extends to the posterior cortex is not found.
(D) On the plain radiograph after 6 months, there is a progression of height loss of the fractured body compared with initial film.
jkfs-21-304-g005
Fig. 6

L1 vertebral body fracture with fracture line involved to the posterior cortex. At 10 month follow up, the compression progress is 8% noted.

jkfs-21-304-g006
Fig. 7

(A) Initial plain radiograph of L1 fracture.

(B) Intermediate to low signal intensity line on T2 weighted image.
(C) On the plain radiograph taken after 6 months, there is an additional 30% height loss compared with the initial film.
jkfs-21-304-g007
Fig. 8

(A) On sagittal multiplanar reconstruction image of Modified discrete cosine transform multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), there is transverse low density at a thoracolumbar vertebra, which is supposed to be a defect of cancellous bone (white arrow).

(B) On T2 weighted MR image, intermediate to low signal intensity line (white arrow) is corresponds to the low density of MDCT image.
jkfs-21-304-g008
Table 1

The MRI factors that we consider which influence progression of compression of vertebral body

jkfs-21-304-i001

References

1. Ağuş H, Kayali C, Arslantaş M. Nonoperative treatment of burst-type thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: clinical and radiological results of 29 patients. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14:536–540.
crossref
2. Akbarnia BA, Crandall DG, Burkus K, Matthews T. Use of long rods and a short arthrodesis for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76:1629–1635.
crossref
3. Alanay A, Yazici M, Acaroglu E, Turhan E, Cila A, Surat A. Course of nonsurgical management of burst fractures with intact posterior ligamentous complex: an MRI study. Spine. 2004; 29:2425–2431.
crossref
4. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Kamitani K, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. Osteoporotic vertebral collapse with late neurological complications. Paraplegia. 1995; 33:281–289.
crossref
5. Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, Eismont FJ. Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracing. Spine. 1993; 18:971–976.
crossref
6. Chow GH, Nelson BJ, Gebhard JS, Brugman JL, Brown CW, Donaldson DH. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization. Spine. 1996; 21:2170–2175.
crossref
7. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 304:78–83.
8. Jacobs RR, Asher MA, Snider RK. Thoracolumbar spinal injuries. A comparative study of recumbent and operative treatment in 100 patients. Spine. 1980; 5:463–477.
9. James KS, Wenger KH, Schlegel JD, Dunn HK. Biomechanical evaluation of the stability of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine. 1994; 19:1731–1740.
crossref
10. Kaneda K, Ito M, Taneichi H, Sato S, Abumi K, Asano S. Osteoporotic posttraumatic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits of the thoracolumar spine: anterior decompression and reconstruction. Rinsho Seikei Geka. 1996; 31:463–470.
11. Kaplan PA, Orton DF, Aselson RJ. Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures, retropulsed fragments, and neurologic compromise. Radiology. 1987; 165:533–535.
crossref
12. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994; 3:184–201.
crossref
13. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP. The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65:461–473.
crossref
14. Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine. 1993; 18:955–970.
15. Oner FC, van Gils AP, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ. MRI findings of thoracolumbar spine fractures: a categorization based on MRI examinations of 100 fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 1999; 28:433–443.
crossref
16. Oner FC, van Gils AP, Faber JA, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ. Some complications of common treatment schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study of 53 patients with 71 fractures. Spine. 2002; 27:629–636.
crossref
17. Tezer M, Erturer RE, Ozturk C, Ozurk I, Kuzgun U. Conservative treatment of fractures of thoracolumbar spine. Int Orthop. 2005; 29:78–82.
18. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP. Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine. 2003; 28:2459–2465.
crossref
19. Weinstein JN, Collalto P, Lehmann TR. Thoracolumbar "burst" fractures treated conservatively: a long-term follow-up. Spine. 1988; 13:33–38.
crossref
20. Young MH. Long-term consequences of stable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973; 55:295–300.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles